Home Blog Page 1335

Hyderabad Qadri sect opposes conference of Pak’s radical group Dawat-e-Islami in the city, threatens chaos

Hyderabad – Scholars and followers of Qadri sect has opposed Pakistan’s Dawat-e-Islami conference in Hyderabad city, they threatened severe infighting if conference is ever granted permission.

Barelvi Sunni group, Dawat-e-Islami runs under Moulana Ilyas Attari of Pakistan, and he is infamous for radicalizing youth in the garb of Ishq-e-Rasool – love towards the Prophet.

“Seventy percent Muslims of Hyderabad aren’t satisfied with Moulana Ilyas Attari and Dawat-e-Islami, his speeches are purely targeted at splitting the Muslim community,” said Moulana Ali Qadri, representative of Quadri order of Hyderabad.

Malik Mumtaz, a police officer of Pakistan, who assassinated Pakistan’s politician Salman Taiseer in 2011, was influenced by the Barelvi radicalization. He was hanged by Pakistan Government on February 29 2016.

“His last year’s speeches were worst and damaged our faith,” Qadri added.

“In case, Attari’s conference is granted permission in Hyderabad, there will be law and order problem,” he threatened.

“We appeal City Commissioner of Police, and Telangana Government to stop this conference,” he appealed.

He also urged the Muslims to facilitate India-based organizations and to oppose all Pakistan-based organizations and preachers.

Qatar misused WashingtonPost with ‘fake-articles’ to exploit Khashoggi case against Saudi Arabia

After the revelations from The Washington Post which cast doubt on the authenticity and credibility of pieces they published under late Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s name, analysts are questioning what’s next for the newspaper and how they will handle the fall-out from their coverage.

Last Saturday, The Washington Post published an investigative piece written by two of their national security reporters in which they revealed that Qatar was involved in getting Khashoggi to support their agenda. This was done through Maggie Mitchell Salem, a senior executive official of Qatar Foundation International who drafted and even proposed some of Khashoggi’s articles.

The revelation sparked controversy surrounding the ethics of the profession in the West and shocked the East in terms of the absence of context in the coverage of the writer’s murder. It also ignited a debate regarding Qatar’s infiltration of western media and exploitation of the latter to hurt its neighbors and empower the Muslim Brotherhood.

Maggie Mitchell Salem is a former US diplomat and tried to defend her relationship with Khashoggi saying her help was based on her feeling that this aid was for a friend seeking success in the US. (via Maggie Mitchell Salem/Facebook)

The campaign in which The Washington Post used everything that was legal and illegal, whether through unknown leaks, doubtful sources, articles and unjustified claims. They’re also being criticized for leading a moral assassination and a vicious attack, lacking in any objectivity, against any opinion that does not condemn Saudi Arabia.

Doha used a foreign citizen to take a hostile stance against his homeland and deceived one of the world’s biggest newspapers. For example, all those who describe themselves as Saudi dissidents abroad are used by Doha as pawns for its subversive project. It grants them platforms and provides them with the means to attack their own country.

Institutional failure

In its article, Washington Post stressed that the Global Opinions department is independent from the newsroom, which some experts have questioned the veracity. However, they see in this a move to distance itself smoothly from Khashoggi’s work.

They also believe that the outlet would go through a review process that would include the editorial standards.

David Reboi, a consultant in US national security and political warfare, said that he was not surprised by Washington Post revelations.

He thinks that it is a normal outcome of what he called a firehose in Khashoggi’s case.

In an article published on Security Studies Group website, he said: “As the news of Khashoggi’s disappearance and death broke, nearly the entire media was abuzz with praise for the late columnist and engaged in an effort to turn him into a martyr for democratic values” and discredit Saudi Arabia.

He added, “Of course, in order to do this, the media largely ignored salient facts about him that emerged almost immediately, among them rumors about his questionable and financial links to Qatari intelligence… As the Post described him recently, “[Khashoggi was] a writer of modest influence beyond the Middle East when he was alive. In death, he has become a symbol of a broader struggle for human rights. No outlet did more in the service of cementing that symbolism than the Washington Post and its news and editorial staff.”

Matt Brodsky has said before the Post’s fresh revelations, “There are far too many important questions still not being asked, let alone answered, at least not on the major networks and newspapers. After the recent Kavanaugh hearing debacle, this is yet another indication that long after President Trump leaves the stage, the damage most mainstream media has done to itself may be irreparable.

While experts praised The Post’s courage to publish the revelations, they think the campaign to destroy the US-Saudi relationship turned out to be built on the fiction.

