While the institution maintains Islamic character, it is deeply embedded within the Israeli state system.

In the heart of Israel’s diverse legal system lies a remarkable institution: the Shariah courts. Far from being relics of history, these courts remain active and relevant today, quietly handling personal matters for the country’s 1.7 million Muslim citizens. They represent not only legal pluralism, but also the careful balancing act between faith, law, and national identity in a complex society.

Ottoman Roots in a Modern Nation

Shariah courts in Israel trace their origins back to the Ottoman Empire, when Islamic law governed personal status matters for Muslims in the region. The British Mandate preserved the system, and rather than dismantling it after the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, the new government incorporated it into its judiciary. Today, these courts are fully recognized under Israeli law and function under the Ministry of Justice.

There are currently nine regional Shariah courts across the country, with a Supreme Shariah Court headquartered in Jerusalem. These courts have jurisdiction over personal status issues such as marriage, divorce, child custody, alimony, inheritance, and burial for Muslim citizens.

Functioning Inside the Israeli Legal Framework

Muslim citizens of Israel can voluntarily use the Shariah courts to resolve family matters in line with Islamic tradition. Qadis (judges) appointed to these courts must be trained in both Shariah and Israeli civil law. Their rulings are legally binding and enforceable like any other court decision in the country.

While the institution maintains Islamic character, it is deeply embedded within the Israeli state system. This integration creates a unique dynamic — one which is both accepted and questioned by segments of the Arab Muslim community and Israeli society at large.

Influencer Shareef Safadi Sheds Light on Tel Aviv’s Shariah Court

Popular Arab-Israeli influencer Shareef Safadi, known for his educational and cultural commentary, brought the Shariah court in Tel Aviv into public focus through a now-viral video filmed in Jaffa. His commentary offers both humor and insight into how these courts operate in contemporary Israel.

“Today we are in the Sharia court in Tel Aviv,” he begins. “Yes, a Sharia court in Tel Aviv — or more specifically in Jaffa.”

Safadi explains the court’s primary role, “Now the Sharia court deals mainly with Islamic civil matters such as marriages, divorces, inheritance, and so on and so on.”

He adds a historical twist, pointing to the building’s past, “This house belonged to a Palestinian Christian family who fled during the war of 1948 during the Nakba. It was later used by the Israeli military, and then it was abandoned — and then after that, it became the Sharia court.”

In a reflective tone, he touches on symbolism and political nuance, “This court is part of the Israeli judicial system and therefore it has to have an Israeli flag. But when Arabs have to put the Israeli flag in governmental institutions, they fold it so the flag isn’t shown that much — as you can see in this court.”

Safadi’s video, layered with subtle commentary and cultural sensitivity, underscores the balancing act Muslim institutions in Israel navigate — functioning under a Jewish state while retaining a distinct religious and communal identity.

A Landmark Moment: The First Female Judge

In a historic development, Hana Khatib became Israel’s first female judge in the Shariah court system in 2017 — a watershed moment in a traditionally male-dominated domain. Appointed after a rigorous process, Khatib, a lawyer and expert in family law, broke significant barriers and became a symbol of evolving gender dynamics within Islamic jurisprudence in Israel.

Her appointment was widely celebrated among Arab-Israeli civil society and cautiously welcomed by religious authorities. For many Muslim women, Khatib’s presence in the courtroom provided a sense of representation and greater confidence in seeking justice through the Shariah courts.

Between Tradition and Modernity

For Muslim communities across Israel — from Nazareth to Rahat — the Shariah courts remain a vital thread in preserving religious identity within a modern, pluralistic state. Elders, imams, and family advocates continue to guide families in navigating these courts, ensuring that age-old traditions meet the demands of modern legal systems.

And while challenges persist — particularly around gender equity and modernization — the Shariah courts of Israel stand as a unique example in the region. They blend faith and law in a way that few other Middle Eastern states manage, allowing Muslims in Israel to live their personal lives in accordance with Islamic values — without stepping outside the bounds of the state.

In a nation often framed through the lens of conflict, the Shariah courts offer a quieter but profound story: of adaptation, coexistence, and continuity.

Whether the bill is truly an infringement on religious freedoms or a necessary step toward greater transparency and accountability in Waqf administration

India’s Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024, has ignited widespread debate and strong reactions, particularly within the Muslim community. Many critics argue that the proposed changes pose a serious threat to the sanctity of religious endowments, raising concerns about potential government overreach and the erosion of long-held community rights.

The controversy has fueled protests, social media discussions, and legal debates, with different factions interpreting the bill’s provisions in varying ways.

Amid the uproar, a detailed analysis by senior journalist Harsh Ranjan, published in The Statesman newspaper, sheds light on the actual intent and implications of the amendment. His article aims to cut through misinformation and present a fact-based breakdown of the bill, explaining how it seeks to address longstanding issues of mismanagement, corruption, and land encroachments within Waqf properties.

By offering a balanced perspective, the analysis clarifies whether the bill is truly an infringement on religious freedoms or a necessary step toward greater transparency and accountability in Waqf administration.

