The Copernicus Climate Change Service said sea surface temperatures in April were the second-highest ever recorded for the month, with warming accelerating across parts of the Pacific Ocean as neutral conditions transition toward El Niño.

Samantha Burgess, strategic lead for climate at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, said daily ocean temperatures in recent days had moved close to surpassing the previous records set in 2024.

“It’s a matter of days before we are back in record-breaking ocean SSTs again,” Burgess told AFP, referring to sea surface temperatures.

Copernicus said marine heatwaves reached unprecedented levels in waters between the tropical Pacific and the United States during April, reflecting broader warming trends tied to both natural climate variability and long-term greenhouse gas emissions.

Last month, the World Meteorological Organization said El Niño conditions could emerge between May and July. The climate phenomenon, linked to warming Pacific Ocean waters and shifting trade winds, alters global weather systems and raises the likelihood of drought, heavy rainfall and severe heat events.

Scientists say El Niño is unfolding against a backdrop of persistent global warming, with oceans absorbing roughly 90 percent of excess heat generated by human-driven emissions from fossil fuels.

The previous El Niño contributed to 2023 and 2024 becoming the second- and hottest years on record respectively, according to climate agencies. Some forecasters believe the developing event could rival the strength of the “super” El Niño recorded in the late 1990s.

Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at Berkeley Earth, said last week that a strong El Niño could significantly increase the chances of 2027 becoming the hottest year ever observed globally.

Burgess cautioned that forecasting the intensity of El Niño during the Northern Hemisphere spring remains difficult because of seasonal uncertainties in climate models. She said, however, that the event was already likely to have substantial global consequences.

“We’re likely to see 2027 exceed 2024 for the warmest year on record,” Burgess said, noting that El Niño’s strongest influence on global temperatures often emerges in the year after it peaks.In its monthly climate bulletin, Copernicus said April temperatures globally were 1.43 degrees Celsius above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial average, making it the third-warmest April on record.

The agency also reported Arctic sea ice levels remained near historic lows during April, while Europe experienced contrasting weather conditions that could increase the risk of drought and wildfires during the coming summer.

Climate researchers say the persistence of marine heatwaves, shrinking ice cover and rising global temperatures underscores the intensifying impact of climate change, even before the full effects of El Niño materialize.

The proposed 650-mile pipeline, often referred to by critics as “Keystone Light” because of its similarities to the scrapped Keystone XL line, would transport up to 550,000 barrels of crude oil per day from Saskatchewan into northeastern Montana before extending through Montana and Wyoming to connect with existing U.S. pipeline infrastructure.

Trump signed the permit in the Oval Office, authorizing the line to cross the U.S.-Canada border and allowing the transport of crude oil as well as petroleum products including gasoline, diesel, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas.“Slightly different from the last administration. They wouldn’t sign a pipeline deal.

And we have pipelines going up,” Trump said after approving the project.At full capacity, the pipeline would carry roughly two-thirds the volume planned for Keystone XL, which was partially constructed before former President Joe Biden revoked its permit in January 2021 on his first day in office, citing climate concerns.

Trump had approved Keystone XL during his first term, but the project became a flashpoint in North American energy politics after Biden’s reversal angered Canadian officials and Alberta’s provincial government, which had invested more than $1 billion in the venture.

Unlike Keystone XL, the Bridger Pipeline Expansion would not cross Native American reservations, a key point of contention in past pipeline disputes. Company officials said more than 70% of the route would be built within existing pipeline corridors and about 80% would cross private land.

Bridger Pipeline LLC said the line would transport several grades of crude, including oil from Canada’s oil sands region, for refining or export in the United States.The project still requires additional state and federal environmental approvals before construction can begin. Company officials said they expect construction to start in 2027, with completion targeted for late 2028 or early 2029, potentially before Trump leaves office in January 2029.

Environmental groups have already signaled opposition, citing the risk of spills and the broader climate implications of expanding fossil fuel infrastructure.“The biggest concern we see right now is the concern inherent in all pipeline projects which is the risk of spills,” said Jenny Harbine, an attorney with environmental law group Earthjustice.

“Pipelines rupture and leak. It’s just a fact of pipelines.”Groups opposing the project include the Montana Environmental Information Center and WildEarth Guardians.Bridger Pipeline and subsidiaries of parent company True Companies have faced scrutiny over previous major spills, including more than 50,000 gallons of crude oil released into Montana’s Yellowstone River in 2015, contaminating a city’s drinking water supply, and a 2016 North Dakota spill of more than 600,000 gallons that affected the Little Missouri River and a tributary.

