The resolution passed 215-208 after a small group of Republicans joined Democrats in defying President Donald Trump, reflecting growing concern in Congress over the cost and duration of the war.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said the conflict had cost U.S. taxpayers more than $100 billion and weakened America’s position, calling it a “reckless and costly war of choice.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson opposed the measure, arguing that Trump remains focused on securing a lasting resolution and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy route disrupted by the conflict.

The resolution now shifts attention to the Senate, where a similar measure has already advanced with bipartisan support but has yet to receive a final vote.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that congressional restrictions could undermine U.S. leverage in negotiations with Tehran, while lawmakers continue debating the balance of war-making powers between Congress and the White House.

The debate over how governments should integrate asylum seekers and refugees often centers on questions of employment, skills and economic contribution.

For one refugee who arrived in Britain before the Second World War, the trajectory from newcomer to wartime intelligence operative offers a striking example of how opportunity and inclusion can produce unexpected results.His son argues that Britain should consider allowing asylum seekers to enter sectors facing acute labour shortages, including construction.

The proposal comes as the government plans to invest £600 million to train up to 60,000 workers in trades such as engineering, bricklaying, electrical work and carpentry.The suggestion is informed by family history. The author’s father arrived in Britain in 1939 and was trained as a builder’s apprentice as a condition of receiving a visa.

He worked on housing construction projects near Cambridge, where at least one house he helped build remains standing today.His construction career, however, was short-lived. The outbreak of war brought much residential building activity to a halt. He subsequently found work as a cleaner in Cambridge colleges before becoming a gardener at a school in the East Midlands.

During the war, British authorities classified many refugees and foreign nationals from enemy countries as “enemy aliens,” despite the fact that many had fled persecution by the Nazi regime. The author’s father was among those caught up in those policies and was later located by police and interned.

His circumstances changed dramatically after his release. He joined the British Army and spent three years serving as a cellist in an army orchestra. While he reportedly did not view musical service as the most effective contribution he could make to the war effort, it marked the beginning of a transition from suspected security risk to trusted serviceman.

That transition eventually led to recruitment into a highly secretive military intelligence operation. Working as part of a specialist unit, he monitored conversations between German prisoners of war who were unaware they were being recorded and observed.

Intelligence gathered from those conversations provided information considered valuable to Britain’s wartime efforts.The contrast was notable. A man who had once been regarded by authorities as a potential threat to national security was later entrusted with responsibilities within a sensitive intelligence programme.

According to historian Helen Fry, who has written extensively about the operation, the programme represented “the biggest bugging operation ever mounted against the enemy in British history.” Information collected by personnel involved in the effort contributed to British military intelligence during the conflict.

For decades, much of the work remained classified. When details of the operation were eventually made public roughly two decades later, surviving participants became the subject of renewed public interest.The author’s father emerged as one of the last surviving members of the group and became a frequent interviewee for newspapers, radio stations and television programmes.

He readily discussed his experiences whenever opportunities arose.His public profile grew steadily as historians, journalists and broadcasters sought first-hand accounts of the secret wartime operation. What had once been hidden from public view became an important part of the historical record of Britain’s intelligence efforts during the Second World War.His final television interview was broadcast the day after his death in 2017 at the age of 98.

News of his passing was reported by the BBC and noted in obituary tributes published by major British newspapers, including The Guardian and The Times.

While his achievements may not have carried the global recognition associated with refugee figures such as Albert Einstein, Sergey Brin, Freddie Mercury, Marc Chagall or Madeleine Albright, his story reflects a broader theme often cited in discussions about migration and asylum policy.

Supporters of expanded employment opportunities for refugees argue that individuals seeking sanctuary frequently possess skills and capabilities that may not be immediately apparent when they arrive. Given access to work, training and long-term stability, they contend, refugees can contribute economically, culturally and, in some cases, nationally.

