Modi’s visit includes meetings in France and Slovakia before he attends the G7 summit in Evian, France, marking India’s 13th participation as a partner country at the forum. The G7 members include Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The Indian government said it would call for safe and unrestricted maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route, while raising broader concerns linked to developments in West Asia.“We want and we have urged that there be unimpeded and safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz in keeping with international law,” Indian foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters.

The comments came after US attacks on vessels near Hormuz that killed three Indian sailors. The US Central Command said the strike was carried out because the tanker involved was “attempting to transport oil from Iran.”India’s foreign ministry said protecting the welfare and security of its seafaring community remained a priority.

More than 320,000 Indians work as mariners globally, making them one of the largest national groups in the profession, while about 20,000 are currently serving on commercial vessels in the Hormuz region, according to the Forward Seamen’s Union of India.The Indian Embassy in Oman said three ships staffed by Indian personnel in the Gulf had been attacked by American forces during the week.

Modi is also expected to meet US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the summit, with the issue likely to feature in discussions between the two leaders.Analysts said the incidents had increased India’s focus on securing maritime movement across the wider Gulf corridor, with New Delhi seeking clarity over the protection of civilian shipping.

The summit will also provide India an opportunity to engage with Gulf countries invited by France, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Egypt.The G7 meeting begins on Monday in France, bringing together leaders of major industrial economies to discuss global economic and security issues.

The aircraft crashed while landing at an air force station, according to a statement from the Indian Air Force. Images from the site showed wreckage scattered across a field.

The air force expressed condolences to the families of those killed and said it stood with them during the loss.

The cause of the crash was not immediately disclosed, and authorities were expected to investigate the incident.

The AN-32 is a twin-engine military transport aircraft used by the Indian Air Force for logistics, training and operational missions.

The crash follows another recent accident involving an Indian military aircraft in Assam. In March, two Indian Air Force pilots were killed when a Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter jet crashed during a routine training mission in the state.

Military aviation accidents in India have previously led to reviews of aircraft safety, maintenance and training procedures.

The ministry said it summoned US Deputy Chief of Mission Jason Meeks to lodge “a strong protest” over what it called continuing attacks by US naval forces on commercial vessels carrying Indian mariners.The attacks had resulted in the “tragic and avoidable loss of three Indian lives,” the ministry said in a statement.

Meeks was first summoned on Wednesday after a US strike hit the Palau-flagged tanker MT Settebello off the coast of Oman, killing three Indian crew members.The incident followed a June 8 strike on another Palau-flagged tanker, MT Marivex, from which Omani authorities rescued 24 Indian sailors.

On Thursday, a Guinea-Bissau-flagged tanker was also hit in a US strike, according to Indian officials. New Delhi said the vessel’s crew, including 20 Indian sailors, were rescued.A US State Department official said Washington was in direct contact with the Indian government regarding the matter.

India is among the world’s largest sources of merchant seafarers, with more than 320,000 active sailors in 2025, according to the country’s shipping ministry.The shipping ministry has advised Indian sailors operating on Indian and foreign-flagged vessels travelling through conflict-affected waters to exercise the highest degree of caution.

“The continuing attacks on shipping in the region are deeply worrisome,” Indian foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said, adding that such attacks must stop.India’s navy said on Thursday it had conducted a high-risk operation to remove an unexploded missile warhead from the Marshall Islands-flagged tanker MT Olympic Life after it was struck off Oman on May 26.The vessel later reached India’s southern port of Kochi safely.

The navy said the projectile had entered the hull, passed through several structural compartments and became lodged inside a fuel tank.Shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz have faced disruption since Iran restricted maritime traffic after attacks by the United States and Israel began on February 28. The United States has also imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports.

For more than a decade, Narendra Modi has remained at the center of Indian politics, shaping national debates, influencing policy priorities, and redefining the contours of electoral campaigning.

His political journey from a modest upbringing in Gujarat to becoming India’s longest-serving non-Congress prime minister represents one of the most significant leadership stories in modern democratic history.Since first taking office as prime minister in May 2014, Modi has led the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) through multiple national elections and overseen a period of profound political transformation.

His continued prominence in public life has made him one of the most recognizable political figures globally and one of the most influential leaders India has produced in the post-independence era.Modi’s rise was neither sudden nor accidental.

Born in Vadnagar in Gujarat, he spent decades working within the organizational framework of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) before becoming a key strategist and political organizer for the BJP. His reputation as an effective administrator grew during his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014, where he promoted industrial development, infrastructure expansion, and investment-driven growth.

