Home Blog Page 1333

Are you using genuine make-up products?

By Riya Sharma


Use of fake cosmetics can have serious consequences in terms of skin and hair damage and thus poses a great risk to customers.

In October last year, e-commerce portals like Amazon and Flipkart were issued notices by the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) for allegedly selling “spurious and adulterated” cosmetics. Reportedly, among cosmetics being sold on these websites included imported brands without valid documents and containing ingredients in the “negative list” of the BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). However, far from the world of digital space, markets like Sadar Bazaar, Sarojini Nagar and Janpath are flooded with cheap makeup products and imported brands like MAC, Huda Beauty and Kylie, all available at less than half the original price. Though the customers for such products vary from college students to homemakers, but 70% clientele of these suspiciously cheap cosmetics and beauty products are beauticians and makeup artists.

‘Beauticians and makeup artists 70% of our clientele’

On a recent visit to Sadar Bazaar, we were approached by a tout who asked if we wanted to buy cheap makeup products. We were then lead to a shop with a surprising variety of makeup products. The seller asked us, “Do you own a parlour or are you a professional makeup artist? We have everything from MAC and Kylie to Lotus and Blue Heaven. Not just makeup, we also sell facial kits, fake eyelashes, masks and lotions that you need at your parlour.”

When we inquired if they have more such buyers, the shopkeeper replied, “Online portals, malls and beauticians – sab Sadar se hi leke jaate hain.”

Another shopkeeper from the market added, “Seventy per cent of our clients are beauticians. We get such clients from all over India and it is all safe. Aaj tak kisi ne wapas aa kar nahi kaha hai ki products kharab thay, humari guarantee hai. Humara dealer bahar ka hai, baaki log fake dete hain, par humara original hai. Hum bulk mein mangate hain tabhi prices kam hain,” he said.

‘Beauticians buy products in bulk for their parlours’

As we visited another shop in the market, we tried a foundation from Huda Beauty. As we hesitated to try it on, a woman buyer told us, “You can buy these products. They look original and people are only concerned about the brand. Original toh nahi hote ye sabko pata hai, par saste mil jaate hain toh sab le lete hain.”

The shopkeeper interrupted her and added, “If you buy this foundation from outside, it will cost you `500, but here you can get it for `100 because we sell in bulk. People also ask for lipsticks from international brands like Kylie and MAC. We sell them at `150 and can reduce the price if you buy more. Hum log ye maal China se mangwate hain aur ye consignment crores ka hota hai, toh hum saare shop wale mil kar mangwate hain. You can get anything here – from hair and makeup brushes to any other product needed for your parlour at cheap prices.”

However, another shopkeeper told us, “These are all fake. Aapko koi bataega nahi kyunki sabko maal bechna hai. Par itna sasta maal kahan se layenge itne bade brands ka? Ye sab local hi manufacture hota hai aur ye log custom ka bolke bechte hain.”

Sarojini is popular for kajals and nail paints

While one can buy all beauty/cosmetic products at Sadar Bazaar, sellers in Sarojini Nagar do not put too many items on display due to regular raids. The market is popular for smaller items like kajals, nail paints and eye liners. While original kajals of brands like Maybelline and Lakme are available for `150-300, in SN, you can easily get them for `50. And if you buy in bulk, you can get them for `30-40 as well, depending on your bargaining skills. “We sell our products in bulk only to those customers who have been buying products for a while now. Yahan zyada samaan rakh bhi nahi sakte kyunki squatters ko hatate rehte hain. Bahut parlour wale aate hain. For regular customers, we bring out products from storage. Hum toh sab asali bechte hain, baaki ka pata nahi,” said one of the squatters in Sarojini Nagar

‘Shopkeepers peddle fake products across NCR’

While the sellers say these products are ‘custom ka maal’, experts tell us that anything which is on a 70-75% discount is fake.

Vandana Luthra, founder, VLCC Group, told us, “It is not only Sarojini Nagar or Sadar Bazaar where shopkeepers peddle fake products, but this is across Delhi-NCR. Counterfeit makeup often contains known carcinogens, arsenic, beryllium, and cadmium. These compounds can potentially harm your skin, and sometimes organs, beyond repair. From effects as minimal as small scarring or burning to total disfigurement, these products can be very harmful. In the end, you will shell out a lot more on treatment than what you saved by buying fake products.”

Makeup artist Ambika Pillai, who has been in the profession for over 20 years now, says that salon owners use such products on one-time clients.

