The company said the price of a 19-kg commercial LPG cylinder used by industrial consumers was increased by 993 rupees, or 47.8%, to 3,071.5 rupees from previous levels.Aviation turbine fuel prices for international airlines were also raised by $76.55 per kilolitre to $1,511.86 per kilolitre, up from $1,435.31, according to a company statement.

Prices of household LPG, primarily used as cooking fuel, were left unchanged, while jet fuel rates for domestic airlines were also not revised.The selective increase reflects the government’s continued effort to shield households and domestic carriers from sharp energy inflation while allowing market-linked pricing for industrial and international commercial users.

The revisions come as global oil prices have climbed above $100 per barrel after the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route for crude exports, amid the ongoing Iran war and heightened military tensions in the Gulf.

The disruption has tightened supply expectations across global energy markets and increased input costs for refiners and fuel distributors across Asia, particularly for countries such as India that depend heavily on imported crude.

India imports more than 80% of its crude oil needs, making domestic fuel pricing highly sensitive to geopolitical shocks in major producing regions such as West Asia.

The increase in commercial LPG prices is expected to affect hotels, restaurants and small industrial users, while higher aviation turbine fuel costs for foreign carriers could raise operational expenses for international flights using Indian refueling hubs.

Indian Oil did not indicate whether further revisions would follow if crude prices remain elevated.

The statement comes at a time when global oil flows are being recalibrated amid sanctions, tariffs, and shifting geopolitical alliances affecting major producers and consumers alike.

Reliance, which operates the world’s largest refining complex, said it is awaiting clarity on whether Venezuelan oil can be legally sold to buyers outside the United States before making any commercial decision.

Any potential purchase, the company emphasized, would be conducted strictly within compliance frameworks governing international trade and sanctions.

Industry sources say India’s state-run refiners are also closely watching developments, as Venezuelan crude could offer an alternative source of supply if restrictions ease.

For India, one of the world’s largest energy importers, access to additional crude streams is critical to managing costs and ensuring long-term energy security.

Reliance halted purchases of Venezuelan oil in 2025 after trade restrictions and punitive tariffs made such imports commercially and politically difficult.

The company’s refineries in Gujarat, however, are technically well suited to process heavier crude grades like Venezuela’s Merey, giving it flexibility if discounted barrels return to the market.

Recent diplomatic developments between Caracas and Washington have reopened discussions around limited oil exports, sparking renewed interest among global refiners.

Analysts note that even modest Venezuelan exports could influence pricing dynamics, particularly for complex refineries designed to handle heavy and sour crudes.

Energy market specialists suggest Venezuelan oil could re-emerge at attractive discounts, improving refining margins for buyers able to process it efficiently.

Such barrels could enhance feedstock flexibility for refiners facing rising costs and narrowing profit margins in other crude streams.

For India, Venezuelan oil also represents a politically acceptable diversification option at a time when Russian crude imports are under intense international scrutiny.

New Delhi has faced sustained pressure from Western governments to reduce reliance on Russian energy following the Ukraine conflict.

While Russian oil has helped India secure discounted supplies, growing compliance risks and tariff threats have prompted some refiners to reassess sourcing strategies.

Reliance’s recent reduction in Russian crude intake reflects a broader trend of cautious recalibration rather than abrupt disengagement.

Analysts say diversification is increasingly becoming a strategic necessity rather than a commercial choice for Indian refiners.
Balancing affordability, compliance, and geopolitical exposure has emerged as a central challenge for the country’s energy planners.

Venezuelan crude, if reintroduced into global markets, could partially offset reductions in Russian supply without triggering the same level of diplomatic backlash.

However, volumes are expected to remain limited, meaning such imports would supplement rather than replace existing supply arrangements.

India’s refining sector has historically demonstrated adaptability, adjusting procurement patterns in response to sanctions, conflicts, and shifting trade rules.

