Dorrah Alharbi, a history graduate of the University of Illinois Chicago, founded The Little Palestine Project to collect and archive stories from immigrants of Arab origin who settled in the Chicago metropolitan area, particularly in the southwest suburban communities collectively known as “Little Palestine.”

The project uses personal objects brought by immigrants during their journeys to the United States as entry points into broader conversations about migration, identity and community formation. Participants are invited to share items that hold personal or cultural significance, ranging from photographs and clothing to official documents and family heirlooms.

“The Little Palestine Project is an object-based oral history initiative,” Alharbi said. “I ask people who have immigrated from any Arab country what items they decided to bring with them on their journey here to Chicago.”

Although Alharbi is Iraqi American, she said the initiative was inspired by the multicultural Arab character of the neighborhood where she lives, which is home to Palestinians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Yemenis and other Arab communities.

The effort comes amid heightened national attention on immigration and identity issues in the United States. Alharbi said documenting personal histories has become increasingly important to improve public understanding of Arab American communities and preserve stories that are often absent from mainstream historical narratives.

Her own family immigrated from Iraq during the 1990s and initially settled on Chicago’s North Side before relocating to the southwest suburbs, where Arab and Palestinian populations have grown significantly over recent decades.

Communities including Bridgeview, Palos Hills and Orland Park have become important centers of Arab American life in the Chicago area. Bridgeview, in particular, was formally designated as “Little Palestine” earlier this year with decorative signage recognizing the area’s cultural heritage.

Alharbi said early efforts to recruit participants were challenging, with some local business owners declining to display promotional materials for the project. She continued outreach efforts across the community to encourage participation and build trust among families willing to share their experiences.

Drawing on her training in art history, Alharbi focuses on material culture as a way of uncovering personal and collective histories. She said physical objects often provide a more accessible and comfortable starting point for conversations about migration, identity and belonging.

The project has documented 15 stories to date. Collected items include family photographs, key chains, wedding memorabilia, immigration documents, traditional clothing, embroidery and a driver’s license issued in Palestine in 1921.

Images and stories from the collection are currently featured through the project’s social media platform, and Alharbi said she plans to launch a bilingual website to make the archive more accessible to a wider audience.

“We’re able to uncover more and more history that isn’t really narrativized,” Alharbi said.

The comments came days after European Union member states approved new migration rules that permit the establishment of so-called “return hubs” outside the bloc, where rejected asylum seekers and migrants could be transferred after being denied permission to remain in EU territory.

Turk said the measures must be implemented in full compliance with international human rights and refugee law, stressing that EU governments cannot transfer their legal obligations to third countries.

“EU states cannot simply outsource their human rights obligations to third states in this context,” Turk said in a statement.

The new framework reflects a broader shift across Europe toward stricter migration controls, as governments face sustained political pressure from anti-immigration and far-right parties that have gained support in several countries in recent years.

European policymakers have increasingly focused on improving deportation and repatriation procedures after years of criticism that existing systems were ineffective. According to EU figures cited by officials, fewer than 30 percent of individuals ordered to leave the bloc are ultimately returned to their countries of origin.

Turk cautioned that returning migrants to countries where they could face persecution, abuse or other serious harm would violate the principle of non-refoulement, a cornerstone of international refugee and human rights law.

“International human rights law and refugee law are very clear — no-one should be returned to a place where they would be at risk of serious human rights violations or other irreparable harm,” he said.

The UN rights chief expressed particular concern about the detention and transfer of vulnerable groups, including children, describing such actions as highly sensitive exercises of state authority that carry significant risks of rights violations.

Under the new rules, migrants subject to deportation orders must cooperate with authorities and leave EU territory. Those deemed security threats, considered likely to abscond, or who refuse to comply may be detained for up to two years.

Turk called for robust oversight mechanisms to ensure respect for due process, family unity and the best interests of children. He said deportation decisions should be based on individual assessments and should not be executed before legal appeals have been completed.

He also urged European governments to avoid linking migration to security concerns in public debate and called for a more balanced approach that recognizes migrants’ contributions to European economies and societies.