They emphasized on reminding that the major source of news about Khashoggi was, Qatar’s Al Jazeera network, and Middle East Eye the outlet with ties to Qatar.

Reboi said that for months, Washington Post, US major media outlets and high-profile “echo chamber” pundits were knowingly assuming the risk of broadcasting false Turkish and Qatari narratives, without adequately informing their readers of the risk being passed on to them.

He added “Now, shockingly, the Washington Post itself has largely revealed rumors to be true. .. It is clear now that, not only was Khashoggi transmogrified in death into a major front in Qatar’s war on its Gulf neighbors; in life, he was Qatar’s asset in that war, as well.

How Qatar is funding top US universities to build lobby-groups

Qatar is pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into top academic institutions in the UK and US, since the beginning of 2012 to June this year, according to a Financial Times analysis of the US education department’s Foreign Gifts and Contracts Report.

Qatar’s part represents around 15 percent of all foreign gifts and contracts over that period. Qatar pays alone $1.3 billion from the $2.2 billion provided by all Gulf countries. However, the much of the money coming from Saudi Arabia, for example, goes to student fees — Riyadh funded about 110,000 US scholarships for Saudis between 2005 and 2015.

The report quoted researchers as saying they had concerns about the impact of funding on research about the Middle East and everything that matter to the region.

Funding for clout

According to media reports, data from US Department of Education shows that Qatar has given about $1 billion to elite American universities since 2011 for ulterior motives. The noted US-based news portal ‘Daily Caller News Foundation’ fears that the funding could have implications for the ‘academic independence’ of prestigious US universities.

A Daily Caller report said that some elite universities hide information on funding from the “ultra-conservative nation of Qatar”.

It states that Doha is seeking to gain political influence in Washington by funding academic institutions like Georgetown University, “which is situated in the seat of power, near the State Department, and its experts are frequently cited by groups shaping policy”.

The article confirmed that the university has “received nearly $333 million from Qatar since 2011 — far more than any other US school has received from any foreign nation”.

The website of this university, which now has an outpost in Qatar itself, claims that at its Walsh School of Foreign Service, “you can study with former Secretaries of State” and access “connections to diplomats from just about every country, and of course, the seat of the US government.

Our location gives SFS the extraordinary opportunity for us to engage (and sometimes even influence) the debates that lead to real action.”

Hidden ‘strings’

Still, many US universities are refusing to reveal the conditions attached to the money they have received from Qatar.

For its part, the Qatar Foundation has itself filed a lawsuit against Texas attorney general on 12 October 2018 to hide information about a massive $225 million donation the country has awarded to Texas A&M University since 2011.

The article also raises concerns about the dean of Georgetown University’s Qatar campus Ahmad Dallal, who the Middle East Forum describes as a long-time and enthusiastic supporter of the “US State Department-designated terrorist group Hezbollah”.

It is also reported that university funding is only one of the multi-pronged public relations exercise launched by Qatar, which includes doling out millions to lobbyists and public relations firms in the US. The vast majority of funds from Qatar were contracts, the Education Department data shows, requiring Georgetown to do something in return for the money, unlike gifts.

The university operations by Qatar are just one prong in a massive public relations and influence push that includes millions to lobbyists and public relations firms in the US. The list of institutions bought by Qatar in whole or in part includes several well-known international bodies that used to enjoy international respect.

It has become clear lately that the Qatari deals have been reflected in the level of research carried out by these institutions, which now lacks credibility.

Qatar paid nearly $15 million in a four-year grant to create the Brookings Doha Center, according to the New York Times, which revealed that Qatar funded some research and studies’ center, led by the Institute of Research and Studies in America, the Brookings Institute. The Center organized the Doha Forum, which was marked by turning it into a platform for Iran to attack the United States and the Gulf states.

Qatar’s tactics in financing research institutions, all over the world, has led to mistrust in evaluating all bodies working on researches and studies focusing on the Gulf, irregardless to their outputs quality.

The Carnegie Middle East Center is a think-tank based in Beirut, Lebanon, part of the Carnegie institution for International Peace. The Center provides in-depth analyzes of the political, socio-economic and security issues facing the Middle East and North Africa.

Egyptian famous newspaper Alyoum7 claimed that the Carnegie Center is closely linked to the Qatari intelligence and the Qatari army. It added that Doha has hired Yazid Sayegh, a senior researcher at the Carnegie Middle East Center, to organize the International Forum for Studies and Strategies under the title “Turkey-Qatar: A Strategic Vision for Common Defense Policies and Regional Crisis” supervised by the Center for Strategic Studies in the Qatari Armed Forces.