Reliance’s conditional openness underscores how major players are keeping options open amid an uncertain global energy environment.

As international negotiations continue, clarity on export permissions will determine whether Venezuelan oil once again finds its way into Indian refineries.

The outcome could influence not only India’s import mix but also broader discussions on energy security, sanctions compliance, and global oil market stability.

Producers emphasise stability as global demand signals soften and supply uncertainties grow.

OPEC+ has decided to keep oil production levels unchanged for the first quarter of 2026, signalling a cautious approach as the group balances market stability with concerns about oversupply and shifting geopolitical conditions.

The decision reflects wider efforts within the alliance to preserve a predictable energy environment amid fluctuating economic indicators, evolving trade flows and ongoing geopolitical negotiations involving key global players.

The coalition, which accounts for roughly half of the world’s oil supply, met at a time when discussions aimed at easing tensions between major nations could reshape energy trade patterns.

Participants noted that potential diplomatic developments could influence sanctions-linked production and alter supply levels across several major exporting countries.

Market analysts observed that the stabilising decision comes as benchmark crude prices have weakened in recent months, prompting producers to prioritise consistency over rapid expansion.

The group’s choice indicates awareness of rising inventories, demand uncertainty and the need for careful coordination among members with differing production capabilities.

More than 3 million barrels per day of earlier output cuts remain active, representing an estimated 3% of global demand and serving as a central component in OPEC+ efforts to support balanced pricing.

These include long-term reductions scheduled to continue through 2026, as well as phased adjustments introduced by selected member countries in recent months.

The alliance confirmed that eight member states will continue to pause planned output increases during the first quarter of 2026, following the earlier return of nearly 3 million barrels per day to the market since April 2025.

Leaders emphasised that the pause is intended to limit volatility and allow producers to align strategies with real-time global demand signals.

Another major outcome of the meeting was the approval of a new mechanism for assessing members’ maximum production capacity, which will serve as the foundation for setting output baselines from 2027 onward.

This evaluation process, scheduled to run from January through September 2026, aims to ensure that quota allocations accurately reflect technical capabilities and long-term investment progress.

Independent assessment firms will analyse the production potential of most OPEC+ members, while countries under sanctions will be evaluated through separate arrangements tailored to their circumstances.

This approach seeks to maintain fairness and transparency while accommodating unique economic and regulatory challenges faced by individual states.

Capacity measurement has been a long-standing point of debate within the group, with nations such as the United Arab Emirates seeking recognition for expanded investment-driven capabilities.

Meanwhile, several African members, whose production has declined in recent years, have advocated against reductions to their established quotas, stressing the need to preserve economic stability.

The introduction of the new assessment mechanism reflects a broader strategy to modernise internal governance and reduce future disputes over quota allocations.

Officials hope that a structured, data-driven process will help streamline decision-making and support the group’s long-term cohesion.

While global oil markets continue to navigate a complex environment of shifting demand patterns, technological advancements and energy-transition policies, OPEC+ reiterated its commitment to maintaining equilibrium.

Producers indicated that additional adjustments will be considered if market conditions require further calibration in the months ahead.

Observers note that the coming year may present challenges as economic growth forecasts vary by region and geopolitical negotiations influence trade dynamics.

However, the group’s latest actions suggest a preference for predictable supply management as it monitors trends in consumption, investment and international policy.

At an international energy forum in Athens, the United States reaffirmed its support for reliable oil and gas supplies while encouraging innovation and investment in renewable energy to ensure global energy stability and economic growth.

The United States has reiterated its commitment to energy security in Europe by emphasizing a balanced approach that includes both traditional energy sources and the gradual integration of renewables.

Speaking at a major international energy conference in Athens, senior U.S. energy officials highlighted the importance of maintaining dependable oil and gas supplies while continuing to invest in new technologies that enhance sustainability and efficiency.

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright stressed that global energy transitions must be practical and inclusive, ensuring stability while advancing toward cleaner solutions.

