The move follows a diplomatic clash between Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who questioned Washington’s strategy in the two-month-old conflict with Iran and said this week that he saw no clear U.S. exit plan. Merz also said Iran was humiliating the United States in negotiations to end the war.

A senior Pentagon official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the administration viewed the German leader’s remarks as “inappropriate and unhelpful,” adding that Trump was “rightly reacting to these counterproductive remarks.”Germany hosts about 35,000 active-duty U.S. military personnel, more than any other country in Europe, making it a central hub for American operations on the continent and in the Middle East.

The Pentagon said the drawdown would reduce U.S. troop levels in Europe to roughly their pre-2022 level, before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine prompted the administration of former President Joe Biden to reinforce NATO’s eastern flank.

The official said the decision also reflected the Trump administration’s broader push for Europe to take primary responsibility for its own defense, a long-standing demand by the president toward NATO allies he believes rely too heavily on U.S. military protection.Reuters reported last week that an internal Pentagon email outlined options to penalize NATO allies seen as failing to support U.S. operations during the Iran conflict.

Those options reportedly included suspending Spain from NATO and reviewing Washington’s stance on Britain’s claim to the Falkland Islands.Trump has repeatedly criticized European allies for not deploying naval support to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route for global oil supplies that has faced severe disruption during the conflict.

The near closure of the waterway has contributed to market volatility and major supply concerns across global energy markets.German officials, however, said Berlin had provided significant logistical support, including authorizing the use of U.S. military bases and overflight permissions for operations linked to the conflict.

Germany also hosts the major U.S. military hospital at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, a critical medical hub for American forces overseas.As part of the drawdown, a brigade combat team currently stationed in Germany will be withdrawn, and a long-range fires battalion planned for deployment later this year under the Biden administration will no longer be sent, the Pentagon official said.

Trump had sought a similar troop reduction during the final months of his first term, but the plan was never implemented after he lost the 2020 election and Biden reversed the proposal.Germany’s military officials told Reuters they were surprised by Trump’s latest announcement, saying meetings at the Pentagon earlier this week had been constructive.

Trump this week sharply criticized German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, calling him “totally ineffective” after Merz questioned the U.S. approach to the Iran conflict and said Washington lacked a clear exit strategy. On Friday, the Pentagon announced plans to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany and confirmed higher tariffs on European Union cars and trucks, a move expected to hit Germany’s export-heavy economy particularly hard.

The administration has also turned its focus toward Britain, with Trump describing Prime Minister Keir Starmer as “not Winston Churchill” and threatening major tariffs on British imports, further widening tensions with traditional U.S. allies.European diplomats described the atmosphere as increasingly unpredictable.

“It’s unnerving to say the least,” one diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We are braced for anything, anytime.”The friction has been aggravated by Washington’s push for stronger allied backing in the Iran war, particularly around securing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping route disrupted by the conflict.

Trump has accused European governments of failing to provide adequate military support for U.S. operations that he argues protect broader Western interests.Reuters reported last week that the Pentagon had internally discussed punitive options for NATO members viewed as unsupportive, including suspending Spain from NATO and reviewing U.S. recognition of British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.

Some European officials said they were adapting to Trump’s confrontational style. One diplomat pointed to former German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a model for managing relations with Trump during his first term.“You must not react immediately, you must let the storm pass, while standing firmly on your positions,” the diplomat said, adding that attempts at personal flattery had also failed to prevent criticism.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, once viewed as one of Trump’s closest European political allies, also faced criticism after she publicly opposed the Iran war and condemned what she called Trump’s “unacceptable” remarks about Pope Leo.Even NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, often seen in Europe as skilled at managing Trump, was reportedly rebuked during a recent White House meeting.

Within the Republican Party, Trump’s hardline stance has drawn some resistance. Representative Don Bacon said repeated attacks on NATO partners were damaging U.S. interests.

“The continued attacks on NATO allies are counterproductive, the comments hurt Americans,” Bacon wrote on X, noting that U.S. air bases in Germany remain strategically important for operations across Europe, Africa and the Middle East.German military officials were reportedly surprised by Trump’s announcement on troop reductions, especially after what they described as constructive Pentagon meetings earlier this week.

General Carsten Breuer, Germany’s top military officer, had indicated he received positive support for Berlin’s updated defense strategy during talks in Washington.Analysts say the political mood in Europe is shifting, with leaders becoming more willing to publicly challenge Washington as domestic pressure rises over the economic and security fallout of the Iran war, including rising energy costs and trade disruptions.

Jeffrey Rathke of the American-German Institute at Johns Hopkins University said Chancellor Merz’s sharper tone reflected a broader recalibration.“It’s pretty clear that something has changed,” Rathke said, noting that European governments increasingly believe they can no longer rely on the post-World War II security framework without significantly expanding their own military capabilities.

Speaking at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, Barrack said discussions between Washington and Ankara were progressing toward a settlement over sanctions imposed following Turkiye’s acquisition of the .

“I think you are going to see the S-400 situation solved soon,” Barrack said, adding that, from Washington’s perspective, Turkiye’s potential re-entry into the would be acceptable.

The United States imposed sanctions on its NATO ally in 2020 after Turkiye purchased the Russian S-400 system, citing concerns over compatibility with NATO defence infrastructure and risks to sensitive military technology. The move also led to Ankara’s removal from the multinational F-35 production and procurement programme.