By the time he entered the national stage in 2014, India was witnessing growing public demand for decisive leadership, economic development, and administrative efficiency. Modi positioned himself as a leader capable of delivering change, presenting a vision centered on governance, growth, and national confidence.

The BJP’s landslide victory that year marked a turning point in Indian politics.What has distinguished Modi from many of his predecessors is his ability to maintain a direct connection with voters across social, economic, and regional divides. Through mass rallies, digital outreach, radio broadcasts, and extensive travel, he has cultivated a public image that extends beyond traditional political structures.

Political analysts frequently point to this communication strategy as one of the principal reasons for his durability. Rather than relying solely on party machinery, Modi developed a personal rapport with supporters, turning elections into leadership-centered contests.

Another factor behind his longevity has been the BJP’s organizational strength. Under Modi’s leadership, the party expanded its electoral footprint into regions where it had historically struggled. State-level victories, grassroots mobilization, and a disciplined campaign structure helped transform the BJP into India’s dominant political force.

His tenure has also been marked by major policy initiatives. Programs aimed at expanding financial inclusion, increasing access to sanitation facilities, improving digital connectivity, and delivering welfare benefits directly to citizens have formed a central pillar of his governance model.

Supporters argue that these initiatives have improved state capacity and brought government services closer to ordinary citizens.Modi’s leadership has coincided with India’s emergence as one of the world’s fastest-growing major economies.

During his years in office, India strengthened its position in global supply chains, expanded digital infrastructure, and increased its international profile through active diplomacy and participation in multilateral forums.On the world stage, Modi has cultivated relationships with leaders across ideological and geographic divides.

His engagements with the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Indo-Pacific region have reflected an effort to position India as a leading global power.Several international leaders have publicly acknowledged India’s growing influence during Modi’s tenure.

Former and current world leaders have often described him as a strong political mandate-holder capable of implementing long-term policy goals. International forums including the G20 have provided platforms where India’s voice has become increasingly prominent.

At home, Modi’s supporters frequently cite his work ethic, disciplined lifestyle, and focus on execution as qualities that distinguish his leadership. His political messaging often emphasizes national pride, cultural heritage, self-reliance, and development.

These themes have resonated with large segments of the electorate and helped sustain his popularity across multiple election cycles.Yet longevity in democratic politics also invites scrutiny. Modi’s years in office have been accompanied by intense political debate over economic decisions, social policies, institutional reforms, and questions relating to governance.

Critics have challenged aspects of his administration’s approach, while supporters argue that difficult decisions were necessary to pursue broader national objectives.This combination of strong support and strong criticism has, paradoxically, reinforced Modi’s centrality in Indian politics.

Few leaders in contemporary India have generated such sustained public engagement, ensuring that political discourse often revolves around his policies and leadership style.Beyond electoral success, Modi’s influence can be seen in how political campaigning itself has evolved.

Modern Indian elections increasingly emphasize leadership branding, digital communication, data-driven outreach, and direct voter engagement. Many political parties have adapted elements of the campaign model refined during the Modi era.His journey has also become a source of inspiration for many supporters who view his rise from humble beginnings as evidence of the opportunities available within India’s democratic system.

The narrative of perseverance, organizational dedication, and long-term political commitment has become a defining feature of his public image.Historians and political observers will ultimately debate the long-term impact of Modi’s tenure. However, there is little disagreement about the scale of his influence.

He has presided over a period in which India experienced major economic, technological, diplomatic, and political changes while remaining one of the most electorally successful leaders in the country’s history.

As India continues its development journey, Modi’s legacy will be assessed through multiple lenses: economic performance, governance reforms, social transformation, foreign policy achievements, and his ability to reshape the political landscape. Regardless of where those debates lead, his place among the most consequential leaders of modern India is already firmly established.

The emerging industry centers on collecting so-called “egocentric data” — first-person recordings captured through head-mounted cameras, smart glasses and motion sensors that allow AI systems to learn how humans interact with physical environments.
In Chennai, 25-year-old homemaker Nagireddy Sriramyachandra spends part of her day filming routine household chores, including food preparation, for AI data company Objectways.

She earns about 250 rupees ($3) an hour for the recordings, which are uploaded through a specialized application and used to train robotic systems.
Developers believe that exposing AI models to large volumes of human behavioral data will help robots perform real-world tasks more effectively, particularly in domestic and industrial settings where navigation and object manipulation remain significant technological challenges.

