
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>state security &#8211; The Milli Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://millichronicle.com/tag/state-security/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://millichronicle.com</link>
	<description>Factual Version of a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Britain Jails Two Men in Landmark China Espionage Case Targeting Hong Kong Dissidents</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/06/69170.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Yuen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Embassy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism Policing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong Dissidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Wai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Democracy Activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Border Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK China relations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=69170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[London-Two British-Chinese nationals, including a former immigration officer, were sentenced to prison on Thursday after being convicted of spying on]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>London-</strong>Two British-Chinese nationals, including a former immigration officer, were sentenced to prison on Thursday after being convicted of spying on pro-democracy activists in Britain on behalf of Hong Kong authorities and, ultimately, China, in what is believed to be the first successful prosecution of its kind in the United Kingdom.</p>



<p>Chung Biu “Bill” Yuen, 66, and Chi Leung “Peter” Wai, 41, were found guilty last month of assisting a foreign intelligence service by conducting surveillance on prominent dissidents between December 2023 and May 2024.</p>



<p>Wai, who worked for the UK Border Force, was additionally convicted of abusing his position to access confidential government databases in search of information relating to surveillance targets.</p>



<p>The pair, both dual British and Chinese citizens, denied the allegations throughout the proceedings. Chinese authorities rejected the case, with the Chinese Embassy in London describing it as a politically motivated misuse of legal processes.</p>



<p>At London’s Old Bailey court, Judge Bobbie Cheema-Grubb sentenced Yuen to eight years in prison and Wai to 10 years, emphasizing the broader threat posed by modern foreign intelligence operations.</p>



<p>“The United Kingdom now faces persistent, adaptive, and often clandestine interference by foreign state actors and those acting on their behalf,” the judge said during sentencing.</p>



<p>She noted that contemporary espionage activities increasingly extend beyond the theft of military or state secrets and can include surveillance, intimidation and information gathering directed at political dissidents and individuals who have sought refuge under British law.</p>



<p>According to prosecutors, the defendants monitored prominent pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong who had relocated to Britain following political crackdowns in the Chinese territory.</p>



<p>The case forms part of growing concerns among British security agencies about foreign interference activities targeting diaspora communities, political activists and critics of overseas governments living in the United Kingdom.</p>



<p>Commander Helen Flanagan, head of counterterrorism policing in London, described the conduct of the two men as deeply troubling and said their activities were directed against individuals exercising democratic freedoms.</p>



<p>“The activity of Wai and Yuen was truly chilling,” Flanagan said.</p>



<p>“They were spying and targeting individuals in the UK who were pro-democracy campaigners and were simply protesting against the Hong Kong and Chinese government and authorities.”</p>



<p>Relations between London and Beijing have become increasingly strained in recent years over issues including Hong Kong, national security concerns, allegations of foreign interference and espionage-related investigations.</p>



<p>British authorities have repeatedly warned that foreign intelligence operations are becoming more sophisticated, often focusing on surveillance, influence campaigns and efforts to monitor critics living abroad.</p>



<p>The convictions mark a significant milestone in the United Kingdom’s efforts to counter foreign-state interference and reinforce legal protections for political dissidents residing in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria Arrests Former Assad Intelligence General Over Human Rights Violations</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/06/68818.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East and North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assad Regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damascus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daraa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daraya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hajar al-Aswad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qais Hassan al-Abd al-Rajab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transitional justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Crimes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=68818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Damascus- Syria’s Interior Ministry said on Friday that it has arrested a senior former intelligence official from the ousted Assad-era]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Damascus-</strong> Syria’s Interior Ministry said on Friday that it has arrested a senior former intelligence official from the ousted Assad-era security apparatus on allegations of human rights violations in areas around the capital and southern Syria.</p>



<p>The ministry identified the detainee as Qais Hassan al-Abd al-Rajab, a former brigadier general who previously served as deputy director of the General Intelligence Directorate, also known as State Security.</p>



<p>According to a statement published on the Interior Ministry’s Telegram channel, al-Abd al-Rajab was detained by the Counterterrorism Directorate after what authorities described as extensive tracking operations.</p>



<p>He is accused of involvement in violations against residents of the Damascus countryside, including areas such as Hajar al-Aswad, Daraya and Moadamiyat al-Sham, as well as parts of Daraa province, the ministry said.</p>



<p>Officials said the suspect had attempted to evade arrest prior to his detention, and that investigations are ongoing ahead of legal proceedings and referral to the judiciary.</p>



<p>Interior Minister Anas Khattab said in earlier remarks that security forces continue to pursue individuals accused of crimes committed under the former Assad administration as part of wider accountability efforts.</p>



