The meeting, held at the Great Hall of the People, comes as Beijing increases military and political pressure on Taiwan, which it claims as its territory. Cheng is visiting China on what she described as a “peace mission” aimed at reducing tensions.

Xi reiterated Beijing’s long-standing “One China” position, stating that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one nation and calling Taiwan independence the “chief culprit” undermining regional stability.

He urged collaboration between China’s Communist Party and Taiwan’s opposition Kuomintang to promote national reunification.Cheng said she hoped to foster mutually beneficial relations and expand exchanges, adding that dialogue could help prevent the Taiwan Strait from becoming a flashpoint for international conflict.

Taiwan’s government rejected Beijing’s stance, with top policymaker Chiu Chui-cheng saying only Taiwan’s people could determine the island’s future and calling on China to engage with its democratically elected leadership.

Beijing has refused to hold talks with President Lai Ching-te, labeling him a separatist. The current divide traces back to 1949, when rival governments split after China’s civil war, with each side maintaining separate political systems.

Cheng, chair of the opposition Kuomintang (KMT), is expected to travel from April 7 to 12, visiting cities including Beijing, Shanghai and Jiangsu, according to party officials.

Outreach contrasts with ruling party stanceThe visit highlights a divergence between the KMT and Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party, led by President Lai Ching-te, whom Beijing has refused to engage and labels a “separatist.”

China maintains that Taiwan is part of its territory and has increased political and military pressure on the island, while continuing to engage with opposition figures seen as more open to dialogue.

Cheng has said improving ties with Beijing does not equate to weakening relations with Washington, stressing the need for stability across the Taiwan Strait.

Timing ahead of Trump visitThe trip comes weeks before Trump is expected to travel to China for talks with Xi, placing Taiwan at the center of broader U.S.-China strategic discussions.

Separately, a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers is also planning visits to Taiwan and the region ahead of the summit, reflecting Washington’s continued engagement despite tensions with Beijing.

The phone call covered evolving political and security situations across the region, with both sides emphasising the importance of dialogue, de-escalation, and cooperation to maintain regional stability. Officials highlighted the longstanding strategic partnership between Saudi Arabia and the United States as a foundation for addressing shared challenges.

Prince Faisal also conducted separate calls with Oman’s Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr bin Hamad Al-Busaidi and Türkiye’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. These discussions underscored Saudi Arabia’s active diplomatic outreach and its role as a key regional interlocutor amid shifting geopolitical dynamics.

According to official statements, the conversations focused on developments affecting regional security, diplomatic initiatives aimed at reducing tensions, and coordination on political solutions to ongoing conflicts. The talks come at a time when the Middle East faces multiple overlapping crises requiring sustained diplomatic engagement.

Saudi Arabia has increasingly positioned itself as a hub for regional dialogue, hosting talks and maintaining open communication channels with regional and international partners. Analysts note that Riyadh’s engagement with Washington, Ankara, and Muscat reflects a broader strategy of balanced diplomacy.

The exchange with the US secretary of state reaffirmed mutual commitments to consultation on issues such as regional security architecture, freedom of navigation, and responses to humanitarian challenges. Both sides reportedly agreed on the need for continued coordination as situations evolve.

Prince Faisal’s conversation with the Omani foreign minister highlighted the close ties between the two Gulf neighbours and their shared interest in promoting stability through diplomacy. Oman has long played a mediating role in regional disputes, making coordination with Muscat strategically significant.

Meanwhile, discussions with Türkiye’s foreign minister focused on broader regional developments, including conflict resolution efforts and political transitions in parts of the Middle East. Saudi-Turkish relations have seen renewed engagement in recent years, particularly on regional security and economic cooperation.

Diplomatic observers say the flurry of calls indicates intensified regional diplomacy as governments seek to manage risks stemming from ongoing conflicts, energy security concerns, and shifting alliances. Saudi Arabia’s outreach signals an effort to align positions and avoid escalation.

