Millions of people living in forest-dependent communities continue to face extreme poverty despite the global forest sector generating an estimated US$1.5 trillion annually, according to a new United Nations assessment that warns progress toward eliminating poverty among forest populations is falling behind international targets.

The findings were published in the Global Forest Goals Report 2026, released during the 21st session of the United Nations Forum on Forests on May 11. The report evaluates progress toward the United Nations General Assembly Strategic Plan for Forests 2017–2030, adopted in 2017 to strengthen the environmental, social and economic contribution of forests worldwide.

Under the framework’s second Global Forest Goal, member states committed to eradicating extreme poverty among forest-dependent people by 2030. However, the report concluded that the target is “off track,” citing persistent structural barriers that continue to prevent forest communities from benefiting fully from forest-based economies.

The global forest sector currently accounts for roughly 1% of worldwide employment, according to the assessment, yet many of the world’s poorest populations continue to reside in heavily forested regions. Large sections of these communities survive on incomes near or below US$3 per day despite forests serving as a primary source of food, fuel, income and subsistence.

The report said forestry has not significantly contributed to long-term poverty reduction among vulnerable populations because communities remain concentrated at the lowest end of supply chains with limited access to markets, processing infrastructure and commercial opportunities.

According to the UN assessment, weak market connectivity and insufficient value-added processing particularly affect producers of non-wood forest products, commonly referred to as NWFPs, which include goods such as medicinal plants, resins, nuts, fibres and wild foods. The report estimated the global value of NWFPs at approximately US$9.4 billion in 2020.

The document stated that nearly three-quarters of the global population uses some form of non-wood forest product, underlining forests’ continued importance to livelihoods and household economies, especially in rural areas across developing countries.However, the report identified major obstacles preventing forest producers from capturing greater economic returns.

These include inadequate transport infrastructure, limited access to business services, weak product standards, insufficient commercialization mechanisms and logistical bottlenecks that isolate producers from national and international markets.“Forest producers and communities remain at the low-value end of supply chains,” the assessment said, adding that infrastructure deficiencies continue to increase operational costs and reduce competitiveness for remote communities.

The report also noted a decline in forest-sector employment over the past decade. According to UN data cited in the assessment, the share of employment linked to the forest sector fell by approximately 3.1% between 2011 and 2022, further limiting income opportunities in forest-dependent regions.

The findings carry broader implications for global development targets beyond forestry itself. The UN assessment said progress in the forest sector directly affects multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including poverty reduction, food security, access to clean water, affordable energy, economic growth and sustainable consumption.

The report linked forest-based livelihoods particularly to SDG 1 on ending poverty and SDG 2 on eliminating hunger, while also identifying connections to sanitation, energy access and rural employment generation.

Sub-Saharan Africa emerged as the region facing the greatest challenge. The report said extreme poverty rates in the region remain close to 46%, with little measurable improvement despite global declines in poverty levels over recent decades. Many of the world’s forest-dependent poor reside in Sub-Saharan Africa, where rural economies remain heavily reliant on forests for daily survival.

By comparison, several countries in Asia and Latin America showed what the report described as “partial recovery” following increases in poverty triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Global extreme poverty rose sharply during the pandemic period before gradually declining from 11.4% in 2020 to approximately 10.3% in 2024, according to figures cited in the assessment. The report stated that forests played only a modest role in this recovery process.

It pointed to localized income gains generated through community forestry, agroforestry systems and payment-for-ecosystem-services programs, often referred to as PES schemes. These initiatives provided limited support for participating households but did not produce significant global reductions in poverty among forest communities.

“Data suggest that while forests continue to buffer rural livelihoods and contribute modestly to poverty reduction, there is no substantial global evidence of a significant post-2020 increase in the contribution of the forest sector to poverty eradication,” the report said.

The findings underscore a growing debate among policymakers and development agencies over how to integrate forest conservation with economic inclusion. International organizations have increasingly promoted community-led forest management and sustainable commercialization of forest resources as mechanisms for both protecting biodiversity and supporting local economies.

Environmental economists have argued that forests provide substantial indirect economic benefits through water regulation, climate stabilization and ecosystem services that are often not reflected in conventional income measurements. However, the UN assessment focused primarily on direct livelihood and poverty indicators tied to measurable household income and employment.

The report warned that without stronger investment in infrastructure, market integration and value-added forest industries, the benefits generated by the global forest economy are likely to remain concentrated away from the communities most dependent on forest resources for survival.

The UNICEF Executive Board concluded its first regular session of 2026 with a warning that decades of progress in child survival could be reversed as funding constraints, conflict and systemic pressures weaken global health systems, according to statements delivered during the meeting.

