Srinagar — At least 18 Indian soldiers were killed on Thursday in the deadliest attack on government forces in Indian-administered Kashmir in more than two years, police said but according to unconfirmed reports, the death toll has reached 30.
They died when an improvised explosive device (IED) went off as a convoy of military vehicles drove on a highway some 20 km from the main city of Srinagar.
“An IED went off as a CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force) convoy passed by,” senior police officer Munir Ahmed Khan said.
“We have 18 CRPF fatalities. We are evacuating the injured from the site and don’t have their number at the moment.”
CRPF spokesman Sanjay Kumar said that the explosives were inside a car, while local media reports said the explosive-laden vehicle was driven into the convoy.
“It was a powerful explosion. The explosive was car-borne,” Kumar said.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, another CRPF official said at least 29 troops were injured in the blast, which damaged a number of vehicles in the convoy.
Unconfirmed photos showed the charred remains of at least one vehicle littered across the highway, alongside blue military buses as black smoke billowed upwards.
Local media reports said the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed militant group had claimed responsibility.
A spokesman for the group said the “suicide attack” was carried out by a militant called Aadil Ahmad, alias Waqas Commando, in a statement sent to local newspapers.
The last major car bombing, which killed 40 people including three suicide attackers, was also carried out by Jaish-e-Mohammed, in 2001. The target of that attack was the local parliament building in Srinagar.
Another car bomb attack also happened in Srinagar in March 2005 in which one civilian died and several soldiers were wounded.
Thursday’s attack was the deadliest on Indian forces in its part of Kashmir since September 2016 when 19 soldiers were killed in a brazen pre-dawn raid by militants on the Uri army camp.
India blamed militants in Pakistan for that attack, the biggest in 14 years, and responded by carrying out strikes across the heavily-militarized Line of Control, the de-facto border dividing the nuclear-armed nations.
Indian officials said troops conducted the “surgical strikes” several kilometers (miles) inside the Pakistan-controlled side of the disputed territory to prevent attacks being planned on major Indian cities.
The strikes are a source of national pride for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government and were the subject of a rousing recent Bollywood film, “Uri: The Surgical Strike”.
India has an estimated 500,000 soldiers in Kashmir, which has been divided between India and Pakistan since independence from Britain in 1947.
Rebel groups have been fighting for an independent Kashmir, or a merger with Pakistan, since 1989.
New Delhi accuses Pakistan of fuelling the insurgency that has left tens of thousands of civilians dead.
Islamabad denies the charge, saying it only provides diplomatic support to Kashmiris’ right to self-determination. — Saudi Gazette
According
to Tamil Nadu IT minister M Manigandan, the state government will initiate a
dialogue with the Centre on banning TikTok. The state will take the step “in
view of its application to circulate extreme content, particularly among a
younger demographic of netizens”.
TikTok
is a Chinese social video app that allows users to create short videos which
can be synced with an existing sound byte – often a song, or a movie dialogue.
It was also one of the most downloaded apps of 2018 on both Android and Apple
devices.
“I raised an issue forwarded to me by community welfare workers that the mobile application (TikTok) was acting as a platform for heated debates inimical to law and order, and sharing of sexually-explicit material. The minister supported my charge and promised to take steps to ban the application in Tamil Nadu,” Tamil Nadu lawmaker Thamimun Ansari, who initiated the debate in the state assembly, told Economic Times.
Here are Five reasons why we’re
rooting for the app to be regulated:
1. Predators encourage children to have sex
Children’s
charity Barnardo, based out of UK, warned
how children—as young as eight—risk being sexually exploited on TikTok.
Predators reportedly use TikTok’s comments function to encourage children
to engage in sexual activity online. As the app is easily accessible, around
half of the app’s user base is aged between 13-24. According to a 2018 study by National Society for the
Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), it only takes 45 minutes for
children to be groomed online, due to the popularity of ‘sexting’.
2. Rise in hate crime and hate speech
Though
the app says it’s trying to moderate the creation of videos featuring hate speech
online, its 200-million strong base in India is proving to be a hindrance. In
2018, Indonesia also banned the video app after a rise in hate speech and hoax
stories. According to Download,
the app also tolerates the use of hashtags that promote Nazi slogans,
violent neo-Nazi groups and anti-semitic remarks, as well as encouraged
physical and sexual violence against women.
3. It affects the music industry and artists
A
significant number of videos on TikTok show people lip-syncing to snippets of
songs. According to a study
on Music Reports, the app has over 150 million songs from 100,000 different
artists. However, with TikTok not showing total views of videos, the
royalty-holders issue a blanket licence—also known as a buyout—and take payment
up front, thus affecting the earnings of artists.
4. TikTok is rife with misinformation and propaganda
An
HT
investigation on ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, revealed that
regional social media platforms with a user base exceeding 50 million are rife
with misinformation and political propaganda. The report found out that
conversation on current affairs was polarised and often married fake news posts
on politics with cinema and cricket.
5. A pseudo-pornographic platform
According
to Motherboard,
a community of users on TikTok appear to be soliciting explicit images of boys
and girls. Though TikTok calls such activity “abhorrent” and encourages users
to report such profiles, they have little to no control over hashtags that are
not associated with any content. One such tag is ‘#tradefortrade’ which are
focused primarily on trading nude images, as well as audios of people
masturbating and videos of men stroking themselves.
PUBG
also recently faced the flak of state governments in India for spreading
violence. The gaming app was banned by the Gujarat state government in primary
schools. The Bombay High Court also restricted its use in colleges, asking them
to create a firewall so that the game can’t be accessed through their servers.
