With one year remaining before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reaches its final stages across the United States, Canada and Mexico, many football supporters living in host cities say anticipation for the tournament is being overshadowed by concerns over ticket prices, political tensions, infrastructure challenges and what they describe as the growing commercialization of the sport.

Interviews with fans across North America reveal a complex picture of public sentiment toward the first 48-team World Cup, which will be jointly hosted by three countries and feature a record number of participating nations.

While many supporters remain enthusiastic about welcoming the world’s largest football tournament to their home cities, numerous fans expressed frustration that attending matches may be financially out of reach for ordinary spectators.In Houston, longtime resident Ian Sherman said the prospect of hosting seven World Cup matches initially generated significant excitement.

However, he said that enthusiasm has diminished as ticket prices have become clearer and access to seats has proven difficult.Sherman pointed to prices exceeding $200 for upper-level seats at some group-stage matches and said many fans may ultimately be forced to rely on secondary markets if they hope to attend games involving major national teams.

Although football’s popularity has grown substantially in the United States over the past two decades, he said Houston remains primarily focused on American football, baseball and basketball.He also raised concerns about the city’s ability to absorb large numbers of visitors, citing traffic congestion and infrastructure pressures that could emerge during the tournament.

In Kansas City, local resident Parker McDowell said pride in hosting the World Cup has been accompanied by concern over broader political and security issues. While welcoming the city’s role as a base camp for several national teams, including England, Argentina, Algeria and the Netherlands, he said international visitors may be surprised by the region’s dependence on automobiles and limited public transportation options.

He also cited worries about global events, ticket affordability and public safety, including concerns surrounding gun violence in American cities.Political concerns emerged repeatedly among supporters interviewed across host locations. Several fans questioned whether current geopolitical developments align with the tournament’s traditional image as an event intended to unite nations through sport.

One supporter argued that restrictions affecting citizens of some countries and ongoing international conflicts have complicated perceptions of the tournament’s inclusiveness. Others criticized FIFA President Gianni Infantino and football’s governing body more broadly, claiming commercial and political considerations have increasingly overshadowed supporters’ interests.

In Mexico City, Francisco Fontano Patán described the tournament as a missed opportunity for urban development despite the city’s status as one of the competition’s flagship venues.Patán said local authorities had an opportunity to improve long-term transportation infrastructure around the city’s southern districts, including areas surrounding the iconic stadium formerly known as Azteca Stadium.

Instead, he said residents have seen only limited improvements that are unlikely to provide lasting benefits after the tournament concludes.He also argued that rising costs have distanced the event from ordinary citizens, leaving many supporters unable to attend matches in person.

Although public viewing events and fan festivals are expected across Mexico, Patán said those experiences are not significantly different from previous tournaments hosted elsewhere and do not compensate for the inability of many local residents to access stadium tickets.

Similar concerns were voiced in Monterrey, another Mexican host city. Resident Jose Galindo said excitement remains high because of the World Cup’s global significance, but acknowledged that many people cannot afford tickets or official merchandise.Galindo said the tournament increasingly feels like a premium product aimed at wealthier consumers rather than ordinary football supporters.

Nevertheless, he expects public viewing areas and informal gatherings to help create a festive atmosphere as the competition approaches.In Miami, Geoff Willerton said he remains excited about the tournament but does not personally know anyone planning to attend matches because of the costs involved.

While fan zones may offer an alternative, he said local awareness and excitement currently appear limited.Across several American host cities, supporters described a notable absence of visible World Cup enthusiasm despite the tournament’s proximity.

In New York, one resident suggested the event could struggle to compete for public attention in a city accustomed to hosting major international gatherings. Although the World Cup final will take place at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, he said many New Yorkers remain largely unaware of the event’s significance.Philadelphia resident James Powell said his own enthusiasm has declined steadily as ticket prices increased and concerns about FIFA’s governance intensified.

While he originally planned to attend matches, he now expects to watch from outside the stadium unless costs become more manageable.Powell said discussion of the World Cup remains relatively uncommon in Philadelphia despite the city’s role as a host venue.

Among the strongest criticism came from supporters in Northern California, where fans expressed disappointment over both ticket prices and the perceived lack of planning around public celebrations.San Francisco resident Ali said many football supporters had expected a festival atmosphere that would bring together fans from around the world.

Instead, uncertainty surrounding fan zones and the cost of attending matches has left many feeling excluded from an event taking place in their own region.Ali criticized organizers for prioritizing sponsors, corporate guests and VIP experiences over ordinary supporters.

He also questioned whether event planners fully understand the cultural significance of the World Cup compared with other major sporting events in North America.Despite widespread criticism, several supporters expressed optimism that local communities will ultimately embrace the tournament as kickoff approaches.

