Speaking to private broadcaster Action 24, Plevris said Greece would further tighten its migration framework and rejected what he described as external interference from international institutions, including the United Nations and European bureaucratic bodies, in national migration policy.

He said that repeated concern expressed by organisations such as Amnesty International and UN agencies reinforced his support for the government’s approach, adding that criticism from such bodies strengthened rather than weakened his political position.

The comments come as Greece’s conservative government faces increased migrant arrivals via the Mediterranean route from eastern Libya, prompting closer engagement with Libyan authorities and broader support for stricter European Union migration policies.

Greece is also cooperating with eastern Libyan authorities through coast guard training and economic support programmes, including employment initiatives and investment cooperation aimed at reducing migrant departures across the Mediterranean, according to officials.

The policy shift aligns with wider discussions within the European Union over establishing migrant processing centres outside Europe for individuals whose asylum claims have been rejected, a proposal that has drawn criticism from rights groups.

Greek authorities reported that arrivals and interceptions on the island of Crete increased by more than 20 percent to around 5,500 through May compared with the same period last year, with flows accelerating in early June.

Libya has become a key transit hub for migrants attempting to reach Europe, facilitated by human trafficking networks operating amid prolonged instability across the country’s borders with multiple neighbouring states.

Analysts say eastern Libyan authorities are seeking deeper diplomatic and financial engagement with European governments as migration pressures increase across the central Mediterranean route.

Recent unrest in Northern Ireland and England has intensified political arguments over migration, policing and social cohesion, with competing claims emerging about the causes of violence and whether institutions are failing to protect communities.

The disturbances in Belfast and Southampton have been cited by some political figures as evidence of deeper problems linked to immigration and policing. Critics of that interpretation argue that available data does not support a direct connection between migration levels and the violence, pointing instead to broader issues including misinformation, public frustration and the mobilisation of extremist groups.

The unrest in Belfast began after an incident involving a black suspect, later identified as a refugee from Sudan, who was accused of attacking a white victim. The incident, which was widely circulated online, triggered tensions and violent disorder in parts of the city.In Glengormley, north of Belfast, residents dealt with the aftermath of attacks described by local authorities and observers as severe community violence.

Homes were damaged, and some families were forced to leave areas affected by masked groups shouting anti-immigrant slogans.At around the same time, courts in Southampton were dealing with the consequences of separate violent demonstrations.

Prosecutors told a hearing that around 1,000 people had gathered outside the city’s central police station on 2 June following the release of police body camera footage connected to the killing of an 18-year-old student.The teenager had been wrongly arrested and restrained after false racism allegations.

The person responsible for the fatal stabbing, a 23-year-old British Sikh man, had later been convicted of murder.During the Southampton protests, prosecutors said some participants were wearing masks and many appeared to have been drinking alcohol. Demonstrators moved towards an incorrect address linked to the family of the convicted man, and violence broke out.

Police officers were attacked with bricks, chairs and other objects, while a police vehicle was damaged. Authorities said officers were subjected to repeated assaults during the disorder, which lasted for several hours.Some of those involved were linked to far-right organisations, including groups calling themselves the Southampton Patriots, White Vanguard and the Portsmouth branch of the National Rebirth Party.

Several defendants later appeared in court. One man was sentenced after admitting to pushing a burning commercial bin towards officers and throwing a wooden object. Another received a prison sentence after admitting to throwing a bin and metal chair at police.The cases became part of a wider political debate about whether Britain faces a crisis of public safety and whether institutions treat different communities differently.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage argued that the police response to the Southampton case showed that the interests of white citizens were being treated differently from those of ethnic minorities. He also said the Belfast violence reflected public fears about immigration and called for action to address concerns about safety.

Opponents said such claims risked increasing social division by presenting complex events through a narrow political lens. They argued that isolated incidents were being used to support wider claims about migration and national identity without sufficient evidence.Figures on migration in Northern Ireland have been cited as challenging the argument that immigration was the primary driver of the Belfast violence.

The 2021 census showed that almost 97% of people in Northern Ireland identified as white. Government figures indicated that 2,248 asylum seekers were receiving support in Northern Ireland as of March 2024, compared with a population of about 1.93 million.Authorities estimated that around 200 people were involved in the Belfast disorder.

Claims of “two-tier policing”, suggesting that law enforcement treats white people unfairly compared with minority groups, have also been disputed by researchers and policing experts. They noted that Britain has spent decades addressing concerns about racism within policing, with multiple official reviews calling for reforms to tackle unequal treatment.

The police response to the Southampton case remains under investigation, but experts warned against using one incident to reverse long-standing concerns about discrimination affecting minority communities.Criminologist Prof Tim Newburn said large-scale riots were unusual in the UK and usually required a combination of public anger and a breakdown in police control.