While people were commemorating Hasan al-Banna’s death anniversary yesterday for he was assassinated 70 years ago on February 12 1949 for political retaliation in Cairo, I was thanking Allah for relieving the earth from a person who spread the ideology of modern terrorism.
He was not assassinated for being the harbinger of “truth
and liberty”, but he was assassinated “in retaliation”. An
Ikhwanul-Muslimeen adherent assassinated Prime Minister of Egypt Nokrashy Pasha
in December
1948, so some of the loyalists of Nokrashy Pasha assassinated Banna in Febryary
1949.
He was the one who shaped
Ikhwanul-Muslimeen along with another notorious figure Syed Qutb who came after
him, who was under the influence of an Iranian-Mullah – Nawab Safavi. Al-Qaeda
and ISIS are the organizations that spawned from Ikhwanul-Muslimeen.
But his advocates say, every
“evil power” is afraid of Banna’s ideology. I say, the fear is
natural—the way we fear devoring beasts, the way we fear the rise of terrorism,
the way we fear the death of our fellow Muslims, obviously the Muslim countries
fear the rise of Ikhwani-ideology which has caused devastation in some of the
middle-Eastern countries.
The reality is—they can’t
withstand any opposition, they call any opposing voice to be
“Zionist” or “Western agent”, while their history is full
of treachery, deceit and backstabbing. In fact, they align with the same
Zionists and Western powers to conspire against Muslim Rulers – in order to
grab the seats and authority.
What Banna was—the decision rests
with Allah, but we Muslims collectively condemn and outcast his destructive
ideology of Ikhwanul-Muslimeen.
Zahack Tanvir is also a regular blogger and vlogger, he also holds diploma in Journalism from London School of Journalism. He often writes on Socio-religious issues. He tweets under @ZahackTanvir
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect The Milli Chronicle’s point-of-view.
A Nigerian man in his 50s decided that it would be enough to marry three women in one night instead of six, because he did not have enough money to marry all of them. One might think that a young woman in any society would not accept polygamy, especially with a man who was much older than her, unless he was wealthy and she was searching for an easy life. But to agree to marry a poor man and be one of his three wives on the same night is really something strange.
The news report about this marriage explained that the man was trying to break the Nigerian Guinness World Records, which was recorded two months earlier with regard to a man from the same village who married two wives in the same day.
The man promised to work hard to secure money to carry out his plan and marry the three women and then planned to later marry three others. I do not know how this man could ever succeed in marrying three young women which would exhaust him financially, physically, mentally and spiritually.
Polygamy is something that is considered strange and hard to understand in Western societies. Whenever I am engaging in discussion with an American or European and they bring up the subject of polygamy, I always tell them that most men in our society marry one woman and do not think about marrying another. I try to explain the wisdom behind polygamy in that if the first wife becomes sick or cannot have children, then she would not be divorced and be forced to live alone facing the pressures of life.
However, these Western men are usually ready for the next tricky question which is why women are not allowed to marry more than one man, especially as medical science is so advanced and it is easy to determine who the baby belongs to?
I used to be on the defensive until I discovered a sect that lives in America that allows polygamy and is not limited to only four wives, but includes men who have as many as seven. It is only then that I have switched my position from defense to attack.
Khalid Suliman writes for Okaz Daily and Saudi Gazette. He tweets under @K_Alsuliman
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect The Milli Chronicle’s point-of-view.
Squeezing his way through the stream of
wriggling rickshaws, carts, and bikes, the little boy emerged from Jama
Masjid’s Dariba Kalan, and climbed the flight of stairs leading to the main
mosque. After entering the mosque, on the left was his corner, and the only
place where he could study in peace. The evenings at his home in congested purani Dilli
were always noisy.
It didn’t help that no one understood
why he was so consumed by the junoon (passion)
to study. His father was a small locksmith in Old Delhi, and money was always a
concern. So, after school, the boy worked at a jewellery workshop and a
garments store to pay the fees. When he passed Class XII with distinction in
1992, it didn’t mean a thing to anyone else. But the boy wanted to become an
engineer, and move away from the same rut that he believed not just his family,
but his entire community was stuck in.
A decade later,
in early 2000s, and around 200 km away from Delhi, another boy was reading his
books spread over a cot on the roof of his home, as he intermittently kept
looking at the kite-filled sky. Sometimes, when a plane passed overhead, the
boy stared fixedly at the sky till he couldn’t see anything anymore. There was
leisure in Rampur’s air. There was contentment that almost looked like
complacence. Flying kites and pigeons was more than just a hobby. But he wanted
to leave the comfort of his hometown, and see if dreams could actually come
true.
After he passed his Class XII
examination, and expressed a desire to go out and try his luck in a big city,
his family was worried. His father, a station in-charge of Rampur UP SRTC, had
died the previous year. His mother, who had never worked before, had to start
afresh to raise her four children. They tried convincing him. He tried
convincing them. Ultimately, he left Rampur for Delhi, still not knowing what
he was chasing.
Finally, in the late 1990s, a young girl
in Mumbai was quietly listening to her grandmother tell stories while she
embroidered small cotton handkerchiefs to raise money to pay her school fees.
The stories were of people who made it big in life, despite all odds. Everyone
in the grandmother’s stories somehow, always used education to climb up. As a
girl, her grandmother told her, she would need to not just be literate, but
educated in the real sense of the word. Brought up singly by her grandmother,
who couldn’t pursue her dreams of studying beyond Class X, money was always a
concern. Even so, not studying was out of the question for the girl.
