
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sculpture &#8211; The Milli Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://millichronicle.com/tag/sculpture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://millichronicle.com</link>
	<description>Factual Version of a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 04:21:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Banksy Unveils New London Sculpture of Flag-Bearing Figure in Westminster</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/05/66205.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 04:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banksy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centre Point Tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crimean War Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florence Nightingale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homelessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Gunningham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Courts of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterloo Place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westminster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winston Churchill]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=66205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The sculpture depicts a man marching forward while carrying a large flag that completely obscures his face, turning anonymity itself]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>&#8220;The sculpture depicts a man marching forward while carrying a large flag that completely obscures his face, turning anonymity itself into the central image of the work.&#8221;</em></p>



<p><strong>London</strong> — Street artist Banksy has confirmed that a newly installed sculpture in central London, depicting a man marching forward with his face entirely covered by a large flag, is his latest work, marking another rare public intervention by the elusive artist in the British capital.</p>



<p>The statue appeared overnight in Waterloo Place, Westminster, an area lined with official monuments and historic memorials near St James’s and close to government buildings and ceremonial landmarks. The work was first noticed on Wednesday, with Banksy’s signature scrawled at the base of the plinth, prompting immediate speculation over its authenticity.</p>



<p>Banksy confirmed authorship on Thursday through a post on Instagram, where he shared a video showing the sculpture being transported through London late at night before being installed at the site. The footage included images of nearby national symbols and landmarks, including the statue of former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, British flags, a Beefeater guard and a traditional black cab, suggesting a deliberate visual dialogue between the new work and established representations of British identity and state symbolism.</p>



<p>The sculpture itself shows a male figure stepping forward from a plinth while holding a large billowing flag that covers his entire face. The concealment of the subject’s identity appears central to the composition, contrasting with the traditional commemorative statues surrounding it, many of which celebrate named military, royal and political figures.In the video posted by Banksy, a passerby is asked for his opinion of the statue and replies, “No, I don’t like it,” a brief exchange that adds to the artist’s longstanding use of public reaction as part of the presentation of his work.</p>



<p>The statue has been placed in Waterloo Place, near monuments to Edward VII, Florence Nightingale and the Crimean War Memorial, an area known for its formal statuary and ceremonial significance. Its location places it within one of London’s most symbolically charged public spaces, where imperial memory and national commemoration dominate the landscape.</p>



<p>Banksy, whose identity remains officially unconfirmed, is best known internationally for politically charged graffiti works that appear without warning in public spaces and often address war, migration, inequality, surveillance and state power. While murals and stencil works remain his most recognisable form, he has previously installed sculptural works in London.One of his best-known earlier sculptures, “The Drinker,” was installed on Shaftesbury Avenue in London’s West End in 2004.</p>



<p> The work was a satirical reinterpretation of Auguste Rodin’s “The Thinker,” showing the figure slumped with a traffic cone placed on its head. It was removed shortly after installation. In 2019, Sotheby’s withdrew the sculpture from auction following concerns over its ownership and removal history.Banksy’s most recent confirmed London work before the Waterloo Place statue was a mural unveiled in December showing two children lying on their backs and looking upward.</p>



<p> The mural appeared near Centre Point Tower and was widely interpreted as referencing homelessness, with the tower long associated with Britain’s housing inequality and homelessness debates. The children in the mural appeared to be pointing toward the building, linking the artwork to wider concerns over urban displacement and housing insecurity.</p>



<p>Another work appeared in September outside the Royal Courts of Justice, where Banksy created a mural showing a judge using a gavel to strike a protester lying defenseless on the ground. The image emerged during a period of heightened arrests linked to demonstrations involving signs associated with the proscribed activist group Palestine Action. The mural was later removed. </p>



<p>Court authorities said they were legally required to preserve the listed character of the building and could not retain the artwork permanently.The new Westminster sculpture arrives as public interest in Banksy’s identity has again intensified following a recent Reuters investigation that reported the artist was likely Robin Gunningham, a Bristol-born figure who has long been suspected of being Banksy. </p>



<p>Reuters said its findings aligned with a similar investigation first published by the Mail on Sunday in 2008.Gunningham has denied being Banksy. According to Reuters, Banksy’s lawyer, Mark Stephens, said the artist “does not accept that many of the details contained within your inquiry are correct” and stressed that anonymity remained essential because Banksy had been “subjected to fixated, threatening and inappropriate behaviour.”The preservation of anonymity has long been central to both the artist’s legal protection and public mythology. </p>



<p>Banksy’s work frequently appears without official permission and often challenges institutions of power, making anonymity both a practical necessity and a core part of the artistic identity itself.The new sculpture’s use of a face hidden behind a national flag may also reinforce that theme, placing concealment, identity and public symbolism at the centre of the work. </p>



<p>Unlike conventional monuments that celebrate recognisable individuals, the Waterloo Place installation removes personal identity altogether, replacing portraiture with obscurity.Its proximity to Churchill’s statue is particularly notable. Churchill remains one of Britain’s most politically contested historical figures, and monuments associated with imperial history and nationalism have been the subject of repeated public debate in recent years.</p>



<p> By placing a faceless flag-bearer within this landscape, the work appears to invite reflection on patriotism, public memory and the politics of visibility.No official statement has been issued by Westminster authorities regarding the installation or whether it will remain permanently in place. As with many Banksy works, questions over ownership, preservation and removal are likely to follow.</p>