Subsidiaries of True Companies later agreed to pay a $12.5 million civil penalty to settle a federal lawsuit related to the Montana and North Dakota incidents. A separate 45,000-gallon diesel spill occurred in Wyoming in 2022.Company spokesperson Bill Salvin said Bridger has since introduced an AI-based leak detection system designed to accelerate incident response and plans to place pipeline sections 30 to 40 feet beneath major rivers including the Yellowstone and Missouri to reduce spill risks.

“We designed the pipeline with integrity and safety in mind,” Salvin said, adding that emergency response systems were in place in the event of a leak.Casper, Wyoming-based Bridger operates more than 3,700 miles of gathering and transmission pipelines across North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

The approval marks another step in Trump’s broader effort to expand domestic and cross-border fossil fuel infrastructure as part of his second-term energy agenda, reversing several climate-focused restrictions imposed under Biden.

Ministers are set to gather in Santa Marta against the backdrop of fuel shortages and rising prices following what the International Energy Agency has described as the largest oil supply shock on record, driven in part by constraints around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical transit route for global energy supplies.

The conference, co-hosted by Colombia and the Netherlands, was initiated amid frustration with the pace of negotiations under United Nations climate frameworks, where consensus-based processes have struggled to produce a clear pathway for reducing fossil fuel dependence.

Organisers say the current energy crisis has reinforced the strategic need for a managed transition, even as some governments increase coal use in the short term to stabilise domestic supply.Energy security considerations are expected to weigh as heavily as climate commitments during the discussions, reflecting the policy dilemma facing both advanced and developing economies.

Countries including Australia, Canada and Norway are expected to attend alongside emerging producers such as Angola, Mexico and Brazil, as well as coal-reliant economies like Turkiye and Vietnam. European nations including Germany, France and the United Kingdom are also set to participate.

However, several of the world’s largest fossil fuel producers and consumers, including the United States, China, Saudi Arabia and Russia, will not be represented, limiting the scope of any immediate global alignment.Colombia’s environment minister Irene Vélez Torres said the meeting has gained increased relevance in light of recent geopolitical developments, describing it as an opportunity to foster more direct engagement between producers and consumers on an issue often constrained in multilateral forums.

Analysts say the smaller, focused format may allow for more candid discussions but could also dilute outcomes given the diversity of national interests. Climate scientist Bill Hare of Climate Analytics noted that broader participation can make it harder to reach specific commitments, while supporters argue the inclusion of fossil fuel-producing nations marks a necessary step in advancing negotiations.

Participants from climate-vulnerable states, including Tuvalu and Vanuatu, are expected to push for accelerated timelines, citing the disproportionate impact of climate change and their reliance on imported energy. Officials from these countries have framed the current crisis as further evidence of the need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

Global investment in clean energy now outpaces spending on fossil fuels by roughly a factor of two, yet emissions from coal, oil and gas reached a record high in 2025, underscoring the gap between policy commitments and implementation.

The Santa Marta meeting is not expected to yield binding agreements but will contribute to a voluntary roadmap on fossil fuel transition being developed under Brazil’s leadership, as countries continue to grapple with balancing climate goals and energy security.

The UK government has said expanding oil and gas drilling in the North Sea would increase exposure to volatile global energy markets, as political divisions intensify over the country’s long-term energy strategy.

Energy secretary Ed Miliband told Labour MPs that continued reliance on fossil fuels leaves the UK vulnerable to external price shocks. He argued that recent geopolitical tensions, including the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Iran, have reinforced the risks associated with global gas markets.

Miliband said the central lesson from recent crises was that countries dependent on fossil fuel imports remain “price takers not price makers,” and therefore exposed to fluctuations beyond their control. He added that accelerating the transition to domestically generated clean power is essential for achieving what he described as “energy sovereignty” and strengthening national security.

Energy minister Michael Shanks echoed this position, stating that the UK must reduce its exposure to fossil fuels to prevent households from bearing the cost of international disruptions. He said previous price shocks had already demonstrated the economic risks tied to dependence on gas markets.

The government’s stance has been challenged by opposition parties and some Labour MPs, who argue that domestic oil and gas production remains critical for energy security and economic growth.

The Conservative Party is expected to use a parliamentary debate to call for the removal of restrictions on new North Sea drilling. Its proposals include scrapping the windfall tax on oil and gas companies, lifting the ban on new exploration licences, and approving projects such as the Rosebank oil field and the Jackdaw gas field.

Shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho said increasing domestic gas production would help meet national demand and reduce reliance on imports. She argued that failing to develop available resources during a period of supply instability would undermine energy security.Within the Labour Party, dissent has also emerged.

MP Henry Tufnell called for a reassessment of the current policy, suggesting that renewed drilling could support economic activity, reduce unemployment in industrial regions and limit the offshoring of carbon emissions. However, other Labour MPs indicated that there was limited support for reversing the party’s existing commitments.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to outline measures aimed at mitigating the impact of rising energy costs linked to geopolitical tensions. These include proposals to protect consumers from higher bills driven by disruptions in global oil and gas markets.

Reeves is also expected to introduce a framework to address potential profiteering, particularly in the retail fuel sector. The measures are intended to prevent excessive price increases in response to international events, including recent military activity involving Iran and its regional counterparts.

Miliband defended the continuation of the windfall tax on energy companies, stating that it has generated approximately £12 billion in revenue since the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war. He argued that removing the levy would primarily benefit corporate profits while reducing the government’s capacity to support households facing higher energy costs.

The government has positioned investment in clean and nuclear energy as a central component of its long-term strategy. Officials say reducing reliance on fossil fuels will help stabilise energy prices and insulate the economy from external shocks.

Reeves is expected to confirm that recommendations from the Fingleton review, aimed at accelerating nuclear power development, will be implemented through legislation. These reforms are intended to streamline project approvals and reduce delays linked to legal challenges.

The government is also considering mechanisms to provide indemnities for critical energy infrastructure projects, allowing them to proceed more quickly in the face of litigation. This approach is designed to address longstanding barriers to large-scale energy development.

According to a government spokesperson, the strategy includes £120 billion in public investment across energy infrastructure, including support for the Sizewell C nuclear plant and the development of small modular reactors in north Wales. These projects are intended to expand domestic energy capacity and reduce exposure to imported fuels.

Ministers argue that prioritising domestically controlled energy sources will enhance resilience against future crises while supporting economic stability.

The debate over North Sea drilling highlights a broader policy divide between short-term supply measures and long-term structural transition within the UK’s energy system.

At an international energy forum in Athens, the United States reaffirmed its support for reliable oil and gas supplies while encouraging innovation and investment in renewable energy to ensure global energy stability and economic growth.

The United States has reiterated its commitment to energy security in Europe by emphasizing a balanced approach that includes both traditional energy sources and the gradual integration of renewables.

Speaking at a major international energy conference in Athens, senior U.S. energy officials highlighted the importance of maintaining dependable oil and gas supplies while continuing to invest in new technologies that enhance sustainability and efficiency.

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright stressed that global energy transitions must be practical and inclusive, ensuring stability while advancing toward cleaner solutions.

He noted that while renewables have made important progress, oil and gas remain essential to supporting Europe’s immediate energy needs — particularly as the continent continues to reduce its reliance on Russian energy imports.

“The United States stands ready to support Europe with secure, reliable, and affordable energy,” Wright stated, emphasizing ongoing cooperation between U.S. energy firms and European nations.

This partnership has already resulted in multiple agreements to expand natural gas supplies and strengthen transatlantic energy infrastructure.

The U.S. shale boom has positioned the country as one of the world’s leading exporters of oil and gas, supplying nearly one-fifth of global output.

This capacity enables the U.S. to act as a stabilizing force in international energy markets while supporting Europe’s diversification goals.

While acknowledging challenges in renewable energy development, U.S. officials encouraged continued investment in technologies such as wind, solar, and hydrogen.

Wright pointed out that over $4 trillion has already been invested globally in renewable infrastructure — a testament to growing international commitment.

However, he emphasized the need for realistic timelines and balanced energy policies that maintain economic growth and energy reliability.

U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum added that the future of energy lies in “addition rather than substitution,” noting that emerging technologies should complement, not replace, existing resources.

He called for innovation-driven strategies that expand the global energy mix while ensuring resilience against supply disruptions.

The discussions in Athens also highlighted alignment between the U.S. and its European partners on long-term sustainability goals, even as approaches differ.

The European Union recently reaffirmed its target of reducing emissions by 90% by 2040, reflecting a shared commitment to climate responsibility and technological advancement.

Experts at the conference agreed that collaboration between major producers and renewable innovators will be essential in shaping a secure and sustainable energy future.

The U.S. continues to advocate for a pragmatic energy framework — one that secures today’s needs while building tomorrow’s cleaner systems.

This balanced vision underscores the U.S. role as both a global energy leader and a partner in innovation, combining traditional strength with forward-looking investments in renewable capacity, efficiency, and climate adaptation.