But Sayegh strongly denied to Al Arabiya English, the claims, stressing that himself and his institution enjoy financial and professional independence.

In 2017, Qatar hired Ashcroft Law Firm, cofounded by former US Attorney General John Ashcroft, and then a second law firm — McDermott, Will & Emory — three weeks later. In late August, Qatar hired a third D.C. law firm, Stonington Strategies, then a fourth, Nelson Mullins.

It also hired Avenue Strategies Global, former Trump campaign manager Corey Leandowski’s lobbying firm, according to Politico. Art Estopinan, recently hired as a partner at Avenue Strategies Global and one of the lobbyists for Qatar, was formerly Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen’s (R-Fla.).

Qatar has also turned to advertising firms, including the Washington, D.C.-based Audience Partners Worldwide. Also, Qatar’s communications office hired PR and lobbying firm BlueFront Strategies to create what would be the country’s most ambitious media campaign denouncing its Gulf neighbors.

Article first published on Al Arabiya English.

Bajrang Dal plans to attack New year Celebrations including women in Bengaluru

0

Bengaluru – The right-wing Hindutva militant outfit – Banrang Dal – has threatened to attack New Year Celebrations in Bengaluru this year. They termed the celebrations as anti-Hindu and anti-Indian.

The outfit has gone beyond in directly threatening the women folk as well.

“Liquor mafia is targeting Hindu girls and saying that girls get a free entry to the pubs with free beer. Drug mafia is working hard in India. Lakhs of youth will take drugs and wear inappropriate clothes during the New Year celebrations. It is not right. It is a conspiracy to defame Hindus,” said a Bajrang Dal activist.

Surya Narayan of Banrang Dal said, “Alcohol should be banned in Karnataka on December 31. Hookah bars and pubs should also be banned. It’s our demand.”

Over 15000 police force have been deployed in the city ahead of New-year celebrations, while no Police officer has claimed that a ban was been imposed.

Bengaluru’s Brigade road celebrations are unique in the country. There have been mass molestations in 2017, and more Police force to be deputed.

MOTIVATING: Time never stays same – struggling story of an Indian Engineer

0

By Zahack Tanvir

We need to have patience and wait for the right time to make the hay while the sun shines.

I share the same type of story like those who after completing their studies desperately hunt for jobs, but continuous rejection at job interviews make them lonely and depressed.

My father was a gulf-returnee, he lived in Saudi Arabia for eight years; he thought of getting back to his family and make a living here in Hyderabad.

But the things turned out unexpected, soon after his return someone insisted him to invest his savings in a business, he promptly believed his friend and invested all the savings he did in Saudi Arabia in a private business, but unfortunately the owners of the firm embezzled with the investments and dashed away.

After losing all his savings, he did not give up hope in Allah, though he had to bear our daily expenses as well as study expenses.

He then started working for Isfahani tea as a daily wage earner and would get hand-to-mouth money to fill our bellies.

Later he had to quit that job and work for a private company that sells products home to home. He did that too for us, he went door to door to sell home appliances and earn a living for our family.

My father’s perseverance always left a great impact on our minds. I remember the days when my mom would struggle hard. We had no private property, no bank balance and no solid financial back-up. So a great zeal in me was to anyhow work and earn to support my family.

After my intermediate, I applied in all the major engineering colleges of Hyderabad. Some gave out the seats in return of huge “donations” under management quota, and I was left with Computer Science and Engineering as this stream of engineering was not much in demand those days, so management would give it without “donations”.

I accepted it and relied in Allah that this would anyway help me in employment in future.

The time came up for submission of fees, in 2003, the fees structure of engineering was 22000 Rs/-. My family was running out of money.

My mother would sleep restless at nights and my father would ask his friends and acquaintances to lend him at least 22000 Rs/- for my fees. As the days went pass, almost everyone in our known circles denied lending money.

One of my father’s friend promised to lend us required amount but with 2.5% interest rate. No sooner we came to know about the interest based transaction, we refused as taking and giving interest is prohibited in Islam; and I personally felt why to start a career on prohibition.

Someone told us, ‘if you go by the rules and conditions of Islam, you cannot prosper’, but we had firm conviction that the only solution is Islam, so we did not want to do anything in haste that goes against its tenets.

Since the act was purely for the sake of Allah, Allah helped us at the last moment; one of my uncles called up my mother and eventually my fees was arranged.