The migration package marks one of the most significant changes to the EU’s return system in recent years and is expected to remain a subject of debate among human rights organizations, national governments and EU institutions as implementation begins.

The comments came days after European Union member states approved new migration rules that permit the establishment of so-called “return hubs” outside the bloc, where rejected asylum seekers and migrants could be transferred after being denied permission to remain in EU territory.

Turk said the measures must be implemented in full compliance with international human rights and refugee law, stressing that EU governments cannot transfer their legal obligations to third countries.

“EU states cannot simply outsource their human rights obligations to third states in this context,” Turk said in a statement.

The new framework reflects a broader shift across Europe toward stricter migration controls, as governments face sustained political pressure from anti-immigration and far-right parties that have gained support in several countries in recent years.

European policymakers have increasingly focused on improving deportation and repatriation procedures after years of criticism that existing systems were ineffective. According to EU figures cited by officials, fewer than 30 percent of individuals ordered to leave the bloc are ultimately returned to their countries of origin.

Turk cautioned that returning migrants to countries where they could face persecution, abuse or other serious harm would violate the principle of non-refoulement, a cornerstone of international refugee and human rights law.

“International human rights law and refugee law are very clear — no-one should be returned to a place where they would be at risk of serious human rights violations or other irreparable harm,” he said.

The UN rights chief expressed particular concern about the detention and transfer of vulnerable groups, including children, describing such actions as highly sensitive exercises of state authority that carry significant risks of rights violations.

Under the new rules, migrants subject to deportation orders must cooperate with authorities and leave EU territory. Those deemed security threats, considered likely to abscond, or who refuse to comply may be detained for up to two years.

Turk called for robust oversight mechanisms to ensure respect for due process, family unity and the best interests of children. He said deportation decisions should be based on individual assessments and should not be executed before legal appeals have been completed.

He also urged European governments to avoid linking migration to security concerns in public debate and called for a more balanced approach that recognizes migrants’ contributions to European economies and societies.

The migration package marks one of the most significant changes to the EU’s return system in recent years and is expected to remain a subject of debate among human rights organizations, national governments and EU institutions as implementation begins.

Among them is 52-year-old Iniebong James, who arrived in Lagos earlier this month on a government-organized repatriation flight after spending a decade in South Africa. While relieved to have escaped an increasingly hostile environment, he now faces many of the same economic pressures that originally drove him to leave Nigeria.

James moved to South Africa in 2016 after losing his job as a truck driver during Nigeria’s first recession in more than two decades. Settling in Eastern Cape Province, he worked as a car mechanic despite overstaying a six-month visitor visa.

His return followed an attack by anti-immigrant protesters in May that left him with a head injury. The incident occurred amid rising anti-foreigner sentiment in South Africa, where demonstrations demanding the removal of undocumented migrants have intensified in recent months.

South Africa has long attracted migrants from across the African continent due to its comparatively developed economy and broader employment opportunities. However, periodic outbreaks of xenophobic violence have repeatedly exposed tensions over unemployment, poverty, public services and crime.

Back in Nigeria, James says he faces a more difficult economic landscape than the one he left behind. Inflation has surged following sweeping economic reforms introduced by President Bola Tinubu in 2023, including the removal of fuel subsidies and the liberalization of the national currency.

The resulting increase in living costs has been compounded by global energy market disruptions linked to the recent US-Iran conflict. According to James, fuel prices that stood at about 85 naira per liter when he departed Nigeria have climbed to approximately 1,400 naira per liter upon his return.

Seeking employment, he says he hopes government assistance programs promised for returning citizens will help him rebuild his life.

Nigeria’s government has stated that repatriated nationals will receive support before reuniting with their families, though officials have not publicly outlined long-term reintegration measures.

Migration experts say returning home after years abroad often presents challenges that extend beyond transportation and immediate assistance.

“Repatriation is not transformation,” said Margaret Monyani, founder of the Johannesburg-based OLAM Africa Research Institute. She noted that migrants who have spent years building lives elsewhere frequently struggle to reconnect economically and socially upon their return.

For younger returnees, the adjustment can be equally difficult.

