Rajapaksa was taken into custody by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption (CIABOC), according to police and commission officials.

After being produced before the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court, he was released on bail, police spokesman F.U. Wootler told Reuters.

The arrest marks the latest legal development involving members of the influential Rajapaksa family, which dominated Sri Lankan politics for nearly two decades through a series of senior government positions, including the presidency and key cabinet portfolios.

Yoshitha Rajapaksa, the second son of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, is under investigation over allegations that his recruitment into the Sri Lankan Navy in 2006 did not follow established procedures, according to a statement issued earlier this month by the bribery commission.

Authorities have not publicly disclosed further details regarding the alleged violations or whether additional charges could follow as the investigation progresses.

Neither Yoshitha Rajapaksa nor representatives of the Rajapaksa family immediately commented publicly on the allegations following the court proceedings.

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery and Corruption has intensified scrutiny of high-profile public figures in recent years as Sri Lanka seeks to strengthen governance standards and address longstanding concerns about accountability in public institutions.

The case is likely to attract significant public attention given the Rajapaksa family’s enduring influence in Sri Lankan politics and previous investigations involving senior members of the family.

Court proceedings and the commission’s investigation are expected to continue.

Supporters of the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), a movement calling for economic and governance reforms, have continued protests despite being banned under anti-terrorism laws last week.
Officials initially reported seven deaths on Monday, including three civilians and four police officers, with dozens of people wounded. The latest count showed the number of fatalities had increased to 20.

Local government higher education minister Malik Zafar told AFP that clashes in his constituency of Kotli had resulted in seven deaths during the week.
Commissioner Sardar Waheed, the senior civilian official in Rawalakot, said 12 people had been killed, including four police officers.

A senior police official in Mirpur, Khurram Iqbal, said one protester died during clashes with police on Wednesday.

Several shops in Muzaffarabad have remained closed as businesses joined calls for a strike in support of the JAAC, while mobile internet services have been largely unavailable, according to an AFP journalist in the area.
JAAC members have rejected the designation of the group as a terrorist organisation, describing the move as suppression and saying their protests are aimed at securing economic and political rights.

The latest unrest follows violent clashes in the Himalayan region in September, when nine people were confirmed killed during protests led by the JAAC.

Kashmir is claimed in full by both India and Pakistan but has been divided between the two countries since the end of British rule. The territory remains highly sensitive, with decades of tensions and conflicts between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.

For more than a decade, Narendra Modi has remained at the center of Indian politics, shaping national debates, influencing policy priorities, and redefining the contours of electoral campaigning.

His political journey from a modest upbringing in Gujarat to becoming India’s longest-serving non-Congress prime minister represents one of the most significant leadership stories in modern democratic history.Since first taking office as prime minister in May 2014, Modi has led the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) through multiple national elections and overseen a period of profound political transformation.

His continued prominence in public life has made him one of the most recognizable political figures globally and one of the most influential leaders India has produced in the post-independence era.Modi’s rise was neither sudden nor accidental.

Born in Vadnagar in Gujarat, he spent decades working within the organizational framework of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) before becoming a key strategist and political organizer for the BJP. His reputation as an effective administrator grew during his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014, where he promoted industrial development, infrastructure expansion, and investment-driven growth.

By the time he entered the national stage in 2014, India was witnessing growing public demand for decisive leadership, economic development, and administrative efficiency. Modi positioned himself as a leader capable of delivering change, presenting a vision centered on governance, growth, and national confidence.

The BJP’s landslide victory that year marked a turning point in Indian politics.What has distinguished Modi from many of his predecessors is his ability to maintain a direct connection with voters across social, economic, and regional divides. Through mass rallies, digital outreach, radio broadcasts, and extensive travel, he has cultivated a public image that extends beyond traditional political structures.

Political analysts frequently point to this communication strategy as one of the principal reasons for his durability. Rather than relying solely on party machinery, Modi developed a personal rapport with supporters, turning elections into leadership-centered contests.

