“The UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” Araghchi said while attending the BRICS gathering hosted by India.“It also became clear that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us,” he added, without publicly providing evidence to support the allegation.

The remarks underscored widening fractures within BRICS as the bloc attempts to project unity amid the war involving Iran and intensifying geopolitical instability across the Middle East.

Araghchi also referenced reports circulated by Israeli media concerning an alleged secret meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in the Emirates.Abu Dhabi has denied that any such meeting took place.

According to Iran’s Mehr news agency, Araghchi said he had initially avoided explicitly naming the UAE “for the sake of unity” during discussions among BRICS member states.“When the attacks started, they didn’t even issue a condemnation,” Araghchi said in response to remarks from the Emirati delegation.

The accusations come as BRICS foreign ministers meet to discuss the economic and geopolitical fallout from the Iran conflict, including disruptions to Gulf shipping lanes, energy markets and rising divisions among member countries.The UAE and Iran both joined BRICS during the bloc’s expansion phase in 2024, despite longstanding regional rivalries and competing strategic interests across the Gulf.

India, which currently chairs BRICS, is seeking to maintain consensus among members ahead of a leaders’ summit later this year, though disagreements over the Middle East conflict have complicated efforts to produce unified positions on global security issues.

“The UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” Araghchi said while attending the BRICS gathering hosted by India.“It also became clear that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us,” he added, without publicly providing evidence to support the allegation.

The remarks underscored widening fractures within BRICS as the bloc attempts to project unity amid the war involving Iran and intensifying geopolitical instability across the Middle East.

Araghchi also referenced reports circulated by Israeli media concerning an alleged secret meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in the Emirates.

Abu Dhabi has denied that any such meeting took place.According to Iran’s Mehr news agency, Araghchi said he had initially avoided explicitly naming the UAE “for the sake of unity” during discussions among BRICS member states.

“When the attacks started, they didn’t even issue a condemnation,” Araghchi said in response to remarks from the Emirati delegation.The accusations come as BRICS foreign ministers meet to discuss the economic and geopolitical fallout from the Iran conflict, including disruptions to Gulf shipping lanes, energy markets and rising divisions among member countries.

The UAE and Iran both joined BRICS during the bloc’s expansion phase in 2024, despite longstanding regional rivalries and competing strategic interests across the Gulf.

India, which currently chairs BRICS, is seeking to maintain consensus among members ahead of a leaders’ summit later this year, though disagreements over the Middle East conflict have complicated efforts to produce unified positions on global security issues.

Speaking at the Tel Aviv Conference in Tel Aviv, Huckabee said Israel had assisted the UAE’s air defenses amid heightened regional tensions and ongoing uncertainty surrounding the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel.

“Israel just sent them Iron Dome batteries and personnel to help operate them,” Huckabee said, praising the UAE as the first Gulf state to normalize relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords.
The UAE did not immediately comment on Huckabee’s remarks.

The disclosure underscores increasingly open military coordination between Israel and Gulf Arab states that share concerns over Iran’s regional influence and missile capabilities.

Regional tensions remain elevated despite the current ceasefire, with concerns continuing over security in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping route long viewed as vulnerable to disruption during confrontations involving Tehran.

Huckabee also expressed optimism that additional Middle Eastern countries could join the Abraham Accords, which established formal diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab states, including Bahrain.

The accords, brokered in 2020, reshaped regional alignments by fostering economic, diplomatic and security ties between Israel and Arab governments concerned about Iran’s expanding influence.

However, broader normalization efforts across the Arab world have been complicated by Israel’s military operations following the Hamas-led attacks in 2023 and the continuing conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria.

Huckabee said Gulf governments increasingly viewed Iran, rather than Israel, as the more immediate regional security threat.

According to state news agency WAM, the leaders described the attacks as violations of UAE sovereignty and threats to national stability, expressing solidarity with the country amid heightened regional tensions linked to the Iran conflict.

Among those who spoke with Sheikh Mohamed were Jordan’s King Abdullah II, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Masrour Barzani, prime minister of Iraq’s Kurdistan Region.The leaders affirmed their backing for the UAE’s efforts to safeguard its security and ensure the protection of civilians, underscoring a coordinated regional response to the escalation.