Objectways, which operates in India and the United States and works with machine-learning platform Amazon SageMaker, collects videos requested by corporate clients seeking to train robotics systems for activities such as folding clothes, preparing beverages and performing basic kitchen tasks.

The business reflects growing investor interest in humanoid robotics. Morgan Stanley has projected that more than one billion humanoid robots could be in operation worldwide by 2050, primarily in commercial and industrial applications.
Objectways Chief Executive Ravi Shankar said automation would eventually assume responsibility for some routine jobs, allowing workers to focus on more advanced activities.

The company’s operations extend beyond homes. At a textile factory in Tamil Nadu’s Karur district, workers wearing smart glasses and head-mounted cameras record manufacturing processes while carrying out routine production work.

India has increasingly positioned itself as a global center for AI data collection, annotation and processing services, leveraging its large labor force and established technology sector.

Aditi Surie, a digital labor researcher at the Indian Institute for Human Settlements in Bengaluru, said demand for data collection services linked to AI development is likely to expand as companies seek increasingly sophisticated training datasets.

The rise of such work has also intensified debate over automation’s impact on employment in a country where informal labor remains a major component of the economy.

Government policy think tank NITI Aayog has warned that discussions surrounding artificial intelligence often focus on highly skilled workers while overlooking implications for India’s estimated 490 million informal workers.

Ahead of an international AI summit hosted by India this year, the institution examined how artificial intelligence could affect a wide range of occupations, including agricultural laborers, street vendors, cobblers and sanitation workers.

Among those participating in data collection projects is Ponni, a 55-year-old flower garland maker in Bengaluru who has spent years working in the informal economy. She has also been paid to wear a recording device while carrying out her daily activities.
She expressed concern that future workers engaged in similar occupations could face growing competition from automated systems trained on human-generated data.

At an Objectways recording studio, workers repeatedly film themselves performing household tasks in fully furnished mock apartments designed to generate varied training material. Employees record dozens of short clips daily while changing positions, angles and environments to increase the diversity of datasets supplied to clients.

Rani N., a 21-year-old engineering graduate employed as an AI system trainer, said she records roughly 90 videos each day, often repeating the same activity in different locations within a room.

Elsewhere, workers arrange objects such as water bottles, crayons and office supplies while specialized depth-sensing cameras capture movement and spatial relationships.

Qanat Consulting Services, a subcontractor based in Andhra Pradesh, supplies recordings to larger AI data firms through a network of around 2,000 contributors. Some participants wear motion-tracking bands on their hands, wrists and legs to provide more detailed movement information.

Other companies are expanding beyond visual data. Bengaluru-based Humyn Labs gathers audio recordings and conversations on assigned topics to help clients train systems capable of understanding speech patterns and human interaction.

Humyn Labs founder Manish Agarwal said he expects future workplaces to combine human expertise with robotic capabilities rather than replace workers entirely.

He said advances in robotics and artificial intelligence could eventually allow workers in one country to supervise automated systems operating thousands of kilometers away, creating new forms of cross-border employment.

The milestone comes nearly 12 years after Modi first took office on May 26, 2014. According to government figures, his uninterrupted tenure has now exceeded Nehru’s 4,398-day period as an elected prime minister, calculated from India’s first general election in 1952.

“Public service is the greatest measure of good governance,” Modi wrote on social media, adding that public trust is earned through humility, dedication and a sense of duty.

The achievement follows Modi’s return to power for a third consecutive term in 2024, making him only the second Indian leader after Nehru to secure three successive electoral mandates. His leadership has further entrenched the dominance of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance in Indian politics.

During Modi’s tenure, India’s economy expanded to approximately $4.19 trillion, becoming the world’s fourth-largest economy by nominal gross domestic product and overtaking Japan. His government has also highlighted large-scale infrastructure expansion, welfare programs and trade agreements with partners including the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

Government officials credit Modi’s administration with major social development initiatives, including the construction of about 120 million household toilets, the provision of 157 million tap-water connections and the expansion of clean cooking gas access to more than 100 million beneficiaries.

Kanchan Gupta, a senior adviser at India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, described the milestone as a reflection of Modi’s role in encouraging ambitious national development goals and delivering large-scale public welfare programs.

Analysts, however, note that Modi’s record in office has also attracted criticism. Journalist and author Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay said economic growth has coincided with concerns over widening wealth inequality and what critics describe as increasing concentration of economic power.