During my engineering studies, I would work for part-time, pretending to be a well-qualified teaching faculty at a computer institute, where I purposefully did not disclose about my on-going studies, as they needed professionals not students for teaching purpose.

I was confident that I would do justice to that job. However, the institute was an upcoming one; so good salary could not be expected.

I completed all my semesters without backlogs and passed engineering with distinction in 2007. My college’s placement cell invited only 2 companies for “on-campus” recruitment, but I failed to get selected.

The only hurdle, I had was to get over the aptitude written test, which every IT company puts to filter-out slow candidates who cannot quickly solve arithmetic and logical queries.

Every time, I prepare for screening–test for those companies, I would practice every problem of RS Agarwal’s ‘Verbal & Non-Verbal’, ‘Quantitive Aptitude’, Shakuntala Devi’s ‘Puzzles to Puzzle You’, and other samples.

But again, the non-encouraging environment at my college where everyone plans to fly abroad and lacking of skills made me an unemployed youth for about seven months after my engineering though I possessed good scores.

During those seven months, I would go to every IT company’s campus-drive and interview. In fact, my friend and I would go dropping CVs in IT companies’ drop-box everyday with a hope to get a call.

However, to overcome my expenses, I started working for a start-up at Red hills, Hyderabad, which paid me based on number of trainees.

One day, my father glanced over an article in local Urdu newspaper about a Government initiative for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Minorities of India.

The scheme was purely meant for backward communities in India, among those communities one that is made to be backward is Muslim community.

The scheme was entitled ‘STP-Special Training Program’, since it was out of the ordinary kind of training; and through that scheme Government of Andhra Pradesh provided food, accommodation, laptops, wifi connection, technical training, soft-skills training, and all sorts of self-development trainings for FREE.

The screening round of STP was easier compared to corporate companies, the cut-off percentage of marks was very less and personal interviews were quite easy. The whole idea of STP was to bridge the gap between IT companies and colleges.

For six complete months, they trained us 12 hours daily. Representatives of corporate IT giants were invited to give motivational talks at our place. After four months, we were confident enough to face any kind of interview.

The aptitude questions that would once scare us became our acquaintance.

My friends and I would conduct group-discussions among ourselves to improve our group-participating skills.

We would interview each other on technical topics, at times we became too serious in even scolding each other.

After six months, was the time for IT companies to hold campus recruitment drive, and we were fully armed.

The first company to come was Infosys; due to negative marking in the assessment, out of 280 students, 32 could clear first round of interview; and I was among them.

Our program manager promised us that all the 32 would get selected, but finally 16 were selected, and I was NOT among those 16. I seriously cried that night sitting alone on the terrace, talking to my family about my rejection.

After rejection in Infosys, the second company to come was an Indian company specialized in SAP technologies.

It was 3rd Ramadan of 2008; we did ‘suhr’ and started making preparations for interviews. Exactly at 8 in the morning, interviewers arrived in our campus; with so much of excitement and zeal we started off.

After checking our eligibility, we were allowed to do the written test. The interviewers announced the declaring of results at 2:30 pm. I was little nervous about the results and my previous rejection was anyway haunting me.

At 2:30 pm, a female colleague came and congratulated me about my selection in the first round and wished me best of luck. Due to negative marking, 38 out of 280 students could clear written-test.

Later 38 students were made in groups of seven to eight students each. Every team was given a topic to speak for 15 minutes.

After all the teams were done, we were made to wait up to 5 pm. Our program manager called me and congratulated me for passing the group discussion.

Later, HR called me in and asked me what I knew about their company; I told whatever I had in my mind. Interestingly it was the time for breaking the fast. He offered me Samosas, but I politely refused telling him that I was fasting. He greeted me ‘Ramadan Mubarak’ with a good smile. I smiled him back.

He asked me about my hobbies, I said, I am interested in making short-videos with moral messages and I love video-narration and video-editing. Since majority of the students there said about their hobbies as playing cricket, listening to music and reading novels.

This hobby of mine caught his attention. However, he remembered me for long as ‘Director’.

Finally they selected seven students. Among seven, two of those Hijaabi ladies and I were the lucky ones.

With the on-campus recruitment drives, majority of the 280 students were selected in various IT companies.

After working for two years, I left it to join the company where I was first rejected. But this time, I was selected with excellent pay-package.

In 2012, I got a six months contractual job offer from King Abdullah University of Jeddah, though my relatives and friends discouraged me as I was offered Germany as my new work-location through Infosys.

Gradually, Allah opened ways and I worked in HP Arabia for Saudi Electricity Company in Dammam for nine months, then moved into another project and then the cycle continued. Eventually, they hired me into their support team.