Omotola Adeniyi returned to Nigeria after spending 11 years in South Africa, where she moved as a child with her mother. Although she completed secondary education there, she said finding employment proved difficult as a foreign national.

Unable to secure stable work and lacking the resources to finance her own return journey, she accepted Nigeria’s offer of repatriation. Now back in Lagos, she says the country feels unfamiliar after more than a decade abroad.

The wave of anti-migrant protests in South Africa has prompted diplomatic responses from several African governments, including Nigeria, Ghana and Malawi, which have repatriated hundreds of their citizens in recent weeks.

Nigeria’s Foreign Minister, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, defended the government’s repatriation efforts, describing the safety of citizens as the primary concern amid rising tensions.

Analysts note that despite recurring xenophobic incidents, South Africa remains a major destination for African migrants because of its relatively advanced infrastructure, stronger institutions and broader economic opportunities compared with many neighboring countries.

The experience of returnees such as James underscores a broader dilemma facing many African migrants: balancing security concerns abroad against economic hardship at home, with neither option offering an easy path to stability.

The flight carried around two dozen migrants to Bangui, according to lawyers involved in the cases. The migrants included nationals from Iran, Jordan, Armenia, Türkiye, Georgia and Afghanistan.

The deportations are part of a series of agreements under which the US administration has sent migrants to countries other than their own. Immigration lawyers and rights advocates have criticized the practice, arguing that it can result in asylum seekers being indirectly returned to places where they fear persecution.

Ali Rahnama, interim executive director of the Iranian American Legal Defense Fund, said several Iranian migrants had previously received protection from deportation to Iran after judges found they had credible fears of persecution based on political or religious grounds.

Three Iranian women were initially scheduled to be deported to the Central African Republic, but two received temporary court orders preventing their removal while judges reviewed the legality of the government’s actions, according to their lawyers.

“Despite being granted withholding of removal, these individuals are being removed from the United States and abandoned in a country where they have no status, no connection and no support network,” said Emily Trostle, an attorney representing two of the women.

The US Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on specific cases, while US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Central African Republic, one of the world’s poorest countries, has faced years of conflict involving government forces and armed groups. The country has also maintained close security ties with Russia, including through the former Wagner mercenary group.

The International Organization for Migration said it would provide humanitarian assistance after arrival at the request of Central African authorities.

The United States earlier awarded $85 million to the IOM for operations in the Central African Republic, including support for migrants and community stabilization efforts.

Community leaders and immigrant support organizations in Belfast have warned that recent anti-immigrant violence reflects deeper social tensions that have been building for years beneath the surface of Northern Ireland’s communities.

Speaking after unrest that targeted immigrant-owned properties and left residents fearful for their safety, local advocates said the violence did not emerge in isolation but followed a prolonged period of growing hostility toward migrants and ethnic minorities.One local resident whose business was attacked described how an individual attempted to gain entry to a building before being turned away.

According to the account, the person then moved around the property, smashed a window and threw an incendiary device.Community representatives said the incident has heightened concerns among immigrant families and refugees already worried about their safety.

The violence has also disrupted the work of organizations supporting newcomers. The 174 Trust, a Belfast-based charity focused on building relationships between local residents and immigrant communities, was forced to halt activities after the disturbances. Refugees displaced from their homes have since sought assistance through the organization’s clothing bank and support services.

Tim Magowan, executive director of the 174 Trust, said recent incidents have exposed tensions that many minority residents have experienced for years.”What was clear was it was underneath the surface, bubbling away,” Magowan said.

According to Magowan, many people from ethnic minority backgrounds living in Northern Ireland have personal experiences of discrimination or hostility. He said the recent unrest has highlighted the need for broader efforts to address prejudice and strengthen community relations.

The violence follows previous episodes of disorder, including riots in Ballymena last year, which also drew attention to concerns about racism and anti-immigrant sentiment in some communities.Observers have pointed to the role of social media and anti-immigration rhetoric in shaping public attitudes.

Some community leaders argue that narratives portraying immigrants as a threat have become increasingly visible online and have contributed to an atmosphere in which hostility is more openly expressed.Magowan noted that Northern Ireland remains less ethnically diverse than many other parts of the United Kingdom.