The author’s father’s experience illustrates that argument. He entered Britain as a refugee, worked in construction, served in the armed forces, participated in a major intelligence operation and later helped preserve an important chapter of wartime history through public testimony.

His story also highlights the unpredictability of individual potential. At different moments, he was viewed as a labourer, a foreign national under suspicion, a soldier, a musician and an intelligence operative. Each role reflected changing circumstances rather than fixed assumptions about what he could contribute.

For advocates of refugee integration, the lesson is straightforward: the long-term value of those seeking refuge may not be visible at the moment they arrive. Policies that provide pathways into employment and training can create opportunities not only for newcomers, but also for the societies that receive them.

Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi faces eight charges, including conspiracy to provide material support to Kata’ib Hezbollah, which Washington designates as a terrorist organization.

Speaking through an interpreter, Al-Saadi told the court, “I am not guilty and we are in a war situation,” while also referencing children allegedly killed in a strike in Iran earlier this year.

U.S. prosecutors allege Al-Saadi helped plan around 18 attacks targeting American interests in Europe and was involved in plotting attacks in the United States, including against a synagogue in New York.

Al-Saadi was taken into U.S. custody in Türkiye last month. The case comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Iran-backed groups across the Middle East and beyond.

Acting Pentagon press secretary Joel Valdez said the office had been converted into a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), making it inaccessible to members of the media.

The move comes amid ongoing disputes between news organizations and the Trump administration over media access to the Defense Department. Several outlets have challenged Pentagon restrictions in court, including policies requiring journalists to be escorted while inside the building.

Media organizations argue the measures hinder independent reporting, while Pentagon officials say the restrictions are necessary to protect classified information.

The statement by Kataeb Hezbollah security chief Abu Mujahid Al-Assaf comes amid heightened tensions following the outbreak of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran in late February, a conflict that triggered a series of drone and rocket attacks by factions operating under the banner of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq against U.S. interests in the country.

Washington responded with strikes on facilities and bases linked to the groups, including Kataeb Hezbollah, killing dozens of fighters, according to the organization and regional media reports.

Since assuming office in mid-May, Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi has pledged to ensure that weapons remain exclusively in the hands of the state, a longstanding objective of successive Iraqi governments seeking to strengthen state authority and limit the influence of armed non-state actors.

In a statement issued on Saturday, Al-Assaf said “militant action is today a collective duty, and we will carry it out on behalf of the brothers who have decided to abandon it,” signaling that the group intends to continue its activities even as some allied factions move toward closer cooperation with state institutions.

While several Iran-backed factions have reportedly agreed to operate under official structures, Kataeb Hezbollah remains among the groups rejecting discussions on disarmament under what it characterizes as U.S. pressure.

Al-Assaf indicated that the organization was prepared to coordinate with other factions that no longer wished to maintain independent arsenals. He said Kataeb Hezbollah could supervise the transfer and storage of weapons and receive specialized systems, including cruise missiles, arguing that state agencies lacked personnel with the necessary expertise to manage such equipment.

The group has consistently linked any discussion of its weapons to the continued presence of foreign troops in Iraq. Kataeb Hezbollah maintains that it will not consider disarmament while international forces remain deployed in Iraq’s northern Kurdistan region as part of the U.S.-led coalition established in 2014 to combat Islamic State militants.

The coalition is scheduled to conclude its mission in the Kurdistan region by September, a timeline that has become a key reference point in Iraq’s debate over the future role of armed factions and the country’s security architecture.

The U.S. State Department said on Friday it was taking action to dismantle what it described as a sophisticated network that used deception and intermediary companies to obtain advanced equipment for Iran’s defense sector in violation of American sanctions.

According to State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott, the network allegedly defrauded dozens of U.S. technology firms and secured millions of dollars’ worth of equipment, including spectrum analyzers and security detection devices with potential military applications.

U.S. officials said the operation relied on fraudulent websites designed to resemble legitimate American companies. The network allegedly used intermediaries in Dubai to receive shipments before transferring the equipment to Iran, circumventing existing sanctions restrictions.