It’s been six years since I came to Saudi Arabia, and Allah has blessed me with what I could not even dream of some five years ago.

I don’t want to brag about my possessions, spouse, children and the indefinite blessings. All I say, I have been given beyond my level.

We need to have patience and wait for the right time to make the hay while the sun shines. Majority of us get influenced by loose-talks and flattery, and fail to have far vision to understand what can be achieved with patience and perseverance.

However, in any case, Allah has set time and moment for you and nothing can go before or after the specified time.

Article has been taken from Zahack Tanvir’s Facebook Notes.

Zahack Tanvir is also a regular blogger and vlogger, he also holds diploma in Journalism from London School of Journalism.

معافی نامہ – تھوک کے چاٹنا

بدرالدین اجمل مسلکی عصبیت کے زہر میں ڈوبا انسان ، علم سے عاری ، نسیان کا مریض ، سیاست کا فقیر ، جھل مرکب کا خمیر ، بیوقفوں کی دنیا کا نیا نام ، بدرالدین احق صاحب ! آپ اس طرح اگر پارلیامنٹ میں زہر اگلیں گے ، تو سلفی کم دھشت گرد نکلیں گے ،

قاسمیوں کی لسٹ زیادہ لمبی ہوجاٸے گی ، جو ابھی دھشت گردی کے الزام میں جیلوں میں سڑ رہے ہیں ، اور قاسمی ہی کیوں تبلیغی بھی نہیں بچیں گے ، جماعت اسلامی وغیرہ بھی نہیں بچیں گے ، مگر ہمارا اس بارے میں موقف یہ ہیکہ دہشت گردی کا نہ کوٸی دھرم و مذھب ہے نہ مسلک ،

آپ ایک عورت کا جواب پارلیامنٹ میں نہیں دے پاٸے کہ قرآن سے کوٸی دلیل دیجٸے ، دلیل تو نہیں دیٸے جناب ذلیل ضرور ہوگٸے ، آپ نے کہا میڈم میں آپ سے اکیلے میں بات کروں گا ، سلفیت کو سرعام رسوا کرکے آپ ایک عورت سے اکیلے میں بات کرنے کی دعوت دے رہے ہیں ، شرم سے ڈوب مرنا چاہیٸے ،

لوگ ساٹھ سال پہ سٹھیا جاتے ہیں مگر اتنا بھی نہیں جتنا یہ بڈھا ، یا آپ اکیلے ، جاکر میچ فکسنگ کرنا چاہ رہے ہیں کیا ؟ پوری حنفیت نے مل کر طلاق و حلالہ کے مسٸلہ میں ساری امت مسلمہ کو رسوا کر کے رکھ دیا ، روزآنہ ٹی وی چینلوں پہ مولوی منہ بسوڑے بھاگتے رہے ،

مگر حنفیت بچانے کے چکر میں یہ توفیق نہیں ہوٸی کہ کہہ دیں ہمارا مسٸلہ قرآن وسنت کے خلاف ہے ہم غلطی پر ہیں ، اس مسٸلے سے رجوع کرتے ہیں ، اور یہ جرأت تقلیدی کبھی نہیں کرسکتے کیونکہ تقلید کا اندھیرا لامتناہی ہے ، اور اب یہ سلفیوں کو محبت نامہ لکھ کر معافی مانگ رہے ہیں کہ دھشت گردوں کا یہ تیس فیصد اوٹ بھی ہم سے بھاگ نہ جاٸے ،

اس کے لٸے تو سب کا جنون فوراً بھاگ جاتا ہے ۔ مگر یاد رکھٸے جس مسلم پرسنل لا ٕ کو قرآن نہ ماننے کی وجہ سے اتنی بڑی ذلت و رسواٸی کا سامنا کرنا پڑا ، آپ بھی ذلت و رسواٸی سے نہیں بچ سکتے جب تک کہ صدق دل سے اللہ کے حضور آپ توبہ نہ کریں ، یہ معافی تو اھل حدیثوں کی دل آزاری کی وجہ سے ہے ، اور ہمیں اس کی ذرہ برابر بھی پرواہ نہیں کیونکہ یہ الزام ہمارے اوپر نیا نہیں ، اھل حدیثوں کی قربانیوں کو چھپایا جاتا ہے اور چند سرپھروں کی غلطیوں کو ان کے اوپر لاکر تھوپ دیاجاتا۔ ہے ۔ مگر یاد رہے بارگاہ الہی میں بھی آپ کو جواب دینا پڑے گا ۔

تحریر : صفی الرحمن ابن مسلم فیضی بندوی

FULL TRANSCRIPT: Asaduddin Owaisi’s parliament speech opposing Triple Talaq Bill

Asaduddin Owaisi, President All India Majlis Ittehadul-Muslimeen (AIMIM), has opposed the Triple Talaq bill in the parliament on December 27 2018.

