Speaking at a Turning Point USA event, Vance said distrust between Washington and Tehran remains a fundamental obstacle to any durable agreement. “There is a lot of, of course, mistrust between Iran and the United States of America.

You are not going to solve that problem overnight,” he said, while adding that Iranian negotiators appeared willing to reach a deal.Vance, who participated in recent negotiations held in Pakistan, said he was cautiously optimistic about the trajectory of talks.

“I feel very good about where we are,” he said, signaling confidence in ongoing diplomatic efforts despite recent setbacks.Donald Trump said on Tuesday that discussions aimed at ending the Iran war could resume in Pakistan within days, following the collapse of negotiations over the weekend.

The breakdown prompted Washington to impose a blockade on Iranian ports, escalating economic and military pressure on Tehran.A two-week ceasefire between US and Iranian forces remains in effect, with one week remaining, offering a limited window for diplomatic engagement.

The pause in hostilities follows weeks of intensified conflict that began on February 28, when US and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran.Tehran retaliated with attacks targeting Israel and Gulf states hosting US military bases, expanding the geographic scope of the conflict.

Subsequent US-Israeli operations inside Iran, along with Israeli strikes in Lebanon, have resulted in significant casualties and widespread displacement, according to official accounts.

The evolving situation underscores the complexity of negotiations, with diplomatic momentum constrained by entrenched mistrust and ongoing military developments.

In a telephone conversation, Lavrov stressed the importance of preventing a return to armed confrontation and reiterated that the conflict has no military solution, according to the ministry’s statement.

The call followed recent talks between the United States and Iran in Pakistan, which ended without agreement. Araqchi briefed Lavrov on the discussions, the ministry said, providing details of negotiations that failed to produce a settlement.

Russia has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the conflict, signaling willingness to engage diplomatically as tensions remain high despite a temporary ceasefire and ongoing international efforts to restart negotiations.

The revised text, circulated by Bahrain, removes earlier provisions that would have allowed the use of force and instead urges states to coordinate “defensive” measures to ensure safe navigation, including escorting commercial vessels.

The vote comes amid more than five weeks of conflict triggered by U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran in late February, which has led Tehran to largely restrict passage through the strait, a key conduit for global energy supplies, sending oil prices sharply higher.

Diplomats said the watered-down version stands a better chance of adoption but its outcome remains uncertain. A resolution requires at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes from the five permanent members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States.

Earlier drafts backed by Gulf states and Washington had included language authorizing “all defensive means necessary,” but faced resistance from China and Russia, prompting multiple revisions. China has argued that authorizing force risks escalation and has instead called for efforts to de-escalate the conflict.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing was prepared to work with Russia at the Security Council to help calm tensions in the Middle East, emphasizing that a ceasefire was the fundamental path to resolving the crisis.

Iran has signaled it seeks a lasting end to hostilities but has resisted pressure to reopen the strait, while U.S. President Donald Trump has warned of consequences if Tehran does not reach a deal by a self-imposed deadline.

The latest draft reflects a compromise effort to bridge divisions within the council while addressing growing concerns over disruptions to one of the world’s most critical maritime trade routes.

Wang Yi has led a flurry of outreach, holding discussions with counterparts across the Middle East and Europe while advocating a ceasefire and reopening of the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Beijing has also opposed a United Nations proposal backed by Bahrain that could authorize force to ensure maritime transit through the strait.

Analysts say the diplomatic push reflects China’s broader ambition to project itself as a responsible global power. Sun Yun of the Stimson Center said the conflict presents an opportunity for Beijing to demonstrate leadership, while former U.S. diplomat Danny Russel described the initiative as largely symbolic, comparing it to China’s earlier proposals on Ukraine that lacked implementation.

“It’s messaging, not mediation,” Russel said, arguing that China is seeking to contrast its approach with Washington’s.The administration of Donald Trump has shown limited enthusiasm for third-party mediation, with U.S. officials indicating reluctance to elevate China’s diplomatic role in the Middle East.

One official described Washington’s stance on the China-Pakistan proposal as “agnostic,” though the position could shift ahead of a planned summit between Trump and Xi Jinping expected in mid-May.Beijing has an economic incentive to contain the conflict, particularly disruptions linked to the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global energy flows.

While China has reduced its reliance on Iranian oil to about 13 percent of imports and maintains strategic reserves, analysts warn that prolonged instability could raise input costs and weaken global demand for Chinese exports.

China has also worked to secure safe passage for its vessels through the strait, even as tensions have driven up energy prices worldwide. At the same time, Beijing’s position aligns with Moscow’s opposition to measures that could expand the conflict, with both countries wary of endorsing force through the United Nations Security Council.

Diplomatic activity has intensified in recent days, with Wang engaging officials from countries including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel, France and the United Arab Emirates. He has also sought backing from European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and regional leaders for China’s ceasefire proposal.