Naved Iqbal, the
boy from Old Delhi is now 44, and is the director of operations at General
Electric (GE) Oil and Gas, India, a position that is only second to the CEO’s.
Mukhtar Khan, the boy from Rampur, is 33, and is part of Air India’s senior
cabin crew. He is expected to soon become a commercial pilot—a dream not many
in his Rampur could dare to have at the time he moved out. After passing out
from a flying school in the United States, and getting a license to fly in both
the US and Canada, Mukhtar is now waiting for the issuance of his commercial
license from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation. Bushra Shad is 39 now,
a corporate lawyer and a partner at Mumbai- based law firm LawCept Partners.
Defining Muslim middle class
These stories of hope and perseverance
are not scattered everywhere, and they’re not easy to find when it comes to Muslims in the country, but they do
exist. Breaking the idea of a monolithic impoverished and illiterate Muslim
community, people like Naved, Mukhtar and Bushra have formed a small, emerging
yet visible Muslim middle class across the country. This emergence has taken
place despite blatant and subtle social discriminations faced by the community
at different levels.
Becoming a part of this class is not
just about reaching a particular financial milestone. It brings with it a
certain lifestyle, and seeds many rising aspirations.
Today, Naved owns a Toyota Corolla, has
a three bedroom apartment in central Delhi, and his daughter (the Iqbal couple
has made a conscious choice to have just one child) studies in one of Delhi’s
best schools .
Mukhtar owns a house in Greater Noida,
both his wife and he own cars—Fiat Linea and Maruti Suzuki Dzire. He has
travelled to 17 countries so far. Bushra has inherited an apartment from her
grandmother, but doesn’t own a car, because she doesn’t feel the need for it.
Unlike when she was growing up, there isn’t anything—a car, jewellery or any
such asset that she would have to think twice about before buying.
In India, the term ‘middle class’ itself
is rather ambiguous. Nearly everyone claims to be in the middle class,
irrespective of where they actually fall on the country’s wealth spectrum.
However, generally, educational status, income, consumption, and occupation are
broad indicators through which the size of a middle class can be measured. On
most of these parameters, nationwide sample surveys show a nascent yet small
rise in the Muslim middle class.
For example, the National Family Health
Survey shows that even though, among all religions, the presence of Muslims in
the highest wealth quintile (top 20%) of the country is still the lowest, the
share has gone up (while 17.2% of the total Muslim population fell in the top
wealth bracket in 2005-06, it inched up to 18.8% by 2015-16). Then, in a short
span between the mid-2000s and the early part of this decade, an average Muslim
household started spending roughly thrice more on vacations and two times more
on social functions (according to the Indian Human Development Survey).
The share of Muslim men who have studied
at least up to Class XII doubled in the decade ending in 2016, according to the
NFHS. The educational status of Muslim women improved much faster than the men,
though the share of women who have gotten past Class XII still remains at
slightly below 15%. Improvements in educational attainments beyond schooling
have been slower. Only a little over 5% of Muslims (men and women) are
graduates, according to census.
The story is clearly mixed. And change,
in many instances, has been slow and hard fought. But the rise is unmistakable.
A conscious look around will show you
the signs of this rise. Muslims are doing ‘ordinary’ things such as going to the
sports stadia, shopping in a mall, watching movies, and in all this carrying
their faith and the modern life hand and hand.
“Across the board, you are seeing signs
of a middle class, consumption-oriented emergence of this segment (Muslims).
You see this both at the demand and supply ends. In my travels, for instance I
have seen a Muslim girl working at a McDonald’s outlet wearing a hijab, and her
sister working there without a headscarf – both educated, confident and
completely at ease with the world of consumption. And the markets have just
begun to take note of this shift,” says Santosh Desai, chief executive and
managing director of Future Brands Ltd.
Unlike in the past, this new Muslim
class is made up of people like Naved, Mukhtar and Bushra who didn’t come from
Muslim-dominated urban centres, but belong to lower middle class Muslim
neighbourhoods in metro cities like say Delhi’s Zakir Nagar or Shaheen Bagh,
Mumbai’s Byculla, or small towns like Rampur and Bareilly across the country.
While the government sponsored Sachar
Committee report extensively documented the lives of Muslims, and the
discrimination faced by them, what it also did was emphasized the idea of one
Muslim community, ignoring internal disparities such as regional differences,
or caste and patriarchy within.
Hilal Ahmed, Associate Professor at the
Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, New Delhi, who has been working
on Muslim politics, believes that like any other community, Muslims in India
too have a class hierarchy, and yet the idea of a Muslim middle class hasn’t
formed part of the mainstream vocabulary so far.
“We have a very small rich Muslim class,
a tiny middle class, a big lower middle class, the artisan class, and finally a
big poor and the marginalized class. But when we look at Muslims in the
country, we only tend to look at the last two classes, and have ignored the
existence of some, and the slow formation of the other classes within,”
says Ahmed. The middle class as we see it today is different from both the
post-Partition, aristocratic class of Muslims, who as Ahmed says, relied on
“Muslim exclusivism”; and the Muslim elite in the later decades that
focused more on protection of symbolic relics of the past like the Urdu
language or the status of institutes like the Aligarh Muslim University.
A story of the rise
The emergence of this new class among
Muslims today is mostly focused around north India, since the Muslims in the
south have been more or less consistently moving up over years along with the
rest of the religions and classes because of a series of reservations and
reforms that impacted the region. It helped that the south was not affected by
Partition as much, and also managed to be isolated from the communal politics
that played out in northern India in colonial times. In the north, a big part
of the elite Muslims migrated to Pakistan after Partition. This continued till
the late 1960s, and the process left behind the predominantly poor Muslims in
the region. It was only after decades that the upward mobility started here.