<p>Public artworks by Banksy often trigger disputes between local councils, private property owners and cultural institutions over conservation and commercial value. Several murals have been removed for protection or sale, while others have been destroyed or painted over.</p>



<p>For now, the Waterloo Place statue remains in place, attracting visitors and photographers in one of London’s busiest ceremonial districts. Its sudden appearance, followed by Banksy’s confirmation, has once again turned a section of the capital into an open-air site of interpretation, where the meaning of the work is shaped as much by public debate as by the sculpture itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Galleries Unite to Spotlight Women Artists in Landmark New Exhibition</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/04/66126.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art Exhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Hepworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornwall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Female Artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gillian Ayres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imogen Bright Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making Her Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museum Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Painting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penlee House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penzance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Galleries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textile Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracey Emin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Galleries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Art]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=66126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“There is still so much more to say about women in art history — and even more to rediscover.” A]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>“There is still so much more to say about women in art history — and even more to rediscover.”</em></p>



<p>A major new collaborative exhibition across regional galleries in Britain is bringing long-overdue attention to women artists whose contributions have often been overlooked in traditional museum collections dominated by male names.</p>



<p>Titled Making Her Mark, the project brings together works by some of the country’s most celebrated female artists, including Tracey Emin, Barbara Hepworth, Laura Knight, Elizabeth Forbes, and Gillian Ayres.</p>



<p>The initiative is being shared between Penlee House Gallery &amp; Museum, galleries in Worcester, and Kirkcaldy, creating a rare regional partnership focused entirely on correcting historical imbalance in artistic representation.</p>



<p>For many smaller galleries across the UK, collections have traditionally reflected centuries of inequality in the art world, where male painters and sculptors were more likely to receive commissions, institutional support, and lasting recognition. </p>



<p>As a result, many museum walls still tell a largely male story.At Penlee House Gallery &amp; Museum in Penzance, that reality is especially visible. Known for its strong representation of the Newlyn School and Cornish art history, much of its permanent collection features male artists whose work shaped the region’s artistic identity.</p>



<p>But from this week, visitors entering the gallery will be greeted by something strikingly different.Displayed prominently above a marble fireplace is a bold and emotionally charged work by Tracey Emin, challenging viewers with the raw personal intensity that has made her one of Britain’s most discussed contemporary artists. </p>



<p>In a nearby room hangs a vibrant work by Barbara Hepworth, whose abstract forms and modernist vision helped define 20th-century British art.Together, the works create a conversation across generations  from early pioneers to contemporary voices  highlighting not only artistic excellence but also the barriers women faced in gaining recognition.</p>



<p>The exhibition also features pieces by Laura Knight, one of the first women elected to full membership of the Royal Academy, and Elizabeth Forbes, often considered one of the leading figures of the Newlyn School despite being historically overshadowed by her male contemporaries.</p>



<p>Textile artist Imogen Bright Moon also contributes to the exhibition, with contemporary tapestry work that adds another dimension to the project’s exploration of female creativity and artistic identity.Curators say the goal is not simply to celebrate famous names, but to encourage visitors to reconsider how art history itself has been written.</p>



<p>For decades, women artists were frequently treated as exceptions rather than central figures. Their work was often categorized as secondary, domestic, or decorative rather than serious fine art. Even highly accomplished artists found themselves remembered mainly in relation to male partners, schools, or movements.Projects like Making Her Mark seek to shift that narrative.</p>



<p>Rather than presenting women artists as a special category separate from the mainstream, the exhibition argues that they have always been central to British art  they were simply not always given equal visibility.This rebalancing is especially significant in regional galleries, where local collections shape public understanding of cultural history.</p>



<p> By placing women’s work at the centre of these spaces, the exhibition challenges long-standing assumptions about whose stories deserve prominence.It also reflects a wider movement across museums and cultural institutions to reassess collections, acquisitions, and curatorial practices through a more inclusive lens.</p>



<p>Across Britain and beyond, galleries are increasingly revisiting archives, reattributing forgotten works, and acquiring art by women and other historically underrepresented groups. The process is not only about fairness but also about revealing a fuller and more accurate picture of artistic history.</p>



<p>At Penlee House, the presence of a contemporary Tracey Emin alongside earlier artists such as Barbara Hepworth and Elizabeth Forbes shows how the conversation spans centuries rather than belonging to a single era.It also reminds visitors that progress remains unfinished.</p>



<p>Despite major advances, women artists still face unequal representation in exhibitions, collections, auction prices, and critical attention. Recognition has improved, but parity remains distant.That is why curators describe Making Her Mark not as a conclusion, but as part of a continuing discussion.</p>



<p>The title itself suggests both artistic creation and historical correction women making their mark on canvas, sculpture, and textiles, while also finally making their mark in the institutions that preserve cultural memory.</p>



<p>For visitors walking through the galleries, the exhibition offers something more than visual pleasure. It invites reflection on absence  whose work was missing, whose voices were muted, and how different the walls of museums might look if history had been written differently.</p>



<p>By bringing these artists together, Making Her Mark offers a small but powerful act of restoration.It suggests that the question is no longer whether women belong at the centre of British art history, but why it took so long for the walls to show it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