“Unfortunately, there are too many spurious products that use names of big brands. The price is less than half the usual cost, that is why salon owners pick them up. In most cases, salons use these on one-time clients so they don’t really care about the feedback. I have come across many people who have got very bad reactions and needed treatment.

I had a bride who came to me with lips swollen to twice the normal size. I told her that it was a reaction to the lipstick she used, but she said that her local parlour girl had used only MAC on her.

Now whalso faced the serious problem of fake cosmetic products being marketed by unscrupulous people. Raids have been conducted and according to the police, the fake products, on testing, have failed in quality and hygiene. However, raids hardly help, as the sellers are back after a few days.

The modus operandi of people dealing in imitations is to manufacture containers and print labels that are copies of the branded products. They ensure that differences between original and fake are so minor that they are not noticeable to the customers or retailers.

Use of fake cosmetics can have serious consequences in terms of skin and hair damage and thus poses a great risk to customers.” at can one say to that? I also had a client who had white lashes. She said she had used a liner that smelt a little off and itched for an hour during her function.

On her way back home, when she removed her makeup and all her lashes came off as well! I was shocked to hear that, and now, her lashes have turned white. That poor girl is scared for life,” she shared.

Shahnaz Husain, chairperson and managing director of Shahnaz Husain Group, says, “As a manufacturer of cosmetics, we have also faced the serious problem of fake cosmetic products being marketed by unscrupulous people.

Raids have been conducted and according to the police, the fake products, on testing, have failed in quality and hygiene. However, raids hardly help, as the sellers are back after a few days.

The modus operandi of people dealing in imitations is to manufacture containers and print labels that are copies of the branded products. They ensure that differences between original and fake are so minor that they are not noticeable to the customers or retailers.

Use of fake cosmetics can have serious consequences in terms of skin and hair damage and thus poses a great risk to customers.”

Extreme Downfall of Iranian Rial for 110000 Iranian Rials to Dollar

Reuters – Iran’s central bank has proposed slashing four zeros from the rial, state news agency IRNA reported on Sunday, after the currency plunged in a year marked by an economic crisis fueled by US sanctions.

Proposals to remove four zeros from the currency have been floated since 2008, but the idea has gained strength as the rial lost more than 60 percent of its value in 2018 despite a recent recovery engineered by the central bank in defiance of US sanctions.

“A bill to remove four zeros from the national currency was presented to the government by the central bank yesterday and I hope this matter can be concluded as soon as possible,” IRNA quoted central bank governor Abdolnaser Hemmati as saying.

The currency was trading at about 110,000 rials per US dollar on the unofficial market on Sunday, according to foreign exchange websites.

President Donald Trump reimposed US sanctions on Iran last year after pulling out of world powers’ 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran. Washington has vowed “maximum pressure” on Iran’s economy to force it to accept tougher limits on its nuclear and missile programs. Iran has ruled this out.

Rial weakness disrupted Iran’s foreign trade last year and helped boost annual inflation fourfold to nearly 40 percent in November. The weak currency and galloping inflation have been a complaint of sporadic street protests since late 2017.

After approval by the government, the proposed currency plan would have to be passed by parliament and approved by the clerical body that vets legislation before it takes effect.

OPINION: Cases should be filed against Suvarna TV anchor Ajith for blaspheming the Prophet

by Advocate Abdulhameed Padubidri

Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) is a ‘Mercy’ to the whole world “Rahmathullil Aalameen”.

We are the followers of that great man and we should be fortunate to be his Ummah for the betterment of this life and life of hereafter. He is the final messenger and “seal of prophets”, whom Allah sent for the guidance of the whole mankind.

While he was very strong in upholding and propagating the oneness of ALLAH as per His commandment, he was very soft in dealing with all affairs of lives of the people in both the worldly and heavenly matters.

He brought uncivilized people into light from the darkness. He shaped a rich civilization through his great message.  That’s the reason, even his deadliest enemies used to call him as “Al-Ameen” (most trusted one). He is most unparalleled and matchless personality on the earth (Ashraful Khalq).

As far as a Mo’min (believer) is concerned, Prophet should be loved by him more than his ownself, his parents, his families, his wealth, and everything.

Even a single word or deed that defames or detests his great personality is not easily digestible and it should be strongly slated and lambasted in the way as it should be.

Our intellectual properties, tangible properties, human resources, unified strengths, powers etc. should be utilized for defending his sacred personality. But, all these should be within the Islamic and legal boundaries without harming others or damaging anything.

Strong adherence to Islamic values and respect to our systems/laws should be remembered because the Prophet (peace be upon him) is our role model in all aspects.