The emergence of this class among
Muslims, even though slow, was inevitable because of several reasons. The Babri Masjid
demolition happened around the same time as liberalization, and so did the
emergence of internet. All the three factors increased the sense of alienation
and disillusionment with the political parties. These also made Muslims
realize, as was the case with Bushra, that education was the most important way
to ensure upward mobility of the community.
Bushra’s
grandmother had shifted to Pune from Mumbai in early 1993 just a few months
after the Bombay riots. Financial troubles were mounting, and she had to sell
off the house she owned. The Bombay Bushra returned to, a year after the riots,
was not the Bombay she had left. The localities, where earlier no one cared
about what religion she belonged to, were slowly metamorphosing into ‘Muslim
only’ and ‘Hindu only’ localities. Suddenly, people around her started talking
about wanting to be “with their own people” and not the “others”.
After a few years, when Bushra started
looking for a flat, agents consciously showed her flats in some areas and not
in others. “They kept saying, ‘this is allowed for you, this isn’t’. I mean it
was so strange and ridiculous to hear them say that one building is allowed,
and the other, in the same locality, is not allowed,” says Bushra.
Suddenly religion started defining people. But her grandmother was still
reminding Bushra about her bigger goal. The fear of the unknown future just
reinforced Bushra’s commitment to make a stronger base for herself in the
society. And education was the answer.
Even though in mid 1990s the community
realized the importance of education, as documented by several researchers
including Anwar Alam, senior fellow at the Policy Prospective Foundation, a
Delhi-based think tank, it wasn’t a dramatic move. Instead some chose
hybridized education, which meant that more and more Madrasas had to slowly
modernize themselves to include English and computer training in their
curriculum. Hence, while they were getting educated, they weren’t enrolled in
the “modern secular education system”, and so this shift in mindset didn’t
really translate into numbers early on.
Access to the Gulf at the time of the
oil boom contributed to some of the early financial success stories among
Muslims. In Mukhtar’s Rampur, many, including his father, had woken up to the
opportunities that the Gulf had, and the potential benefit of this move to
increase their living standards. Even though his father came back soon because
of personal problems, many more in Rampur continued their tryst with the
markets abroad. For Mukhtar, the father’s move to Saudi Arabia opened a
different world to him.
There, his father had worked with an
airline company as a ground staffer. This coincided with the time when Mukhtar
first got access to the internet. “Through his stories, I had already imagined
and fancied the glamour around the airline industry. I kept searching on the
internet to see what all I could possibly do,” says Mukhtar. This is when
he planted the seeds of his dream. In 2004, a year after he had moved to Delhi,
and worked with McDonald’s, Planet Fashion and Provogue, Mukhtar saw an ad on a
hoarding in Noida. The Frankfinn Institute advertisement had pictures of
smartly dressed, confident looking cabin crew. This is when Mukhtar knew what
he wanted to do.
Because most Muslims are located in
urban centres, as several data sets show, the community has over time become
the beneficiary of the urban economic growth story of the country. These urban
spaces with significant economic visibility of Muslim communities, as Alam
writes have also then “been a site of communal riots in the modern India.”
For Naved, just because he was in Delhi,
it was easier for others to notice the potential in him. Just physically being
in Delhi opened up his horizons. Since he moved to the Jamia Millia Islamia for
his Class II and XII, where students from different parts of the country were
studying, Naved suddenly realized there was so much more he needed to do. “In
my locality, I was the smartest. At Jamia, I got to know how hard I still
needed to work to move up,” says Naved. In 1996, after completing his
engineering in electronics and communication with 85 %, he got placed in the
DLF Power Ltd as a field engineer. He worked there for four years, and joined
GE in 2000 where he has been working since then. But people like Naved, Bushra
and Mukhtar, who have become the part of the formal economy, are still as Naved
says “exceptions.”
While “salaried state classes”
predominantly constitute what is called a middle class in post colonial
societies, and the same has happened say in the formation of the Hindu middle
class in this country too, the growth of middle class in the Muslims, Anwar
Alam writes, is rooted in its “informal bazaar character”. They are
entrepreneurs but not in the traditional sense of the term. “Just because they
weren’t or aren’t still a part of the formal economy in large numbers, doesn’t
automatically mean they are backward. This is where we need to bring the
cultural preferences of the community in while decoding their choices—whether
it is in the choice of jobs they take or the education they seek,” says
Alam.
Realizing the desire within the
community to stick to entrepreneurship, and the need to scale up and go beyond
the traditional jobs that Muslims have been doing; just like it happened with
the Dalits after liberalization, groups such as Indian Muslim Chamber of
Commerce and Industry and the All India Muslim Business Startup Network have
recently come up. But the Muslim entrepreneurship success story is too early to
tell, even though in small and big ways this sector is also contributing to the
formation of the middle class.
The visible markers
The visible markers of this change in the
country can be seen if noticed carefully. The recent Bollywood movie Gully Boy
for example has Aliya Bhat, a modern looking hijabi middle class woman as the
lead. One of the costliest markets in India—Khan Market in Delhi— recently had
a poster of a hijabi model alongside others, showcasing new shades. There are
advertisements with hijabi women, not shown in traditional oppressed ways, but
in normal roles, quite contrary to Bollywood in the 1990s where Muslims were
shown only as poor, criminals, and without fail wearing their identity on their
sleeves (or in normal settings, reciting couplets of Urdu poetry every time
they appeared on screen).