The calls come as geopolitical tensions continue to rise across the Middle East, with recent incidents involving Iranian-linked actions drawing strong reactions from regional governments.

According to Iran’s ISNA news agency, Araghchi was due to convey “Iran’s positions and views on the framework of any understanding to completely end the war” during fresh meetings with Pakistani officials.

The minister had visited Islamabad a day earlier, meeting Army Chief Asim Munir, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar before flying to Muscat, where he met Haitham bin Tariq as regional diplomacy intensified.Other Iranian envoys returned to Tehran for consultations and to obtain instructions related to ending the conflict, ISNA reported.

Before those talks, the White House had said Trump’s peace envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner were preparing to travel to Pakistan for further indirect negotiations.Trump later scrapped the trip, telling Fox News there was no reason to continue “sitting around talking about nothing,” while criticizing Tehran’s negotiating position.

“They gave us a paper that should have been better and interestingly immediately when I canceled it, within 10 minutes, we got a new paper that was much better,” Trump said, without giving details.Asked whether canceling the trip meant a return to open conflict, Trump said: “No, it doesn’t mean that. We haven’t thought about it yet.”Araghchi described his initial Pakistan visit as “very fruitful” but questioned Washington’s seriousness about diplomacy.“

Have yet to see if the U.S. is truly serious about diplomacy,” he said.Pressure for a diplomatic breakthrough has intensified as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively blocked, disrupting one of the world’s most important oil and gas shipping routes and driving energy prices sharply higher.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said it had no intention of lifting the blockade.“Controlling the Strait of Hormuz and maintaining the shadow of its deterrent effects over America and the White House’s supporters in the region is the definitive strategy of Islamic Iran,” the Guards said on Telegram.

The United States has responded by tightening restrictions on Iranian ports and increasing maritime enforcement actions against vessels linked to Tehran’s energy exports.Iran’s military accused Washington of “blockading, banditry and piracy” and warned that continued pressure would trigger a response.

Regional tensions also escalated on the Lebanese front, where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered strikes against Hezbollah targets after accusing the group of violating a ceasefire recently extended for three weeks.

Lebanese state media reported Israeli strikes in several southern districts, while Lebanon’s health ministry said attacks in Nabatieh and Bint Jbeil killed six people.Israel’s military said it had killed multiple Hezbollah operatives, including fighters allegedly transporting weapons.

Although Trump had earlier expressed optimism about peace after meetings with Israeli and Lebanese envoys, Hezbollah parliamentary bloc leader Mohammed Raad urged Lebanon to withdraw from negotiations, warning that any agreement without broader consensus would be politically unsustainable.

Araghchi is expected to travel to Moscow after completing the Islamabad consultations.

The meeting brought together Badr Abdelatty, Ishaq Dar and Hakan Fidan, who reviewed the evolving security situation and emphasized support for efforts aimed at achieving a permanent ceasefire, according to an official statement.

Participants welcomed Pakistan’s mediation role in ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, expressing hope that diplomatic progress would help de-escalate tensions and limit broader economic and security fallout.Recent developments have raised expectations of a breakthrough.

A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, alongside Iran’s decision to reopen the Strait of Hormuz during a temporary truce, have eased pressure on global energy markets and reduced immediate risks of escalation.The conflict, which began on Feb. 28 with U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, had disrupted shipping routes and triggered volatility in global oil supplies.

The reopening of the strait long a key U.S. demand—combined with a ceasefire extension linked to Lebanon, has aligned core conditions in ongoing talks.Donald Trump said on Friday that negotiations with Tehran were nearing completion, describing a deal as “very close” and indicating that most major issues had already been resolved.

Previous talks led by J.D. Vance in Pakistan did not produce an agreement, but further negotiations are expected as diplomatic channels remain active.Trump also credited regional actors including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar for supporting stabilization efforts, while praising Shehbaz Sharif and Asim Munir for their role in facilitating dialogue.

The Antalya meeting reflects intensified regional coordination as governments seek to consolidate recent gains and move toward a broader settlement that could end hostilities and restore stability across the Middle East.

Ishaq Dar said after meetings with regional counterparts that Islamabad was ready to facilitate “meaningful talks” toward a “comprehensive and lasting settlement,” including potential U.S.-Iran negotiations. It was not immediately clear whether either side had agreed to participate.

Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf accused Washington of signalling openness to diplomacy while preparing for military escalation, saying Tehran would not accept demands amounting to surrender.U.S. officials have not publicly confirmed any agreement to attend talks.

Reports cited by U.S. media indicate the Pentagon is assessing options that could include ground operations, though no final decision has been announced by Donald Trump.

Discussions among regional powers, including Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt, have focused on reopening the Strait of Hormuz, where Iranian restrictions on shipping since late February have disrupted global oil flows.

The conflict has driven oil prices sharply higher and intensified risks to maritime trade, with additional threats emerging near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait following attacks by Iran-aligned Houthi forces.

Israel said it carried out more than 140 air strikes across Iran over a 24-hour period, targeting missile infrastructure and other sites. Iranian media reported damage to Mehrabad airport in Tehran and a petrochemical facility in Tabriz.

Missile and drone exchanges have extended beyond Iran, with strikes reported in southern Israel near Beersheba and damage to industrial facilities in Gulf states including the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran’s heavy water production plant at Khondab had suffered severe damage and was no longer operational, though it contained no declared nuclear material.

The U.S. military has begun deploying thousands of Marines to the region, with the first contingent arriving aboard an amphibious assault ship, according to official statements.

Washington last week proposed a ceasefire framework that included reopening Hormuz and limiting Iran’s nuclear programme, but Tehran rejected the plan.

The conflict has triggered domestic political divisions in the United States, with protests reported in multiple cities and lawmakers offering sharply differing views on the war’s trajectory.

Marcos told reporters he had consulted counterparts across the 10-member bloc on whether to postpone the gathering, but leaders agreed that coordination was more critical given the external shocks affecting fuel supply chains, food prices and migrant workers.

“The consensus that we came to is that it is precisely now that we must coordinate our efforts,” Marcos said.

The streamlined agenda will concentrate on immediate economic pressures facing Southeast Asia, including volatility in energy markets and rising food costs, which governments in the region are monitoring closely as geopolitical tensions persist.

ASEAN economies are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in global fuel prices due to their reliance on imports, while supply chain disruptions have added strain to domestic inflation dynamics in several member states.

Marcos said discussions would also address the welfare of migrant workers, a key issue for ASEAN countries that rely heavily on overseas employment. Regional governments have been assessing the impact of instability in the Middle East, a major destination for Southeast Asian labour.

The Philippine government has already flagged concerns about overseas workers in affected areas, reflecting broader anxieties across ASEAN about potential displacement and income disruptions.

The decision to proceed with the summit underscores ASEAN’s preference for continuity in regional dialogue despite global uncertainty. Marcos indicated that postponement was considered but ultimately rejected in favour of maintaining diplomatic engagement.

The summit is expected to retain core leadership interactions while scaling back ceremonial and extended policy sessions, reflecting what Marcos described as a need for efficiency under current conditions.

Public statements and media reports suggest a more measured phase, as officials emphasize legal review processes and stability-focused approaches.

Developments gained attention after remarks from the United States highlighted expectations that severe measures linked to recent demonstrations may not proceed.

These remarks were followed by Iranian media clarifying that certain individuals detained during protests are not facing capital punishment under existing legal provisions.

Observers note that such clarifications have contributed to calmer market sentiment, with commodity prices adjusting as immediate fears of escalation softened.

This reaction reflects how closely global markets track geopolitical signals and statements related to regional stability.

Inside Iran, people contacted by international media indicated that street demonstrations appeared to have slowed in recent days.

Limited internet access has made independent verification difficult, but anecdotal accounts point to reduced public gatherings compared to earlier periods.

Iranian officials have also spoken about addressing underlying economic concerns that contributed to public dissatisfaction

These include efforts to improve purchasing power, manage currency pressures, and strengthen oversight mechanisms within the economy.

Analysts say that a focus on economic management and administrative reform can play a role in restoring confidence among citizens.

Such measures are often viewed as practical steps to stabilize daily life and reduce social strain over time.

Diplomatic messaging from multiple sides has emphasized observation and dialogue rather than immediate action.

This tone has been interpreted as an attempt to allow internal processes to unfold without additional external pressure.

Regional actors have also expressed interest in avoiding further instability, underlining the importance of restraint and communication.