Mukhopadhyay also pointed to concerns raised by democracy watchdogs and political observers regarding the state of democratic institutions and growing political polarization during Modi’s years in office.

Modi has frequently faced criticism from opponents and rights groups over allegations that his Hindu nationalist agenda has weakened India’s secular traditions and contributed to rising religious polarization, particularly affecting the country’s Muslim minority. His supporters reject those accusations and argue that his policies have accelerated development, improved governance and expanded access to basic services.

After spending more than 15 years building careers and raising a family in the United States, Indian entrepreneur Astha Chaturvedi and her husband made a decision that would have seemed unlikely years earlier: they left the country and relocated to Bengaluru, concluding that the uncertainty surrounding their immigration status no longer aligned with their personal and professional goals.

Chaturvedi, 38, founder of Mouri Living, said the move followed years of waiting for employment-based permanent residency in the United States. Despite establishing successful careers and long-term roots in the country, the couple faced an immigration process that offered little certainty about when they might receive green cards.

Speaking about the decision, Chaturvedi said she and her husband had spent approximately 15 years building their lives in the United States. However, the lack of a predictable timeline for permanent residency increasingly influenced their future planning. According to her account, her husband’s place in the green card queue dated back to 2015, while her own application timeline began in 2020.

The experience reflects a challenge faced by many highly skilled foreign workers from India employed in the United States. Long waiting periods for employment-based green cards have become a defining feature of the immigration system for many applicants, particularly those working in technology and professional services sectors.

Before launching her own company, Chaturvedi built a career across some of the most prominent names in technology and consulting. She spent more than a decade working in Big Tech and at consulting firm McKinsey before joining Ripple in San Francisco.While pursuing her corporate career, she also nurtured ambitions of becoming a founder.

That goal, however, was complicated by visa restrictions. Chaturvedi said she initially held an H-1B visa, a status commonly used by skilled foreign professionals working in the United States. Because the visa tied her work authorization to a sponsoring employer, she was unable to independently launch a startup while maintaining that status.

Seeking greater flexibility, she transitioned to an H-4 dependent visa through her husband. After becoming eligible for an H-4 Employment Authorization Document, she gained the legal ability to work independently and pursue entrepreneurial opportunities.

A turning point came during a visit to India in 2024. Chaturvedi traveled there to recruit a chief technology officer for her startup. During the trip, a conversation with a family member prompted a broader reassessment of where the business should be based. A cousin suggested establishing an office in India, pointing to the country’s rapidly expanding startup ecosystem and growing pool of technology talent.

The idea led the couple to explore the possibility of relocating permanently. What began as a business discussion gradually evolved into a broader evaluation of career prospects, family priorities and long-term stability.According to Chaturvedi, the prospect of building a company in India became increasingly attractive as the country’s startup environment matured.

Bengaluru, often referred to as India’s technology capital, emerged as a natural destination because of its concentration of entrepreneurs, engineers, investors and technology companies.The move also offered something that years of waiting in the United States had not provided: certainty.

Rather than continuing to plan around an immigration process with no defined endpoint, the family chose to establish themselves in a country where residency and business ownership presented fewer structural obstacles.

Their decision comes at a time when immigration pathways for highly skilled workers remain a significant topic within the global technology industry. Many foreign professionals working in the United States contribute to sectors such as software development, consulting, finance and artificial intelligence while navigating visa systems that can affect career choices, entrepreneurial ambitions and family planning.

For Chaturvedi, the relocation was not framed as a rejection of the United States. Instead, it reflected a reassessment of where she could most effectively pursue personal and professional goals.

After years spent advancing through major corporations and waiting for permanent residency, she concluded that India offered a clearer path toward building the company and life she envisioned.The decision ultimately combined business opportunity with personal certainty.

After more than a decade and a half in the United States, the couple relocated to Bengaluru, where they began the next phase of their careers without the constraints of an unresolved immigration timeline.

India’s Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways said a fire broke out at around 1:30 p.m. local time aboard the Palau-flagged tanker MT Marivex while it was operating off Oman’s coast.

“There has been a fire reported on a vessel, MT Marivex, on which there were 24 Indian seafarers. All Indian seafarers are safe,” ministry director Opesh Kumar Sharma told reporters.

Images shared by the Forward Seamen’s Union of India showed Indian Navy helicopters winching crew members from the vessel as thick black smoke engulfed parts of the ship, including the bridge and accommodation block.

Ship-tracking data from MarineTraffic showed the tanker south of Oman’s capital, Muscat, at the time of the incident.