He said recent unrest reflected current political tensions, particularly around issues of borders, national identity and migration. Economic pressures, including rising living costs, have affected many people, but recent disorder has more often been connected to disputes involving race and immigration.Police capacity has also been raised as a factor.

The Police Service of Northern Ireland requested support from other forces after officers were injured during the Belfast unrest. In Southampton, police reported injuries among officers and a police dog during the disorder.Social psychologist Prof John Drury said recent events showed how racist ideas could gain influence when individuals believed their views were becoming more widely accepted.

He argued that online networks and political discussion had contributed to the spread and normalisation of anti-immigrant narratives.Drury said some participants in violent protests may use claims of victimhood as justification, while others genuinely believe such ideas as part of their worldview.The Belfast unrest continued for two nights before a peaceful protest took place.

Attempts by far-right activists to encourage wider demonstrations did not lead to broader disorder.In Southampton, sentencing continued as judges assessed the impact of the violence on residents and the wider community.

One judge described the disorder as involving hostility towards police and, in some cases, racist views.The recent events have become a point of disagreement over how Britain should interpret social tensions, with political leaders, academics and community figures offering sharply different explanations for the causes of unrest.

The debate over how governments should integrate asylum seekers and refugees often centers on questions of employment, skills and economic contribution.

For one refugee who arrived in Britain before the Second World War, the trajectory from newcomer to wartime intelligence operative offers a striking example of how opportunity and inclusion can produce unexpected results.His son argues that Britain should consider allowing asylum seekers to enter sectors facing acute labour shortages, including construction.

The proposal comes as the government plans to invest £600 million to train up to 60,000 workers in trades such as engineering, bricklaying, electrical work and carpentry.The suggestion is informed by family history. The author’s father arrived in Britain in 1939 and was trained as a builder’s apprentice as a condition of receiving a visa.

He worked on housing construction projects near Cambridge, where at least one house he helped build remains standing today.His construction career, however, was short-lived. The outbreak of war brought much residential building activity to a halt. He subsequently found work as a cleaner in Cambridge colleges before becoming a gardener at a school in the East Midlands.

During the war, British authorities classified many refugees and foreign nationals from enemy countries as “enemy aliens,” despite the fact that many had fled persecution by the Nazi regime. The author’s father was among those caught up in those policies and was later located by police and interned.

His circumstances changed dramatically after his release. He joined the British Army and spent three years serving as a cellist in an army orchestra. While he reportedly did not view musical service as the most effective contribution he could make to the war effort, it marked the beginning of a transition from suspected security risk to trusted serviceman.

That transition eventually led to recruitment into a highly secretive military intelligence operation. Working as part of a specialist unit, he monitored conversations between German prisoners of war who were unaware they were being recorded and observed.

Intelligence gathered from those conversations provided information considered valuable to Britain’s wartime efforts.The contrast was notable. A man who had once been regarded by authorities as a potential threat to national security was later entrusted with responsibilities within a sensitive intelligence programme.

According to historian Helen Fry, who has written extensively about the operation, the programme represented “the biggest bugging operation ever mounted against the enemy in British history.” Information collected by personnel involved in the effort contributed to British military intelligence during the conflict.

For decades, much of the work remained classified. When details of the operation were eventually made public roughly two decades later, surviving participants became the subject of renewed public interest.The author’s father emerged as one of the last surviving members of the group and became a frequent interviewee for newspapers, radio stations and television programmes.

He readily discussed his experiences whenever opportunities arose.His public profile grew steadily as historians, journalists and broadcasters sought first-hand accounts of the secret wartime operation. What had once been hidden from public view became an important part of the historical record of Britain’s intelligence efforts during the Second World War.His final television interview was broadcast the day after his death in 2017 at the age of 98.

News of his passing was reported by the BBC and noted in obituary tributes published by major British newspapers, including The Guardian and The Times.

While his achievements may not have carried the global recognition associated with refugee figures such as Albert Einstein, Sergey Brin, Freddie Mercury, Marc Chagall or Madeleine Albright, his story reflects a broader theme often cited in discussions about migration and asylum policy.

Supporters of expanded employment opportunities for refugees argue that individuals seeking sanctuary frequently possess skills and capabilities that may not be immediately apparent when they arrive. Given access to work, training and long-term stability, they contend, refugees can contribute economically, culturally and, in some cases, nationally.

The author’s father’s experience illustrates that argument. He entered Britain as a refugee, worked in construction, served in the armed forces, participated in a major intelligence operation and later helped preserve an important chapter of wartime history through public testimony.