What we observed from the good reactions of our people and others alike in Karnataka and other parts of India and gulf countries is, after Suvarna News TV’s  Ajith Hanumakkanavar spat the venomous bubbles against our Prophet (peace be upon him), a wide-length of  protests in a legal and a very democratic way are on the move in many parts of Karnataka, largely in the coastal regions of DK, Udupi, Bhatkal etc.

NRI Muslims and other compatriots of different faiths in gulf countries including Saudi Arabia are also on the active mode in this regard.

We need to accelerate our agitations against his mindless remarks on organizational or individual basis (like submitting complaints, totally discouraging his TV channel, filing cases in courts, filing complaints in ministry of information and broadcasting etc.).

Also we need to see him to be booked under the relevant law of the land and to be arrested.

However, our abiding to the system/law should not be treated as weakness by any authorities and state Government.

The government and concerned authorities should take this matter seriously so that peace and order shall prevail in the society. Please note that the defamatory remarks uttered by Ajith is heinous and a very serious offence.

Let us hope for the justice and equity.

Advocate PA Hameed Padubidri is an Indian Lawyer, writer and freelance journalist from Udipi. He has worked as Legal Advisor in a Riyadh-based Saudi defense company in contracting department for the past 12 years.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect The Milli Chronicle’s point-of-view.

EMOTIONAL: The heart-breaking story of Prophet’s daughter Zainab and her husband

0

This is a must read story of Zainab bint Muhammad, the eldest daughter of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Khadijah (may Allah be pleased with her).

The story shows the importance of having a great Patience in Islam.

Abu al-‘As ibn Rabi’ was the husband of Zainab and was loved by Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) very much. One day Abu al-‘As ibn Rabi’ went to the Prophet (ﷺ) before he had received his mission of Prophethood and said: “I want to marry your eldest daughter”. So the Prophet (ﷺ) replied: “I must ask her first”. He went to Zainab and asked her: “Your cousin came to me and he wishes to marry you, do you accept him as your husband?” Her face turned red with bashfulness and she smiled.

So Zainab married him, the beginning of a great love story! They had two children; Ali and Omama. Then Muhammad ibn Abdullahi became a Prophet of Allah while Abu al-‘As ibn Rabi’ was away from Makkah. When he returned he saw Zainab had become a Muslim. When he first came back, his wife said “I have great news for you”. He stood up and left her. Zainab was surprised and followed him as she said, “My father became a Prophet (ﷺ) and I have become a Muslim”.

He replied, “Why didn’t you tell me first?” Hence a big problem began between the two; a problem of religion and belief. She told him, “I wasn’t going to disbelieve in my father and his message, he is not a liar, and he is “The Honest and Trustworthy”. I’m not the only believer; my mother and my sisters became Muslims, my cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib became a Muslim, your cousin Uthman ibn Affan became a Muslim, and your friend, Abu Bakr, became a Muslim”.

He replied, “Well, as for me, I don’t want people to say, ‘he let down his people and his forefathers to please his wife’. And I am not accusing your father of anything”. Then he said, “So will you excuse me and understand?” She replied, “Who will excuse and understand you if I don’t? I will stay beside you and help you until you reach the truth.” And she kept her word for 20 years.

He remained an unbeliever, and then came the migration. Zainab went to her father and asked him for the permission to stay with her husband. The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, “Stay with your husband and children”.

So Zainab stayed in Makkah, until the battle of Badr occurred. Her husband was to fight in the army of Quraish against the Muslims. For Zainab, it meant that her husband will be fighting her father, a time Zainab had always feared. She kept crying out: “O Allah, I fear one day the sun may rise and my children become orphans or I lose my father”. So the battle started, and ended in victory for the Muslims. Abu al-‘As ibn Rabi’ was captured by the Muslims, and news of this reached Makkah.

Zainab asked, “What did my father do?” They told her, “The Muslims won”. So she prayed to Allah, thanking Him. Then she asked: “What did my husband do?” They said: “He was captured”. She said, “I’ll send a payment to release him”. She didn’t own anything of much value, so she took off her mother’s necklace, and sent it with her huusbands brother to the Prophet (ﷺ). While the Prophet (ﷺ) was sitting, taking payments and releasing captives, he saw Khadeeja’s necklace. He held it up and asked: “Whose payment is this?”

