The walkout, scheduled from Monday to Friday, would have been the 16th strike by resident doctors since 2023 in a dispute over what the British Medical Association (BMA) described as years of pay erosion and pressure on the National Health Service.

The BMA said it would hold a referendum on the government proposal and pause industrial action while members consider the offer.

“We have always been clear that no strikes needed to go ahead if we received an offer appropriate to put to our members,” BMA committee chair Jack Fletcher said.

The union represents about 55,000 of England’s approximately 75,000 resident doctors, previously known as junior doctors.

The proposed deal includes a 3.5 percent pay increase this year, in line with recommendations from an independent review body. The Department of Health said resident doctors would receive an average increase of about 4.9 percent under the wider package.

The BMA said the package could raise average pay growth to 6.6 percent by April 2027, with further increases expected later.

Health Minister James Murray said the agreement could help end years of industrial disputes and improve stability in the health service.

Resident doctors have received total pay increases of 33.4 percent over four years, including this year’s rise, although the BMA has argued that inflation-adjusted pay remains below 2008 levels.

The offer also includes 4,500 additional training places over three years, measures to address employment pressures among medical trainees, annual progression for part-time doctors and improved additional payments for medical academics.

The petition, submitted to a court in Dhaka on Monday by lawmaker Mujibur Rahman Iqbal, alleges that Yunus’ caretaker administration failed to procure measles vaccines and neglected a scheduled nationwide immunization campaign during its 18-month tenure, which ended following general elections in February.

According to the filing, the missed vaccination drive contributed to an outbreak officially recorded on March 15. Since then, 620 children have died with measles symptoms and more than 79,000 have been hospitalized, making it the country’s most severe outbreak in recent decades.

Advocate Rafiqul Islam, representing the petitioner, said the complaint accused the former administration of deliberately failing to fulfill its public health responsibilities despite repeated warnings from UNICEF about the risks of delaying immunization.

The case names Yunus, former health adviser Nur Jahan Begum and three other former officials as respondents.

The court dismissed the petition on the day it was filed, according to Islam, who said he was awaiting the written order before seeking a review of the decision.

The legal action follows a separate petition filed last month by a High Court lawyer seeking an investigation into the former government’s 18-month administration.

Health experts say the outbreak remains difficult to contain despite a vaccination campaign launched by the current government in April.

Dr. Be-Nazir Ahmed, former director of the disease control branch at Bangladesh’s Directorate General of Health Services, said approximately 1,000 children with measles symptoms are still being admitted to hospitals each day.

Ahmed said infection rates had not declined as expected after the launch of the vaccination campaign and called for a review of the government’s response to identify gaps in implementation.

Public health officials note that measles requires vaccination coverage of at least 95% to prevent transmission. The current campaign targets children aged six months to 59 months, a broader age group than the country’s routine immunization schedule, which administers measles-rubella vaccines at nine and 15 months.

Health experts say the change in vaccination strategy may have created confusion among parents, leaving some eligible children unvaccinated and allowing the virus to continue spreading.

Yunus, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, assumed leadership of Bangladesh’s caretaker government following student-led protests that removed the previous administration. His office has not publicly responded to the latest allegations.

Nearly 600 children with suspected or confirmed measles have died since March, while hospitals across the country are struggling to cope with hundreds of new admissions each day. Medical facilities remain under severe pressure as doctors attempt to isolate infected patients and prevent further transmission.

Health experts fear large-scale population movement during the Eid holidays could accelerate the spread of the highly contagious disease, particularly in rural areas with limited access to healthcare services.

The outbreak has overwhelmed pediatric wards in several hospitals, prompting renewed calls for expanded vaccination efforts and stronger public health measures to contain the crisis.

Officials said the virus likely circulated undetected for weeks because initial testing focused on more common Ebola strains. No approved vaccine currently exists for the Bundibugyo variant, with WHO estimating any targeted vaccine could take six to nine months to develop.

The outbreak is unfolding in conflict-hit areas of eastern Congo, where insecurity, population displacement and weak health infrastructure are complicating containment efforts.

A recent escalation in US policy toward Cuba is disrupting longstanding international medical programmes, with potential consequences for healthcare systems across Latin America and the Caribbean.

The measures, which target the deployment of Cuban doctors abroad, are part of broader economic and diplomatic pressure on Havana, a country that has been under US sanctions for decades.Cuba’s overseas medical missions have historically been a central component of its international engagement and a significant source of revenue.

