The elections across England, Scotland and Wales marked Labour’s most serious political setback since the party returned to power in the 2024 general election, ending more than a decade of Conservative-led government.Writing in Britain’s Guardian newspaper, Starmer acknowledged public dissatisfaction following Thursday’s vote but rejected calls for Labour to shift ideologically in response to the results.“

The right lesson is to listen to voters,” Starmer wrote, adding that doing so “doesn’t mean tacking right or left.”The strongest advances came from Reform UK, the anti-immigration party that expanded its footprint across England, Scotland and Wales as disillusioned voters increasingly turned toward nationalist and insurgent political movements.With nearly all ballots counted, Labour lost almost 1,400 council seats in England and relinquished control of several local authorities.

Reform UK secured nearly 1,500 of the roughly 5,000 council seats contested, while the Green Party also posted strong gains with more than 500 seats won.The outcome was particularly severe in Wales, where Labour lost control of the devolved government for the first time since the Welsh parliament was established in 1999.

Nationalist party Plaid Cymru emerged as the largest political force, followed by Reform UK, with Labour falling to third place.In Scotland, the Scottish National Party retained its position as the largest party but failed to secure an outright majority, winning six fewer seats than in the previous regional elections in 2021.

Although Labour’s performance in London was less damaging than some party officials had feared, the broader results underscored mounting public unease over the government’s economic record and a series of policy reversals and political controversies since taking office.

The election setback comes as British households continue to face persistent cost-of-living pressures, sluggish economic growth and strained public services, conditions that have increasingly benefited smaller opposition parties and anti-establishment movements.

Actor Danny Dyer says his latest role in Rivals has reshaped public perceptions of both his career and masculinity, marking a notable shift from the tough, volatile characters that defined much of his three-decade screen career.

Approaching 50, Dyer has found renewed attention as the breakout emotional center of the television adaptation of Jilly Cooper’s novel. In the series, he plays Freddie Jones, a self-made electronics businessman portrayed as one of the few morally grounded figures in a world driven by rivalry, betrayal and sexual intrigue.

The role contrasts sharply with the football hooligans and self-destructive antiheroes long associated with his screen image.Speaking during promotional work for the show’s return, Dyer acknowledged that the role surprised audiences as much as it surprised him. Known for performances in films such as The Football Factory and Marching Powder, both directed by Nick Love, he had become closely identified with violent, emotionally guarded male characters.

In Rivals, however, Freddie Jones is written with emotional openness and vulnerability. Dyer said that aspect of the character resonated strongly with viewers and reflected a wider issue around modern masculinity. He argued that many men remain uncomfortable expressing affection or emotional honesty, often equating vulnerability with weakness.

Dyer said the character’s softer qualities helped challenge those assumptions. Rather than relying on aggression or dominance, Freddie is defined by emotional intelligence and loyalty. The role has turned Dyer, unexpectedly, into what many viewers describe as a middle-aged romantic lead, a development he said he did not anticipate.

The actor’s recent visibility reflects that change. This year, he appeared on the cover of Rolling Stone UK, something he said felt unusual after decades in the public eye. He noted that despite a long career across film, television and theatre, mainstream recognition at that level had come relatively late.Much of Dyer’s earlier fame was shaped as much by tabloid notoriety as acting.

Public attention frequently focused on his drinking, personal scandals and outspoken persona. Yet he also built a reputation for durability, remaining with his childhood partner Jo for decades despite periods of separation and public scrutiny.Dyer said financial stability, rather than artistic prestige, has often guided his career decisions.

He spoke openly about the commercial realities of acting, recalling earnings from projects ranging from the BBC genealogy programme Who Do You Think You Are? to long-running soap EastEnders, where he played Queen Vic landlord Mick Carter.During his appearance on Who Do You Think You Are?, Dyer discovered family links to Thomas Cromwell and Edward III.