16th Speaker of Lok Sabha was Smt. Sumitra Mahajan.

Following is the transcript of his Urdu speech translated in English.

Madam, I would like to thank you that you have granted me permission to speak.

I speak as a father, as a brother, as an uncle and as a son, on behalf of cent percent Muslim women of this dearly nation, I would like to convey through this parliament to the Government that cent percent Muslim women of India absolutely oppose and reject this bill.

And the second matter is, Respected Madam/Speaker, the way this bill was presented, and I oppose this bill because according to the Indian constitution and the Article 14, Article 15, Article 26, and Article 29, and the preamble of our constitution which has clearly written in it—“guarantees liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship”, so based on this—I oppose it.

Respected Madam/Speaker, I would like to question the government through you, that what is your explanation that homosexuality has been decriminalized in our dearly nation – according to the judgment 377 – homosexuality has been decriminalized but you criminalize Triple Talaq?

A man and a man, and a woman and a woman can stay together and do whatever they wish, and you have no objection to it, and you have objection to Triple Talaq?

Why it’s imposed? Because it will be misused against us.

Further, respected Madam/Speaker, this government has appealed Supreme court to impose Adultery law for women, and Supreme court has decriminalized it. Adultery was decriminalized and you remained silent, but you criminalize the matter of Triple Talaq?

Madam, let’s consider the prevention of corruption act. You have decriminalized it that anyone can take money which is not meant for public benefit. But you criminalize Triple Talaq?

Respected Madam/Speaker, why is this law against the constitution? You said it correctly from the chair (where you are seated), that this custom is not among Hindus but among Muslims.

But Madam/Speaker, I would like to mention it with utter humbleness before you that, in our dearly country, according to the law of divorce, if a Hindu gets divorced, why does he get only one year of punishment, while Muslim gets three years of punishment? Is this not the violation of Article 14?

This act is against the “harm theory”.

And Madam, I would like to convey through you, our minister has aggressively said that, supreme court has termed it unconstitutional. I would like to learn from him, please show me the part of the judgment  where the majority of judgment has called Triple Talaq as unconstitutional?

Please, for the sake of God, please don’t make a mention of Supreme Court and misguide the parliament.

Madam/Speaker, I would like to ask Government through you, what did Bentham say? What did Montesquieu say?

Montesquieu said that, if law is not required, and if you introduce and enforce a law then it’s tyranny. You are initiating tyranny.

Madam, please listen to me.

Madam, you have kept tribals deprived of Hindu Marriage Act. Why did you do?

Hence, we speak about Article 26 and 29.

And Madam, I have listened to the great talented people here about Quran, and we call those who speak about Quran as “Fazeelatus-Shaykh” and “Shaykha”. What is left now? You have to proclaim Tawheed (monotheism) and finality of the Prophethood (of Prophet Mohammed ﷺ), and I invite you to it, please embrace it.

Madam, Sabrimala’s judgment was out, and you speak about equality, but where’s my equality? Your faith is your faith and my faith not mine? Is this not the violation of culture? Is this not violation of Article 29?

The intentions of the Government are not sincere.

Madam, now look at the surprising point, you are a woman, and please allow me to express this with humility, a man can run extra-marital affair with multiple-woman, and that’s not a crime, but if anyone calls Talaq thrice, then three years of imprisonment?

While Supreme court has clearly said, marriage is not terminated. If marriage is not terminated, where’s the question of punishment?

“Harm theory” – 377 is in front of you, and Madam, three years of punishment?

Communal riot acts like 148, 153A, 295 has three years of punishment. And if someone’s car hits a person and he dies, then two years of punishment.

Please read Bentham and Montesquieu, or get a fourth year student of any National law school, he will mentor you.

And yes, this is a fact, that marriage is contract in Islam.

I present a proposal, write a condition in the Nikah Nama (marriage contract) that if a Muslim man calls Talaq thrice, then he has to pay double or triple the amount of Maher (dowry given by groom to the bride). If any violation takes place, he goes to jail. It’s a contract and the act will be violation of contract.

You could also write, if anyone calls Talaq thrice, it will be considered only one. But you don’t do that either. We have a provision for it.

But, the intention is to imprison. They never favor women.