Authorities did not disclose the cause of the fire or provide details on damage to the vessel.

The rescue comes amid heightened maritime tensions in the region, where shipping routes have faced disruptions since the outbreak of conflict involving Iran, the United States and Israel earlier this year.

India’s foreign ministry on Monday reiterated concerns over the regional conflict, saying it had caused significant human suffering and disrupted global energy supplies and economic activity.

The campaign follows a landslide electoral victory by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP in West Bengal, where the party pledged to “detect, delete and deport” illegal migrants.

West Bengal Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari said on Sunday that 4,800 Bangladeshi citizens had already been deported after being held in newly established detention facilities across the state.

“We have started the work of deporting Bangladeshi infiltrators who do not fall under the purview of the Citizenship Amendment Act,” Adhikari told reporters in Kolkata.

He said the government established holding centers in every district during May and that a further 836 people were currently being held pending deportation.

India and Bangladesh share a long and porous border, and migration between the two countries has historically been driven by economic opportunities, family ties and cross-border cultural links.

The new state administration has also ordered detention measures for Rohingya refugees, members of a predominantly Muslim minority who fled persecution in neighboring Myanmar.

The deportation drive has renewed debate over immigration and citizenship in one of India’s most politically sensitive border regions.

Senior BJP leaders have frequently described undocumented migrants as “infiltrators,” arguing that illegal migration places pressure on public resources and alters demographic balances.

Critics, including civil rights advocates and opposition groups, contend that the government’s rhetoric and enforcement measures disproportionately affect Muslim communities and risk undermining due process protections. Human rights organizations have previously accused Indian authorities of forcibly expelling Bengali-speaking Muslims without adequate legal review.

The crackdown comes as diplomatic relations between India and Bangladesh continue to recover from tensions that emerged after the 2024 political upheaval in Dhaka, which ended the rule of former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, a close partner of New Delhi.

A new government elected in Bangladesh in February has sought to stabilize ties with India. Border security chiefs from both countries are scheduled to meet in New Delhi on Monday to discuss cross-border issues, including migration and security cooperation.

The project, located in Visakhapatnam district on India’s eastern coast, forms part of Google’s planned $15 billion investment in India between 2026 and 2030. The facility, comprising three data centers in Tarluvada, Adavivaram and Rambilli villages, is expected to become the company’s largest AI infrastructure hub outside the United States.

While state authorities and industry advocates have promoted the development as a landmark investment in India’s digital economy, concerns have intensified in recent weeks over land acquisition, environmental impacts and the project’s long-term demands on local infrastructure.

According to activists, nearly 200 acres of the approximately 500 acres allocated for the development belong to Dalit families who were granted land rights under a nationwide redistribution program launched during the 1970s.

Critics allege that landowners were pressured into selling their plots at prices significantly below prevailing market rates.E.A.S. Sarma, a former Indian power secretary who has campaigned against the project, said the acquisition process disproportionately affected marginalized landholders.

He argued that compensation paid to local families amounted to a fraction of the land’s market value, effectively transferring economic benefits from poor rural communities to a global technology company.Environmental concerns have emerged as another focal point of opposition. Activists contend that a large portion of the proposed development area falls within or near notified forest land and warn that extensive clearing could increase erosion and sedimentation in nearby reservoirs.Critics also question the project’s future water requirements. Data centers typically consume substantial volumes of water for cooling systems, and residents fear the facility could place additional pressure on resources in a region that has periodically faced water scarcity.Sarma said the development could affect both reservoir capacity and drinking water availability for Visakhapatnam and surrounding communities. He also raised concerns about electricity demand, arguing that large-scale data centers place significant loads on local power infrastructure.Local advocacy groups say uncertainty surrounding the project’s environmental footprint has fueled public anxiety. The Human Rights Forum, a grassroots organization active in the region, said residents have struggled to obtain detailed information regarding water sourcing, electricity supply arrangements and environmental mitigation plans.V.S. Krishna, the organization’s coordinator in Visakhapatnam, said public frustration has grown because key aspects of the project remain unclear. He said local communities were seeking greater transparency regarding the hub’s operational requirements and its potential social and environmental consequences.Residents, including Dalit farmers and urban community groups, have begun organizing meetings and localized protests to demand additional information and safeguards before construction progresses further.The dispute highlights the broader challenge facing India as it seeks to attract large-scale technology investments while balancing environmental concerns, infrastructure constraints and the interests of communities affected by major industrial projects.