The Saudi foreign minister’s engagements also reflect the kingdom’s emphasis on multilateral dialogue rather than unilateral action. By engaging with diverse partners, Riyadh aims to contribute to consensus-building and coordinated responses.

Regional developments discussed are believed to include political negotiations, security conditions, and humanitarian considerations, though officials did not disclose specific details. Such discretion is common in high-level diplomatic communications.

Saudi Arabia has consistently stated that political solutions and dialogue remain the most effective means of resolving regional disputes. The latest talks reinforce this stance and demonstrate continued diplomatic momentum.

As global attention remains focused on the Middle East, sustained communication between key regional and international actors is seen as essential to prevent further instability. Saudi Arabia’s diplomatic activity positions it as a central player in shaping regional responses.

Officials are expected to maintain close contact in the coming weeks as developments continue to unfold. The discussions highlight the importance of proactive diplomacy in navigating a complex and rapidly changing regional landscape.

The announcement reflects continued attention by European institutions on developments linked to public order and civil conditions.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that the EU remains closely engaged with events unfolding in Iran.

She highlighted the importance of monitoring conditions while maintaining alignment with international principles.

EU officials have emphasized that their approach is guided by long-standing commitments to human dignity and legal norms.

Any future steps are expected to follow established EU procedures and collective decision-making processes.

Brussels has repeatedly underlined the need for restraint and dialogue in situations involving public unrest.

European leaders have also stressed that stability and lawful conduct are essential for long-term regional balance.

The European Commission plays a central role in proposing policy measures that are later reviewed by member states.

Such proposals typically undergo extensive consultation before being finalized and adopted.

In recent years, the EU has used a range of diplomatic and economic tools to express its positions on global issues.

These tools are often framed within a broader strategy aimed at encouraging cooperation and compliance with international standards.

Officials say the current focus reflects ongoing assessments rather than abrupt policy shifts.

The EU continues to engage with international partners to ensure consistency and coordination.

Observers note that European actions are often incremental and designed to send clear policy signals.

This approach allows room for dialogue while reinforcing shared values among member countries.

The situation in Iran has remained on the EU agenda through various institutional forums.

Regular discussions help shape responses that balance principle, diplomacy, and regional considerations.

European leaders have reiterated that their goal is not isolation but constructive engagement where possible.

They maintain that long-term solutions depend on dialogue, transparency, and respect for established norms.

As developments continue, EU institutions are expected to keep member states informed.

Any proposals will be discussed collectively to ensure unity and clarity of purpose.

Overall, the EU’s latest remarks signal continued attentiveness rather than immediate change.

Future steps will likely depend on evolving circumstances and ongoing consultations.

Despite ongoing exchanges between the two militaries in disputed areas, Thai officials underscored that diplomatic channels remain open and active, with Prime Minister Anutin set to speak with U.S. President Donald Trump to provide a direct update on the situation and explore avenues for de-escalation.

The call is expected to center on reaffirming Thailand’s commitment to dialogue while ensuring the safety and sovereignty of its territory. The Thai leadership has stressed that the priority remains to end hostilities and create space for peaceful negotiation, supported by regional allies and long-standing international relationships.

Cambodia has likewise expressed readiness for communication, with officials stating that they remain open to discussions at any time. The growing international attention has encouraged both sides to consider less confrontational approaches, despite tensions and accusations exchanged over the past week.

The United States has conveyed strong interest in helping restore stability, noting the importance of safeguarding Southeast Asia’s long-term peace and economic resilience. Trump has expressed confidence that diplomatic outreach can guide both countries back toward a cessation of hostilities and renewed cooperation.

Thai officials highlighted the importance of conveying accurate information to global partners, reassuring allies that Thailand remains committed to maintaining order while seeking solutions that prevent further humanitarian impact. This engagement is seen as essential for protecting regional development and trade routes shared by both nations.