China’s embassy in Washington said Beijing has been working “tirelessly for peace,” while analysts note that its approach emphasizes calls for de-escalation, respect for international law and a greater role for the United Nations.

However, U.S. officials say the proposal lacks operational detail, describing it as a broad appeal rather than a concrete roadmap for ending the conflict. The muted response from Washington underscores broader strategic competition between the two powers, limiting the prospects for coordinated diplomacy.

Meanwhile, efforts at the United Nations continue, with Bahrain revising its proposal to authorize defensive measures to protect shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, with a vote expected in the coming days.

Speaking to reporters, Zelensky said the messages followed a sharp escalation in global energy prices linked to widening conflict in the Middle East, which has disrupted supplies of oil, gas and refined products. He said Kyiv remained open to an Easter ceasefire under reciprocal conditions.

Signals tied to energy market pressuresA source familiar with the matter said U.S. officials had conveyed the concerns during routine contacts with Ukrainian counterparts, adding that the initial signals appeared to have originated from Moscow.

The US State Department and Russia’s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.Ukraine has intensified strikes on Russian oil facilities in recent months as part of its broader strategy to undermine revenues supporting Moscow’s military campaign.

The reported outreach from allies reflects concern that such attacks could further tighten global supply at a time of already elevated prices.Russian strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have left the country facing acute shortages, forcing authorities to secure alternative supplies.

Zelensky said Kyiv had reached agreements with several Middle Eastern countries to bolster energy support following a recent regional visit.He said Ukraine had secured a deal for year-long diesel deliveries, critical for both military operations and the agricultural sector, though he did not disclose volumes or suppliers.

Ukraine also signed framework cooperation agreements with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and indicated another agreement was being prepared with the United Arab Emirates.

Zelensky said he had also discussed air defense needs with regional leaders, but noted that partners were currently prioritizing deployments to the Middle East due to ongoing hostilities involving Iran.

He added that Ukraine risked being sidelined in the allocation of advanced anti-ballistic missile systems as international focus shifts toward the escalating regional conflict.

Sharif, writing on social media platform X, said Pakistan would be “ready and honoured” to facilitate “meaningful and conclusive talks” for a comprehensive settlement, subject to agreement by Washington and Tehran.

His statement comes as the war, involving U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran and retaliatory attacks, entered its fourth week.Trump said on Monday that U.S. officials had engaged in “very good and productive” discussions with Iran over a “complete and total resolution of hostilities in the Middle East.”

He added that talks began on Sunday and continued into Monday, involving Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner.

Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf rejected the U.S. account, saying no talks had taken place and describing reports of negotiations as “fake news,” according to Iranian state-linked statements and sources familiar with the matter.

The divergence underscores the opacity surrounding diplomatic efforts as fighting continues across the region.

The United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, citing a lack of progress in negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme. Mediator Oman had previously indicated that significant advances had been made in earlier discussions.

Since the strikes, Iran has responded with missile attacks and expanded its actions beyond Israeli territory, targeting countries hosting U.S. bases and striking Gulf energy infrastructure.

The conflict has disrupted global energy markets, with Iran effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supplies transit.

The escalation has heightened concerns over supply stability and increased geopolitical risk across the Middle East, prompting renewed international calls for de-escalation through diplomatic channels.

The announcement reflects continued attention by European institutions on developments linked to public order and civil conditions.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that the EU remains closely engaged with events unfolding in Iran.

She highlighted the importance of monitoring conditions while maintaining alignment with international principles.

EU officials have emphasized that their approach is guided by long-standing commitments to human dignity and legal norms.

Any future steps are expected to follow established EU procedures and collective decision-making processes.

Brussels has repeatedly underlined the need for restraint and dialogue in situations involving public unrest.

European leaders have also stressed that stability and lawful conduct are essential for long-term regional balance.

The European Commission plays a central role in proposing policy measures that are later reviewed by member states.

Such proposals typically undergo extensive consultation before being finalized and adopted.

In recent years, the EU has used a range of diplomatic and economic tools to express its positions on global issues.

These tools are often framed within a broader strategy aimed at encouraging cooperation and compliance with international standards.

Officials say the current focus reflects ongoing assessments rather than abrupt policy shifts.

The EU continues to engage with international partners to ensure consistency and coordination.

Observers note that European actions are often incremental and designed to send clear policy signals.

This approach allows room for dialogue while reinforcing shared values among member countries.

The situation in Iran has remained on the EU agenda through various institutional forums.

Regular discussions help shape responses that balance principle, diplomacy, and regional considerations.

European leaders have reiterated that their goal is not isolation but constructive engagement where possible.

They maintain that long-term solutions depend on dialogue, transparency, and respect for established norms.