His story also highlights the unpredictability of individual potential. At different moments, he was viewed as a labourer, a foreign national under suspicion, a soldier, a musician and an intelligence operative. Each role reflected changing circumstances rather than fixed assumptions about what he could contribute.

For advocates of refugee integration, the lesson is straightforward: the long-term value of those seeking refuge may not be visible at the moment they arrive. Policies that provide pathways into employment and training can create opportunities not only for newcomers, but also for the societies that receive them.

The Bamy Hotel on Bioko Island, owned by the family of President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, has housed at least 32 deportees since late 2025, many of whom had previously received protection orders from U.S. immigration judges, the report said. Most have since been deported to African countries they fled, despite fears of persecution.

Migrants from Eritrea, Ethiopia, Angola and Mauritania described psychological pressure, restricted movement and uncertainty over their fate while being held inside the largely empty hotel. Several detainees told AP they feared imprisonment or death if returned home.

The Trump administration has expanded third-country deportation agreements with developing nations as part of its immigration crackdown. Rights advocates argue the policy circumvents asylum protections by transferring migrants to countries with poor human rights records.

Washington declined to comment on details of the arrangement with Equatorial Guinea, while the State Department said it remained committed to ending “illegal and mass immigration.” Equatorial Guinea’s government did not respond to requests for comment

.
The oil-rich Central African nation, ruled by Obiang for more than four decades, has long faced criticism from rights groups and U.S. officials over allegations of corruption, repression and abuses against dissidents.

Taylor accused the government of reducing financial support for pensioners and older Australians, particularly through changes affecting private health insurance assistance.“At exactly the same time, they’ve ripped money away from pensioners and from older Australians with support for their private health insurance,” Taylor said while outlining the opposition’s policy priorities.

The opposition leader also vowed to confront what he described as “mass migration madness,” proposing a policy that would tie Australia’s annual migration intake to the pace of new housing construction.The announcement reflected growing political pressure over housing affordability, infrastructure strain and population growth, issues that have become central themes in national debate ahead of future elections.

Taylor’s remarks came days after the Coalition suffered a sharp electoral setback in the traditionally conservative seat of Farrer, where One Nation secured victory in last weekend’s vote.The Liberal candidate received just 12% of the primary vote, compared with the 43% previously secured in the electorate by former Liberal leader Sussan Ley a year earlier.

The result underscored growing fragmentation within Australia’s conservative voter base as One Nation gains support in regional and outer suburban areas amid concerns over migration, cost-of-living pressures and housing shortages.

The governing Labor Party has accused Taylor’s opposition of increasingly adopting policies associated with Hanson’s nationalist platform in an attempt to stem voter losses to the right-wing populist party.

One Nation has recently outperformed the Coalition in several major opinion polls, adding to pressure on the opposition to redefine its electoral strategy and policy agenda.

Under the agreement, France will significantly expand its coastal security presence, increasing the number of officers tackling irregular migration by more than 50% to reach 1,400 by 2029. The funding from United Kingdom will be partly conditional, with nearly a quarter tied to performance benchmarks assessing the effectiveness of French actions.

The deal follows months of negotiations between United Kingdom and France over renewing the Sandhurst Treaty, which governs British financial contributions toward efforts to prevent migrants from departing French shores.

British authorities have long argued that France needed to do more to stop departures, as crossings by small boats have become a politically sensitive issue in the UK. London had insisted on tighter oversight and conditions on how funds are deployed before agreeing to renew the framework, first signed in 2018 and extended in 2023.

According to the roadmap, funding allocations could be redirected if joint annual assessments determine that the measures fail to deliver sufficient results. French authorities also plan to deploy additional surveillance tools, including drones, helicopters and digital monitoring systems, to reduce departures, particularly those involving so-called “taxi boats.”

Under international maritime law, authorities are limited in their ability to intervene once vessels have left shore, focusing primarily on rescue operations to prevent loss of life.

Official British data shows that 41,472 people reached the UK via irregular small-boat crossings in 2025, the second-highest annual figure since such journeys were first recorded in 2018.

At least 29 migrants died attempting the crossing that year, according to figures compiled from French and British sources.

Shawn VanDiver, a U.S. military veteran who heads AfghanEvac, said he had been briefed that the administration of Donald Trump was weighing the proposal for more than 1,100 Afghans housed at a former U.S. base in Qatar.

The group includes individuals who had worked with U.S. forces and fear reprisals from the Taliban after their return to power in 2021.The administration had set a March 31 deadline to close the as-Sayliyah camp, which has served as a processing hub for Afghans seeking relocation to the United States following the collapse of the Western-backed Afghan government.