They said: “Abu Al’As ibn Rabi”. He cried and said “This is Khadeeja’s necklace”. As soon as the Messenger of Allah saw that necklace, he had a feeling of extreme compassion and his heart palpitated for the great memory. The Companions who were present there gazed in amazement having being captivated by the magnificence of the situation. After a long silence, the Messenger of Allah stood up and said “People, this man is my in-law, should I release him? And do you accept the return of this necklace to my daughter?” They answered in unison “Yes, Messenger of Allah”.

The Prophet (ﷺ) gave the necklace to Abu Al’As and said to him: “Tell Zainab not to give away Khadeeja’s necklace”. Then he (ﷺ) said, “Abu Al’As, Can we speak privately?” He took him aside and said, “Allah has ordered me to separate between a Muslim and a disbeliever, so could you return my daughter to me?” Abu El’As reluctantly agreed.

Zainab stood on the gates of Makkah waiting for the arrival of Abu Al’As. When he finally came he said, “I am going away”. She asked, “Where to?” He replied, “It is not me who is going, it is you. You are going to your father. We must separate because you are a Muslim”. She implored him, “Will you become a Muslim and come with me?” But he refused.

So Zainab took her son and daughter and traveled to Madinah, and for 6 years she refused to remarry, hoping that one day Abu Al’As would come. After 6 years, he was traveling in a caravan from Makkah to Syria. During the journey, he was intercepted by some of the Prophet’s companions. He escaped and asked for Zainab’s home. He knocked on her door shortly before the dawn prayer. She opened the door and asked him “Did you become a Muslim?” He whispered “No, I come as a fugitive”. She implored him once more “Can you become a Muslim?” Again his answer was a negative. “Do not worry.” She said, Welcome the father of my children.

After the Prophet (ﷺ) prayed the dawn prayer in congregation with the people, they heard a voice from the back of the Masjid, “I have freed Abu Al’As ibn Rabi”. Zainab had granted his freedom. The Prophet (ﷺ) asked, “Have you heard what I heard?” They all said, “Yes, Messenger of Allah”. Zainab said, “He is the father of my children and I have freed him”.

The Prophet (ﷺ) stood up and said, “O people, I declare that this man was a very good son-in-law, he never broke his promise, and neither did he tell lies. So if you accept, I will return his money back and let him go. If you refuse it’s your decision and I will not blame you for it.” The companions agreed, “We will give him his money”.

So the Prophet (ﷺ) said to Zainab, “We have freed the one you have freed, O Zainab.” Then he went to her and told her, …don’t let him get near you, he is prohibited for you.” She replied, “Sure, father, I’ll do as you say”.

She went in and told her husband, “O Abu Al’As, didn’t you miss us at all? Won’t you become a Muslim and stay with us?” But he refused. Abu Al’As then took the money and returned to Makkah.

Once he returned he stood up and announced, “O people, here is your money. Is there anything left?”

They replied, “No, Abu Al’As, there is nothing left, thanks a lot.” So Abu Al’As said, “I testify that there is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His Messenger.”

Then he went back to Madinah and ran to the Prophet (ﷺ) as he said, “Dear Prophet, you freed me yesterday, and today I say that I testify there is no god but Allah and you are His Messenger.”

He asked the Prophet (ﷺ), “Will you give me the permission to go back to Zainab?” The Prophet (ﷺ) smiled and said, “Come with me”; he took him to Zainab’s house and knocked on her door. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “O Zainab, your husband came to me and asked if he can return to you”. Just like 20 years before, her face turned red with bashfulness and she smiled.

The sad thing was, a year after this incident, Zainab died. Abu Al’As shed hot tears because of her death and drove those who were around him to tears. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) came with eyes full of tears and a heart full of sorrow.

Zainab’s death reminded him of the death of his wife, Khadeejah. He told the women, who gathered around Zainab’s corpse, “Wash her three times and use camphor in the third wash.” He performed funeral prayers on her and followed her final resting place. Abu El’As returned to his children, Ali and Omama. Kissing them and wetting them with his tears, he remembered the face of his departed darling.

Abu Al’As would cry so profusely that the people saw the Prophet (ﷺ) himself weeping and calming him down. Abu Al’As would say, “By Allah, I can’t stand life anymore without Zainab”. He died one year after Zainab’s death..

May Allah be pleased with Zainab, the Prophet’s daughter and grant her Jannat-ul-Firdause for her patience, endurance and struggle. Aameen

The story has been submitted by Adnan bin Taqi.

Five Tablighi Jamaat suspects get arrested by RPF, while returning from Nizamuddin “Jod”

Nizamuddin – Five members of Tablighi Jamat have been arrested on Thursday by Railway Protection Force (RPF) while they were returning through Simanchal Express from Nizamuddin Markaz after attending “Jod”.