He said he was less interested in royal ancestry than in Cromwell’s rise from working-class origins.Alongside Rivals, Dyer is balancing multiple television and film projects, including the Sky reality programme The Dyers’ Caravan Park with his daughter Dani, the Channel 4 drama The Siege, based on the 1980 Iranian embassy siege, and the ITV competition format Nobody’s Fool.

He has also paused the family podcast he co-hosted with Dani because of time constraints.His recent film Marching Powder, in which he plays a middle-aged man struggling with addiction and marital breakdown against a backdrop of football violence, became his most commercially successful film despite poor critical reception.

Dyer said the project should have focused more on addiction and relationships rather than hooliganism, arguing that the emotional core of the story was overshadowed by violence.The subject remains relevant. Reported football-related disorder incidents across England and Wales rose by 18% in the 2024–25 season compared with the previous year, according to figures referenced in the interview.

Dyer said such stories are not intended to glorify violence but to reflect tribalism, disenfranchisement and male social behaviour often shaped around alcohol and group identity.He linked these concerns to wider anxieties about masculinity and parenting.

Dyer said he worries about raising his 12-year-old son Arty in a culture dominated by phones, digital distraction and online influence. He expressed concern that children increasingly rely on technology for thinking and decision-making, which he believes weakens independence and real-world social habits.To counter that, he said he prioritises time outdoors, cycling and teaching his son chess.

Still, he acknowledged that modern parenting requires adapting to a generation that socialises largely through gaming and online communication rather than face-to-face interaction.Dyer’s own upbringing in Custom House, east London, shaped much of his understanding of male identity.

Raised in a working-class environment marked by conflict and instability, he said humour became his defence rather than physical confrontation. Although often cast as football hooligans, he said he was never directly involved in that culture, despite growing up around it.His family life was also marked by disruption. His father left when Dyer was nine and was later found to have maintained a second family.

For years, they were estranged. Dyer said those experiences created deep fears of abandonment, later reinforced by the death of his maternal step-grandfather, who had become a father figure.He has since spoken openly about therapy and how those unresolved fears influenced destructive behaviour, including affairs that nearly ended his long relationship with Jo.

The couple separated for several years before reconciling and eventually marrying. Dyer said he still considers that reconciliation one of the defining moments of his personal life.Politically, Dyer remains outspoken. His 2018 televised criticism of former Prime Minister David Cameron over Brexit became one of his most widely shared public moments.

Asked more recently about current leadership under Keir Starmer, Dyer said his frustration is less about individuals than about a broader political failure to represent working-class communities.He argued that successive governments have encouraged division among ordinary people while avoiding accountability for structural inequality, particularly around class, economic insecurity and public services.

For Dyer, the success of Rivals appears to reflect not only a career reinvention but also a broader cultural shift. The actor long associated with aggression and volatility is now being recognised for portraying emotional honesty, suggesting that public ideas of masculinity may be changing as much as his own screen image.

Trump this week sharply criticized German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, calling him “totally ineffective” after Merz questioned the U.S. approach to the Iran conflict and said Washington lacked a clear exit strategy. On Friday, the Pentagon announced plans to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany and confirmed higher tariffs on European Union cars and trucks, a move expected to hit Germany’s export-heavy economy particularly hard.

The administration has also turned its focus toward Britain, with Trump describing Prime Minister Keir Starmer as “not Winston Churchill” and threatening major tariffs on British imports, further widening tensions with traditional U.S. allies.European diplomats described the atmosphere as increasingly unpredictable.

“It’s unnerving to say the least,” one diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We are braced for anything, anytime.”The friction has been aggravated by Washington’s push for stronger allied backing in the Iran war, particularly around securing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil shipping route disrupted by the conflict.

Trump has accused European governments of failing to provide adequate military support for U.S. operations that he argues protect broader Western interests.Reuters reported last week that the Pentagon had internally discussed punitive options for NATO members viewed as unsupportive, including suspending Spain from NATO and reviewing U.S. recognition of British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.