In Seattle, Roger Paul Probert-Baker described strong enthusiasm among residents and pointed to the city’s long football tradition, including support for the local club team and extensive experience hosting major sporting events.Probert-Baker said his family plans to participate in fan activities throughout the tournament and noted that preparations for security and crowd management are already underway.

He expressed confidence that Seattle will provide a welcoming environment for international visitors.Toronto residents also anticipate a vibrant atmosphere. Supporters there highlighted the city’s multicultural population and history of large public celebrations during previous World Cups.

Fans from numerous national backgrounds are expected to gather in neighborhoods, restaurants and public spaces to support their respective teams.

While enthusiasm varies across host cities, a common theme emerged from conversations with supporters throughout North America: the belief that the World Cup remains one of sport’s most powerful events, even as concerns over affordability, accessibility and governance continue to shape expectations.

For many fans, the challenge is not a lack of interest in football or the tournament itself. Rather, it is the perception that the event has become increasingly difficult for ordinary supporters to experience firsthand, despite being staged in their own communities.

After both Rajoub and Israeli football representative Basim Sheikh Suliman addressed delegates, FIFA President Gianni Infantino invited the two officials to stand beside him for a photograph.Rajoub declined repeatedly, despite several attempts by Infantino to persuade him to participate.

At one point, Rajoub could be heard saying, “We are suffering,” according to footage from the meeting.The incident followed renewed Palestinian pressure on FIFA over Israeli football clubs based in West Bank settlements, an issue that has remained a source of dispute for years within world football’s governing body.

The Palestinian Football Association has appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport after FIFA declined to impose sanctions on Israel over clubs located in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Palestinian officials argue that such clubs should not be allowed to compete in leagues organized under Israeli football authorities because the settlements are considered illegal under international law by much of the international community.

In 2024, United Nations experts identified at least eight football clubs operating in what they described as “Israeli colonial settlements” and called on FIFA to fulfill its human rights responsibilities by addressing the issue.

Speaking to reporters after the congress, Rajoub urged FIFA to enforce its own statutes consistently.“Apply the statutes with fairness, with logic,” he said.He also cited the broader impact of the Gaza war on Palestinian sport, accusing Israel of destroying sports facilities and causing the deaths of Palestinian athletes and staff.

“What’s going on in Palestine is terrible, destroying all the Palestinian sport facilities in Gaza, the killings of hundreds of Palestinian athletes, employees I think it’s now the time to make justice,” Rajoub said.Referring to the Israeli delegate, he added: “The guy who spoke on behalf of Israel, he did not even pay attention to the suffering, to what’s going on.”

“I refused to shake hands. How can I shake hands or have a photo with such a man?”FIFA has faced repeated calls from Palestinian officials and rights advocates to take action over Israeli settlement clubs, but the governing body has so far stopped short of imposing disciplinary measures.

The issue has added to wider political tensions surrounding international sport as the conflict in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories continues to affect athletes, federations and major sporting institutions.

The suggestion was attributed to Paolo Zampolli, a U.S. special envoy for global partnerships, who according to the Financial Times raised the possibility with U.S. President Donald Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino as a contingency plan should Iran withdraw.

Zampolli told the Associated Press the proposal was not political and framed it as a hypothetical scenario. “My request was for the Italian people and the American-Italian people,” he said, adding that Italy’s four World Cup titles could justify its inclusion.Italian officials rejected the idea.

Sports Minister Andrea Abodi said “it’s not possible” and “not a good idea,” while Luciano Buonfiglio said participation in the tournament must be earned on merit. Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti described the suggestion as “shameful.”Iran has not withdrawn from the World Cup and is preparing to play matches scheduled in U.S. cities including Los Angeles and Seattle in June.

FIFA has maintained that Iran’s fixtures will proceed as planned and has declined to comment on proposals to alter the lineup.Speaking at the White House, Trump said he had not given the matter much thought but called it “an interesting question.”

He deferred to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said no U.S. decision had been made to bar Iranian players from entering the country.Rubio indicated that concerns, if any, would relate to non-athlete personnel accompanying the team.

“The problem with Iran would be, not their athletes. It would be some of the other people that they want to bring with them,” he said, adding that authorities might restrict entry to certain individuals.Iran’s embassy in Rome criticized the proposal, saying in a statement on X that football “belongs to the people, not to politicians,” and describing any attempt to exclude the team as unjustified.

Iran secured qualification through the Asian Football Confederation and has publicly affirmed its intention to participate. An Iranian government spokesperson said this week that the national team is preparing for “proud and successful participation.

”Italy failed to qualify for the World Cup for a third consecutive time, following a campaign that led to the resignation of its national team coach and football federation president.

FIFA regulations state that in the event of a team’s withdrawal, a replacement may be selected from another association, though the rules do not explicitly require the substitute to come from the same continental confederation.