Another factor behind his longevity has been the BJP’s organizational strength. Under Modi’s leadership, the party expanded its electoral footprint into regions where it had historically struggled. State-level victories, grassroots mobilization, and a disciplined campaign structure helped transform the BJP into India’s dominant political force.

His tenure has also been marked by major policy initiatives. Programs aimed at expanding financial inclusion, increasing access to sanitation facilities, improving digital connectivity, and delivering welfare benefits directly to citizens have formed a central pillar of his governance model.

Supporters argue that these initiatives have improved state capacity and brought government services closer to ordinary citizens.Modi’s leadership has coincided with India’s emergence as one of the world’s fastest-growing major economies.

During his years in office, India strengthened its position in global supply chains, expanded digital infrastructure, and increased its international profile through active diplomacy and participation in multilateral forums.On the world stage, Modi has cultivated relationships with leaders across ideological and geographic divides.

His engagements with the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Indo-Pacific region have reflected an effort to position India as a leading global power.Several international leaders have publicly acknowledged India’s growing influence during Modi’s tenure.

Former and current world leaders have often described him as a strong political mandate-holder capable of implementing long-term policy goals. International forums including the G20 have provided platforms where India’s voice has become increasingly prominent.

At home, Modi’s supporters frequently cite his work ethic, disciplined lifestyle, and focus on execution as qualities that distinguish his leadership. His political messaging often emphasizes national pride, cultural heritage, self-reliance, and development.

These themes have resonated with large segments of the electorate and helped sustain his popularity across multiple election cycles.Yet longevity in democratic politics also invites scrutiny. Modi’s years in office have been accompanied by intense political debate over economic decisions, social policies, institutional reforms, and questions relating to governance.

Critics have challenged aspects of his administration’s approach, while supporters argue that difficult decisions were necessary to pursue broader national objectives.This combination of strong support and strong criticism has, paradoxically, reinforced Modi’s centrality in Indian politics.

Few leaders in contemporary India have generated such sustained public engagement, ensuring that political discourse often revolves around his policies and leadership style.Beyond electoral success, Modi’s influence can be seen in how political campaigning itself has evolved.

Modern Indian elections increasingly emphasize leadership branding, digital communication, data-driven outreach, and direct voter engagement. Many political parties have adapted elements of the campaign model refined during the Modi era.His journey has also become a source of inspiration for many supporters who view his rise from humble beginnings as evidence of the opportunities available within India’s democratic system.

The narrative of perseverance, organizational dedication, and long-term political commitment has become a defining feature of his public image.Historians and political observers will ultimately debate the long-term impact of Modi’s tenure. However, there is little disagreement about the scale of his influence.

He has presided over a period in which India experienced major economic, technological, diplomatic, and political changes while remaining one of the most electorally successful leaders in the country’s history.

As India continues its development journey, Modi’s legacy will be assessed through multiple lenses: economic performance, governance reforms, social transformation, foreign policy achievements, and his ability to reshape the political landscape. Regardless of where those debates lead, his place among the most consequential leaders of modern India is already firmly established.

The milestone comes nearly 12 years after Modi first took office on May 26, 2014. According to government figures, his uninterrupted tenure has now exceeded Nehru’s 4,398-day period as an elected prime minister, calculated from India’s first general election in 1952.

“Public service is the greatest measure of good governance,” Modi wrote on social media, adding that public trust is earned through humility, dedication and a sense of duty.

The achievement follows Modi’s return to power for a third consecutive term in 2024, making him only the second Indian leader after Nehru to secure three successive electoral mandates. His leadership has further entrenched the dominance of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance in Indian politics.

During Modi’s tenure, India’s economy expanded to approximately $4.19 trillion, becoming the world’s fourth-largest economy by nominal gross domestic product and overtaking Japan. His government has also highlighted large-scale infrastructure expansion, welfare programs and trade agreements with partners including the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

Government officials credit Modi’s administration with major social development initiatives, including the construction of about 120 million household toilets, the provision of 157 million tap-water connections and the expansion of clean cooking gas access to more than 100 million beneficiaries.