He noted that while renewables have made important progress, oil and gas remain essential to supporting Europe’s immediate energy needs — particularly as the continent continues to reduce its reliance on Russian energy imports.

“The United States stands ready to support Europe with secure, reliable, and affordable energy,” Wright stated, emphasizing ongoing cooperation between U.S. energy firms and European nations.

This partnership has already resulted in multiple agreements to expand natural gas supplies and strengthen transatlantic energy infrastructure.

The U.S. shale boom has positioned the country as one of the world’s leading exporters of oil and gas, supplying nearly one-fifth of global output.

This capacity enables the U.S. to act as a stabilizing force in international energy markets while supporting Europe’s diversification goals.

While acknowledging challenges in renewable energy development, U.S. officials encouraged continued investment in technologies such as wind, solar, and hydrogen.

Wright pointed out that over $4 trillion has already been invested globally in renewable infrastructure — a testament to growing international commitment.

However, he emphasized the need for realistic timelines and balanced energy policies that maintain economic growth and energy reliability.

U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum added that the future of energy lies in “addition rather than substitution,” noting that emerging technologies should complement, not replace, existing resources.

He called for innovation-driven strategies that expand the global energy mix while ensuring resilience against supply disruptions.

The discussions in Athens also highlighted alignment between the U.S. and its European partners on long-term sustainability goals, even as approaches differ.

The European Union recently reaffirmed its target of reducing emissions by 90% by 2040, reflecting a shared commitment to climate responsibility and technological advancement.

Experts at the conference agreed that collaboration between major producers and renewable innovators will be essential in shaping a secure and sustainable energy future.

The U.S. continues to advocate for a pragmatic energy framework — one that secures today’s needs while building tomorrow’s cleaner systems.

This balanced vision underscores the U.S. role as both a global energy leader and a partner in innovation, combining traditional strength with forward-looking investments in renewable capacity, efficiency, and climate adaptation.

Despite softer oil prices, energy giants Shell and TotalEnergies reported strong, stable results that reflect disciplined strategy, investor confidence, and growing opportunities in natural gas and refining — reinforcing their leadership in the global energy transition.

Shell and TotalEnergies, two of the world’s leading energy companies, showcased steady performance in their latest quarterly results, demonstrating resilience and strategic adaptability amid fluctuating oil prices.

While both firms reported modest declines in profit, they continued to deliver solid shareholder returns, strengthened their balance sheets, and reaffirmed their commitment to long-term growth in liquefied natural gas (LNG) and downstream operations.

Shell reported adjusted earnings of $5.4 billion for the quarter ending September 30, surpassing analyst expectations of $5.09 billion.

The company’s strong showing was supported by robust results from its gas and upstream businesses, which performed better than anticipated despite weaker commodity prices.

This underscores Shell’s ability to leverage its diversified portfolio and trading expertise to sustain profitability even in challenging market conditions.

The energy major also maintained its $3.5 billion share buyback program for the quarter, reflecting continued confidence in its financial stability. Over the past four years, Shell has repurchased more than a quarter of its outstanding shares, enhancing value for investors.

Combined with dividends of $2.1 billion, Shell’s shareholder returns over the last four quarters represent nearly half of its operating cash flow, in line with its long-term payout targets.

Shell CEO Wael Sawan emphasized the company’s commitment to balancing profitability with energy transition goals. He noted that while short-term oil supply dynamics remain uncertain, the company is well-positioned for the future through its expanding LNG portfolio.

Shell continues to bet on rising global demand for liquefied natural gas, especially as countries accelerate their shift toward cleaner energy sources.

Shell’s integrated gas unit — the world’s largest LNG trading business — once again proved to be a key profit driver. The segment benefited from favorable trading conditions and resilient demand across Asia and Europe.

Looking ahead, Shell expects the LNG market to stabilize next year, with potential imbalances depending on the timing of new global projects.