Abubakar (52), Abu Salman (35), Shahnawaz (30), Aftab (35), and Fuzail (40) were taken into custody at Tundla Junction around 11 am by RPF personnel.

Around 100 Tablighi Jamaat members boarded Simanchal Express at Anand Vihar Terminal, when the train reached Tundla Junction.

RPF personnel barged into the coach and were initially arresting three suspected Nepali members of the group, however the other two Bihari members were arrested for intervening and faulting the arrests.

“The RPF personnel tried to take away three persons with them forcibly. When two another members of the team objected, the RPF men also arrested them”, said one of the co-members.

The suspects have been sent to Lucknow for further investigations.

Highly talented Turks leave the nation due to Erdogan’s policies

0

More than a quarter of a million Turks emigrated in 2017, according to the Turkish Institute of Statistics, an increase of 42 percent over 2016, when nearly 178,000 citizens left the country.

According to a report published by The New York Times this week has highlighted the anguish of the Turkish people who are leaving the country in large numbers due to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s policies, especially after the failed 2016 coup.

According to the report, for 17 years, Erdogan won elections by offering voters a vision of restoring the glories of Turkey’s Ottoman past, but after the 2016 he embarked on a sweeping crackdown.

Also the deteriorating economy, which has led to the Turkish currency plunging, has made Turks take a different approach by leaving the country in droves and taking talent and capital with them, in a way that indicates a broad and alarming loss of confidence in Erdogan’s vision, according to government statistics and analysts.

More than a quarter of a million Turks emigrated in 2017, according to the Turkish Institute of Statistics, an increase of 42 percent over 2016, when nearly 178,000 citizens left the country.

At least 12,000 of Turkey’s millionaires — around 12 percent of the country’s wealthy class — moved their assets out of the country in 2016 and 2017, according to the Global Wealth Migration Review, an annual report produced by AfrAsia Bank.

Turkey has seen waves of students and teachers leave before, but this exodus looks like a more permanent reordering of the society and threatens to set Turkey back decades, said Ibrahim Sirkeci, director of transnational studies at Regent’s University in London, and other analysts.

“The brain drain is real,” Sirkeci said. According to The New York Times, the flight of people, talent and capital is being driven by a powerful combination of factors that have come to define life under Erdogan and that his opponents increasingly despair is here to stay.

They include fear of political persecution, terrorism, a deepening distrust of the judiciary and the arbitrariness of the rule of law, and a deteriorating business climate, accelerated by worries that Erdogan is unsoundly manipulating management of the economy to benefit himself and his inner circle.

The result is that, for the first time since the republic was founded nearly a century ago, many from the old moneyed class, in particular the secular elite who have dominated Turkey’s cultural and business life for decades, are moving away and the new rich close to Erdogan and his governing party are taking their place.

Exodus of wealthy

Most of them moved to Europe or the United Arab Emirates, the report said. Turkey’s largest business center, Istanbul, was listed among the top seven cities worldwide experiencing an exodus of wealthy people. Erdogan has reviled as traitors businesspeople who have moved their assets abroad as the Turkish economy began to falter.

“Pardon us, we do not forgive,” he warned in a speech at the Foreign Economic Relations Board, a business association in Istanbul in April. “The hands of our nation would be on their collars both in this world and in the afterlife.” “Behavior like this cannot have a valid explanation,” Erdogan added.

His comments came amid reports that some of Turkey’s largest companies were divesting in Turkey. Several such companies have made significant transfers of capital abroad, amid fears they would be targeted in the post-coup crackdown or as the economy began to contract.

One is the Turkish food giant Yildiz Holding, which came under fire on social media as being linked to US-based cleric Fethullah Gulen’s movement.

Soon after, Yildiz rescheduled $7 billion of debt and sold shares of its Turkish biscuit maker, Ulker, to its London-based holding company, essentially transferring the family’s majority holding of Ulker out of reach of Turkish courts, The New York Times report says.

Article first published in Al Arabiya English.

King Abdulzeez supported the dream of Ottoman Caliph to bury him in Madina

by Ather Moin

King Abdulazeez Aal-e-Saud had stipulated that there would be no public ceremony nor any marker for the grave.