Some European officials said they were adapting to Trump’s confrontational style. One diplomat pointed to former German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a model for managing relations with Trump during his first term.“You must not react immediately, you must let the storm pass, while standing firmly on your positions,” the diplomat said, adding that attempts at personal flattery had also failed to prevent criticism.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, once viewed as one of Trump’s closest European political allies, also faced criticism after she publicly opposed the Iran war and condemned what she called Trump’s “unacceptable” remarks about Pope Leo.Even NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, often seen in Europe as skilled at managing Trump, was reportedly rebuked during a recent White House meeting.

Within the Republican Party, Trump’s hardline stance has drawn some resistance. Representative Don Bacon said repeated attacks on NATO partners were damaging U.S. interests.

“The continued attacks on NATO allies are counterproductive, the comments hurt Americans,” Bacon wrote on X, noting that U.S. air bases in Germany remain strategically important for operations across Europe, Africa and the Middle East.German military officials were reportedly surprised by Trump’s announcement on troop reductions, especially after what they described as constructive Pentagon meetings earlier this week.

General Carsten Breuer, Germany’s top military officer, had indicated he received positive support for Berlin’s updated defense strategy during talks in Washington.Analysts say the political mood in Europe is shifting, with leaders becoming more willing to publicly challenge Washington as domestic pressure rises over the economic and security fallout of the Iran war, including rising energy costs and trade disruptions.

Jeffrey Rathke of the American-German Institute at Johns Hopkins University said Chancellor Merz’s sharper tone reflected a broader recalibration.“It’s pretty clear that something has changed,” Rathke said, noting that European governments increasingly believe they can no longer rely on the post-World War II security framework without significantly expanding their own military capabilities.

London’s Metropolitan Police said a 45-year-old British man born in Somalia was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder after the late-morning assaults, which left two men aged 76 and 34 hospitalized in stable condition.

Police said the suspect, who also allegedly attempted to stab officers during the arrest, is believed to have been involved in a separate incident earlier the same morning in southeast London in which another person sustained minor injuries.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley said the suspect had “a history of serious violence and mental health issues,” while counter-terrorism officers were leading the investigation to determine motive and possible links to a broader pattern of attacks targeting Jewish communities.

The incident occurred shortly after 11 a.m. local time when the Shomrim Jewish neighborhood watch group reported that a knife-wielding man was attempting to stab Jewish members of the public in Golders Green, an area with a large Jewish population.

The incident occurred shortly after 11 a.m. local time when the Shomrim Jewish neighborhood watch group reported that a knife-wielding man was attempting to stab Jewish members of the public in Golders Green, an area with a large Jewish population.

Members of Shomrim helped detain the suspect before police arrived and used a Taser to subdue him. The victims were treated at the scene by Hatzola, a Jewish volunteer ambulance service, before being taken to hospital.King Charles III, currently on a state visit to the United States, said he was “deeply concerned” by the attacks in a statement issued by Buckingham Palace.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the stabbings as “appalling” and convened an emergency meeting of senior ministers and officials, saying the government would ensure a swift response from criminal justice agencies.“The government is taking action in relation to security, cohesion, extremism,” Starmer told broadcasters, adding that he would meet officials on Thursday to review security arrangements and legal responses.

The attack follows several recent arson incidents targeting synagogues and Jewish institutions in north London, including fires involving Hatzola ambulances and attacks on synagogues in Kenton and Finchley.Police have arrested 28 people in connection with those incidents and Wednesday’s stabbing since the start of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran on Feb. 28.

A little-known group believed to be linked to Iran, Harakat Ashab Al-Yamin Al-Islamiya (HAYI), claimed responsibility for the stabbing through an online video cited by SITE Intelligence Group, saying one of its “lone wolves” carried out the attack. The claim has not been independently verified.

Israel’s foreign ministry said the attacks showed Britain was failing to protect its Jewish community.“After attacks on synagogues, Jewish institutions, community ambulances and now Jews targeted in Golders Green, the UK government can no longer claim this is under control,” it said in a post on X.

