Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the community sponsorship system, modeled on a long-running Canadian program, is expected to begin later this year, with the first sponsored refugees anticipated to arrive in autumn 2027. The Home Office also said it plans to launch a separate employer sponsorship route for refugees next year.

The announcement comes as immigration remains one of the most politically sensitive issues in Britain, where public debate over asylum policy has intensified alongside growing support for the right-wing Reform UK party.

The government said the new sponsorship framework would operate at a significantly higher capacity than the existing UK Resettlement Scheme, which resettled around 800 people in the year ending September 2025. Officials did not specify how many refugees the expanded program would accommodate, saying only that admissions would be subject to an annual cap.

Mahmood said the policy was designed to expand safe and legal pathways for people with genuine protection needs while strengthening controls against abuse of the asylum system.

The initiative forms part of a wider immigration strategy being pursued by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government. Parliament is expected to consider legislation next week that would tighten asylum rules by making it easier to remove failed asylum applicants and limiting refugee family reunification rights to immediate family members.

The policy announcement also comes during a period of political transition. Starmer stepped down as leader this week but will remain prime minister until a successor is selected. Andy Burnham, widely viewed as a leading contender to replace him, has acknowledged public concerns over migration during his recent political campaign, although his detailed immigration policy has yet to be outlined.

It also remains uncertain whether Mahmood will continue as home secretary under the incoming administration.

Britain has previously implemented targeted sponsorship and resettlement schemes for refugees fleeing conflicts in countries including Syria and Afghanistan. Earlier this year, Mahmood faced criticism from humanitarian organizations and members of her own party after introducing measures that made refugee status temporary and restricted education visas for nationals of countries including Afghanistan, Myanmar and Sudan.

The Home Office is appealing against the High Court’s earlier decision that the 2025 ban on Palestine Action was disproportionate to the threat posed by the group and should be revoked. The government had outlawed the organization days after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in southern England and caused millions of pounds of damage to two military aircraft during protests against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

Under the ban introduced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government, Palestine Action was added to a proscribed list that includes Hamas and Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah, making membership or public support for the group a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison under British terrorism laws.

Government lawyer James Eadie told the court that the earlier ruling had wrongly assessed the balance between civil liberties and public protection, arguing parliament had already determined the measure was both necessary and proportionate.“The protection of national security and of the public from terrorism was central” to the decision, Eadie said in written submissions.

He told the court that judges had failed to properly consider parliament’s judgment that the ban was “both effective and appropriate,” adding that ordinary criminal law had “demonstrably failed” to prevent an escalation in the group’s activities.

“The line between criminality, sometimes violent criminality, and terrorism is not a bright one,” Eadie said, arguing Palestine Action was “not engaged in what can be properly described as merely civil disobedience.”He said the group met the statutory definition of being involved in terrorism under British law.

The ban triggered strong criticism from civil liberties advocates and pro-Palestinian campaigners, with thousands of supporters reportedly arrested since its introduction.In February, a three-judge High Court panel ruled in favor of a legal challenge brought by Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori, finding that the prohibition had caused a “very significant interference” with rights to free expression and peaceful assembly.

Founded in 2020, Palestine Action says its objective is to end what it describes as global complicity in Israel’s actions in Palestinian territories.

The group has primarily targeted weapons manufacturers, particularly facilities linked to Israeli defense company Elbit Systems.The appeal hearing is scheduled to conclude on Thursday.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper revoked his travel permission after The Telegraph revealed his upcoming tour of London, Manchester, and Birmingham, titled “Waking the Dead – Returning from the Darkness.” The Home Office concluded his presence was “not conducive to the public good,” citing concerns over public safety and social cohesion.

“Sheikh Farooq will not be permitted to enter the UK,” a Home Office spokesperson confirmed. “Our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of the UK and our communities. We have robust safeguards in place to prevent entry of individuals who seek to sow hatred and division.”

Airlines have reportedly been instructed not to allow Sheikh Farooq to board flights to the UK.

Preacher Under Fire for Comments on Slavery and Women

Sheikh Farooq, who is based in San Diego and affiliated with the One Message Foundation, stirred widespread condemnation after a video surfaced in which he claimed that sexual relations with female slaves captured in war were permissible under Islamic law.

Explaining his view in the video, he said: “Those taken under war as captives… you’re now going to support and keep in your house… they are like a wife… if Allah made it halal, then it’s not sinning, that is not adultery.”

His comments have drawn sharp criticism from human rights advocates, secular organizations, and Muslim community leaders alike.

Fiyaz Mughal, founder of Faith Matters, condemned the preacher’s statements as “abhorrent,” adding, “Saying that sex with slaves is permissible sends a barbaric message to people. We’ve seen what groups like ISIS did to Yazidi women. Such views should not find a platform in the UK.”

Stephen Evans, chief executive of the National Secular Society, said: “Any charity hosting a speaker who condones sexual slavery should have its charitable status seriously reviewed. Promoting misogyny undermines public benefit and social harmony.”

Robert Jenrick, Shadow Justice Secretary, had earlier called on the government to prevent the preacher’s entry. “This man should never step foot on UK soil. His visa must be revoked immediately,” he stated. “Islamists spreading hate and sowing division are not welcome here.”

Sheikh Farooq previously toured parts of the UK last month, delivering lectures that also raised concerns. He has made remarks predicting the Islamization of Europe, the US, and Russia, saying, “The future is ours… every nightmare of a Muslim Europe will come true.” He urged Muslims to “never apologize” or “compromise” their faith.

In another appearance in Leicester, he made comments perceived as anti-Semitic, adding to the backlash.

Sheikh Farooq was set to appear alongside Ustadh Imran ibn Mansur, a social media figure who brands himself a Muslim entrepreneur. Mr. Mansur has shared videos advising Muslim women to create anonymous online content and has made controversial statements about women wearing perfume, calling them “fornicatresses.”

The UK government’s move reflects a broader effort to counter extremist ideologies, particularly those that incite hatred or undermine democratic values. The decision signals zero tolerance for individuals espousing regressive or inflammatory views, regardless of religious affiliation.

The ban underscores Britain’s commitment to ensuring that religious discourse does not become a platform for misogyny, antisemitism, or hate speech cloaked in theological justifications.