Despite military activity in several areas, senior Thai leaders reiterated that any strategic action taken has been grounded in the responsibility to safeguard lives and maintain national security. At the same time, they emphasized their openness to efforts that reduce confrontation and encourage dialogue.

Thai diplomats have been actively speaking with international counterparts, reinforcing that Thailand supports peaceful conflict resolution grounded in sincerity, accountability, and respect for borders. These diplomatic exchanges have helped spotlight the shared regional interest in minimizing disruptions that could affect economic recovery and cross-border cooperation.

In Cambodia, government representatives noted that their leadership remains receptive to communication, with officials reaffirming willingness to participate in discussions that lower tensions and protect civilians on both sides. Their statements have added to optimism that renewed dialogue is possible with sufficient international support.

The situation has displaced thousands of families, but relief teams in border provinces are working to ensure access to food, shelter, and medical care. Local communities expressed hope that the increasing diplomatic momentum will soon bring stability and enable them to return home safely.

Thailand’s political landscape has also shifted, with the prime minister dissolving parliament ahead of an upcoming election. Though this adds uncertainty, analysts believe democratic processes can strengthen national unity during a difficult moment and reinforce public confidence in peaceful governance.

As both nations face the challenges of conflict, economic pressure, and shifting political dynamics, officials from Thailand, Cambodia, and the United States continue to highlight the importance of restraint, communication, and constructive partnership. With active diplomacy underway, there is cautious optimism that tensions can ease and that both countries will return to cooperation and shared prosperity.

The exchange, held amid rising international scrutiny, reflected a broader effort to keep communication channels open and promote peaceful outcomes during times of geopolitical tension.

Belarus also deepened its diplomatic outreach, with President Alexander Lukashenko holding his second meeting in under three weeks with Venezuelan ambassador Jesus Rafael Salazar Velazquez.

The discussions signaled a willingness to strengthen ties and coordinate approaches to regional issues, reflecting a long-standing partnership built on cooperation and mutual respect.

Reports indicate that Maduro conveyed readiness to step aside under conditions of full legal amnesty for himself and his family.

The request underscores the complex legal and political considerations shaping Venezuela’s future and the international community’s role in facilitating lawful transitions of power.

Lukashenko emphasized in earlier meetings that Maduro would always be welcome in Belarus, encouraging continued dialogue on matters requiring mutual attention.

The diplomatic tone remained positive, signaling an openness to peaceful solutions and an emphasis on sovereignty, stability, and legal protections.

Putin’s call reiterated Russia’s view that Venezuela’s national interests and sovereignty must be safeguarded in the face of growing external pressure.

His remarks aligned with Moscow’s longstanding position that constructive diplomacy should guide international engagement rather than confrontation.

Meanwhile, the United States has continued to increase pressure on Maduro’s administration, maintaining its stance on the legitimacy of Venezuela’s leadership.

Washington has voiced its position firmly, but global observers continue to highlight the importance of lawful, measured, and diplomatic strategies over heightened tensions.

The situation comes as the U.S. undertakes a military build-up in the Caribbean, a move that has prompted calls from several quarters for restraint and respect for international law.

Analysts note that avoiding escalation is essential to preserving stability across the Western Hemisphere.

Russian officials expressed hope that diplomatic channels would remain active to prevent any slide toward conflict.

The emphasis was on responsible statecraft and the shared international interest in preventing unpredictable consequences.

Lukashenko’s outreach to both the Venezuelan government and the U.S. administration demonstrates a nuanced diplomatic balancing act.

Belarus has sought to strengthen its global ties, improve political dialogue, and create pathways for constructive negotiations that benefit regional and international stability.

Recent U.S. moves to ease certain sanctions on Belarus and appoint a special envoy for dialogue indicate a shift toward engagement over isolation.

This trend highlights the growing recognition that diplomatic solutions grounded in legal frameworks and mutual understanding can help pave the way for lasting peace.

The evolving dynamic between Russia, Belarus, Venezuela, and the United States underscores the importance of diplomacy as a cornerstone of global politics.