The dispute has been a longstanding source of tension in bilateral relations, with both sides seeking a framework that addresses security concerns while restoring defence cooperation.

Sanchez’s trip highlights Spain’s effort to chart an independent foreign policy within Europe, positioning China as a strategic partner rather than a geopolitical rival, in contrast with Washington’s stance.

Trump has previously criticized Madrid over its refusal to grant landing rights for U.S. forces during the Iran conflict and for what he described as insufficient defence spending among NATO allies.

The Spanish leader’s approach has drawn mixed reactions domestically, with supporters backing his economic engagement strategy while businesses and opposition figures warn that deteriorating relations with the United States could carry economic risks.

A government source said Sanchez’s meeting with Xi Jinping on Tuesday would focus on geopolitical issues, reflecting Madrid’s view of China as a stabilizing global actor. However, trade representatives cautioned that such positioning could exacerbate existing strains, particularly as U.S. tariffs on European Union imports continue to weigh on Spanish exports.

“The United States is the leading foreign investor in Spain,” said Ramon Gascon Alonso of Spain’s Exporters’ and Investors’ Club, pointing to the importance of bilateral trade in key sectors of the economy.

Opposition figures have also criticized Sanchez’s stance, warning that public disagreements with Washington could undermine NATO cohesion and jeopardize the U.S. military presence in Spain.

China’s ambassador to Spain, Yao Jing, said stable bilateral relations had contributed to increased Chinese investment, describing Spain as pragmatic in its approach to economic cooperation and market access.

Official data showed Chinese firms invested 643 million euros in Spain in 2025, up from 149 million a year earlier, bringing total investment between 2010 and 2025 to 9.7 billion euros, largely concentrated in extractive industries and the energy sector.

During the three-day visit, Sanchez is scheduled to attend a formal banquet hosted by Xi, meet Premier Li Qiang and senior legislator Zhao Leji, and engage with business and academic leaders, including a visit to Xiaomi and a speech at Tsinghua University.

Spain is seeking to narrow a trade deficit with China that has more than doubled over four years to nearly $50 billion in 2025, with efforts focused on boosting agricultural and manufacturing exports.

Officials are also aiming to finalize a regionalization agreement to protect poultry exports affected by bird flu, following a similar arrangement that supported the pork industry during a previous African swine fever outbreak.

Speaking at the Saudi-backed Future Investment Initiative summit in Miami, Trump said, “We’re negotiating now but they have to open it up,” referring to the vital maritime route that has been largely disrupted during the war.

The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil supply typically passes, has seen sharply reduced traffic since the conflict began, contributing to rising energy prices and global market uncertainty.

Trump said Iran was “on the run” and repeated claims that its military and nuclear capabilities had been significantly weakened, despite Tehran’s denials.U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier warned that Iran could seek to impose a “tolling system” on vessels transiting the strait, raising concerns over long-term disruptions to global shipping.

Trump praised Mohammed bin Salman and other Gulf leaders from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Bahrain for what he described as efforts to promote regional stability.Calling the Saudi crown prince a “close friend,” Trump said Riyadh had played a constructive role in ongoing diplomatic outreach.

The U.S. president also questioned Washington’s commitment to NATO, suggesting the United States might reconsider its obligations if European allies continued to withhold support in the Iran conflict.

“We would have always been there for them but now I guess we don’t have to be,” Trump said, framing the issue as one of burden-sharing within the alliance.

The conflict, now entering its fourth week, has disrupted shipping through the Hormuz corridor, with only limited vessel movement reported amid heightened security risks and ongoing military activity in the region.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told lawmakers in Berlin that while Iran must not threaten regional stability, Washington had failed to present a credible plan or request European participation. “To this day, there is no convincing plan for how this operation could succeed,” he said, adding that the United States had neither coordinated with allies nor outlined the necessity of their involvement.

His defense minister, Boris Pistorius, struck a similarly firm tone earlier in the week, stating, “This is not our war, we have not started it,” underscoring Berlin’s reluctance to be drawn into a widening confrontation linked to U.S. and Israeli actions.

French President Emmanuel Macron echoed Germany’s position, saying Paris was not a party to the conflict, reflecting broader unease among European capitals about both the rationale and execution of the U.S. initiative.

The near closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy shipments, has heightened economic concerns, placing pressure on governments to respond to rising risks to trade and supply chains. However, European leaders have signaled that any response must be coordinated, measured, and grounded in clear strategic objectives.

Merz, who has long advocated strong transatlantic ties, adopted notably direct language, highlighting a shift in tone among U.S. allies faced with what they perceive as unilateral decision-making in Washington.

Despite differing national interests, European leaders have sought to maintain a unified front, prioritizing diplomatic coherence while managing relations with an unpredictable U.S. administration.

Officials across the region have emphasized the importance of avoiding escalation, even as they acknowledge the broader security implications of instability in the Gulf. Their stance suggests a recalibration of transatlantic dynamics, with greater emphasis on consultation and multilateral engagement.

The divergence comes at a time when global markets remain sensitive to disruptions in energy flows, and policymakers weigh the risks of deeper military entanglement against economic and security considerations.