Sports companies have come out with
options for specific hijabs for workouts, and burkinis for swimming. There are
companies which have halal products (as prescribed by Muslim law). The halal
market per se has risen from just halal meat, to halal cosmetics, to halal
tourism, to halal clothing and Sharia-compliant mutual funds. Despite still
being niche, it is a sign about how the market is realizing the buying
potential of Muslims.
“This class likes to behave
distinctively…they want to be seen as Muslims, but they want to be different
from the common people,” says Hilal Ahmed. This is a reason why this
middle class is more influenced by the culture of the rich and powerful West
Asian countries than, as Ahmed says, the life of the Prophet.
The members of this middle class, Ahmed
adds, have drifted towards carrying the seemingly innocuous markers of their
religion in their everyday lives. But they are also making it clear to not let
it interfere with their professional life. While this is a conscious choice
modern, educated Muslim middle class has made, the media continues to
inadvertently present the hijab wearing and bearded Muslims as an orthodox
bunch of people.
Nothing about Naved and Mukhtar’s
physical appearance points to their belief system. Both say they want to follow
their religion in their personal space, and don’t want the religion to decide
what they do or don’t do in their professional lives. “Kaam kaam hai, religion
religion hai…donon alag hain,” says Mukhtar. In his initial years, Naved
found it harder to assert his identity in decisions like why he chose not to
drink, but as he moved up the socio-economic ladder, the power of navigating
through such barriers became easier. At 30, Bushra wanted to wear a hijab, but
was terrified of the consequences, of being overtly identified as a Muslim.
Soon she realized she could keep living her life normally despite this piece of
fabric on the head. Simply put, it is a part of her faith, and she doesn’t want
to explain her choice to anyone.
In Bengaluru, P C Mustafa, the CEO of
‘iD Fresh Food’, a₹1,000-crore
ready-to-cook packaged food company, stuck to his ground when faced with a
similar dilemma.
When Mustafa had started operations, a
five-star hotel chain had approached his company to supply them with several
packets of “diamond cuts” that could be used as a bar snack. Mustafa
politely declined, saying he wouldn’t be associated with the business of
liquor. Mustafa says he has never faced any discrimination because of his
religious identity per se, and for him halal is not just about halal food, it
is predominantly about halal money, and this is where his religion plays a role
in his professional life. “I don’t consider my money to be halal, till I ensure
nothing about my business cheats the customer or misleads them, and I dutifully
pay my taxes and follow the law of the land,” he says, stressing that
southern Indian Muslims took to the combination of entrepreneurship and
education early on to rise, and have done so successfully.
The M Word
When Mukhtar started out, the memories
of 9/11 were very fresh. When he left Rampur, he says he knew he was leaving a
Muslim majority city and so, things wouldn’t be as they were back home. The
challenges of the city aside, being a Muslim in a field not accustomed to
seeing this community around, was not easy. Take an example of procuring visas.
In a crew of say 50 people, if two were Muslims, it was almost accepted that
the rest would get the visa immediately, and theirs would require “some random
cross-checks.” For processes that take a week for his colleagues, he keeps
aside at least a month. He knows he has to do it, and he has come to terms with
it.
Naved says while subtle references that
could be construed as offensive keep figuring, nothing directly affected his
career trajectory. But he was always called a “different Muslim.”
Before she wore a hijab, even though
Bushra wasn’t ‘visibly’ a Muslim, her name did raise red flags. This one time
when she applied for a job, employers first assumed she was a Sindhi or a
Parsi. When they directly made a phone call to ask about her religion and then
never got back, she knew something was wrong.
There were several times statements like
“you don’t look like a Muslim” or “we hate Muslims, but you are a good
Muslim” were hurled at all our three protagonists.
Conversations this reporter had with
many other Muslims show no matter where you are placed across the class
spectrum, being a Muslim in this country brings with it a certain set of
challenges. Most are so afraid that they either self censor what parts of their
lives they reveal to others, or they constantly keep questioning their own
lived experiences. Those who have emerged and risen now, did so not because
they didn’t face hurdles unique to the community, but despite it.
With the class rise, even though the
lifestyles and incomes change, the discrimination may not necessarily go. If
anything, it just becomes more refined. While they may not get lynched for
uncorroborated accusations of cow slaughter, many like Bushra, still get that
phone call, where the caller asks them to clarify their faith. Despite hard
work and determination, not all Naveds win their fight to secure a better life.
There still are countless Mukhtars who stare at the sky and then give up on
their dreams, because the people around are too hostile to them, for who they
are.
“Shahid ’s life and work kindled a new kind of spirit amongst Muslims, especially young men and women.”
Rajeev Yadav – journalist turned human-rights activists of Rihai Manch
While gunning down Mumbai-based lawyer Shahid Azmi on February 11, 2010, his killers must have thought that this act would strike terror within the Muslim community, especially amongst its youth. That it would deter those who’d dare to follow in the footsteps of their dearly loved lawyer – instilling in them the fear of an untimely and abrupt end. But, Azmi’s death seems to have worked to achieve the opposite, as eight years into his killing, many Muslims (and I am sure non-Muslims as well) are on their way to fight for justice, or to become a Shahid Azmi in their own right.