As developments continue, EU institutions are expected to keep member states informed.

Any proposals will be discussed collectively to ensure unity and clarity of purpose.

Overall, the EU’s latest remarks signal continued attentiveness rather than immediate change.

Future steps will likely depend on evolving circumstances and ongoing consultations.

The renewed meetings bring together Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, senior United States envoys, and key European leaders, reflecting a shared determination to explore pathways toward ending the conflict.

After lengthy discussions on Sunday, US representatives expressed optimism, noting tangible progress and constructive engagement among all sides involved in the dialogue.

The continuation of talks underscores the seriousness of the moment, as diplomatic efforts intensify to shape a framework for stability and long-term peace in Europe.

Ukraine has shown flexibility by signalling openness to alternative security arrangements in exchange for firm international guarantees, highlighting a pragmatic approach to safeguarding its sovereignty.

This willingness to explore compromise has been welcomed by several European leaders, who see it as a step toward unlocking broader consensus.

The Berlin talks are unfolding against the backdrop of a pivotal week for European diplomacy, with major decisions expected at the European Union level.

Later this week, EU leaders are set to consider financial mechanisms designed to support Ukraine’s economic resilience and reconstruction.

These measures are viewed as essential to ensuring that Ukraine remains economically stable while diplomatic negotiations continue.

European officials have emphasized that sustained financial and political backing is central to preserving peace and deterring future conflict.

Foreign ministers meeting in Brussels are also working to reinforce unity through coordinated policy responses and updated sanctions frameworks.

Despite complex geopolitical pressures, there is a visible effort among European capitals to present a cohesive and confident stance.

Several leaders have described the current phase as a rare opening, where sustained diplomacy could lead to meaningful de-escalation.

Finnish President Alexander Stubb captured this cautious optimism by describing the talks as the closest point yet to a viable peace arrangement.

Discussions are reportedly focusing on three interconnected pillars: a structured peace framework, reliable security guarantees, and a comprehensive reconstruction plan.

Together, these elements aim to address both immediate security needs and the long-term rebuilding of Ukraine’s economy and infrastructure.

European leaders attending the Berlin meetings have stressed the importance of inclusive dialogue involving Ukraine, the United States, and European partners.

This collective approach reflects a broader belief that durable peace can only be achieved through shared responsibility and cooperation.

The presence of multiple European heads of government highlights the depth of regional commitment to a negotiated solution.

At the same time, diplomatic engagement is being paired with clear messages about the importance of respecting international law and sovereignty.

European officials have reiterated that peace must be built on stability, not coercion, and on guarantees that prevent future escalation.

The talks also signal Europe’s intention to remain an active global actor capable of shaping outcomes through diplomacy rather than division.

As negotiations continue, there is growing recognition that the choices made this week could influence Europe’s security architecture for years to come.

The focus remains on creating conditions that allow for a ceasefire, followed by structured steps toward normalization and recovery.

For Ukraine, the talks represent both a challenge and an opportunity to secure lasting protection and international partnership.

For Europe, they offer a chance to demonstrate unity, leadership, and strategic maturity at a critical historical juncture.

Observers note that even incremental progress in Berlin carries symbolic weight, reinforcing faith in diplomacy amid prolonged conflict.

As the second day of talks unfolds, expectations remain measured but hopeful, with many leaders emphasizing patience and persistence.

The coming days are likely to test Europe’s cohesion, but they also present a rare opportunity to shape a more stable future.

If sustained, the dialogue underway in Berlin could mark the beginning of a new chapter centered on security, cooperation, and reconstruction.

The meeting reflected the Kingdom’s ongoing commitment to strengthening regional partnerships and expanding cooperation across multiple fields.

The discussions highlighted the deep historical ties between Saudi Arabia and Eritrea, with both leaders emphasizing their shared vision for stability, development, and enhanced collaboration.

The meeting underscored the Kingdom’s role in fostering constructive dialogue with neighboring nations and supporting regional progress.

During the talks, the two sides reviewed various areas of cooperation, including economic development, security coordination, cultural exchange, and opportunities for joint investment.

The dialogue reflected mutual interest in broadening the strategic partnership to benefit both nations and support long-term regional stability.

The leaders also explored ways to strengthen political and diplomatic relations in line with evolving regional priorities.

Their discussions demonstrated a unified commitment to addressing shared challenges through cooperation, trust, and diplomatic engagement.

In addition to bilateral matters, the meeting touched on broader issues of common interest that affect the Red Sea region and the African continent.

This included enhancing mechanisms that promote peace, maritime security, and economic integration.

The visit of President Afwerki to Riyadh reflects the growing importance of Saudi-Eritrean relations and the Kingdom’s ongoing efforts to build bridges across regions.

The meeting reaffirmed the spirit of partnership that both countries seek to nurture as they progress toward greater development and cooperation.