<p>He added that intelligence and internal security units were conducting surveillance and enforcement operations aimed at bringing suspects before the courts.</p>



<p>The arrest comes amid ongoing efforts by Syrian authorities to investigate alleged abuses committed during the Assad era, including broader transitional justice measures and attempts to document violations against civilians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netanyahu Confidant Faces Espionage Charges in Gaza Leak Probe</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/05/67883.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East and North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ari Rosenfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bild newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Feldstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostage negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israeli prosecutors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Likud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qatargate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saudi arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tel Aviv court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tzachi Braverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yonatan Urich]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=67883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jerusalem-Israeli prosecutors said on Thursday they would indict a senior adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges including transmitting]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Jerusalem-</strong>Israeli prosecutors said on Thursday they would indict a senior adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges including transmitting classified information with intent to harm state security, in a case tied to the leak of sensitive Gaza war documents to German newspaper Bild.</p>



<p><br>Israel’s attorney general’s office said an indictment against Netanyahu aide Yonatan Urich would be filed in a Tel Aviv court following a hearing process with his legal team.</p>



<p><br>According to a letter sent to Urich’s lawyers and reviewed by AFP, prosecutors intend to charge him with transmitting classified information, possession and transfer of classified materials, and destruction of evidence.</p>



<p><br>The investigation centers on the alleged leak of a classified document linked to Israel’s war in Gaza in 2024, in violation of Israeli military censorship regulations. </p>



<p>The leaked material was reportedly used to reinforce Netanyahu’s public position that Hamas was not genuinely pursuing a ceasefire agreement and that hostages seized during the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks could only be freed through sustained military pressure.</p>



<p><br>Israeli authorities have already indicted two former Netanyahu advisers, Eli Feldstein and Ari Rosenfeld, in connection with the same case.</p>



<p><br>The legal pressure surrounding Netanyahu’s inner circle has intensified in recent months amid multiple investigations linked to the government’s conduct during the Gaza conflict and allegations involving foreign lobbying.</p>



<p><br>Urich is also among the figures implicated in the so-called “Qatargate” affair, in which several close Netanyahu associates are suspected of working to promote the interests of Qatar within Israel while Doha played a central mediation role in hostage and ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas.</p>



<p><br>Qatar has hosted senior Hamas officials for years and has frequently acted as an intermediary in indirect negotiations involving Israel, Hamas and international mediators during the Gaza war.</p>



<p><br>Israeli media reports have alleged that a consulting firm headed by Urich, a former spokesperson for Netanyahu’s Likud party, was hired to improve Qatar’s international image ahead of the 2022 FIFA World Cup.<br>Separately, Israeli prosecutors said earlier this week they were considering charges against Netanyahu’s former chief of staff Tzachi Braverman for alleged fraud, breach of trust and obstruction of justice related to the classified document leak investigation.</p>



<p><br>The case adds to mounting political and legal scrutiny surrounding Netanyahu’s administration as Israel continues military operations in Gaza and faces growing domestic divisions over the handling of the war and hostage negotiations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hong Kong Mandates Password Disclosure in Security Probes, Tightens Enforcement Powers</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/03/63896.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests 2019]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=63896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hong Kong— Authorities in Hong Kong will require individuals to provide phone and computer passwords in national security investigations or]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Hong Kong</strong>— Authorities in Hong Kong will require individuals to provide phone and computer passwords in national security investigations or face up to one year in prison and a fine of HK$100,000 ($12,780), under new rules that took effect on Monday.</p>



<p>The measures expand enforcement powers under the Hong Kong national security law, introduced by Beijing in 2020 following large-scale pro-democracy protests in the financial hub. </p>



<p>The latest amendments mandate that individuals hand over “any password or other decryption method” needed for police to access electronic devices believed to contain evidence.</p>



<p>The rules apply not only to those under investigation for national security offences but also to individuals who own, possess, or are authorized to access the relevant devices, as well as anyone with knowledge of the required passwords or decryption tools.</p>



<p> Failure to comply constitutes a criminal offence, marking a shift from previous practice, where refusal to unlock devices was not treated as obstruction.The amendments were formulated under the direction of Chief Executive John Lee in coordination with the National Security Commission.</p>



<p>A government spokesperson said the measures aim to ensure that activities endangering national security can be “effectively prevented, suppressed and punished,” while safeguarding the lawful rights and interests of individuals and organizations.</p>



<p>Hong Kong has further strengthened its legal framework with an additional security law enacted in 2024, complementing the broader legislation imposed after the 2019 unrest.</p>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