He estimated that people of colour account for only a small proportion of the local population, which can contribute to limited interaction between different communities.He also argued that Northern Ireland’s history of sectarian division has shaped how communities perceive identity and difference.

Many residents continue to live in largely homogeneous neighbourhoods, while physical and psychological barriers built over decades of conflict remain present in everyday life.

According to Magowan, these historical patterns have influenced how some people respond to demographic change and increasing diversity.Community organizations are continuing efforts to support those affected by the violence while calling for stronger action to counter racism and improve understanding between established residents and newer arrivals.

Two Ugandan care workers were evacuated from their home in north Belfast after spending several hours trapped inside during a night of violence that saw properties attacked, vehicles set alight and emergency services deployed across the city.

Sumayah Nakazibwe and Stella Ariokot said they were forced to remain barricaded inside their house near the Crumlin Road area while disorder unfolded outside and fires spread through nearby streets. The women said smoke entered their home as neighboring properties and vehicles were targeted during the unrest.

According to Nakazibwe, the disturbances began with groups of young people gathering and moving through the area. She said many of those involved were dressed in dark clothing and wearing face coverings.

Initially, the situation appeared limited to isolated acts of vandalism, including the burning of tires taken from a bus and rubbish bins placed along the roadside.
The violence later escalated as groups moved into residential streets where families from a range of backgrounds, including Romanian, Nigerian, British and Irish communities, live alongside one another.

Nakazibwe said attackers began targeting vehicles, setting some on fire and throwing projectiles. As flames spread and smoke intensified, residents contacted police and fire services for assistance. She said the volume of incidents across Belfast appeared to stretch emergency resources, with firefighters taking time to reach the area because of multiple ongoing emergencies.

The two women remained inside their home for approximately four hours as the situation deteriorated. They said emergency responders advised them not to leave because of concerns for their safety. According to Nakazibwe, they were encouraged to put on their care worker uniforms in case their professional roles might help de-escalate any confrontation should rioters attempt to enter the property.

Reflecting on the experience, Nakazibwe said the violence highlighted how little attackers may know about the people they target. She noted that many migrant workers in Northern Ireland provide essential services, including caring for elderly residents and vulnerable individuals within local communities.

As the attacks intensified, the women feared their home could become a target. Ariokot said Nakazibwe lost consciousness at one stage after stones were thrown at their windows. While remaining in contact with emergency services, Ariokot followed instructions provided by ambulance personnel until her colleague regained consciousness.

The women eventually left the property only after assistance arrived from their church community. Pastor Jack McKee of New Life City Church said he decided to travel to the area after learning that members of his congregation were trapped.

McKee described arriving to find a heavily secured scene involving police officers in riot gear, multiple fire engines and ambulance crews operating amid ongoing disorder. He said groups of masked individuals remained present in the area, with some carrying bricks.
According to McKee, emergency responders faced significant challenges reaching affected residents because of the level of violence and disruption on surrounding streets. He said the atmosphere remained volatile even as authorities attempted to bring the situation under control.

A charity worker involved in supporting affected families said police escorted residents from danger and remained with them until temporary accommodation could be arranged. The displaced families were taken to safety while authorities assessed conditions in the area.

Local residents said some of the houses targeted during the unrest were occupied by ethnic minority families. One neighbor claimed attackers appeared to focus on specific properties associated with migrant communities. The same resident also alleged that individuals from different community backgrounds had participated in the violence, reflecting an unusual convergence in an area historically shaped by sectarian divisions.

The disturbances have drawn attention to concerns about the safety of migrant workers and minority communities living in parts of Northern Ireland. The region has increasingly relied on international workers in sectors including health care and social care, where staffing shortages have led employers to recruit from overseas.

The experiences described by Nakazibwe and Ariokot underscore the risks faced by residents caught up in episodes of urban disorder, particularly when emergency services are required to respond simultaneously to multiple incidents. Their account also highlights the role played by community organizations, faith groups and support networks in assisting vulnerable residents during periods of crisis.