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis said the Jewish community remained resilient but demanded stronger action.“Such attacks need to stop now. Zero tolerance that’s what our community wants,” he told reporters.

Monitoring groups in Britain have reported a sharp increase in both antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, with tensions further intensified by the broader regional conflict involving Iran.

The Home Office is appealing against the High Court’s earlier decision that the 2025 ban on Palestine Action was disproportionate to the threat posed by the group and should be revoked. The government had outlawed the organization days after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in southern England and caused millions of pounds of damage to two military aircraft during protests against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

Under the ban introduced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government, Palestine Action was added to a proscribed list that includes Hamas and Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah, making membership or public support for the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison under British terrorism laws.

Government lawyer James Eadie told the court that the earlier ruling had wrongly assessed the balance between civil liberties and public protection, arguing parliament had already determined the measure was both necessary and proportionate.“The protection of national security and of the public from terrorism was central” to the decision, Eadie said in written submissions.

He told the court that judges had failed to properly consider parliament’s judgment that the ban was “both effective and appropriate,” adding that ordinary criminal law had “demonstrably failed” to prevent an escalation in the group’s activities.

“The line between criminality, sometimes violent criminality, and terrorism is not a bright one,” Eadie said, arguing Palestine Action was “not engaged in what can be properly described as merely civil disobedience.”He said the group met the statutory definition of being involved in terrorism under British law.

The ban triggered strong criticism from civil liberties advocates and pro-Palestinian campaigners, with thousands of supporters reportedly arrested since its introduction.In February, a three-judge High Court panel ruled in favor of a legal challenge brought by Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori, finding that the prohibition had caused a “very significant interference” with rights to free expression and peaceful assembly.

Founded in 2020, Palestine Action says its objective is to end what it describes as global complicity in Israel’s actions in Palestinian territories.

The group has primarily targeted weapons manufacturers, particularly facilities linked to Israeli defense company Elbit Systems.The appeal hearing is scheduled to conclude on Thursday.

Trump said the United States could “put a big tariff on the UK” if London maintains the tax, which was introduced in 2020 and applies a 2% levy on revenues generated by large digital companies operating in Britain.

The measure affects major U.S.-based firms including Apple, Alphabet’s Google and Meta.“I don’t like it when they target American companies, because basically, you’re talking about our great American companies,” Trump told The Telegraph, adding that Washington could respond swiftly through trade measures.

“If they don’t drop the tax, we’ll probably put a big tariff on the UK.”The digital services tax has been a longstanding point of friction between Washington and London, drawing criticism not only from Trump but also from his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, who similarly argued that such levies disproportionately impact U.S. technology giants.

The dispute underscores broader transatlantic disagreements over how to tax multinational digital corporations, particularly those with significant cross-border revenues but limited physical presence in foreign markets.

Britain has defended the tax as a temporary measure aimed at ensuring fair contributions from large tech firms operating within its jurisdiction.

Trump’s remarks come ahead of a scheduled visit by Britain’s King Charles to the United States next week, adding a diplomatic dimension to the trade tensions at a time when both countries have sought to maintain close economic ties.

The meeting at the Permanent Joint Headquarters in northwest London is intended to advance operational planning for reopening the strategic waterway when conditions permit, following what officials described as progress at international discussions held in Paris last week.

“The task today and tomorrow is to translate diplomatic consensus into a joint plan to safeguard freedom of navigation in the Strait and support a lasting ceasefire,” Defense Minister John Healey said in a statement.

The London conference follows talks co-chaired in Paris by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron that brought together representatives from more than 40 countries to address security in the strait, a critical global shipping route.

British and French officials have emphasized that the proposed multinational force would be defensive in nature and deployed only after a durable peace agreement is reached in the region.The United States and Iran, the principal parties to the ongoing conflict, did not participate in the Paris discussions.

A two-week ceasefire between the two countries was due to expire at midnight GMT on Tuesday, but US President Donald Trump said shortly before the deadline that it would be extended to allow further negotiations.

