U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he spoke by video call with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to discuss preparations for Trump’s planned May 14–15 visit to China, which would mark a major diplomatic engagement between the world’s two largest economies.

“Our meeting was both candid and comprehensive, and I stressed that China’s recent provocative extraterritorial regulations have a chilling effect on global supply chains,” Bessent said in a post on X.

His remarks marked one of the Trump administration’s clearest public criticisms of Beijing’s newly introduced supply chain regulations, which U.S. businesses and analysts say could make it harder for foreign firms to diversify sourcing of critical minerals and industrial goods away from China.

The rules, introduced in recent weeks, create a legal framework that could penalize foreign companies shifting supply chains out of China, particularly in sectors involving rare earths and strategic manufacturing inputs.Analysts have described the move as a significant escalation that could complicate Washington’s broader effort to reduce dependence on Chinese-controlled supply chains.

Bessent did not outline a direct U.S. response to the measures but said he looked forward to “a productive summit” between Trump and Xi.Chinese state broadcaster CCTV said He Lifeng had “candid, in-depth and constructive exchanges” with Bessent and Greer and that Beijing had raised “serious concerns” over recent U.S. trade-restrictive measures targeting China.

According to CCTV, both sides agreed to enhance consensus, manage differences and strengthen cooperation, signaling that preparations for the summit remain on track despite persistent tensions.The officials last met in person in Paris in March, where they discussed possible Chinese purchases of U.S. agricultural goods and the creation of new joint mechanisms to manage trade and investment disputes.

Chinese officials also used those talks to object to new tariff investigations launched by Trump’s administration after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his earlier global tariff framework in February.Trump had delayed his Beijing trip because of the U.S.-Israeli war involving Iran, but officials on both sides now appear focused on preserving stability ahead of the summit.

In a separate diplomatic exchange on Thursday, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio that Taiwan remained the “biggest point of risk” in bilateral ties, underscoring broader geopolitical tensions beyond trade.

The two countries reached a fragile trade truce last October during talks in Busan, South Korea, after months of retaliatory tariffs triggered by Trump’s “Liberation Day” duties and China’s restrictions on exports of rare earths and other critical minerals.

As the summit approaches, U.S. lawmakers and industry groups are also pressing the administration not to grant China greater access to the American automotive sector.Ten U.S. steel industry groups wrote to Bessent, Greer, Rubio and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday, warning against allowing Chinese investment into the U.S. auto market.

The groups said such access could weaken domestic manufacturing competitiveness and create national security risks linked to data collection and strategic industrial dependence.At the same time, both governments have continued to build leverage ahead of the leaders’ meeting, with China advancing its new supply chain rules and Washington tightening restrictions on tool shipments to one of China’s major semiconductor manufacturers.

Chinese state media said both sides had expressed willingness to promote the “healthy, stable and sustainable development” of bilateral economic and trade relations.

Faisal Ibrahim Alshammeri, a Saudi analyst, has painted a bleak picture of China’s economic landscape, highlighting a rapid financial hemorrhage, difficulties in manipulating the exchange rate, and a failure to inject sufficient liquidity into the markets. All of these factors contribute to a looming internal breakdown in the country’s economic system, exacerbated by an ongoing real estate collapse and a declining investment climate.

The situation is particularly ironic given that those who once championed globalization—the very entities that moved industries and jobs to China in pursuit of lower costs and higher profits—are now among its victims. Multinational corporations that heavily relied on China’s manufacturing and consumer base are witnessing significant financial losses, realizing that their gamble on an opaque and unpredictable economy has not paid off. The once-promising business environment in China is now being seen as a high-risk venture.

Amid these growing economic troubles, Beijing has responded to Washington by imposing reciprocal tariffs. However, this move appears to be counterproductive. China’s exports to the United States are relatively limited in scope, consisting mainly of food and some consumer goods. By shutting itself off from the world’s largest consumer market, China is only deepening its economic troubles. Domestically, it lacks a consumer base with enough purchasing power and confidence to offset these losses, further accelerating its downturn.

This crisis marks not just a temporary economic slump but potentially the collapse of the traditional globalization model that has dominated world trade since the end of World War II. This model, which has overwhelmingly benefited China, is now being reassessed as the United States and its allies shift towards a new economic framework. The diminishing ability of Beijing to effectively manage its internal crises has fast-tracked the decline of the old global financial system, signaling the rise of a new era in international trade and economic policy.

The upcoming transition will be fraught with challenges, but it is expected to be decisive. By the end of this year, the United States is predicted to enter a phase of robust economic recovery, not only bouncing back from setbacks but also leading a restructuring of global economic power. This shift will likely establish an alternative model of globalization—one that prioritizes balance, stability, national sovereignty, and strategic economic interests over unfettered free trade.

In a further escalation of trade tensions, former U.S. President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to China, threatening to impose an additional 50% tariff on Chinese imports if Beijing does not reverse its recently introduced retaliatory tariffs of 34% by April 8, 2025. Reports indicate that these new U.S. tariffs will be enforced on April 9 if China fails to comply. Trump has also suggested that, should China refuse to yield, the United States may entirely abandon ongoing trade negotiations with Beijing and instead shift its focus to countries more willing to engage in favorable trade deals.

As the world watches these developments unfold, it is becoming increasingly evident that China is navigating treacherous economic waters. Whether Beijing can devise a strategy to reverse its downward trajectory remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the global economic landscape is on the cusp of a major transformation, with far-reaching implications for international trade, investment, and economic stability.