The two-and-a-half day session reviewed a range of institutional priorities, including implementation of the United Nations’ UN80 reform initiative, UNICEF’s global evaluation plan for 2026–2029, and updates on the work of national committees engaged in fundraising and youth outreach. Financial oversight, programme delivery and governance issues were also examined as part of the Board’s agenda.

A central focus of the session was child health, highlighted during discussions on eight newly approved country programme documents covering Argentina, Cuba, Georgia, Malaysia, Mexico, Somalia, South Africa and Sudan. Board members and senior officials framed investment in primary healthcare as critical not only to survival outcomes but to broader human development and social stability.

Opening the session, Rein Tammsaar, President of the Board and Estonia’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, emphasized inclusive governance as a priority for 2026. He also pointed to the potential role of artificial intelligence in expanding access to and improving the quality of education.

Tammsaar acknowledged UNICEF personnel working in high-risk environments, stating that their operational commitment underpins the organization’s credibility.In her introductory remarks, Catherine Russell cautioned that progress in reducing child mortality could stall for the first time in three decades.

She identified child and maternal health as core priorities and cited the establishment of a global Centre of Excellence in Nairobi aimed at strengthening technical capacity in health, nutrition and water, sanitation and hygiene services.Senior officials presented evidence of significant global gains, including a reduction in annual under-five deaths to below 5 million and an estimated 4.2 million child deaths prevented annually through immunization.

Maternal mortality has declined by roughly one third since 2000. However, speakers stressed that these achievements remain fragile.Douglas Noble, Associate Director of Health, said abrupt reductions in development funding are disrupting essential services and exposing structural weaknesses in health systems. He added that misinformation is undermining vaccine confidence, while conflict, climate-related shocks and economic instability are increasing displacement and limiting access to care.

Noble stated that survival alone is no longer an adequate benchmark for child development, arguing for integrated approaches that include mental health, psychosocial support and adolescent well-being alongside physical health services. He urged governments to prioritize primary healthcare in national budgets, protect health spending during fiscal pressures and invest in community-level health workers.

Panel discussions reflected concerns that setbacks are not confined to low-income countries. Participants noted declining vaccination rates in Argentina and signs of reversal in child survival indicators in South Africa. Rising mental health challenges among adolescents, including increased suicidal behaviour in Malaysia, were also highlighted.

Speakers from governments, international organizations, academia and civil society reiterated that access to healthcare should not be treated as a privilege. They stressed the need for age-appropriate services that address both communicable and noncommunicable conditions, supported by integrated systems spanning health, education and social protection.

Testimony from field representatives underscored the impact of conflict on health infrastructure. Ayoub Ibrahim Arabi Mohammed described conditions in Sudan, where ongoing violence has displaced populations and disrupted medical services. He reported shortages of fuel, medicine and basic supplies in hospitals, while some clinics have ceased operations entirely, leaving families without access to care.

He emphasized the role of frontline health workers as critical to sustaining services in conflict settings and called for their protection. He also warned that children are dying due to the inability of healthcare systems to function effectively under prolonged instability.Across discussions, a consistent theme emerged that sustaining progress in child survival requires resilient primary healthcare systems capable of withstanding external shocks.

UNICEF outlined key policy areas for governments, including strengthening primary care, restoring trust in immunization programmes, addressing underlying determinants such as malnutrition and sanitation, and integrating mental health and noncommunicable disease responses into health strategies.

Mental health featured prominently in the session, with officials noting that one in seven adolescents aged 10 to 19 is living with a mental health condition. Data presented indicated that one in four children has a caregiver experiencing mental health challenges, highlighting broader social implications.

Officials also cited global estimates suggesting that a young person dies by suicide every 11 minutes, underscoring the scale of the issue.Meylan Alejandra Ramos Espejel, speaking on behalf of young people, linked mental health challenges to wider global pressures including migration, conflict and climate-related disruptions.

She called for greater inclusion of youth perspectives in policymaking and emphasized the need for tangible support mechanisms.Noncommunicable diseases were identified as another growing concern, affecting more than 2 billion individuals under the age of 20 through direct conditions or exposure to risk factors.

Officials noted that these diseases disproportionately affect children in lower-income settings, challenging the perception that they are confined to wealthier populations.The Board also reviewed progress on international policy commitments.

A political declaration adopted by heads of state in September 2025 on noncommunicable diseases and mental health was cited as a milestone, with references to children and youth included multiple times, reflecting increased global attention to these issues.Despite broad agreement on key priorities, the Board did not reach consensus on all agenda items, with some decisions requiring formal votes.