At a moment of heightened geopolitical focus, the priority shared by many nations remains the pursuit of lawful, peaceful, and cooperative outcomes that support regional security and international stability.

Despite recent clashes, both nations are emphasizing dialogue, coordination, and respect for regional mechanisms to prevent further escalation.

Officials in Bangkok remain focused on ensuring that trade relations and political negotiations stay on a steady track.

The government stresses that economic tools should not overshadow diplomatic channels, especially when addressing deep-rooted historical disputes.

This positive positioning has created space for new conversations that prioritize regional peace.

Leaders from both countries recognize that cooperation, rather than confrontation, can help safeguard border communities and protect shared economic interests.

The renewed attention from the international community has also encouraged a more balanced diplomatic environment.

Policymakers in Southeast Asia view the situation as a chance to reinforce frameworks that support conflict prevention and sustainable cross-border development.

Bangkok’s response highlights its commitment to maintaining stability despite political pressures at home.

With snap elections approaching, the Thai administration aims to demonstrate leadership that favors peace, measured diplomacy, and responsible governance.

Thailand’s foreign ministry continues to underline that border negotiations must proceed independently from trade discussions.

This approach promotes clarity and avoids mixing security issues with broader economic dialogues.

Both countries share more than a century of historical ties, and officials acknowledge that dialogue remains the most reliable path forward.

Efforts to revisit existing frameworks, strengthen communication between military units, and encourage joint monitoring have gained momentum.

The recent developments have opened opportunities for humanitarian coordination as well.

Communities near the border, including those temporarily displaced, stand to benefit from enhanced cooperation and faster emergency response mechanisms.

Regional analysts note that Thailand’s insistence on diplomatic resolution sets a constructive example in Southeast Asia.

It reinforces the idea that even in tense moments, negotiation and regional collaboration can pave the way toward sustainable peace.

Meanwhile, Cambodia has signaled openness to renewed discussions, further softening the tone of earlier exchanges.

This environment of cautious optimism offers a foundation for confidence-building measures and technical talks on boundary demarcation.

Economic observers point out that stable relations between Thailand and Cambodia will support trade flows and investment during a challenging global economic climate.

Both governments understand that investors value peace, predictability, and respect for diplomatic processes.

Political leaders in Thailand are also using this moment to emphasize national unity.

By promoting a message centered on peace, resilience, and regional cooperation, they aim to reassure citizens ahead of upcoming political transitions.

International stakeholders continue to encourage peaceful engagement, highlighting the importance of diplomatic tools over economic pressure.

This broader support has strengthened Bangkok’s position and helped maintain constructive communication channels.

As discussions move forward, both nations are expected to explore updated mechanisms for monitoring the border.

Strengthening these systems could reduce misunderstandings and provide early warning signals during periods of tension.

The current situation, while challenging, reflects a renewed momentum toward peaceful resolution rather than prolonged conflict.

Thailand and Cambodia’s willingness to keep diplomatic doors open marks a significant step toward stability in mainland Southeast Asia.

With continued dialogue and regional cooperation, the two neighbors have an opportunity to turn a moment of tension into a foundation for long-term peace.

The focus on diplomacy, humanitarian needs, and economic stability suggests a future built on partnership rather than rivalry.

The meeting reflected the Kingdom’s ongoing commitment to strengthening regional partnerships and expanding cooperation across multiple fields.

The discussions highlighted the deep historical ties between Saudi Arabia and Eritrea, with both leaders emphasizing their shared vision for stability, development, and enhanced collaboration.

The meeting underscored the Kingdom’s role in fostering constructive dialogue with neighboring nations and supporting regional progress.

During the talks, the two sides reviewed various areas of cooperation, including economic development, security coordination, cultural exchange, and opportunities for joint investment.

The dialogue reflected mutual interest in broadening the strategic partnership to benefit both nations and support long-term regional stability.

The leaders also explored ways to strengthen political and diplomatic relations in line with evolving regional priorities.