Meet Asim Khan, who was a TV journalist when Azmi was killed but now practices in the courts of Mumbai. He knew Azmi personally. “Shahid bhai’s murder changed my life” he recalls. “Immediately after his murder, I took admission in a law course and decided to become a lawyer, just like him,” adds Khan, who has been practising for two years now. “I know that it is almost impossible to fill the void that was created by his murder. You can kill a person but not the idea that he believed in and practiced. And that is the message that I want to give.”
Khan is absolutely right in saying that it’s difficult to match Azmi’s calibre and courage, as in a brief career of only seven years, he secured the acquittal of 17 men charged with terrorism. And this does not include the many acquittals that took place after his murder.
Azmi’s was not an ordinary fight, and despite all the hurdles and lack of resources that he faced, he did things for people that would take a lifetime for others to achieve. That’s because he knew what he was doing and why. His answer to his feelings towards the victims of the blasts ably illustrates what he had lived and died for. “I am pained, the heart bleeds when I hear what they have endured,” he had said. “But in spite of all that, it will never be easy for me to see an innocent being sent behind bars or to the gallows only because the crime alleged was a bomb blast.”
From his personal experience, Azmi knew what it meant to be a terror accused. In court rooms and outside, he was often called the ‘terrorist lawyer’ because he was once a terror accused and had to spend five years in jail for a crime that he had never committed. He did not believe in just whining about what he had to go through, but moving beyond that and working and fighting for those who were going through a similar situation.
It is not a surprise that among the guiding principles of his life were the following words by Roy Black, a New York-based civil and criminal defence lawyer “By showing me injustice, he taught me to love justice. By teaching me what pain and humiliation were all about, he awakened my heart to mercy. Through these hardships, I learned hard lessons. Fight against prejudice, battle the oppressors, support the underdog.” This quotation could be seen hanging both at his gate and the desk of his office in Mumbai. Justice was the key word in his life.
Muhammed Riyas, from Kerala’s Kasargod district, remembers Azmi as someone who was “unapologetic and courageous”, though he never met him personally. “I was a boy with an ambition to become a pilot and, therefore, chose to study science after my 10th standard, only to join a flying academy later on.” But then, on the first anniversary of Azmi’s murder, he read an article about his life and work and immediately decided to become a lawyer. “That was the turning point of my life,” he told The Wire, adding that “I decided to take sweet revenge by becoming a lawyer and to be just like Shahid. Through this, I intend to send a strong message to the evil fascist elements that they can’t be a barrier for justice by killing a young lawyer, who stood for justice and upheld constitutional values.” After finishing his law course last year from SDM Law College, Mangalore (Karnataka), Riyas is now practicing in his home district Kasargod.
Azmi was not the first Muslim lawyer to have been killed. In April 2009, a Mangalore-based lawyer, Naushad Kashimji, was killed. Like Azmi, Kashimji (with the help of his mentor and senior advocate Purshottam Poojary) had taken up cases for those whose lawyers were not willing to represent them. After Kashimji’s murder, his wife advocate Nusrath Fatima joined Poojary as one of his six juniors.
It is worth recalling that Azmi and Kashimji worked in an environment when their own legal fraternity was against them. In the wake of terror attacks, several bar associations across the country had passed resolutions that forbid members from representing those accused in terror cases. And those who defied these unconstitutional resolutions were beaten up by their fellow lawyers, as was reported in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra, to name a few states.
According to Rajeev Yadav, a journalist turned human rights activist who works with the Rihai Manch, a forum to campaign for the release of innocent youth accused in terror cases, “Shahid ’s life and work kindled a new kind of spirit amongst Muslims, especially young men and women.”
Speaking to The Wire, Yadav says that he has by now met dozens of youth who wish to become like Azmi and carry on his legacy by doing something similar to what he was doing. He cites the example of a young girl named Firdaus Siddiqui, a madrasa graduate who is currently a law student. Apart from studying law, she is assisting Mohammed Shoaib, who is one of the few lawyers in the state fighting cases of the terror-accused for a couple of years now. He was beaten up in the Lucknow court premises by fellow lawyers in 2007, for defying the diktat of the bar association.
Apart from Siddiqui, there are several young Muslims who are assisting Shoaib in light of the path shown by Azmi. Yadav also remembers meeting a young Muslim woman lawyer in Amroha, a small town in western Uttar Pradesh, who like Azmi, wants to fight for justice. “What is striking about these young men and women is that they don’t want to become just any other lawyer. They all want to be like him (Azmi),” he points out. “That’s because there is no dearth of lawyers in India, even among the Muslim community, but what lacks in them is the courage and competence that Shahid possessed and portrayed.”
Malegaon-born and brought up advocate Shahid Nadeem agrees with Yadav. “Shahid bhai was not just courageous but also competent to fight the cases he decided to take up,” Nadeem, who briefly worked with Azmi and now practices in Mumbai, told The Wire. “While I was studying law in Malegaon, it was my dream to work with him, which I eventually did. But it was for a very brief time, just for about a month and a half month.”
At the Jamiat Ulema Hind Maharashtra Legal Cell, a group engaged in providing legal help to the terror accused, Nadeem plays the same role for the organisation that Azmi previously played for it, and through which Nadeem came in touch with him. He says there are several others in his home town who want to practice law like Azmi.
In short, for those who conspired to see Azmi dead, he might be long dead and gone. But for dozens of Muslim youth across the country, Shahid abhi bhi zinda hai (Shahid is still alive). And if you have an iota of doubt about this, just count the number of programmes being organised in Delhi, Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and West Bengal among others, to pay tribute to his legacy on the eight anniversary of his murder.
UAE – Abu Dhabi has introduced Hindi as the official language last week after Arabic and English for all the interactive forms filed for the legal purposes in court of law.
