Tokyo — Business sentiment among Japanese firms improved in the three months to March while corporate inflation expectations rose to record levels, a closely watched survey showed on Wednesday, strengthening the case for a near-term interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan, even as escalating fuel costs linked to the Iran conflict darken the economic outlook.

The central bank’s quarterly “tankan” survey indicated that large manufacturers’ sentiment index rose to +17 in March, slightly above market forecasts of +16 and up from +16 in December, marking its highest level since December 2021.

The improvement extended a fourth consecutive quarter of gains, suggesting that parts of Japan’s industrial sector have continued to recover despite mounting global uncertainties.

Sentiment among large non-manufacturers remained robust, with the index holding steady at +36, surpassing a median market forecast of +33. The strength in the services sector was supported by rising profits from price increases and a continued recovery in inbound tourism, according to the survey data.

A Bank of Japan official said resilient demand for artificial intelligence-related semiconductors and easing uncertainty over U.S. trade policy helped offset pressures from higher input costs and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

At the same time, the survey highlighted growing inflationary pressures within the corporate sector. Companies reported rising expectations for future price increases, reflecting the impact of higher fuel and raw material costs.

Analysts said this trend could provide additional justification for the central bank to move toward policy normalisation after years of ultra-loose monetary settings.Mari Iwashita, executive rates strategist at Nomura Securities, said the survey underscored mounting inflation risks driven by external shocks.

She noted that companies facing surging energy costs may increasingly pass those expenses on to consumers, reinforcing upward pressure on prices.The data comes at a critical juncture for the Bank of Japan, which is weighing whether to raise interest rates as early as this month.

Market participants have been closely monitoring the tankan survey as a key gauge of corporate sentiment and investment plans.Despite the relatively upbeat current conditions, the survey revealed growing caution among firms about the near-term outlook.

Both manufacturers and non-manufacturers expect business conditions to deteriorate over the next three months, reflecting concerns about the economic fallout from the Iran conflict and its impact on energy markets.

The ongoing conflict has driven up global fuel costs, increasing operational expenses for Japanese companies that rely heavily on imported energy. The resulting squeeze on margins is expected to weigh on profitability, particularly for industries with limited pricing power.

Marcel Thieliant, head of Asia-Pacific at Capital Economics, said the strength of the survey could still encourage policymakers to act. He noted that firms appeared to be absorbing the energy shock for now, suggesting that underlying economic conditions remain stable enough to support a rate hike in the near term.

Capital expenditure plans among large firms also pointed to cautious optimism. Companies expect to increase investment by 3.3% in the fiscal year 2026, exceeding a median market forecast of a 3.0% rise.

The planned increase suggests that firms are continuing to invest in growth despite heightened uncertainty.The survey period, which ran from February 26 to March 31, captured responses from roughly 70% of firms by March 12, shortly after the escalation of hostilities involving the U.S.-Israel attacks on Iran on February 28.

This timing indicates that early assessments of the conflict’s economic impact are already being reflected in corporate sentiment.Economists cautioned that the positive momentum seen in the survey may not be sustained if external conditions worsen.

Stefan Angrick said that while a weak yen and subdued wage growth have supported corporate margins, broader economic challenges remain.He noted that export growth could weaken amid slowing global demand, while domestic consumption may remain constrained by modest income gains.

Over time, these factors could weigh on corporate profits and sentiment, complicating the central bank’s policy decisions.The survey underscores the delicate balance facing policymakers as they navigate between emerging inflationary pressures and risks to economic growth.

While improving sentiment and rising prices strengthen the case for tightening monetary policy, the uncertain global environment, particularly developments in the Middle East, continues to pose significant challenges for Japan’s export-driven economy.

Aiyar cautioned that the simultaneous downturn in the world’s two largest economies would inevitably exert a strong downward pull on the entire global economy.

While the recent trade tensions between the United States and India have garnered significant attention, economists warn that a potential slowdown in the world’s two largest economies, the US and China, poses a far greater threat to India’s economic stability. Swaminathan Aiyar, a prominent economist and consulting editor at ET Now, emphasized that the ripple effects of a major recession in these global powerhouses would significantly outweigh the impact of any bilateral tariff disputes.   

Aiyar’s concerns arise amidst escalating uncertainty in the global economy, largely fueled by President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies. Despite a temporary 90-day pause on planned tariffs against several nations, including India, following a sharp decline in US stock markets, the underlying tensions remain. Moreover, China’s retaliatory measures, including increased tariffs on US goods, further exacerbate the situation.   

The economist had previously criticized Trump’s tariff announcements, labeling them a potential “Recession Day” rather than a “Liberation Day,” as the president had claimed. He argued that these policies would disrupt global supply chains, impede economic growth, and plunge the world economy into turmoil. Aiyar dismissed Trump’s assertion that tariffs would revitalize American manufacturing, predicting instead economic disruption.   

The erratic nature of Trump’s trade policies, with frequent changes occurring within hours, has created a climate of uncertainty for economists and investors. Goldman Sachs, while revising its recession forecast, still anticipates a significant US economic slowdown. Conversely, JPMorgan Chase maintains a more cautious outlook, assessing the probability of a US recession as still higher than not. This divergence in expert opinion underscores the precarious state of the global economic landscape, even after the temporary tariff reprieve.   

India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has already responded to these growing global uncertainties by reducing its economic growth forecast for the current financial year. The RBI also lowered the repo rate, citing concerns about weakening demand, tighter liquidity, and emerging global risks stemming from the escalating trade tensions.   

Moody’s Analytics has echoed these concerns, trimming its growth outlook for India in 2025, attributing the downward revision to the potential fallout from the US tariff measures. Despite the temporary freeze on some tariffs, Moody’s analysts highlighted that their current forecast reflects the potential economic damage should these tariffs be fully implemented in the future.   

Earlier warnings from leading global banks, including Morgan Stanley and Nomura, had already identified India, along with Thailand, as among the economies most vulnerable to the impact of reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US on key trading partners.   

According to Aiyar, a full-scale financial meltdown may have been averted, primarily due to pressure from the bond market rather than diplomatic efforts. However, he remains convinced that a US recession is highly probable. Furthermore, he anticipates a significant economic slowdown in China, even if the country avoids negative GDP growth, effectively mirroring the impact of a recession.   

Aiyar cautioned that the simultaneous downturn in the world’s two largest economies would inevitably exert a strong downward pull on the entire global economy. The unpredictability of President Trump’s future trade actions has become an embedded factor in the global economic equation, influencing investor behavior and fostering a climate of risk aversion.   

The prevailing uncertainty surrounding US trade policy is prompting investors to prioritize safety, further dampening economic activity. As Aiyar aptly stated, the constant ambiguity of Trump’s next move is “getting baked into everything else,” leading to a cautious approach across global markets.   

In conclusion, while the bilateral trade discussions between the US and India are important, the potential for a significant economic slowdown in the United States and China presents a far more substantial risk to India’s economic prospects. The interconnected nature of the global economy dictates that a downturn in these major engines of growth would have widespread and severe consequences, dwarfing the impact of any specific tariff disputes. The prevailing uncertainty and the potential for a synchronized slowdown necessitate a cautious and adaptive approach to economic policy in India.

Deepshikha Singh is an analytical content writer who enjoys turning complex information into compelling stories. Her passion lies in uncovering insights and sharing them in a way that’s both informative and engaging.