The company’s cash flow from operations stood at $12.2 billion, down from $14.7 billion a year earlier, but still indicative of strong underlying performance.

Shell’s gearing, or debt-to-equity ratio, dipped slightly from the previous quarter and remains within comfortable levels. The company’s focus on disciplined capital spending and operational efficiency continues to strengthen its financial foundation.

Meanwhile, French energy major TotalEnergies also delivered a stable performance, with adjusted net income of $4.0 billion for the quarter, slightly lower than last year’s $4.1 billion.

The results aligned with market expectations and reflected strong upstream production, higher refining margins, and disciplined cost control.

TotalEnergies’ downstream operations stood out with an impressive 76% jump in profits, boosted by surging European refining margins.

The increase was driven by the European Union’s ban on fuel imports derived from Russian crude oil, which reshaped the continent’s energy supply landscape.

CEO Patrick Pouyanné noted that refining margins are expected to remain strong, projecting an average near $100 per ton in the next quarter.

Despite the external headwinds, TotalEnergies remains focused on financial discipline. The company will scale back its share buybacks slightly in the coming quarter to maintain balance sheet strength and manage debt responsibly.

Its gearing ratio improved quarter-on-quarter to 17.3%, reflecting prudent financial management.

Both Shell and TotalEnergies are navigating a complex energy landscape marked by evolving demand patterns, climate commitments, and geopolitical uncertainty.

Yet, both companies continue to balance short-term performance with long-term transformation. Shell’s emphasis on LNG expansion and TotalEnergies’ success in refining and low-carbon initiatives signal strategic foresight as the global energy system evolves.

Brent crude prices averaged around $68 per barrel during the quarter, lower than last year’s $78 average, while European gas prices also eased.

Despite this softer pricing environment, both companies’ results highlight their ability to sustain profitability through diversification, trading strength, and capital efficiency.

As the energy industry undergoes rapid change, Shell and TotalEnergies are proving that adaptability and forward-thinking strategies can yield stability even in uncertain times.

By investing in LNG, renewables, and refining modernization, they are positioning themselves not just for immediate recovery but for leadership in a lower-carbon future.

Investors remain cautiously optimistic about the sector’s outlook. Both firms’ continued focus on shareholder returns, disciplined investment, and innovation in cleaner technologies demonstrate how traditional energy leaders are redefining their roles in the global energy transition.

In a year marked by volatility, Shell and TotalEnergies have shown that strategic resilience, operational excellence, and a clear focus on long-term growth remain the cornerstones of enduring success in the evolving energy landscape.

Brent crude futures were up 61 cents, or 0.9%, to $67.18 a barrel at 1110 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was up 67 cents, or 1.1%, at $62.95 a barrel, both recouping modest earlier losses.

Investors on Tuesday were watching developments around the deal to restart oil exports from Iraq’s Kurdistan. Two oil producing firms asked for assurances their debts would be repaid, stalling the deal.

The deal between Iraq’s federal and Kurdish regional governments and oil firms is designed to lead to the resumption of about 230,000 barrels per day of oil exports from Kurdistan to the global market via Turkey. They have been suspended since March 2023.

Overall, the global oil market is bracing for elevated supply and slowing demand, hampered by the take-up of electric vehicles and economic pressures fuelled by U.S. tariffs.

In its latest monthly report, the International Energy Agency said world oil supply would rise more rapidly this year and a surplus could expand in 2026 as OPEC+ members increase output and supply from outside the producer group grows.

Still, risks overhang the market as traders monitor the European Union’s consideration of stricter sanctions on Russian oil exports, as well as any escalation of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

“Supportive elements are still low OECD oil inventories,” UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said. “On the other hand, higher crude exports from OPEC+ are a headwind for prices as well as the lack of new sanctions targeting Russian oil exports.”

U.S. crude oil stockpiles were expected to have risen last week, while gasoline and distillate inventories likely fell, a preliminary Reuters poll on Monday showed.