The Purpose of Waqf and the Need for Reform

Waqf properties are meant to serve the welfare of the Muslim community, supporting initiatives such as education, healthcare, and religious activities. However, over the years, numerous instances of land grabbing, fraudulent claims, and misuse by politically connected individuals have come to light.

Instead of benefiting underprivileged Muslims—particularly women—Waqf properties have often been exploited for personal gains.

Despite multiple amendments in the past, previous laws failed to address these concerns effectively. The Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024, is a legislative attempt to correct these issues by ensuring that Waqf properties are protected and utilized as originally intended.

Key Features of the Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024

The Bill introduces several crucial measures aimed at transparency, accountability, and legal ownership verification. Below are the major aspects of the amendment:

1. Protection of Waqf Properties Through Digital Record-Keeping

One of the primary concerns with Waqf property management has been the lack of proper identification and record-keeping.

The amendment mandates:

• Digitization of all Waqf properties.
• Prevention of encroachments through better documentation and transparency.
• Swift resolution of disputes related to Waqf properties.

By introducing a digital registry, the bill aims to curb unauthorized claims and fraudulent transactions, ensuring that endowments remain dedicated to their intended charitable and religious purposes.

2. Restriction on Fraudulent Waqf Declarations

A key change is the restoration of the pre-2013 definition of Waqf property dedication. The 2013 amendment allowed any person to dedicate property as Waqf, which led to numerous fraudulent claims. The new amendment:

• Limits Waqf dedication to legal owners of the property who are of the Islamic faith.
• Requires the person dedicating a property to have been practicing Islam for at least five years.
• Mandates verification of ownership before Waqf status is granted.

This measure ensures that only genuine religious endowments are recognized and prevents fraudulent conversions of property into Waqf status.

3. Removal of the “Waqf by User” Clause

Previously, properties could be classified as Waqf based on long-term usage rather than legal documentation. This led to disputes where even government-owned properties were wrongly classified as Waqf.

The amendment:

• Requires formal Waqf deeds for any new Waqf declaration.
• Protects existing registered Waqf properties unless they are in dispute or government-owned.
• Prevents unauthorized claims over public and private properties.

4. Clarification of Muslim Charitable Trusts’ Status

To prevent the wrongful takeover of independent Muslim charitable trusts by Waqf Boards, the bill clarifies that trusts established under separate statutory provisions will not be treated as Waqf properties. This prevents undue interference and ensures that Muslim charitable organizations operate freely.

5. Mandatory Registration of Waqf Properties on the WAMSI Portal

A major administrative issue has been the failure to upload Waqf records on the Waqf Assets Management System of India (WAMSI) portal. The bill makes it compulsory for all Waqf properties to be registered online within six months, ensuring greater transparency and accessibility.

6. Prevention of Wrongful Declaration of Government Properties as Waqf

Several cases, such as the disputed 123 Waqf properties in Delhi and conflicts involving the Surat Municipal Corporation, highlighted the issue of government properties being wrongly classified as Waqf. The amendment:

• Introduces Section 3C, requiring verification by a designated state-appointed officer before government property can be declared as Waqf.
• Ensures that public assets are protected from wrongful appropriation.

7. Transfer of Waqf Surveys to the Collector’s Jurisdiction

To improve efficiency, the amendment shifts the responsibility of pending Waqf property surveys from Waqf Boards to the jurisdiction of the Collector, who will follow state revenue laws for surveys and verification.

8. Strengthening Governance and Accountability of Waqf Boards

State Waqf Boards have long been criticized for corruption, mismanagement, and lack of accountability.

The amendment includes:

• Mandatory monthly meetings for Waqf Boards to ensure regular oversight.
• Requirement for all new Waqf registrations to be verified by the Collector before approval.
• Omission of Section 40, which previously allowed Waqf Boards to declare any property as Waqf without scrutiny.

9. Stricter Disqualification Criteria for Mutawallis (Custodians of Waqf Properties)

To prevent misuse of Waqf assets, individuals involved in malpractices will be disqualified from serving as Mutawallis. This measure ensures that only responsible custodians oversee Waqf properties.

10. Strengthening Legal Mechanisms for Waqf Disputes

The amendment introduces a structured legal framework:

• Appellate Mechanism: Section 83(9) allows for tribunal decisions to be challenged, strengthening judicial remedies.
• Applicability of the Limitation Act: This prevents indefinite litigation, ensuring timely resolution of disputes.
• Removal of Section 108A: This section previously granted Waqf laws overriding authority over other legal provisions. The amendment removes this, ensuring consistency in legal applications.

A Step Towards Transparency and Reform

India’s Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024, brings much-needed reforms aimed at curbing corruption, preventing unauthorized claims, and ensuring better management of Waqf properties. By emphasizing transparency, legal ownership verification, and administrative accountability, the bill seeks to restore the credibility of Waqf Boards while protecting the interests of both the Muslim community and the larger public.

While concerns exist about the bill’s impact, its focus on proper governance and fair property management signals a move towards a more just and transparent system. However, it remains to be seen how effectively the new provisions will be implemented to safeguard Waqf assets for their intended purposes.