By the end of the session, seven decisions were adopted, covering areas including governance, financial oversight, evaluation frameworks and fundraising strategies.The Board approved eight country programmes and extended a subregional programme for the Gulf Area.

These programmes are intended to guide interventions across sectors including health, education, nutrition and child protection, reflecting an integrated approach to humanitarian and development challenges.In closing remarks, Russell said the approved programmes provide operational frameworks for delivering measurable outcomes, while acknowledging the absence of consensus on certain items.

Tammsaar expressed concern over divisions within the Board, stating that consensus-based decisions strengthen institutional unity and effectiveness.The next annual session of the Executive Board is scheduled to take place from June 16 to 19, 2026.

Environmental degradation and systemic inequality are leaving billions of people without access to safe drinking water and sanitation, according to a United Nations policy brief that underscores the growing intersection between climate pressures, public health risks, and human rights obligations.

The brief, prepared by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on behalf of UN-Water, estimates that around 2.1 billion people globally lack access to safely managed drinking water, while 3.4 billion do not have access to safely managed sanitation services.

The findings are intended to guide policymakers and government authorities in designing laws and strategies that address water scarcity and environmental stress through a human rights-based framework.Under international human rights law, states are required to ensure that water and sanitation services are available, accessible, affordable, acceptable, and of adequate quality.

These obligations are central to maintaining public health, supporting livelihoods, and ensuring a basic standard of dignity.Despite these commitments, the report highlights persistent and widespread gaps in service delivery. More than 1,000 children under the age of five die each day from diseases linked to unsafe water, poor sanitation, and inadequate hygiene.

The burden of water access also falls disproportionately on women and girls, who collectively spend an estimated 250 million hours daily collecting water, often under conditions that expose them to physical risk and limit opportunities for education and employment.

The report identifies chronic underinvestment in the water and sanitation sector as a major constraint, noting that funding levels remain insufficient relative to the scale of the challenge. This underinvestment comes despite the sector’s critical role in climate resilience, economic development, and disease prevention.

According to the brief, environmental degradation is compounding existing inequalities and disproportionately affecting marginalized populations. Groups identified as particularly vulnerable include women and girls, children, older persons, persons with disabilities, Indigenous communities, people living in poverty, and those displaced by conflict or environmental stress.

“For many, the denial of access to safe drinking water and sanitation is a result, not of scarcity alone, but of exclusion and inaccessibility woven into institutions and infrastructure,” the report states, highlighting structural barriers that limit equitable access.The document also draws attention to emerging and conflict-related threats to water security.

It notes that water infrastructure has increasingly been targeted in armed conflicts, in violation of international humanitarian law. In Gaza, the destruction of desalination facilities and damage to water systems has forced civilians to rely on contaminated supplies. In Sudan, attacks on water and electricity infrastructure have disrupted access for millions, while in Yemen, sanitation facilities supported by international organizations have been struck by airstrikes.

In addition to conflict-related risks, the brief identifies new pressures linked to technological and industrial expansion. The rapid growth of data centres, for example, is emerging as a significant but often overlooked source of water consumption. A single one-megawatt data centre can require more than 25 million litres of water annually for cooling, an amount roughly equivalent to the daily consumption needs of 300,000 people.

Amid these challenges, the report outlines examples of policy interventions that integrate human rights principles into water governance. Case studies from multiple countries illustrate how targeted reforms can improve access, affordability, and sustainability.In Bangladesh, a community-led initiative enabled residents in coastal areas to co-finance a climate-resilient water facility, with women trained to manage operations.

The program contributed to a reduction in waterborne diseases and improved school attendance among girls, and has since been replicated across hundreds of administrative wards.In Costa Rica, a water tariff reform introduced progressive pricing, charging higher rates for heavy users while offering subsidized rates for low-income households. The approach improved affordability for vulnerable populations while encouraging conservation, demonstrating how economic regulation can align with human rights objectives.

The brief emphasizes that such initiatives are most effective when supported by strong governance frameworks. It calls for greater transparency, public participation, and access to information, alongside legal mechanisms that allow individuals to seek redress when rights are violated.States are also urged to integrate water and sanitation priorities into broader policy frameworks, including climate adaptation plans, biodiversity strategies, and disaster risk reduction efforts.

The report highlights the need for financing models that are predictable, accessible, and aligned with human rights standards, as well as the importance of strengthening local governance capacities.Gender considerations are identified as a critical component of effective policy design.