Kanchan Gupta, a senior adviser at India’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, described the milestone as a reflection of Modi’s role in encouraging ambitious national development goals and delivering large-scale public welfare programs.

Analysts, however, note that Modi’s record in office has also attracted criticism. Journalist and author Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay said economic growth has coincided with concerns over widening wealth inequality and what critics describe as increasing concentration of economic power.

Mukhopadhyay also pointed to concerns raised by democracy watchdogs and political observers regarding the state of democratic institutions and growing political polarization during Modi’s years in office.

Modi has frequently faced criticism from opponents and rights groups over allegations that his Hindu nationalist agenda has weakened India’s secular traditions and contributed to rising religious polarization, particularly affecting the country’s Muslim minority. His supporters reject those accusations and argue that his policies have accelerated development, improved governance and expanded access to basic services.

The rise of live political blogging has reshaped the way major news organizations cover government, elections and policy debates, allowing journalists to provide continuous analysis while creating a searchable public record of rapidly developing events.

Few reporters have been associated with the format as closely as Andrew Sparrow, who has written the Guardian’s daily political live blog for more than 15 years and has chronicled a period of extraordinary upheaval in British politics marked by repeated leadership changes, constitutional disputes and government crises.

The demands of the role were highlighted this week when the UK Cabinet Office released more than 1,000 documents relating to the controversial appointment of Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to Washington. The disclosures included emails, official memoranda, handwritten notes and WhatsApp exchanges, creating one of the largest releases of government documents in recent British political history.

Shortly after the documents became public, Sparrow informed readers that the Cabinet Office had published the so-called Mandelson files in three volumes before beginning a detailed examination of the material throughout the day.

The scale and complexity of the disclosures underscored the advantages of live blogging as a reporting format. Rather than producing a single article, the approach allows journalists to analyze developments in real time, provide context, incorporate expert opinion and update readers continuously as new information emerges.

Sparrow said the format’s value became apparent during his coverage of the inquiry into Britain’s involvement in the Iraq War, a process that also involved the publication of a vast archive of official government records.

Writing before the latest document release, he noted that contemporary researchers and readers now have access to information that would once have remained inaccessible. He argued that the publication of private digital communications offers a particularly revealing view of decision-making inside government.

Unlike traditional official memoranda intended for circulation within Whitehall, Sparrow said WhatsApp messages often capture more personal exchanges and can provide a rare glimpse into conversations that previously would never have entered the public domain.

His observations reflect a broader shift in political journalism over the past two decades as reporters increasingly cover politics through digital platforms that combine elements of traditional reporting, analysis and audience engagement.

Sparrow began live blogging British politics in 2009, well before the format became widely adopted across news organizations. Since then, Britain has had seven prime ministers, while political developments including Brexit, leadership contests, constitutional disputes and successive government crises have generated an almost continuous stream of major news events.

The transformation has altered not only how journalists report politics but also how they interact with audiences.

Sparrow said one of the biggest changes from his earlier career in print journalism has been the immediacy of reader feedback. Through social media platforms and comment sections, reporters now face constant scrutiny and challenge from audiences in ways that were largely absent in traditional newspaper reporting.

While he described that engagement as largely positive and useful, he acknowledged that it places journalists under continuous public examination.

The broader media environment has also changed significantly during the period in which live blogging has become established. Sparrow said digital platforms and recommendation algorithms often favor content that appeals to emotion rather than careful analysis, contributing to greater political and media polarization.

According to Sparrow, navigating that environment has become increasingly difficult compared with the era when most political reporting was produced primarily for print audiences.

Despite those challenges, he sees important distinctions between live blogging and conventional rolling television coverage.

He described the relationship between political live blogs and 24-hour television news as largely complementary, with both formats drawing information from one another while serving different purposes.