Their discussions demonstrated a unified commitment to addressing shared challenges through cooperation, trust, and diplomatic engagement.

In addition to bilateral matters, the meeting touched on broader issues of common interest that affect the Red Sea region and the African continent.

This included enhancing mechanisms that promote peace, maritime security, and economic integration.

The visit of President Afwerki to Riyadh reflects the growing importance of Saudi-Eritrean relations and the Kingdom’s ongoing efforts to build bridges across regions.

The meeting reaffirmed the spirit of partnership that both countries seek to nurture as they progress toward greater development and cooperation.

Later in the day, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman held a separate meeting with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, marking another significant diplomatic engagement.

Their conversation focused on key regional and global developments, including efforts to promote peace and stability across different parts of the world.

The Crown Prince and the UN chief reviewed international challenges and discussed ways to enhance global cooperation. Both emphasized the importance of supporting international institutions and strengthening multilateral efforts that contribute to global security.

The meeting highlighted Saudi Arabia’s active role in international diplomacy, particularly in promoting humanitarian initiatives, supporting conflict resolution, and contributing to global development.

The Kingdom’s cooperation with the United Nations continues to expand through shared goals and collaborative programs.

Discussions with the UN Secretary-General also touched on joint efforts to address humanitarian needs, support sustainable development, and enhance dialogue between nations.

The talks reflected the Kingdom’s vision of contributing to a more stable and prosperous global community.

Both meetings showcased the Kingdom’s strategic engagement with global and regional leaders.

By hosting discussions that address international issues, Saudi Arabia continues to strengthen its position as a pivotal diplomatic actor and a trusted partner in global affairs.

The presence of both President Afwerki and Secretary-General Guterres in Riyadh illustrates the Kingdom’s growing diplomatic influence and its commitment to fostering cooperation at all levels.

These meetings reaffirm the Kingdom’s role in shaping conversations that promote peace, unity, and international dialogue.

Through such engagements, the Kingdom continues to work toward a future defined by collaboration, development, and global stability.

The leadership’s dedication to building strong relationships ensures that Saudi Arabia remains at the forefront of international diplomacy.

The day’s diplomatic activities sent a clear message of the Kingdom’s readiness to engage constructively with all partners, explore new opportunities, and support initiatives that contribute to regional and global progress.

These efforts reflect a long-term vision of fostering a secure and interconnected world.

The remarks come at a moment when global attention remains focused on pathways toward a sustainable settlement that prevents further escalation and strengthens regional stability.

President Vladimir Putin, speaking ahead of his upcoming visit to New Delhi, said that Moscow expects a resolution that ensures its strategic goals in Donetsk and Luhansk.

At the same time, officials emphasized that discussions with multiple nations, including the United States and partners in Asia, are aimed at pursuing diplomatic channels that keep negotiations open.

Russian authorities maintain that the long conflict in eastern Ukraine began years before the full-scale escalation, shaped by tensions between Ukrainian forces and local groups.

Moscow continues to argue that its interests in Donbas are tied to security concerns and cultural ties, although Kyiv rejects any proposal involving territorial concessions.

Despite stark differences between the two sides, recent engagements with U.S. representatives have drawn international attention.

Putin received envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Moscow, calling the meeting productive and describing the dialogue as grounded in proposals earlier discussed with U.S. leadership.

Russian state media highlighted that Moscow has accepted some ideas put forward in ongoing diplomatic exchanges, framing the talks as an important step toward identifying areas of mutual understanding.

While details remain undisclosed, the acknowledgement of progress has been seen by analysts as a positive gesture toward keeping diplomatic avenues active.

Russia currently holds significant portions of Ukrainian territory, including full administrative control of Luhansk and most of Donetsk.

Ukrainian officials nonetheless insist that all regions recognized internationally as Ukrainian must remain under Kyiv’s sovereignty, expressing opposition to any form of territorial compromise.