Maintaining calm in a strategically sensitive region is widely seen as beneficial for broader economic and security interests.

Experts on Middle Eastern affairs suggest that while challenges remain, the situation does not indicate imminent systemic disruption.

Instead, they describe a complex environment where governance, public expectations, and international scrutiny intersect.

Market responses following recent statements indicate how political developments can influence investor sentiment.

Oil and precious metal prices showed adjustments consistent with reduced short-term risk perceptions.

International observers continue to monitor developments closely, particularly legal proceedings connected to recent events.

Transparency and clarity around such processes are often cited as key factors in sustaining stability.

The broader situation highlights the interconnected nature of domestic policy, public response, and international reaction.

Small shifts in tone or policy communication can have outsized effects across borders and markets.

For many analysts, the current phase represents a pause marked by cautious observation rather than decisive resolution.

They note that continued engagement and economic focus may shape the direction of events in the coming weeks.

Overall, the latest signals suggest an emphasis on de-escalation and administrative review.

Such an approach is viewed as supportive of steadier conditions both domestically and regionally.

Her name surfaced prominently after U.S. President Donald Trump stated that Rodríguez had assumed the presidency, a claim that has added new layers of uncertainty to an already fluid situation.

Official confirmation from Venezuelan authorities has remained unclear, fueling speculation about leadership arrangements and transitional authority.

Despite the ambiguity, Rodríguez’s long-standing role within the country’s power structure makes her a pivotal figure in any immediate political scenario.

Born in Caracas in 1969, Delcy Rodríguez comes from a deeply political family background rooted in leftist activism.

Her father, Jorge Antonio Rodríguez, was a prominent revolutionary figure whose legacy shaped her ideological outlook and early political identity.

Trained as a lawyer at the Central University of Venezuela, Rodríguez entered public service with a strong grounding in constitutional and political affairs.

Her rapid rise through government ranks reflected both loyalty to the ruling movement and an ability to navigate complex institutional environments.

Rodríguez first gained national prominence as communications and information minister, a role that placed her at the center of state messaging during turbulent years.

She later served as foreign minister, becoming a familiar face on the international stage during a period of growing diplomatic isolation.

Her tenure was marked by confrontational diplomacy and firm defense of Venezuela’s sovereignty against external pressure.

She played a visible role in regional disputes, including tense engagements with South American trade blocs.

In 2017, Rodríguez assumed leadership of the Constituent Assembly, an institution that significantly expanded executive authority.

The move solidified her reputation as a trusted enforcer of the government’s political strategy.

Her appointment as vice president in 2018 further strengthened her influence across multiple branches of the state.

In addition to the vice presidency, Rodríguez took on the powerful roles of finance and oil minister, placing her at the heart of economic decision-making.

This concentration of authority allowed her to shape policy responses during one of Venezuela’s most severe economic crises.

Unlike some ideological hardliners, Rodríguez backed pragmatic measures aimed at stabilizing inflation and restoring limited confidence in the private sector.

Her approach reflected a blend of political loyalty and economic realism amid shrinking resources and sanctions pressure.

Internationally, Rodríguez has been a vocal critic of U.S. sanctions, framing them as economic warfare against the Venezuelan population.

She has consistently rejected allegations of authoritarianism, arguing that Venezuela’s challenges stem from foreign interference.

Her public image combines political toughness with personal flair, often noted for her high-profile fashion choices alongside forceful rhetoric.

These contrasting traits have made her both a symbol of continuity and a subject of intense scrutiny.

Recent reports about her possible location abroad have further complicated the narrative around leadership succession.

Calls for proof of life regarding Maduro underscored the uncertainty surrounding the transition process.

As Venezuela stands at a crossroads, Rodríguez’s experience positions her as a key actor during any interim phase.

Supporters see her as a stabilizing figure capable of maintaining institutional control during disruption.

Critics question whether her leadership would represent meaningful change or an extension of existing power structures.

The coming weeks will determine whether Rodríguez plays a temporary role or becomes a defining figure in Venezuela’s next chapter.

Her actions could influence negotiations, governance reform, and international engagement during a critical period.

For now, Delcy Rodríguez remains central to Venezuela’s unfolding political story, embodying both continuity and uncertainty at a historic moment.