Who will give allowance?

What does a woman need? She needs a house, food on her table, and arrangement of her kids’ school fees.

Will you do?

Will you do?

Madam, I would like to ask you, Shayara Banu (Triple Talaq Petitioner) joined BJP, what have you done so far for her? Tell me. Have you done anything for her?

Madam, I am concluding. I am concluding.

There are hidden plans behind introducing these laws.

Madam, sexual minorities have choice as per section 377, why don’t religious minorities get choice?

There’s choice-jurisprudence in the Indian constitution. Won’t I get it?

Your law is against religion. You intend to dismantle the plurality. It’s quite clear.

You are not in favor of justice for Muslim women, in fact your hidden target was evident, when Attorney General in the Supreme Court said—terminate every law.

Mukhtar Sahab (while pointing towards him), Shia’s Segha law will also be terminated, so be careful.

Finally, Madam, #MeToo movement was started in the entire nation by the women. Where is the Minister (referring to MJ Akbar) who was standing here? Where is he now? Tell me?

[MLAs in the background shout: SHAME SHAME SHAME]

And you sheltered them in your party? You would have kicked him out, the one who raped women, the one who oppressed them. He was a mean fraudster. We call him in Urdu – “Totaye-Chasma”, and you sheltered them? And you show us the mirror?

Madam, please look, why I tell this – in our country 84% under-aged Hindu girls around 10 years of age are married, we made law against it. What happened? What happened, please tell me?

How about desertion? Over 20 Lac Hindu women are deserted after marriage. What about them? Please implement law against it.

Social evils have to be ended with everyone’s collective efforts.

I am ending it, Madam, and in conclusion I say – I tell the Government through you that, under your pressure, under your force, under your aggression, we shall not forsake our religion.

We shall live as Muslims till the end of times. We reject this bill, Madam!

Lok Sabha passes Triple Talaq Bill

Delhi – The Lok Sabha, after debating the merits of the triple talaq bill, finally passed the bill with all government amendments while rejecting opposition demands.

The Congress and many opposition parties earlier demanded that the bill should be sent to a joint select committee of Parliament for further deliberations.

The Opposition argued that the bill is against the Supreme Court’s verdict that outlawed instant triple talaq. The government, on the other hand, said that the bill is aimed at honouring the rights of women.

It said the government is ready to discuss and listen to the objections that the opposition parties have on the triple talaq bill.

The bill seeks to make instant triple talaq a criminal offence. The Narendra Modi government drafted the bill after the August 2017 Supreme Court verdict that outlawed the practice.

S Q R Ilayas, member of working committee of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), said there was no need for this bill and it has been brought keeping in mind the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.

“It is a very dangerous bill that will make a civil issue a criminal offence. Who will take care of the wives and children once the husband goes to jail?” he said.

Why the early Americans banned Christmas?

0


The upper classes in ancient Rome celebrated Dec. 25 as the birthday of the sun god Mithra.

How did the first settlers celebrate Christmas?

They didn’t. The Pilgrims who came to America in 1620 were strict Puritans, with firm views on religious holidays such as Christmas and Easter. Scripture did not name any holiday except the Sabbath, they argued, and the very concept of “holy days” implied that some days were not holy. “They for whom all days are holy can have no holiday,” was a common Puritan maxim. Puritans were particularly contemptuous of Christmas, nicknaming it “Foolstide” and banning their flock from any celebration of it throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. On the first Dec. 25 the settlers spent in Plymouth Colony, they worked in the fields as they would on any other day. The next year, a group of non-Puritan workmen caught celebrating Christmas with a game of “stoole-ball” — an early precursor of baseball — were punished by Gov. William Bradford. “My conscience cannot let you play while everybody else is out working,” he told them.

Why didn’t Puritans like Christmas?

They had several reasons, including the fact that it did not originate as a Christian holiday. The upper classes in ancient Rome celebrated Dec. 25 as the birthday of the sun god Mithra. The date fell right in the middle of Saturnalia, a monthlong holiday dedicated to food, drink, and revelry, and Pope Julius I is said to have chosen that day to celebrate Christ’s birth as a way of co-opting the pagan rituals. Beyond that, the Puritans considered it historically inaccurate to place the Messiah’s arrival on Dec. 25. They thought Jesus had been born sometime in September.

So their objections were theological?