A key advantage of written live coverage, he said, is its permanence and accessibility. Unlike television broadcasts, which flow continuously and are often difficult to search after the fact, live blogs create a detailed chronological record that readers can revisit and examine.

The format also allows journalists to assemble a broader range of perspectives by incorporating comments, analysis and reporting from multiple sources into a single stream.

Sparrow said that process has become more difficult following changes to the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. He argued that the site once provided ready access to a large community of commentators and experts whose contributions could be aggregated, filtered and incorporated into reporting.

Since changes in ownership and platform dynamics, he said, locating the same breadth of commentary has become more challenging.

As a result, Sparrow said he increasingly draws on alternative platforms, including Bluesky, while also encouraging readers to contribute observations and insights through comments and direct messages.

The evolution of live blogging mirrors wider changes in political journalism, where audiences increasingly expect immediate updates alongside deeper context and analysis. As governments generate growing volumes of digital records and political events unfold at ever greater speed, the format has become an established part of news coverage across much of the media industry.

For journalists covering British politics, however, the pace of events presents both professional opportunities and personal challenges. Reflecting on years of reporting through successive political crises, Sparrow said the experience can be viewed differently depending on whether one approaches it as a reporter or as a citizen.

The constant turbulence, he suggested, may provide abundant material for journalists. Yet the same instability can also raise broader concerns about the direction of public life and governance in Britain.

The snap election was triggered after parliament failed to resolve a months-long dispute over the election of a new president, leading to the legislature’s dissolution in April and extending a period of political uncertainty in Europe’s youngest nation.

Analysts expect Kurti’s Vetevendosje movement to emerge as the largest party once again, although its ability to translate electoral success into effective governance remains uncertain. Even if it secures another victory, the party is expected to require cooperation from rivals to obtain the two-thirds parliamentary majority necessary to elect a president and end the institutional stalemate.

Kosovo has spent much of the past year without a fully operational government as fragmented political forces repeatedly failed to agree on key leadership appointments. The inability to elect first a parliamentary speaker and later a head of state has deepened concerns about governance and reform implementation.

Kurti’s Vetevendosje party won 51.1% of the vote in the December election, improving on its 42% result in February 2025. However, the party was unable to secure support from opposition groups for a presidential candidate, resulting in another collapse of the political process.

The European Union has repeatedly urged Kosovo’s political leaders to establish stable institutions capable of advancing reforms required for eventual membership in the bloc. Political instability has raised concerns in Brussels about the pace of governance, judicial and economic reforms.

Since first taking power in 2021, Vetevendosje has pursued a nationalist and welfare-oriented agenda while maintaining Kosovo’s broadly pro-Western foreign policy orientation. The party has also resisted making additional concessions in negotiations with Serbia, which continues to reject Kosovo’s 2008 declaration of independence and remains at odds with Pristina over a range of political and security issues.

According to Kosovo’s election commission, more than 900 candidates from 17 political parties and three coalition groups are contesting seats in the 120-member parliament.

More than 2.1 million voters are registered to cast ballots, a figure exceeding Kosovo’s resident population of roughly 1.6 million because of a large diaspora community concentrated mainly in Western Europe. The diaspora has traditionally been an important source of support for Kurti and his party.

The election is being closely watched by European officials and regional observers seeking signs that Kosovo can overcome repeated political deadlocks and restore institutional stability after more than a year of recurring electoral contests.

The movement, founded by political communications strategist Abhijeet Dipke, has attracted more than 22 million followers in less than a month and gained traction among young Indians frustrated by job shortages and repeated controversies surrounding competitive examinations.

Hundreds gathered at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar protest site, many wearing cockroach masks and carrying books, to demand the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over recurring exam paper leaks that protesters say have undermined opportunities for students.

The movement emerged after Chief Justice Surya Kant compared critics and some unemployed youth to cockroaches during a court hearing in May. Although the judge later said his remarks had been taken out of context, activists adopted the term as a symbol of protest.