Princess Niloufer who was married to Moazzam Jah, the second son of the last Nizam of Hyderabad, Mir Osman Ali Khan, helped her cousin Princess Durru Shehvar to fulfil her desire to see her father, the last Ottoman Ruler, Abdul Majid II, buried in the graveyard attached to the holy mosque in Madina, a decade after his demise. Princess Durru Shevar was married to Azam Jah, the eldest son of Mir Osman Ali Khan.

Princess Niloufer Khanum Farhat was born on January 4, 1916 in Istanbul. Her mother Adile Sultan was the granddaughter of Sultan Murad V. Her father, Salahuddin, died when Niloufer was only two years old.

Arvind Acharya, a city-based historian, who has a unique collection of personal belongings of Princess Niloufer, said that a significant moment in Princess Niloufer’s life occurred in 1954. She received a call from Princess Durru Shehvar requesting help for a specific action. The action was difficult and so Niloufer was reluctant to do it. She consulted her mother, who told her to do the best she could.

Princess Niloufer then placed a call to one of her friends, Ghulam Mohammed, a former official in the Nizam’s Government, who was at that time the President of Pakistan.

Ghulam Mohammed called the then King Abdulzeez bin Abdurrahman Aal-e-Saud of Saudi Arabia to relay the request. The King finally agreed to grant the request.

Thereby hangs a tale. Ten years earlier, the Khalifa Abdul Majid who was living in France after the Ottoman Caliphate was abolished and the Ottoman dynasty deposed and expelled from Turkey, died during the German occupation of France. For several days, his body lay in his flat and was only discovered when neighbours complained. The body was then shifted to the Paris Mosque and lay there in a frozen condition till Niloufer’s intervention.

Princess Durru Shehvar had made several efforts to have her father’s body buried in Istanbul, but could not obtain the permission of the Turkish government. The Khalifa had wanted to be buried in either Turkey or Hyderabad. It was not feasible to fulfil the last will of Khalifa at his death or later as at the time of his death Saudi Arabia had become independent. Niloufer’s intervention ensured that he was finally buried in Saudi Arabia in the Jannat-ul-Baqi.

King Abdulazeez Aal-e-Saud had stipulated that there would be no public ceremony nor any marker for the grave.

Arvind Acharya said that on the recommendation of Maulana Shaukat Ali, a freedom fighter and one of the founders of the Khilafat Movement, the Nizam of Hyderabad decided to give Khalifa Abdul Majid a pension of £300 a month when he was living in exile.

Seven years later, in 1931, the Khalifa was looking for marriage matches for his daughter, Durru Shehvar. Shaukat Ali proposed the match between her and Azam Jah, the elder son of the Nizam.

The negotiations for the terms of the marriage started, but soon broke down as the Nizam felt that the requirement for the mehr (dowry given by husband to his wife) was exorbitant. Following several discussions, it was settled that the dowry to be paid would be £40,000.

As the Nizam wanted to perform the marriage of his younger son Moazzam Jah at the same time, and within the same dowry, efforts were made to find a match for him within the Turkish royal family. This resulted in his marriage to Niloufer.

On their way back from the Round Table Conference in London in 1931, the two princes Azam Jah and Moazzam Jah visited Nice and were married there. The Caliph himself performed the role of Qazi at the wedding.

In 1977, Princess Niloufer was living in an apartment in Paris and one evening, she came out of her bedroom and crossed the hallway to go to her mother’s bedroom where she wanted to read a Quran given to her by her one-time secretary, Fathema Ghani. At that moment, a bomb went off inside the building.

Algerian terrorists had wanted to assassinate the chief of the French electric utility, who was living in the flat below Niloufer’s. The bomb ripped open Niloufer’s bedroom, but nothing happened on the other side of the building. Princess Niloufer wrote in her memoirs that she was saved because of her visit to the room of her mother to fetch the Quran. The Princess died in 1989 and was buried near Paris.

Article first published in Deccan Chronicle.

FAITH: We talk about all rights but not the right of Allah

0

by Tahir Sanabili

Today people talk about Rights and there are variety of rights like rights of mountains, rights of skies, rights of even Tuna fish and a lot more.

Everybody talks about rights of creations, but nobody talks about the rights of the Creator.

No matter people flaunt about carring out the variety of rights but they have never fulfilled any of these rights.

People have studied everything about Stars, but they have never studied about who created them.

They looked at the sun and were awed by it, they looked at the Moon and were awed by it, and they started to worship them.

The short-sighted person always gets influenced by the outward glims, so he forgets the One who created them.

When a doctor treats you, you try best to fulfill his rights by words and finance, though the cure comes from Allah. But we never repay the rights of Allah, we don’t even mention about it.