Both Washington and Tehran have accused each other of violating the truce, while the United States has maintained a blockade of Iranian ports.Downing Street had earlier indicated that a military planning summit would take place this week without providing further details

“We’re not going to get dragged into this war. It is not our war,” Starmer told parliament, adding that participation would not serve Britain’s national interest.Trump, speaking in a phone interview with Sky News, said he could alter an agreement limiting the impact of U.S. tariffs on Britain, signaling potential economic consequences for London’s stance.

He also criticized the UK’s level of support during U.S. military operations.Tensions have risen between the allies after Britain declined to allow its bases to be used for initial U.S. strikes on Iran last month.

London later approved a request for the use of two bases for what officials described as a “specific and limited defensive purpose.”Starmer emphasized the resilience of the bilateral relationship, referencing the planned state visit of King Charles III to the United States and stating that ties between the two countries extend beyond individual leaders.

Trump said disagreements would not affect the royal visit but reiterated criticism of Britain’s position. “When we needed them, they were not there,” he said.The dispute reflects a broader hardening in tone from Starmer’s government toward Washington.

Finance Minister Rachel Reeves criticized the U.S. decision to launch military action against Iran as lacking a clear exit strategy, while Health Minister Wes Streeting described Trump’s rhetoric as “incendiary” and “provocative.”

Reeves was scheduled to meet U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington on Wednesday on the sidelines of International Monetary Fund meetings to discuss the economic implications of the conflict.

In a readout issued by Downing Street, a spokesperson said the two leaders discussed the failed negotiations held in Pakistan over the weekend and agreed it was “vital” to maintain the ceasefire while seeking a path forward through dialogue.

Starmer, who recently returned from meetings in the Middle East, also said international partners were working to restore safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a key global energy transit route, and reaffirmed Britain’s commitment to Oman’s security.

UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting described the breakdown in talks as “disappointing,” while emphasizing that continued engagement remained necessary to achieve a sustainable end to the conflict.

Speaking to Sky News, he said diplomacy often requires persistence, adding that lack of immediate success did not diminish the value of ongoing negotiations.

Streeting also criticized comments made earlier by U.S. President Donald Trump during the crisis, calling them “extraordinary,” particularly remarks he said appeared to threaten Iranian civilization.

Separately, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong called for the continuation of the Middle East ceasefire and a return to negotiations, stating that the outcome of the Islamabad talks was disappointing but underscoring the need for further diplomatic efforts.

The statements come after high-level U.S.-Iran talks ended without agreement, prolonging uncertainty over a conflict that has disrupted regional stability and global energy markets.

Speaking to reporters, Trump acknowledged the difficulty of the task and provided no operational details but indicated that other countries were prepared to assist. “It won’t be easy, we will have that open fairly soon,” he said, adding that multiple nations reliant on the waterway were offering support.

The Strait of Hormuz, which handles roughly 20 percent of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, has seen traffic severely curtailed since Tehran effectively blocked passage following the outbreak of hostilities. The disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global energy markets and raised concerns over supply security.

The conflict escalated after U.S. and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran on February 28, prompting retaliatory attacks by Tehran on Israel and U.S. military installations in Gulf states. The broader regional confrontation has resulted in significant casualties, mass displacement and sustained pressure on oil prices.Trump has also pressed allies to contribute more actively to securing the waterway.

Following talks with the U.S. president, Mark Rutte urged European governments to provide concrete commitments within days, according to Reuters reporting.A fragile ceasefire announced earlier this week between Washington and Tehran has yet to restore normal shipping flows through the strait.

Separately, the United Kingdom is set to convene another meeting next week involving countries seeking to reestablish safe maritime transit through the strait. The discussions are expected to include senior officials and focus on coordinated diplomatic, economic and potential security measures to ensure passage for commercial vessels.

The meeting follows earlier consultations involving dozens of countries, including foreign ministers and military planners, as governments weigh options ranging from sanctions on Iran to maritime security operations once conditions permit.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said a credible plan is needed to reopen the route and stabilize global trade flows.