Participants said the demonstration reflected wider concerns over youth unemployment, governance and educational reforms. According to a recent State of Working India report by Azim Premji University, 67 percent of unemployed Indians aged 20 to 29 are graduates, up from 32 percent in 2004.

Supporters described the protest as the beginning of a broader youth-led campaign that could expand beyond education issues to address other social and economic concerns.

Police maintained a heavy presence around the protest venue, while organizers urged participants to keep the movement peaceful and focused on accountability and reform.

The two state elections, which must be held within 60 days, will not affect Anwar’s parliamentary majority but could provide a key measure of public support for his government ahead of a general election due by early 2028.

Anwar said last month he could consider an early national election if divisions within his coalition continue to widen. His alliance brings together his Pakatan Harapan bloc, former rival Barisan Nasional and several smaller parties.

Tensions have emerged over ethnic and religious issues, while some reform-minded allies have expressed frustration over the pace of promised changes. Anwar has also faced pressure from the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), a key coalition partner, over calls for a royal pardon for former prime minister Najib Razak, who is serving a prison sentence linked to the 1MDB scandal.

In a sign of strains within the alliance, Barisan Nasional said it would contest the Johor election independently rather than alongside Pakatan Harapan.

The outcomes in Johor and Negeri Sembilan are expected to be closely watched as an indicator of the coalition’s electoral strength and cohesion ahead of future state and national contests.

In a five-page letter posted on X, López Obrador, who left office in 2024 but remains one of Mexico’s most influential political figures, said relations with Washington had deteriorated under Trump’s current administration and argued that the U.S. president had changed significantly since their earlier interactions.

“Speaking from what I personally experienced and can prove, the Trump of today is different from the one I dealt with,” López Obrador wrote, describing Trump during his first term as cooperative, pragmatic and open to dialogue.

He attributed what he called Trump’s transformation to “false friends and advisers, both internal and external,” whom he accused of leading the U.S. leader into policies detrimental to bilateral relations.

The comments represent one of López Obrador’s most direct interventions in public affairs since leaving office and amount to a strong endorsement of President Claudia Sheinbaum, his longtime political ally and successor. In the letter, he praised Sheinbaum as the “best president Mexico has had in our time.”

The remarks come amid growing strains between Mexico City and Washington after more than a year of often difficult but largely cooperative engagement. Sheinbaum has recently adopted a firmer tone toward the United States, emphasizing the need to defend Mexican sovereignty.

A major source of friction has been the U.S. Justice Department’s April indictment of 10 Mexican officials over alleged links to drug trafficking organizations. Mexican authorities have viewed the move as a sensitive issue in bilateral relations.

López Obrador accused U.S. officials of attempting to weaken Morena, the governing party he founded, under the banner of combating migration and narcotics-related crime.

Neither U.S. nor Mexican government officials immediately responded to requests for comment regarding López Obrador’s statements.

Mexico and the United States maintain one of the world’s largest economic relationships, with close cooperation on trade, migration and security issues, although political disputes have periodically strained ties between the two countries.

López Obrador ended his message with an appeal for improved relations, writing: “For the good of all, may the other Trump return.”

Voters are choosing 16 mayors and provincial governors, along with 14 lawmakers in parliamentary by-elections. Opinion polls indicate Lee’s liberal Democratic Party of Korea is favored to outperform the conservative People Power Party, which remains weakened following the removal and conviction of former president Yoon Suk Yeol over his 2024 martial law declaration.

Political analysts say the elections will show whether Lee’s strong approval ratings, currently above 60%, can translate into long-term political dominance. Particular attention is focused on the closely watched Seoul mayoral race, seen as a major indicator of public sentiment toward the government.

As of noon, voter turnout stood at 19%, according to election officials, with about 44.6 million eligible voters registered nationwide.

The results are also expected to shape the future of South Korea’s conservative opposition, which remains divided between reformists and supporters of Yoon.