The report calls for measures to address structural inequalities, including gender-responsive budgeting, increased representation of women in decision-making, and protections against gender-based violence linked to water access.The role of the private sector is also addressed, with the report referencing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Companies are expected to conduct due diligence, disclose environmental and social impacts, and provide remedies where harm occurs.

Governments, in turn, are tasked with regulating corporate activity to prevent abuses affecting water and sanitation systems.UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said that addressing water and sanitation challenges requires sustained political and financial commitment. “Investment in water is an investment in dignity, equality, public health, and sustainable development,” he said in a statement marking World Water Day 2026.

The findings highlight the scale and complexity of the global water crisis, with environmental degradation, population pressures, and governance gaps continuing to strain already fragile systems.

The global drug crisis is expanding in both scale and complexity, with new data pointing to a steady rise in consumption, production, and associated harms across regions. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), an estimated 292 million people used drugs in 2022, marking a 20% increase over the past decade.

This upward trend reflects not only population growth but also deeper structural challenges tied to inequality, conflict, and evolving illicit markets.Down To EarthCannabis remains the most widely used substance globally, with 228 million users, followed by opioids at 60 million, amphetamines at 30 million, cocaine at 23 million, and ecstasy at 20 million.

While these figures highlight the breadth of usage, the more pressing concern lies in the growing number of individuals developing drug use disorders. UNODC estimates that around 64 million people worldwide suffer from such conditions, yet access to treatment remains limited and uneven.

Despite the scale of the problem, treatment coverage remains critically low. Only one in 11 people with drug use disorders receives any form of medical or psychological support, according to UN data.

The gap is even more pronounced among women, with only one in 18 receiving treatment compared to one in seven men. These disparities point to systemic barriers, including stigma, lack of healthcare infrastructure, and gender-based inequalities in access to services.

Down To EarthPolitical EconomistHealth risks associated with drug use are also intensifying, particularly with the emergence of new synthetic substances. Nitazenes, a class of synthetic opioids more potent than fentanyl, have been linked to rising overdose deaths in several high-income countries.

At the same time, harm reduction strategies such as supervised consumption sites and naloxone distribution programmes have been introduced in some countries, though their availability remains inconsistent globally.

The supply side of the drug economy is also undergoing significant transformation. The global cocaine market, in particular, has seen rapid expansion, with production, seizures, and consumption all reaching record levels in recent years.

Global cocaine production exceeded 3,700 tonnes in 2023, driven largely by increased cultivation in Latin America and improved yields. Synthetic drugs are emerging as another dominant force, reshaping trafficking patterns due to their low production costs and ease of distribution.

Amphetamine-type stimulants now account for a substantial share of global synthetic drug seizures, while new psychoactive substances continue to proliferate.

In 2024 alone, a record 688 unique new psychoactive substances were reported worldwide, highlighting the rapid pace of innovation within illicit markets. UNODCThese developments are closely linked to organised crime networks, which have diversified their operations across regions.

Drug trafficking routes are increasingly integrated with other forms of illicit activity, including financial fraud and illegal resource extraction. In parts of Southeast Asia, for example, industrial-scale methamphetamine production has surged, supported by transnational networks and ongoing political instability.

Underlying the expansion of drug markets are broader socio-economic factors. Poverty, unemployment, and displacement continue to push vulnerable populations toward both drug use and participation in illicit economies. In some regions, farmers have turned to cultivating narcotic crops such as opium as a means of survival, particularly in areas affected by conflict or economic disruption.

The human cost extends beyond individual users to families and communities. Drug-related crime remains significant, with an estimated 7 million people globally coming into contact with law enforcement for drug-related offences in 2022.

Of these, a large proportion were linked to possession or personal use, raising questions about the balance between criminal justice approaches and public health strategies.

At the same time, younger populations are increasingly affected. Data from multiple regions indicate a rise in early drug exposure, with youth representing a growing share of new users. This trend has implications for long-term health outcomes, workforce participation, and social stability.

Governments have adopted a mix of enforcement, prevention, and treatment strategies to address the crisis, but results remain uneven. While some countries have expanded harm reduction programmes and public health interventions, others continue to rely heavily on punitive approaches.

Experts argue that without coordinated international action, disparities in policy responses will continue to undermine progress.The evolving nature of drug markets particularly the rise of synthetic substances and digital trafficking networks poses additional challenges for regulation and enforcement.

As supply chains become more decentralised and adaptable, traditional control mechanisms are increasingly strained.

,The data suggests that the global drug problem is no longer confined to specific regions or substances but has become a widespread and multifaceted issue, shaped by economic, social, and technological forces.