Since the 1959 revolution, the Cuban government has deployed medical professionals to countries facing shortages, initially responding to crises such as the 1960 earthquake in Chile. Over time, these efforts evolved into formal bilateral agreements, with Cuban doctors providing services in underserved regions across Latin America, the Caribbean, and beyond.

According to Tiago Rogero, South America correspondent for The Guardian, these programmes have become increasingly constrained due to US pressure on host countries. Washington has argued that the arrangements amount to exploitative labour practices, citing the Cuban state’s retention of a portion of doctors’ earnings.

While some testimonies from medical personnel have supported claims of exploitation, Rogero noted that this does not represent the majority view among those involved. Analysts cited in his reporting suggest that financial considerations specifically limiting revenue flows to the Cuban government—are a central factor behind the policy.

The withdrawal of Cuban medical personnel is already affecting healthcare provision in several countries. A number of governments have ended their agreements with Cuba, in some cases under pressure linked to US sanctions mechanisms such as financial restrictions and visa policies. These measures have reduced the availability of healthcare workers in regions that were already facing shortages.

Cuban doctors have played a significant role in filling gaps in national health systems, particularly in remote or low-income areas where local capacity is limited. In countries such as Brazil, they have been deployed to underserved communities, often in roles that domestic practitioners were unwilling or unable to fill.

Their presence has been part of a broader strategy sometimes referred to as “medical diplomacy,” through which Cuba has combined healthcare assistance with international cooperation.Beyond their immediate service delivery, Cuban medical programmes have also included training initiatives for foreign students in Cuban institutions.

This has contributed to building healthcare capacity in partner countries, although such efforts typically require long-term investment before yielding results.The current policy shift is raising concerns among healthcare professionals and development experts about the absence of alternative arrangements.

Rogero reported that non-governmental organisations and local practitioners anticipate a worsening of healthcare access in affected regions. “Most of these countries do not have enough doctors of their own,” he said, adding that the termination of Cuban programmes is not being matched by new support mechanisms.

The policy comes in the context of a broader reduction in US development assistance. The dismantling of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which previously funded health and development programmes in Latin America, has further limited available resources.

Observers note that this combination reduced aid and restrictions on third-party assistance—may intensify existing vulnerabilities in public health systems.The geopolitical dimension of the policy is also evident. US sanctions have long been used as a tool of foreign policy toward Cuba, and recent measures, including tighter fuel restrictions, indicate an expansion of pressure.

While the stated rationale focuses on labour conditions within the medical missions, analysts suggest the policy aligns with broader efforts to constrain the Cuban state economically.For recipient countries, the immediate concern remains service continuity. Healthcare systems in parts of Latin America and the Caribbean rely heavily on external support to address shortages in personnel and infrastructure.

The removal of Cuban doctors is expected to disproportionately affect rural and low-income populations, where access to medical care is already limited.Rogero emphasised that the impact will be most acute among vulnerable groups. “How will they cope now without the few doctors they had?” he said, pointing to the lack of contingency planning. In many cases, Cuban medical teams represented the primary or sole source of healthcare provision in certain communities.

The situation underscores the interconnected nature of global health systems and the role of international cooperation in addressing disparities. As policy decisions reshape these arrangements, the consequences are likely to be felt most strongly at the local level, where healthcare access depends on sustained and coordinated support.

The campaign, led by the health ministry with support from UNICEF, the World Health Organization and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, has been rolled out across 18 high-risk districts, according to a joint statement.

Government data shows 17 confirmed deaths linked to measles so far, alongside 113 suspected fatalities and more than 7,500 suspected infections across the country. The outbreak has now spread to 56 of Bangladesh’s 64 districts, raising concerns over further transmission.

Authorities said the vaccination drive is prioritising children aged between six months and five years, particularly those who missed routine immunisation and are at higher risk of severe complications. Health officials described the campaign as a critical intervention to address immunity gaps exposed by the surge in infections.

UNICEF representative Rana Flowers said the agency was alarmed by the sharp rise in cases, warning that thousands of children, especially the youngest and most vulnerable, face heightened risk.

She said the resurgence underscored significant gaps in population immunity.Hospitals in several high-burden areas are operating beyond capacity, with limited resources to manage the influx of patients, officials said, adding to concerns about the outbreak’s trajectory.

The World Health Organization said the outbreak is likely to continue spreading in the coming days but could be brought under control following the large-scale vaccination effort. WHO representative Dr Ahmed Jamsheed Mohamed said the campaign would be key to preventing further child deaths.

Officials said the emergency drive is intended to complement existing routine immunisation programmes as authorities work to contain the outbreak and stabilise public health conditions.