The State Department identified Ali Majd Sepehr as the individual leading the network. Officials did not disclose the names of the affected American companies or provide details on the quantity of technology allegedly transferred.

The sanctions announcement comes as Washington increases efforts to disrupt financial and logistical channels linked to Iran’s military establishment. On Thursday, the State Department offered a reward of up to $15 million for information leading to the disruption of financial mechanisms associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its affiliated branches.

The move also coincides with high-stakes diplomatic discussions between Washington and Tehran aimed at ending the conflict that began earlier this year. The White House said on Friday that President Donald Trump would approve an agreement only if it fully satisfies U.S. requirements, underscoring uncertainty surrounding the negotiations.

The latest sanctions signal that the United States intends to maintain economic and legal pressure on Iran’s defense procurement networks even as diplomatic efforts continue.

The group, comprising seven women and 12 children, was scheduled to arrive in Sydney and Melbourne on Tuesday, according to Australian officials. Their return follows the repatriation earlier this month of another group of 13 Australians from the same region, some of whom were subsequently charged with terrorism-related offenses.

Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said law enforcement and intelligence agencies had spent years preparing for such returns and would closely monitor those arriving.

“Anyone who has committed crimes can expect to face the full force of the law,” Burke said in a statement, emphasizing that community safety remained the government’s primary concern.

The minister added that the government had not provided assistance for the latest group’s travel arrangements, describing the individuals as people who had chosen to associate with a terrorist organization and place their children in dangerous circumstances.

The returnees were being held in Roj Camp, a detention facility in northeastern Syria near the Iraqi border that has housed women and children associated with Daesh since the group’s territorial defeat in 2019.

Following the departure of the latest group, at least two Australian nationals are expected to remain at the camp. One woman subject to a temporary exclusion order, a legal mechanism designed to delay the return of high-risk citizens for up to two years, was not among those traveling back to Australia.

The repatriations highlight the continuing challenge facing governments around the world as they deal with citizens who traveled to territories once controlled by Daesh. Australia introduced temporary exclusion orders in 2019 as part of broader legislation aimed at managing the return of suspected foreign fighters and their families.

Authorities have already demonstrated a willingness to pursue legal action against returnees. Three of the four women repatriated earlier this month were charged with slavery and terrorism-related offenses and remain in custody pending legal proceedings.
Among those charged were Kawsar Ahmed, also known as Kawsar Abbas, and her daughter Zeinab Ahmed, who were arrested upon arrival in Melbourne over allegations connected to the purchase of a Yazidi woman held as a slave during Daesh’s rule.

Another returnee, Janai Safar, was detained in Sydney and charged with membership in a terrorist organization as well as entering or remaining in territory controlled by a terrorist group.
Australian governments have conducted several organized repatriation efforts since the collapse of Daesh’s self-declared caliphate, while other citizens have returned independently without official assistance.

The latest operation reflects Canberra’s continuing policy of bringing back women and children from Syrian detention camps while relying on criminal investigations, intelligence monitoring and court proceedings to address potential security risks posed by returning adults.

In an initial statement, the military reported that warning sirens had sounded in the area of Sasa and surrounding communities after systems detected what was believed to be a hostile aircraft entering Israeli airspace.

Following an assessment, the military said the alert had been caused by a mistaken identification and that no hostile aerial object had entered the area.
“The sirens warning of a hostile aircraft infiltration were determined to have been a false identification,” the military said in a statement.

No injuries or damage were reported.

The incident occurred as Israel remains on heightened alert due to continuing regional security tensions linked to the ongoing conflict involving Iran and recent missile and drone activity across the region.

False alarms have become increasingly sensitive security events as Israeli air-defense and early-warning systems operate under elevated readiness conditions amid concerns over potential aerial threats, including drones, missiles and other unmanned platforms.