A new segment of digital labour is expanding as individuals license their voices, images, and other personal attributes to technology firms in exchange for small, usage-based payments. Compensation can be minimal, with some platforms offering base rates as low as $0.02 per minute for voice data.

This model reflects a broader shift toward monetising personal data as a resource for developing and refining digital systems, while raising questions about long-term value distribution and worker protections.Bouke Klein Teeselink, an economics professor at King’s College London, characterised this trend as part of a growing “gig AI training” economy, where individuals perform fragmented, task-based work tied to data generation.

He noted that companies are increasingly choosing to compensate contributors directly rather than relying exclusively on publicly scraped material, in part to reduce the risk of copyright disputes. This shift also aligns with the need for more controlled and higher-quality datasets.

Veniamin Veselovsky, a researcher in the field, said that human-generated data remains critical for improving system outputs, particularly in areas where existing datasets fall short. He stated that “human data, for now, is the gold standard” for extending system capabilities beyond established patterns.The growth of these marketplaces is closely linked to global economic disparities.

Workers in developing countries, where unemployment is high and local currencies are often volatile, are among the most active participants. Payments in U.S. dollars can provide relatively greater purchasing power, making even low-paying digital tasks financially attractive compared to local alternatives.

For many individuals, this work represents a pragmatic response to limited employment opportunities rather than a long-term career choice.Participants often include individuals who have struggled to secure stable employment or entry-level positions in traditional sectors. In some cases, the income generated is used to fund education or vocational training.

A data trainer based in Cape Town, identified as Louw, said the earnings, while inconsistent, enabled him to save for a $500 course to train as a masseur. He reported difficulty accessing formal employment due to a long-term nervous disorder and viewed the platform-based work as a necessary interim solution. Louw acknowledged the trade-offs involved but emphasised that earning in U.S. currency provided a meaningful financial advantage in his local context.

In higher-income countries, participation is also increasing, though driven by different pressures. Rising living costs have led some individuals to monetise personal data as a supplementary income source. In such cases, the decision is often framed as a financial adjustment rather than a primary occupation, reflecting broader changes in labour markets and household economics.

Despite the apparent accessibility of this work, the contractual frameworks governing these platforms have drawn scrutiny. Many marketplaces require contributors to grant irrevocable, royalty-free licenses over their data, allowing companies to use, modify, and commercialise the material indefinitely without further payment.

This creates a disconnect between the one-time compensation received by workers and the potentially long-term commercial value derived from their data.For example, a brief voice recording could be incorporated into automated systems that operate for years, generating revenue without additional compensation to the original contributor. Similar concerns apply to image and video data, where likenesses may be repurposed across multiple contexts.

The absence of ongoing royalties or profit-sharing mechanisms has raised questions about fairness and sustainability within the model.Transparency is another significant concern.

Participants often have limited visibility into how their data will be used or where it may appear. This lack of clarity increases the risk of unintended applications, including use in contexts that contributors may find objectionable.

Legal protections are also limited, particularly in cross-border scenarios where jurisdictional challenges can complicate enforcement.Mark Graham, a professor of internet geography at the University of Oxford and author of Feeding the Machine, said that while the income generated can be meaningful in the short term, the broader structure of the work presents systemic risks.

He described the sector as “precarious, non-progressive and effectively a dead end,” noting that it does not typically provide pathways for skill development or career advancement. Graham also pointed to what he termed a “race to the bottom in wages,” driven by global competition among workers and the absence of standardised pay structures.

He added that demand for such data may be temporary, shaped by current technological requirements rather than long-term labour needs. As systems evolve, reliance on human-generated inputs could decline, leaving workers without stable income streams or transferable skills.

In this scenario, the enduring value is captured primarily by platform operators and firms based in higher-income economies, while contributors receive only short-term compensation.Personal accounts from participants highlight both the opportunities and the limitations of this emerging form of work.

Coy, who previously licensed his likeness for use in promotional content related to medical supplements for pregnant and postpartum women, described mixed feelings about the experience. He said the process felt impersonal, with public reactions focusing on his physical appearance rather than his identity.

Coy indicated that his initial decision was influenced by a perception that such data would be collected regardless, making compensation preferable to uncompensated use. However, he later expressed discomfort with the lack of control over how his image was used and interpreted.

He has since chosen not to participate in similar opportunities and stated that he would only reconsider if offered significantly higher compensation and clearer terms.His experience reflects a broader reassessment among some participants, particularly as awareness grows around licensing conditions and downstream uses of personal data.

While the market continues to expand, these concerns suggest that its long-term trajectory may depend on evolving standards around transparency, compensation, and worker protections.