You thank a person for a glass of water but you have never thanked the One who engineered your entire body system.

The education that keeps a person away from recognizing Allah—is of no use.

We fear everything on the planet, but we care least to fear Allah.

Have belief that Creator exists and He created us for His worship alone.

Oh man, you eat what Allah gives you, and you breath from what Allah has provided you, but you have never spoken about His rights.

The one who forgets Allah, Allah forgets him. When he dies, he pleads Allah to give him respite to go back and worship Him.

So to fulfill any right – a person has to have Eeman that is belief and the fear of Allah.

The culmination of all rights is the fulfilment of rights of Allah.

When you fulfill the rights of Allah, Allah gets fulfilled all the rights directed towards you.

When you are concerned about the rights of everything but not the rights of Allah, it leads to anarchy, tranny, and chaos.

A person feels he is achieving salvation and is heading towards the right direction but he gets drowned but he feels not about it.

Today a wave is rising, the wave of anarchy, the wave of unaccountability. The person who follows this wave, gets destroyed.

The ignorant of the highest level is the one who recognizes everything but he ignores the One created it.

A person has to recognize Allah, not based on logic and analogy, but based on proofs and evidences, based on Himself described in the Quran.

To use analogies to understand the attributes of Allah – is the attack on the rights of Allah.

The fear of accountability or the fear of Allah watches is the right of Allah.

Loving Allah is also the right of Allah.

The person who has the love of Allah, he leaves all sorts of love that distract from the love of Allah.

It is also the right of Allah, to consider Him alone as the reliever of problems, rescuer during hardships, the one who cures and the one who bestows all sorts of divine help.

Take lessons from the Quran, and spread it among the humanity that it’s the book that has come to solve every problem of humankind.

Article is based on Tahir Sanabili’s Urdu lecture at 22nd Annual Urdu Conference at Jubail Dawah Center – Saudi Arabia on January 4 2019.

Tahir Sanabili works as a fulltime Preacher for Qassim Dawah Center – Saudi Arabia.

Forceful kisses, groping, and sex – Indian nuns speak up against Church priests

0

But the priest forced his way in, tried to kiss her and grabbed at her body. Weeping, she pushed him back enough to slam the door.

The nuns talk of Catholic priests who pushed into their bedrooms and of priests who pressured them to turn close friendships into sex. Across India, they talk about being groped and kissed, of hands pressed against them by men they were raised to believe were representatives of Jesus Christ.

At its most grim, nuns speak of repeated rapes, and of a Catholic hierarchy that did little to protect them.

The Vatican has long been aware of nuns sexually abused by priests and bishops in Asia, Europe, South America and Africa, but it has done very little to stop it, The Associated Press reported last year.

An investigation of the situation in India has uncovered a decades-long history of nuns enduring sexual abuse from within the church. Nuns detailed the sexual pressure they endured from priests; nearly two dozen nuns, former nuns and priests, and others said they had direct knowledge of such incidents.

Still, the problem is cloaked by a powerful culture of silence. Many nuns believe abuse is commonplace, insisting most sisters can at least tell of fending off a priest’s sexual advances. Some believe it is rare. Almost none talk about it readily, and most speak only on the condition that they not be identified. But this summer, one nun forced the issue into the open.

When repeated complaints to church officials brought no response, the 44-year-old nun filed a police complaint against the bishop who oversees her order, accusing him of raping her 13 times over two years. A group of nuns launched a public protest to demand the bishop’s arrest.

The protest divided India’s Catholic community. The accuser and the nuns who support her are now pariahs, isolated from the other sisters, many of whom defend the bishop.

“Some people are accusing us of working against the church,” said one supporter, Sister Josephine Villoonnickal. “They say: ‘You are worshipping Satan.’ But we need to stand up for the truth.”

Some nuns’ accounts date back decades. Like the sister, barely out of her teens, teaching in a Catholic school in the early 1990s. It was exhausting work, and she was looking forward to time at a New Delhi retreat centre.

The nun is a forceful woman who has spent years working with the poor. But when she talks about the retreat her voice grows quiet.

One night, a priest in his 60s who was supposed to be leading the nuns in reflection went to a neighbourhood party. He came back late and knocked at her room. She could smell the alcohol.

“You’re not stable. I’m not ready to meet you,” she said.

But the priest forced his way in, tried to kiss her and grabbed at her body. Weeping, she pushed him back enough to slam the door.

Afterward she quietly told her mother superior, who let her avoid meeting the priest again. She also wrote anonymously to church officials. The priest was reassigned. But there were no public reprimands, no warnings to other nuns. She was too afraid to challenge him openly.