Even with positions firmly held, observers note that the recent diplomatic activity suggests both sides acknowledge the importance of international mediation.

In particular, the involvement of global actors has helped sustain pressure for dialogue rather than prolonged military escalation.

International organizations continue to advocate for a negotiated outcome rooted in international law, regional security guarantees and humanitarian considerations.

The global community has consistently emphasized the importance of protecting civilians and maintaining the integrity of diplomatic platforms that encourage peaceful resolutions.

For Russia, the Donbas region holds political, historical and strategic significance, making it central to its stated goals.

However, the recent diplomatic tone suggests Moscow remains aware that long-term peace and regional stability will require the involvement of multiple nations and structured discussions.

Ukraine, meanwhile, continues to receive broad international support for its sovereignty as it defends the remaining parts of Donetsk still under its control.

Kyiv also maintains active diplomatic communication with partners to build consensus on a settlement that reinforces its territorial integrity.

As both sides navigate a complex geopolitical environment, global attention remains focused on preventing further military escalation.

Diplomats hope that sustained discussions, even amid disagreements, may eventually help bridge gaps and lead toward a roadmap addressing both security concerns and humanitarian priorities.

With heightened interest from global powers, including major states in Europe, Asia and North America, the coming months will likely see intensified diplomatic exchanges.

The hope among mediators is that continued dialogue will help reduce tensions and create meaningful steps toward a durable, internationally accepted agreement.

Following extended discussions in Moscow between Putin and the US President’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, joined by senior adviser Jared Kushner, Russian officials stated that the dialogue was constructive. A Kremlin aide acknowledged that compromises had not yet been finalized, but emphasized that the talks represented an important beginning in aligning perspectives.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reiterated that it would be inaccurate to say the proposals were rejected in full. Instead, he described the talks as a direct exchange of views, with some ideas accepted and others deemed unsuitable. This, he noted, was part of a normal negotiation process in which both sides work through disagreements to identify shared ground.

Peskov highlighted Russia’s appreciation for the diplomatic efforts being made by the US administration. He added that while the Kremlin values transparency, ongoing discussions would not be accompanied by detailed public updates, as discretion was essential to maintaining a productive environment for negotiations.

According to Peskov, expert-level teams from both sides are now working through the details of the proposals. These discussions are expected to produce tangible results that will pave the way for potential future engagements at the highest political level. The structured approach indicates a deliberate attempt to build a durable foundation for peace efforts.

The developments come amid a series of overlapping proposals from different international actors. A previous set of 28 US draft peace points circulated in November, prompting concerns among Ukrainian and European officials who felt they were overly accommodating to Moscow’s demands. European states later drafted their own counter-proposal, while new discussions in Geneva led the US and Ukraine to assemble what they described as an updated and refined peace framework.

Putin expressed unease with certain European suggestions, stating that some of the ideas were completely unacceptable to Russia. However, the ongoing talks illustrate that Moscow remains engaged in the broader diplomatic process, even while disagreements persist. The Russian president’s foreign policy aide, Yuri Ushakov, said the discussions with Witkoff covered a series of documents, including previous sets of proposals and new additions.

The outlines of the peace frameworks under discussion have not been disclosed publicly. Nonetheless, the continuity of dialogue and the acknowledgment that some US ideas have been accepted signal a potentially meaningful shift in tone. Both sides appear committed to repeated meetings if necessary, reflecting an understanding of the complexity of the issues at stake.

The diplomatic momentum suggests a shared desire to identify avenues for de-escalation. As expert teams continue to review, revise and refine proposals, the possibility of creating a balanced and practical peace framework becomes increasingly viable. While challenges remain, the reaffirmation of dialogue underscores a broader recognition that sustained communication is essential for progress.

In a global climate where conflicts carry far-reaching consequences, this renewed engagement between the US and Russia may help stabilize the international environment. With both parties expressing readiness for continued negotiations, the path toward a workable agreement remains open, setting the stage for future diplomatic breakthroughs.