Later in the day, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman held a separate meeting with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, marking another significant diplomatic engagement.

Their conversation focused on key regional and global developments, including efforts to promote peace and stability across different parts of the world.

The Crown Prince and the UN chief reviewed international challenges and discussed ways to enhance global cooperation. Both emphasized the importance of supporting international institutions and strengthening multilateral efforts that contribute to global security.

The meeting highlighted Saudi Arabia’s active role in international diplomacy, particularly in promoting humanitarian initiatives, supporting conflict resolution, and contributing to global development.

The Kingdom’s cooperation with the United Nations continues to expand through shared goals and collaborative programs.

Discussions with the UN Secretary-General also touched on joint efforts to address humanitarian needs, support sustainable development, and enhance dialogue between nations.

The talks reflected the Kingdom’s vision of contributing to a more stable and prosperous global community.

Both meetings showcased the Kingdom’s strategic engagement with global and regional leaders.

By hosting discussions that address international issues, Saudi Arabia continues to strengthen its position as a pivotal diplomatic actor and a trusted partner in global affairs.

The presence of both President Afwerki and Secretary-General Guterres in Riyadh illustrates the Kingdom’s growing diplomatic influence and its commitment to fostering cooperation at all levels.

These meetings reaffirm the Kingdom’s role in shaping conversations that promote peace, unity, and international dialogue.

Through such engagements, the Kingdom continues to work toward a future defined by collaboration, development, and global stability.

The leadership’s dedication to building strong relationships ensures that Saudi Arabia remains at the forefront of international diplomacy.

The day’s diplomatic activities sent a clear message of the Kingdom’s readiness to engage constructively with all partners, explore new opportunities, and support initiatives that contribute to regional and global progress.

These efforts reflect a long-term vision of fostering a secure and interconnected world.

Officials emphasized that constructive engagement, not economic pressure, is the most effective path toward resolving disputes and restoring harmony along the shared frontier.

Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow noted that dialogue must remain independent from any discussions on trade or tariffs.

He stressed that linking unrelated issues to political negotiations can distort diplomatic efforts and hinder long-term peacebuilding.

Tensions resurfaced recently after isolated clashes escalated along the border, prompting concerns for civilian safety and regional stability.

Both countries experienced significant displacement of residents, highlighting the importance of immediate cooperation and calm.

Thailand’s leadership underscored that its priority is to protect its citizens while simultaneously encouraging a peaceful environment for talks.

Officials reiterated that meaningful dialogue can only take place when both sides demonstrate sincerity and willingness to step back from confrontation.

The government emphasized that negotiations should focus on reducing tensions and preventing misunderstandings between the two neighbouring nations.

Thailand expressed hope that Cambodia will engage responsibly and help create space for de-escalation and cooperation.

Despite renewed hostilities, Thailand maintains that external pressure—particularly through tariffs—should not be used as a tool to force diplomacy.

The foreign minister explained that economic discussions and security dialogue must remain clearly separated to avoid undermining trust.

Thailand continues to rely on established diplomatic channels within ASEAN to promote stability and encourage peaceful problem-solving.

Regional cooperation, officials said, remains fundamental to maintaining unity and resilience in Southeast Asia.

Leaders also highlighted that sustainable peace requires open communication and credible commitments from all parties involved in the dispute.

They stated that Cambodia’s willingness to halt hostilities would be a crucial first step in setting the stage for talks.

Thailand affirmed its readiness to listen and re-enter discussions once conditions are conducive to productive negotiation.

Officials noted that showing restraint, reducing aggression and building confidence are essential components of any renewed dialogue.

Cambodia has repeatedly said it intends to honour previous ceasefire arrangements, though Thailand has pointed to several incidents that have raised concern.

The recent exchanges underscore the need for stronger mechanisms to prevent flare-ups and maintain stability.

Thailand’s foreign minister stated that there are two paths ahead: continued tension or a commitment to peace and cooperation.

He expressed confidence that diplomatic engagement, when genuine, can restore calm along the border and strengthen bilateral ties.

The country has continued to take precautionary steps to secure affected areas while ensuring that any defensive measures remain measured and responsible.

Officials reassured the public that protecting human life and preventing escalation remain central to Thailand’s approach.

Both nations have a long history of cultural ties and economic interaction, making cooperation essential for long-term prosperity.

Thailand emphasized that peace is not only in the interest of the two countries but also vital for regional development and stability.

International observers have encouraged both nations to pursue dialogue and avoid actions that could worsen the situation.

Thailand welcomed international support while reiterating that durable peace must originate through genuine cooperation between the two neighbours.

As Thailand works toward reducing tensions, its leaders stressed the importance of diplomacy, patience and responsible decision-making.

The government remains hopeful that constructive engagement will ultimately pave the way for a peaceful and stable future for both sides.