According to Khaleej Times,
Abu Dhabi Judicial Department made the move aiming at providing Indian labors
easy access to the court of law without the barrier of Arabic and English
languages.
“The
adoption of multilingual interactive forms for claim sheets, grievances and
requests, aims to promote judicial services in line with the plan ‘Tomorrow
2021’, and increase the transparency of litigation procedures,” said Yousef
Saeed Al Abri, undersecretary of the judicial department.
The
decision was carried out by Deputy Prime Minister of Abu Dhabi and Minister of
Presidential Affairs, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan.
Two-thirds
of the total five-million UAE population are foreigners, and Indian community
makes upto 30% of the foreigners.
“This
is in addition to facilitating registration procedures to the public through
simplified and easy forms and raising litigants’ legal awareness via
interactive forms of the statements of claims to ensure access to the legal
materials related to the subject of the dispute,” al-Abri added.
سوشل میڈیا پر راؤنڈ کرتی ایک خبر کے مطابق، سعودی عرب کے مقدس شہر مدینہ میں ایک ٹیکسی ڈرائیور نے چھ سالہ “شیعہ” بچے کو اسکی ماں کے سامنے سر قلم کردیا، یه معلوم ہونے پر کہ ماں اور بچہ شیعه عقیدہ سے تعلق رکھتے ہیں
ایرانی پریس ٹی وی سے لیکر الجزیرہ کے مہدی حسن تک، ہر شخص اس کہانی کو سعودی کے خلاف استمعال کررہے ہے
ہر ذرائع ابلاغ چینل نےاس رپورٹ كو واشنگٹن کی غیر سرکاری تنظیم ” شیعہ حقوق و ضوابط مشاهده” کی بنیاد اور حوالے سے رپورٹ پیش کی ہے ایسا اداره جسے آٹھ سال قبل مصطفی اخوند نے قائم کیا جو جارج میسن یونیورسٹی ورجینیا کا ایک گریجویٹ ہے
تجزیہ
شیعہ حقوق و ضوابط کی اشاعت کا احتیاط سے تجزیہ کرنے سے اندازه ہوتا ہے کہ رپورٹ بہت ڈھیلی اختتام کی حامل ہے
رپورٹ غیر ذمہ داری طور پر کہتی ہے – کارکن نے اطلاع دی کہ اس بات چیت کے کچھ منٹ بعد ایک گاڑی آکر رکی اور مزید یہ کہتی ہے کہ گواہوں نے اطلاع دی کہ بچے كا سر قلم کر دیا تھا
سب سے پہلے یہ، کہ رپورٹ سرکاری نہیں ہے، اور یہ نامعلوم کارکنوں اور گمنام گواہوں کا ذکر کرتی ہے
وہ گواہاں کون ہیں؟ ان گواہوں کا کیا اعتبار ہے؟ ان گواہوں کا کیا پس منظر کیا ہے؟ ہم کیسے ان گواہوں کا کس طرح یقین کر سکتے ہیں؟ اس حقیقت کا کیا ثبوت ہے کہ بچہ اپنی ماں کے ساتھ ٹیکسی میں سفر کررہا تھا؟ ہم کیسے جانتے ہیں کہ بچه شیعہ تها؟ اور بہت سارے سوالات کے جوابات نہیں ہیں
دلچسپ بات یہ ہے کہ شیعہ حقوق کی یه تنظیم واشنگٹن ڈی-سی سے چلائی جاتی ہے – جس جگہ کو خمینی اور اس کے جانشین ملاه عظیم شیطان کہتے ہیں – کس طرح سے تمام برائیوں کا ذریعہ ایک ملک ان کے اپنے پروپیگنڈے کی بنیاد بن گیا؟
کس طرح مدینہ سے 11,737 کلومیٹر دور سے ایک ایسی رپورٹ تیار کی جا سکتی ہے جو غیرمستند اور قابل بهروسه نه ہو؟
دوسری طرف منظر پرموجود افراد پر مبنی سرکاری رپورٹ (واشنگٹن کی نہیں) مکمل طور پر اس کے برعکس داستان فراہم کرتی ہے
سرکاری روایات کے مطابق — 35 سالہ حملہ آور ایک کافی شاپ کے اندر بیٹھا تھا (ٹیکسی ڈرائیونگ نہیں کررها تها) – جب اس نے ایک ریسٹورانٹ کے باہر ایک چھ سالہ بچہ گھومتے دیکھا – قاتل نے ماں کے ہاتھوں سے جلدی سے بچے کو پکڑا، ایک بوتل جسکو اسنے کافی شاپ کے قریب پایا اور اس بچے پر وار کیا – ایک پولیس اہلکار فوری طور پر پہنچ گیا لیکن معصوم بچہ بچا نہیں سکا
شیعہ حقوق و ضوابط کی طرف سے عیار رپورٹ نے جان بوجھ کر قارئین کو گمراه کرنے کی کوشش کی کہ سعودی عرب میں “شیعہ” کمیونٹی محفوظ نہیں ہے
ہم صرف یه جانتے ہیں که وہ بچہ معصوم تھا
اگر بچہ ایک “شیعہ” ہونے کی وجہ سے ہلاک کیا گیا تو پھر سعودی حکام نے اسے – جنت الابقی – مدینہ کے قدیم قبرستان میں دفن کیوں کیا، جہاں 14 صدی قبل رسول الله کے تمام بڑے صحابیوں کو دفن کیا گیا تھا؟
سرکاری طور پر، حملہ آور ایک پاگل اور ایک نفسیاتی تھا، جس نے شیعہ یا سنی فرق کے بغیر کسی بھی سوچ کے بغیر، ایک لمحے میں جرم کا ارتکاب کیا
کیا سعودی شیعہ مظلوم ہیں؟
اگر سعودی حکومت نے شیعہ کمیونٹی کو جبر اور زبردستی سے توڑا هوتا، تو کوئی شیعہ قابل ذکر عہدوں پر نہیں هوتا
ندهمي النصر کی ہی مثال لیں جو نیوم سٹی کے سی ای او ہے اور شاہ عبداللہ یونیورسٹی آف سائنس اور ٹیکنالوجی میں انتظامیہ اور فنانس کے سابق ایگزیکٹو نائب صدر تهے
نتیجہ
جان بوجھ کر “گمنام” پروپیگنڈہ سعودی قیادت کو بدنام کرنے کے لئے سرمایہ کاری، حصص دار اور حصول داروں کو بهگانے اور سعودی عرب کی روشن معیشت کو تباه کرنےاور ترقی پسند سعودی سوسائٹی کو روکنے کی سازش ہے
سعودی سوسائٹی پر انسانی حقوق کے خلاف ورزی کرنے کا الزام لگانا ہے، شام اور یمن میں معصوم خواتین اور بچوں کی قاتلین کی پردہ پوشی کرنا ہے اور ایرانی جرائم اور قتل کو چهپانا هے
If the child was killed by a Saudi national for being a “Shia”, then why Saudi authorities buried him in – Jannatul-Baqi?