For the two care workers, the immediate focus remained on personal safety after an evening they described as one of fear and uncertainty. Having spent hours unable to leave while violence unfolded around them, they were eventually escorted from the area and relocated to temporary accommodation as authorities worked to restore order.

After spending more than 15 years building careers and raising a family in the United States, Indian entrepreneur Astha Chaturvedi and her husband made a decision that would have seemed unlikely years earlier: they left the country and relocated to Bengaluru, concluding that the uncertainty surrounding their immigration status no longer aligned with their personal and professional goals.

Chaturvedi, 38, founder of Mouri Living, said the move followed years of waiting for employment-based permanent residency in the United States. Despite establishing successful careers and long-term roots in the country, the couple faced an immigration process that offered little certainty about when they might receive green cards.

Speaking about the decision, Chaturvedi said she and her husband had spent approximately 15 years building their lives in the United States. However, the lack of a predictable timeline for permanent residency increasingly influenced their future planning. According to her account, her husband’s place in the green card queue dated back to 2015, while her own application timeline began in 2020.

The experience reflects a challenge faced by many highly skilled foreign workers from India employed in the United States. Long waiting periods for employment-based green cards have become a defining feature of the immigration system for many applicants, particularly those working in technology and professional services sectors.

Before launching her own company, Chaturvedi built a career across some of the most prominent names in technology and consulting. She spent more than a decade working in Big Tech and at consulting firm McKinsey before joining Ripple in San Francisco.While pursuing her corporate career, she also nurtured ambitions of becoming a founder.

That goal, however, was complicated by visa restrictions. Chaturvedi said she initially held an H-1B visa, a status commonly used by skilled foreign professionals working in the United States. Because the visa tied her work authorization to a sponsoring employer, she was unable to independently launch a startup while maintaining that status.

Seeking greater flexibility, she transitioned to an H-4 dependent visa through her husband. After becoming eligible for an H-4 Employment Authorization Document, she gained the legal ability to work independently and pursue entrepreneurial opportunities.

A turning point came during a visit to India in 2024. Chaturvedi traveled there to recruit a chief technology officer for her startup. During the trip, a conversation with a family member prompted a broader reassessment of where the business should be based. A cousin suggested establishing an office in India, pointing to the country’s rapidly expanding startup ecosystem and growing pool of technology talent.

The idea led the couple to explore the possibility of relocating permanently. What began as a business discussion gradually evolved into a broader evaluation of career prospects, family priorities and long-term stability.According to Chaturvedi, the prospect of building a company in India became increasingly attractive as the country’s startup environment matured.

Bengaluru, often referred to as India’s technology capital, emerged as a natural destination because of its concentration of entrepreneurs, engineers, investors and technology companies.The move also offered something that years of waiting in the United States had not provided: certainty.

Rather than continuing to plan around an immigration process with no defined endpoint, the family chose to establish themselves in a country where residency and business ownership presented fewer structural obstacles.

Their decision comes at a time when immigration pathways for highly skilled workers remain a significant topic within the global technology industry. Many foreign professionals working in the United States contribute to sectors such as software development, consulting, finance and artificial intelligence while navigating visa systems that can affect career choices, entrepreneurial ambitions and family planning.

For Chaturvedi, the relocation was not framed as a rejection of the United States. Instead, it reflected a reassessment of where she could most effectively pursue personal and professional goals.

After years spent advancing through major corporations and waiting for permanent residency, she concluded that India offered a clearer path toward building the company and life she envisioned.The decision ultimately combined business opportunity with personal certainty.

After more than a decade and a half in the United States, the couple relocated to Bengaluru, where they began the next phase of their careers without the constraints of an unresolved immigration timeline.

Filipino migrants with pending applications for U.S. permanent residency say uncertainty surrounding a recent government memo on green card processing has heightened concerns over their legal status, employment prospects and family stability, while immigration advocates continue to seek formal clarification from federal authorities.

Questions emerged after comments by Philippine Ambassador to the United States Jose Manuel Romualdez to Philippine broadcaster GMA News, in which he said Filipinos applying for a green card would need to “go home first,” reflecting guidance that appeared consistent with a U.S. government memo whose implications have been widely debated among migrant communities.