Israeli authorities did not provide further details regarding the nature of the misidentification or the systems involved in triggering the alert.

Appearing before a royal commission investigating Australia’s deadliest mass shooting in decades, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation chief Mike Burgess said the agency had been “stretched” by competing security challenges, including religious extremism, politically motivated violence and the growing radicalization of young people online.

The inquiry is examining the circumstances surrounding the December attack at Bondi Beach, where authorities allege that Sajid Akram and his son Naveed opened fire during a Hanukkah celebration attended by Jewish families, killing 15 people and triggering a nationwide debate over security failures and rising antisemitism.

Questioned about Australia’s counterterrorism capabilities before the attack, Burgess acknowledged mounting operational demands on the intelligence service but rejected suggestions that resource constraints had prevented investigations into significant threats.

“We were not leaving serious matters untreated or uninvestigated,” Burgess told the commission, adding that intelligence agencies could not anticipate every potential threat despite extensive monitoring efforts.
He said that, even in hindsight, he believed the agency’s resources were sufficient to address the security challenges it faced at the time.

Burgess is expected to provide further evidence in a closed hearing focused on classified intelligence matters and operational arrangements that cannot be discussed publicly.

The attack has prompted intense scrutiny of Australia’s security framework and sparked broader concerns about the safety of Jewish communities. It also led to calls for stronger measures against violent extremism and hate-motivated attacks.

In response to the shooting, the Australian government announced a package of firearm reforms, including a proposed nationwide gun buyback program. However, implementation has slowed amid difficulties securing support from state and territorial governments, whose cooperation is required for nationwide enforcement.

The inquiry is being led by former High Court judge Virginia Bell and is expected to examine intelligence assessments, law enforcement responses and broader policy issues linked to the attack.

Authorities said alleged gunman Sajid Akram, 50, was killed by police during the assault. His son, Naveed Akram, 24, remains in custody and has been charged with terrorism offenses and 15 counts of murder.

Royal commissions are among Australia’s most powerful public inquiries and can run for months or years while examining evidence and making recommendations for legislative and institutional reform.

The incident unfolded on Saturday evening when a man identified by police as 21-year-old Nasire Best allegedly fired toward a security checkpoint near the White House. Secret Service personnel returned fire, striking the suspect, who was later pronounced dead at a hospital.

The unidentified bystander sustained a gunshot wound during the exchange of fire. Officials said the injury was not considered life-threatening, though authorities have not determined whether the individual was struck by the suspect’s gunfire or during the officers’ response.

The United States Secret Service said no officers were injured. Secret Service Director Sean Curran expressed concern for the wounded civilian and said the agency hoped for a full recovery.
President Donald Trump was inside the White House at the time of the shooting, according to officials.
Authorities have released limited information regarding the motive behind the attack. In a post on his social media platform, Trump said the suspect appeared to have a “possible obsession” with the White House and linked the incident to his broader calls for expanded security measures around the presidential complex.

The president has requested congressional funding for a major security expansion of the White House campus, including the construction of a large ballroom and additional protective infrastructure. Following the shooting, Trump argued that enhanced facilities would contribute to future presidential security.

Court records show Best had a previous encounter with law enforcement near the White House in July 2025. During that incident, he was arrested after allegedly attempting to enter White House grounds near another checkpoint, ignoring police orders and making statements claiming he was Jesus Christ.

Investigators are reviewing the latest shooting as concerns grow over a series of security incidents near the president. The attack marked the third shooting-related episode in the vicinity of Trump within the past month.

In April, an armed individual breached security at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, while earlier this month Secret Service officers shot and wounded another man following a confrontation near the Washington Monument.

Best graduated from Dundalk High School in Maryland in 2023 and had previously participated in track and field athletics. In comments reported by U.S. media, a woman identifying herself as his mother said she learned of the shooting through social media and disputed portrayals of her son as a violent person.

The shooting remains under investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia and federal authorities.