Dissanayake said Washington had sought permission for the aircraft to land at Mattala Rajapaksa International Airport between March 4 and March 8.

The planes were reportedly carrying anti-ship missiles and were to arrive from a U.S. base in Djibouti.“We turned down the request to maintain Sri Lanka’s neutrality,” Dissanayake said, adding that the decision was met with approval from lawmakers.

The president said Sri Lanka also rejected a separate request from Iran for three naval vessels to make a goodwill visit between March 9 and March 13 after participating in an Indian naval exercise.

“We were considering this request. Had we said ‘yes’ to Iran, we would have had to say ‘yes’ to the U.S. as well,” he said, indicating Colombo’s effort to avoid alignment with either side.

The decisions come amid heightened tensions following military action by the United States and Israel against Iran in late February, which has disrupted energy flows and unsettled global markets.

Sri Lanka’s navy was also involved in rescue operations linked to the conflict. Authorities said 32 Iranian crew members were rescued from the vessel IRIS Dena after it was torpedoed on March 4, in an incident that reportedly caused significant casualties.

A second vessel, IRIS Booshehr, and its crew were assisted after encountering technical difficulties near Sri Lankan waters.

The developments coincide with a visit by Sergio Gor, who met Dissanayake on Thursday as part of ongoing diplomatic engagement.

Sri Lanka, still recovering from a financial crisis that peaked in 2022, is facing renewed economic pressure due to energy supply disruptions linked to the regional conflict, underscoring the challenges of maintaining a neutral stance.

The development follows detailed discussions in parliament, where lawmakers have emphasized the need to modernize export rules without undermining Switzerland’s role as a responsible and stable actor in international security.

The lower house recently approved the proposed legal adjustments, opening the way for more flexibility in how export decisions are made.

The upper house is expected to vote on the measure shortly, and political observers believe it is likely to move forward given the broad recognition of the pressures facing the domestic industry.

Under current rules, Switzerland blocks weapons exports to countries engaged in internal or external conflicts or accused of serious human rights violations.

These restrictions have long shaped the nation’s cautious approach, ensuring that Swiss-made equipment is not used to escalate regional tensions or contribute to humanitarian risks.

Even under the revised framework, direct exports to active conflict zones, including Ukraine, will remain prohibited.

Officials have repeatedly underscored that this safeguard will not change, reaffirming Switzerland’s commitment to preventing the misuse of its manufactured systems.

The proposed adjustments shift greater discretion to the Federal Council, allowing it to evaluate specific cases where easing restrictions may reduce the risk of indirect or unintended supply to conflict-linked regions.

This approach is designed to provide flexibility during exceptional circumstances while keeping ethical and diplomatic considerations at the center of decision-making.

The amendment originally proposed earlier this year includes mechanisms that allow temporary exceptions when strategic or economic conditions demand it.

Swiss leaders have described this as a pragmatic middle path that strengthens oversight while providing industry partners with clearer expectations.

Supporters of the reform argue that Swiss manufacturers have been placed at a competitive disadvantage due to the country’s highly restrictive rules.

They note that several European partners allow more tailored export decisions, enabling their industries to maintain long-term contracts and international collaborations.

Swiss companies warn that without regulatory adjustments, production chains, research capabilities, and high-skilled jobs could come under increasing pressure.

The new law aims to address these concerns without diluting Switzerland’s moral and political obligations.

Balancing neutrality with industry stability has been a recurring challenge for the country.

By refining the export framework instead of abandoning restrictions altogether, policymakers say they are protecting both ethical standards and economic vitality.

The process reflects Switzerland’s broader strategy of adapting to evolving geopolitical realities while maintaining credibility in global diplomacy.

The proposal has also sparked discussions among civil society groups, some of which may push for a referendum if the reform is officially approved.

Public debate remains focused on ensuring that any change continues to uphold Switzerland’s humanitarian values and international commitments.

If adopted, the revised law would take effect in a phased manner, allowing regulators time to implement oversight procedures, strengthen transparency measures, and update compliance checks for manufacturers.

The government has said it plans to keep monitoring outcomes closely to ensure the system remains aligned with Switzerland’s neutral identity.

As Switzerland moves forward, the emphasis on responsibility, controlled flexibility, and stable economic policy has positioned the reform as a step intended to support national interests without compromising long-held principles.