“For me it was risking my own vocation,” she said.

Caught at this intersection of sexual taboo, Catholic hierarchy and loneliness, sisters can be left at the mercy of predatory priests. It can be particularly hard for sisters from deeply conservative Kerala.

“Once you grow up, once you get your first menstruation, you are not encouraged to speak normally to a boy,” said a nun from Kerala, a cheerful woman with sparkly glass earrings.

That naivety, she said, can be costly. Like the time she was a novice nun, still in her teens, and an older priest came to the Catholic centre where she worked. He was from Goa, another coastal state. When she brought the priest his laundry, he grabbed her and began to kiss her.

“The kissing was all coming here,” she said, gesturing at her chest. “He was from Goa. I am from Kerala. In my mind I was trying to figure out: ‘Is this the way that Goans kiss?’”

She soon understood what was happening but couldn’t escape his grip. Eventually, she slipped out the door.

She quietly told a senior nun to not send other novices to the priest’s room. But she made no official complaint.

In the church, even some of those who doubt there is widespread abuse of nuns say the silence can be enveloping.

Archbishop Kuriakose Bharanikulangara calls abuse “kind of sporadic. Once here, once there.”

But “many people don’t want to talk,” he continued.

The rapes, the nun says, happened in a small convent in rural Kerala, where the sisters at the St Francis Mission Home spend their days in prayer or caring for the aged. The rapist, she says, was the most powerful man in this world: Bishop Franco Mulakkal.

Mulakkal was the official patron of her community, the Missionaries of Jesus, wielding immense influence over its budgets and job assignments. Every few months, the nun says, Mulakkal would visit the convent. Then, according to a letter she wrote church officials, he raped her. Mulakkal angrily denies the accusations, accusing the sister of trying to blackmail him to get a better job.

“I am going through painful agony,” said Mulakkal, who was jailed for three weeks and released on bail in October.

Many in Kerala see Mulakkal as a martyr, and a string of supporters visited him in jail. The sisters who now cluster around the nun who levelled the accusations see things very differently.

“Many times she was telling him to stop. But each time he was forcing himself on her,” said Villoonnickal, the nun, who moved back to Kerala to support “our survivor sister”.

Catholic authorities have said little about the case, with India’s Catholic Bishops’ Conference saying in a statement that it has no jurisdiction over individual bishops, and the investigation and court case must run their course.

The conference said: “Silence should in no way be construed as siding with either of the two parties.”

Article first published on South China Morning Post.

No Ram Temple till Supreme Court judgement, says Modi, Hindutva angry

New Delhi – India’s Prime Minister Narender Modi on Tuesday refused to build Ram Temple at the place of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya until Supreme Court finalizes the judgement.

Hindutva organizations have been pushing BJP Government to expedite the construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya despite the judgement is pending with the Supreme Court.

“Let the judicial process take its own course. Don’t weigh it in political terms. Let the judicial process be over. After the judicial process is over, whatever be our responsibility as government, we are ready to make all efforts,” the Prime Minister said during an interview, broadcast by several TV channels.

The comments have angered the hardcore Hindutva groups since BJP promised in 2014 to build Ram Temple for them at the Babri masjid’s site.

“Under the leadership of Modi, the BJP in its 2014 election manifesto had promised to make all possible efforts within the ambit of the Constitution to build the Ram temple. People of India gave the BJP a majority, trusting their promise,” the RSS tweeted.

People of India expect the government to fulfil the promise within its tenure, it added.

On the other hand, Shiv Sena reacted sharply to his comments.

“Whether law is bigger than lord Ram,” said Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut.

He also accused the Congress of delaying the judicial process in the Ram temple case through its lawyers. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case on January 4.

Randeep Surjewala, Congress chief spokesperson said, the prime minister should have spoken about the suffering caused to the people from note ban and GST, bank frauds, black money, national security and farmers woes.

“Summary of Modiji’s monologue’ interview — I, Me, Mine, Myself. The country is suffering your I’s and lies,” he tweeted.

“Modiji’s interview looks like a parody”, former Union minister Anand Sharma alleged that it was “fixed”.

“Nation suffers – DeMo, Gabbar Singh Tax (GST), bank frauds, black money, `15 lakh in every account, corruption in Rafale deal, price rise, national security imperilled, farm distress, and ‘acche din’,” Surjewala said.

Modi Government has started to face sharp criticisms after BJP lost three major states – Rajashthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Chattisgarh.