The remarks drew attention among Filipino workers in the United States, many of whom have spent years building careers and supporting families while awaiting decisions on their residency applications.Sharvari Dalal-Dheini, director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said uncertainty remains because U.S. authorities have yet to issue updated public guidance clarifying reports that elements of the policy may have been reconsidered.

“Stakeholders continue to be confused and dubious of the government’s claims. Until we have official word, we remain concerned and extremely cautious,” Dalal-Dheini said.The lack of clear guidance has created challenges for migrants attempting to plan their futures, according to advocates and workers affected by the policy debate.

Immigration lawyers say applicants are often reluctant to make major employment, housing or family decisions when regulatory requirements remain unclear.Among those affected is Marie, a Filipino migrant whose green card application remains pending.

She said the uncertainty extends beyond migrants themselves and affects the broader network of relatives and communities that depend on them.According to Marie, the consequences of prolonged uncertainty could also be felt by U.S. citizens who rely on migrant workers for essential services and care.

The issue is particularly significant in sectors such as elder care, where Filipino workers have long played an important role in addressing labor shortages and supporting aging populations in parts of the United States.Gabriela, a Filipino caregiver who has worked at the same retirement home in California’s San Fernando Valley for 15 years, said concerns about her immigration status have intensified because her permanent residency application has not yet been resolved.

She has cared for one patient, now 97 years old, for nine years and said the prospect of being required to leave the country raises questions about the continuity of care for elderly residents as well as the welfare of her own family.Gabriela said she migrated to the United States after concluding that opportunities in the Philippines were insufficient to provide the level of financial support she sought for her children.

With her residency application still pending, she said she fears the consequences for both her family and the people under her care if she were required to return to the Philippines before receiving a final decision on her immigration status.The concerns expressed by Filipino migrants highlight broader questions about labor migration and the economic factors that continue to drive workers overseas.

Marie said many migrants leave their home countries because of limited economic opportunities and the need to secure stable incomes for their families. She argued that immigration policies should take into account the human impact on workers who have established lives abroad while contributing to the economies and communities where they live.

“There needs to be more leadership from both the U.S. government and the Philippines government to understand the human impact, the human cost of these things,” she said.The Philippine Embassy in Washington defended the country’s record on migrant welfare and said the government remains committed to supporting Filipinos overseas.

“The Philippines is recognized globally as being at the forefront of promoting and protecting the welfare and rights of Filipino nationals overseas,” an embassy spokesperson said.The spokesperson said many overseas Filipinos choose to work abroad after assessing their personal circumstances and determining that international employment offers greater professional, financial or career opportunities than those available at home.

“While the Philippines continues to offer opportunities as a growing economy, many overseas Filipinos have carefully weighed their choices and determined that employment abroad is better suited to their personal, professional, or financial goals,” the spokesperson said.For migrants awaiting greater clarity, however, uncertainty remains the dominant concern.

Immigration advocates say formal guidance from U.S. authorities will be critical in determining how affected applicants proceed and whether existing interpretations of the policy accurately reflect government intentions.

Until such clarification is issued, lawyers, workers and advocacy groups say many applicants are likely to remain cautious about making decisions that could affect their legal status, employment and family arrangements in the United States.

The visits will take the pontiff to two major gateways for African migrants seeking entry into Europe. Although migrant arrivals have fallen this year, particularly in the Canary Islands, immigration and integration remain contentious issues across Europe’s traditionally Catholic societies.

Church leaders and migrant advocates hope the trips will shift attention toward humanitarian concerns and the challenges faced by migrants rather than political disputes.

The pope is expected to meet migrants and pay tribute to those who died attempting dangerous sea crossings. His visit follows the migration-focused legacy of Pope Francis, who made Lampedusa the destination of his first pastoral trip outside Rome in 2013.

Catholic organizations in Spain and Italy continue to provide assistance to migrants arriving through Atlantic and Mediterranean routes, while debates over migration policy increasingly divide political parties and public opinion.

The visits come as European governments balance border control measures with growing calls from religious and humanitarian groups for a more compassionate approach toward migrants and asylum seekers.