
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>women reservation &#8211; The Milli Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://millichronicle.com/tag/women-reservation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://millichronicle.com</link>
	<description>Factual Version of a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>India’s Parliament Expansion Bill on Women’s Quotas Suffers Setback</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/04/65434.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amit shah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delimitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lok Sabha vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narendra Modi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rahul gandhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Asia Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women reservation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=65434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi- India’s parliament on Friday failed to pass a government-backed constitutional amendment bill to expand legislative assemblies and accelerate]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>New Delhi-</strong> India’s parliament on Friday failed to pass a government-backed constitutional amendment bill to expand legislative assemblies and accelerate the implementation of a one-third quota for women lawmakers, dealing a rare legislative setback to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p>



<p>The proposed law, which sought to increase the size of the lower house by about 55% to 850 seats ahead of the 2029 general elections, fell short of the required two-thirds majority, with 298 lawmakers voting in favor and 230 against in the Lok Sabha.</p>



<p>The government had linked the expansion to the implementation of women’s reservation, arguing that redrawing constituency boundaries based on updated population data was necessary to ensure equitable representation. Seats in parliament have remained frozen since the 1971 census, despite significant demographic changes.</p>



<p>Opposition parties supported the principle of reserving seats for women but opposed tying it to a nationwide delimitation exercise, alleging the move could be used to alter electoral dynamics in favor of the ruling party. </p>



<p>Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi criticized the bill shortly after the vote, calling it an “unconstitutional trick” that undermined the Constitution under the guise of advancing women’s representation.The government rejected those claims, maintaining that the proposal was essential for modernizing India’s electoral framework. </p>



<p>Interior Minister Amit Shah defended the bill in parliament, warning that blocking it would disappoint women across the country and vowing continued efforts to secure legislative backing for gender quotas.</p>



<p>A law passed in 2023 had already approved reserving one-third of parliamentary seats for women, but its implementation was contingent on the completion of the next census and subsequent constituency redrawing, a process still underway and expected to delay enforcement beyond the next election cycle.</p>



<p>Women currently account for about 14% of members in the lower house and 17% in the upper house, with representation in state legislatures averaging around 10%, according to official data.</p>



<p>The failure of the bill highlights ongoing political divisions over electoral reforms and gender representation, as well as the challenges of securing broad consensus for constitutional amendments in India’s increasingly polarized parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modi Pushes Parliament Expansion, Women’s Quota in Sweeping Electoral Reform Bid</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/04/65369.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census 1971]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constituency delimitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections 2029]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narendra Modi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Democratic Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women reservation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=65369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Delhi— Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday introduced bills to expand parliament and reserve one-third of seats for]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>New Delhi</strong>— Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday introduced bills to expand parliament and reserve one-third of seats for women, in a proposed overhaul of the country’s democratic framework that the opposition criticised as an attempt to reshape electoral outcomes.</p>



<p>Addressing the lower house, Modi said the measures, which include increasing the number of legislators, extending quotas for women to state assemblies and redrawing constituency boundaries, would move India in a “new direction.” He said greater representation of women would bring “new strength, fresh thinking, and a greater sense of sensitivity” to governance.</p>



<p>The government said the proposed boundary changes reflect population shifts since constituencies were last fixed following the 1971 census, arguing the reforms are necessary to align representation with demographic realities.</p>



<p>The proposals come from the ruling National Democratic Alliance, which does not hold the two-thirds majority required to pass constitutional amendments in both houses of parliament, and is seeking support from smaller parties and opposition groups ahead of a vote expected this week.</p>



<p>Opposition parties, including the Congress, said they support the principle of women’s reservation but accused the government of attempting to use constituency redrawing to its political advantage. They called for immediate implementation of the quota without linking it to broader structural changes.</p>



<p>The bills propose increasing the strength of the lower house by about 55% to around 850 members, alongside proportional expansion in state legislatures, by the next general election scheduled for 2029.They also aim to operationalise the one-third reservation for women in both parliament and state assemblies by that timeline. </p>



<p>The quota was approved in legislation passed in 2023 but tied to a future census, delaying its implementation beyond the next election cycle.The proposed changes require ratification by at least half of India’s state legislatures before becoming law.</p>



<p>India currently does not reserve seats for women in parliament, despite women comprising nearly half of the country’s 968 million voters. </p>



<p>Women account for about 14% of members in the lower house and 17% in the upper house, while representation in state legislatures stands at roughly 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