VanDiver criticized the reported plan, saying it would effectively pressure Afghans to return to their home country. “You do not relocate vetted wartime allies, more than 400 of them children, from American custody into a country in the middle of its own collapse,” he said.

The U.S. State Department did not confirm whether Congo was under consideration but said authorities were exploring “voluntary resettlement” options for those remaining in Qatar. A spokesperson described relocation to a third country as a potential pathway to safety while maintaining U.S. security priorities.

Democratic Senator Tim Kaine criticized the reported option, saying the United States had an obligation to protect Afghan partners who assisted during the two-decade conflict.More than 190,000 Afghans have been resettled in the United States since 2021 under a program initiated by Joe Biden, with most living without incident.

The effort initially drew bipartisan support but has since been affected by policy changes.The Trump administration has curtailed broader refugee resettlement programs and paused processing for some Afghan applicants following a fatal shooting incident in Washington last year involving an Afghan national.

The paper, circulated among member states by the EU’s diplomatic service, proposes resuming the bloc’s 1978 cooperation agreement with Syria and initiating a High-Level Political Dialogue with transitional authorities starting May 11. The move signals a departure from years of limited engagement following the country’s prolonged conflict.

The EU also intends to “reframe and adapt” its sanctions regime to retain leverage while engaging Syria’s leadership, focusing restrictions on actors seen as obstructing the political transition. Most Western sanctions were lifted late last year as Damascus sought reintegration into the international system under interim President , who assumed power after the removal of former leader in 2024.

The document outlines plans to expand economic ties through trade and investment frameworks, including mobilising private sector funding and establishing a technical assistance hub to support regulatory and business reforms. The EU also aims to facilitate the safe and voluntary return of refugees, with more than one million Syrians currently residing in Europe, around half of them in Germany.

Brussels is additionally exploring Syria’s integration into regional connectivity initiatives such as the , positioning the country as a potential hub for transport, energy and digital links amid shifting global supply routes.

Syria has gained strategic relevance as an emerging transit corridor following disruptions linked to tensions affecting the . A tanker carrying Iraqi oil recently departed from the Syrian port of Baniyas after overland transport, highlighting evolving logistics patterns.
On security cooperation, the EU is considering support for training Syrian police forces, strengthening institutional capacity within the interior ministry, and coordinating efforts on counterterrorism, organised crime and drug trafficking.

The document also reaffirms EU backing for a political agreement between Damascus and Kurdish-led authorities aimed at integrating northeastern institutions into the state framework and expanding rights for Kurdish populations. Recent steps include the appointment of a senior Kurdish commander to a deputy defence role overseeing eastern territories.

The policy shift reflects a broader recalibration by European governments seeking stability, migration management and economic engagement following more than a decade of conflict and isolation.

Al-Sharaa met Starmer at 10 Downing Street, marking the first visit by a Syrian head of state to London since former president Bashar Assad traveled to the UK in 2002.According to a Downing Street spokesperson, discussions covered migration returns, border security and efforts to combat people-smuggling networks.

Starmer also welcomed steps taken by Damascus against Daesh, citing progress in counter-terrorism cooperation between the two countries.The talks also addressed broader regional stability concerns alongside economic cooperation.

The visit comes as Syria seeks foreign investment to rebuild infrastructure damaged during years of civil war. Al-Sharaa is expected to hold further meetings with senior British officials during his stay.

He was accompanied by Foreign Affairs Minister Asaad Hassan Al-Shaibani and Economy Minister Nidal Al-Shaar.European outreach continuesAl-Sharaa arrived in London following a visit to Germany, where he met Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as part of a broader diplomatic push to re-engage European partners.

No specific agreements were announced following the London meeting.

Speaking alongside Syrian transitional President Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Berlin, Merz said both governments were seeking to create conditions that would allow more Syrians to return voluntarily to their homeland.

Germany hosts the largest Syrian diaspora in the European Union, with more than one million Syrians, many of whom arrived during the 2015–2016 migrant influx.“We are working jointly toward more Syrians being able to return to their homeland,” Merz said at a joint press conference.

Sharaa said Damascus and Berlin were exploring a “circular” migration framework that would allow Syrians to participate in rebuilding their country while retaining the option to remain in Germany.

Such a model would enable returnees to contribute to reconstruction efforts without permanently relinquishing the economic and social stability they have established abroad, he said.

Merz said Germany intended to support Syria’s reconstruction after years of civil war, adding that a German delegation would travel to Syria in the coming days to advance cooperation.

However, he stressed that deeper bilateral engagement would depend on progress toward establishing rule-of-law institutions.

“Many joint projects in the future will depend on our finding a state governed by the rule of law,” Merz said, adding that he was confident such conditions could be achieved following discussions with Sharaa.