Not exclusively. The main reason Puritans didn’t like Christmas was that it was a raucously popular holiday in late medieval England. Each year, rich landowners would throw open their doors to the poor and give them food and drink as an act of charity. The poorest man in the parish was named the “Lord of Misrule,” and the rich would wait upon him at feasts that often descended into bawdy drunkenness. Such decadence never impressed religious purists. “Men dishonor Christ more in the 12 days of Christmas,” wrote the 16th-century clergyman Hugh Latimer, “than in all the 12 months besides.”

When did that view win out?

Puritans in the English Parliament eliminated Christmas as a national holiday in 1645, amid widespread anti-Christmas sentiment. Settlers in New England went even further, outlawing Christmas celebrations entirely in 1659. Anyone caught shirking their work duties or feasting was forced to pay a significant penalty of five shillings. Christmas returned to England in 1660, but in New England it remained banned until the 1680s, when the Crown managed to exert greater control over its subjects in Massachusetts. In 1686, the royal governor of the colony, Sir Edmund Andros, sponsored a Christmas Day service at the Boston Town House. Fearing a violent backlash from Puritan settlers, Andros was flanked by redcoats as he prayed and sang Christmas hymns.

Did the Puritans finally relent?

Not at all. They kept up their boycott of Christmas in Massa­chusetts for decades. Cotton Mather, New England’s most influential religious leader, told his flock in 1712 that “the feast of Christ’s nativity is spent in reveling, dicing, carding, masking, and in all licentious liberty…by mad mirth, by long eating, by hard drinking, by lewd gaming, by rude reveling!” European settlers in other American colonies continued to celebrate it, however, as both a pious holiday and a time for revelry. In his Poor Richard’s Almanac of 1739, Philadelphian Benjamin Franklin wrote of Christmas: “O blessed Season! Lov’d by Saints and Sinners / For long Devotions, or for longer Dinners.”

So Christmas was finally accepted at that time?

No. Anti-Christmas sentiment flared up again around the time of the American Revolution. Colonial New Englanders began to associate Christmas with royal officialdom, and refused to mark it as a holiday. Even after the U.S. Constitution came into effect, the Senate assembled on Christmas Day in 1797, as did the House in 1802. It was only in the following decades that disdain for the holiday slowly ebbed away. Clement Clarke Moore’s poem “A Visit From St. Nicholas” — aka “‘Twas the Night Before Christmas” — was published in New York in 1823 to enormous success. In 1836, Alabama became the first state to declare Christmas a public holiday, and other states soon followed suit. But New England remained defiantly Scrooge-like; as late as 1850, schools and markets remained open on Christmas Day. Henry Wadsworth Longfellow finally noted a “transition state about Christmas” in New England in 1856. “The old Puritan feeling prevents it from being a cheerful, hearty holiday; though every year makes it more so,” he wrote. Christmas Day was formally declared a federal holiday by President Ulysses S. Grant in 1870.

Article first published on TheWeek.

DANGER: Christmas and New-year Music leads to psychological disorders, say experts

0

Playing the same Christmas songs all season long produces cognitive fatigue.

The sights and sounds of the holidays are here — and they’re completely inescapable. No matter where you go, it seems like the same classic songs are played on repeat.

This perception is spot on: Spotify reports that listening spikes during the last two months of the year. Michael Bublé’s “Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas” and Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas” top the list of most streamed tunes.

But the incessant repetition can have a psychological impact. There’s a U-shaped relationship between how often we hear a song and how much we like it, what’s known as the mere exposure effect.

At first, holiday music may spark nostalgia and get you in the holiday spirit. But hearing “Jingle Bells” for the millionth time can lead to annoyance, boredom, and even distress, researchers say.

That’s because the brain becomes oversaturated, triggering a negative response. If you’re already worried about money, work, or seeing family during the holidays, the constant inundation of cheerful tunes may reinforce your stress instead of relieving it.

It can also be downright distracting, affecting employee productivity and irritating consumers. In fact, a 2011 Consumer Reports survey found that 23 percent of Americans dread holiday music.

Clinical psychologist Linda Blair says Christmas music can be mentally draining:

“People working in the shops [have to tune out] Christmas music, because if they don’t, it really does stop you from being able to focus on anything else…You’re simply spending all of your energy trying not to hear what you’re hearing.”

How can you strike the right balance of good cheer that doesn’t drive you crazy?

Switch up your music so people’s brains don’t get bored. Playing the same Christmas songs all season long produces cognitive fatigue. Practice good sound management by varying your playlists and keeping the volume in check.

Studies also show that wintry scents like pine and cinnamon help conjure happy emotions, so recruit other senses when celebrating.

If all else fails, a set of ear plugs makes a nice stocking stuffer.

Article first published on BusinessInsider.