A news that is making rounds on social media off late is about a six-year-old “Shia” child – Zakariya al-Jaber – who was beheaded in front of his mother, in the holy city of Madina in Saudi Arabia by a Saudi taxi driver after he came to know that the mother and child belongs to Shia creed.
From the Iranian PressTV to al-Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan, everybody reports this story insinuating to end the “destructive Saudi theological rule”.
Every media channel refers back the report to a Washington-based NGO – “Shia Rights Watch”, which was established eight years ago by Mustafa Akhwand – a graduate from George Mason University Virginia-USA.
Analysis
Careful analysis of the report published by Shia Rights Watch leaves a lot of loose-ends.
The report carelessly says—“Activists report that minutes after this conversation a car stopped..”, and further it says—“Witnesses report the child was beheaded.”
First of all, the report is not official, and it mentions anonymous “activists” and anonymous “witnesses”.
Who are those witnesses? What credibility those witnesses hold? What background those witnesses belong to? How can we believe those witnesses? How do we know if the child was Shia? Where is the factual and official report that the child was traveling in a taxi? And a lot more questions are unanswered.
Interestingly, Shia Rights Watch runs from Washington-DC – the place which is referred to as “the great Satan” by Khomeini and his successor-Mullahs. How come the country – “source of all evils” – has become their own propaganda base?
How can a report that is crafted 11,737 kms away from Madina be authentic and believable?
Official Narrative
On the other hand—official reports based on those present at the scene (not seated in Washington) gives completely contrast narrative.
Official narrative is—the 35-year-old assailant was seated inside a coffee shop (not driving a taxi), when he saw a six-year old child roaming outside a restaurant, the killer quickly grabbed the child from the hands of his mother, broke a bottle he found near the coffee shop and stabbed him. A policeman arrived instantly but couldn’t save the innocent child.
The crafty report by Shia Rights Watch deliberately tried to lure the readers into believing that “Shia” community isn’t safe in Saudi Arabia.
No one knows if the child was Shia or Sunni. No one even concerned to know if he was Shia or Sunni. All we know is—he was an innocent soul.
If the child was killed by a Saudi national for being a “Shia”, then why Saudi authorities buried him in – Jannatul Baqi – the Madina’s ancient graveyard where all the major companions of the Prophet Mohammed were buried 14 centuries ago?
Officially, the assailant was a lunatic and a psychopath, who committed the crime on the spur of the moment, without any thought of Shia or Sunni difference.
Are Saudi Shia suppressed?
Had Saudi Government suppressed Shia community, there would be no Shia notable figures at top-notch positions in the Saudi public services.
Take the example of Nadhmi A. Al-Nasr who is the upcoming CEO of NEOM project and is the former Executive Vice-President for Administration and Finance at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) and had held this office since 2008.
Conclusion
The deliberate and “anonymous” propaganda is to defame the Saudi leadership in order to bar the investors, shareholders, and stakeholders from the booming Saudi Arabia’s economy, and to paint the progressive Saudi Arabian society as human-rights violator and also to brush-off the Iranian crimes and murders of the innocent women and children in Syria and Yemen under the carpet.
Zahack Tanvir is also a regular blogger and vlogger, he also holds diploma in Journalism from London School of Journalism. He often writes on Socio-religious issues.
Hyderabad — Doctors of a hospital in Hyderabad left a pair of foreceps in a woman’s stomach during surgery. It remained in her stomach for three months, though she started complaining about abdominal pain soon after the surgery.
A 33-year-old woman underwent surgery at the city’s Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) three months ago, no sooner she was discharged, she complained about the pain.
When she returned to the hospital for check-up and an X-ray report shocked the negligent doctors that they left a pair of foreceps in her body. The woman was immediately admitted and she was expected to undergo another surgery on Saturday morning.
“The patient is our first priority. At the earliest we are removing the instrument to nurture the patient back to health,” NIMS director K. Manohar told media.
The director promised to conduct a vigilant investigation about the negligence and would take stringent acttion against them.