“The UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” Araghchi said while attending the BRICS gathering hosted by India.“It also became clear that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us,” he added, without publicly providing evidence to support the allegation.

The remarks underscored widening fractures within BRICS as the bloc attempts to project unity amid the war involving Iran and intensifying geopolitical instability across the Middle East.

Araghchi also referenced reports circulated by Israeli media concerning an alleged secret meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in the Emirates.Abu Dhabi has denied that any such meeting took place.

According to Iran’s Mehr news agency, Araghchi said he had initially avoided explicitly naming the UAE “for the sake of unity” during discussions among BRICS member states.“When the attacks started, they didn’t even issue a condemnation,” Araghchi said in response to remarks from the Emirati delegation.

The accusations come as BRICS foreign ministers meet to discuss the economic and geopolitical fallout from the Iran conflict, including disruptions to Gulf shipping lanes, energy markets and rising divisions among member countries.The UAE and Iran both joined BRICS during the bloc’s expansion phase in 2024, despite longstanding regional rivalries and competing strategic interests across the Gulf.

India, which currently chairs BRICS, is seeking to maintain consensus among members ahead of a leaders’ summit later this year, though disagreements over the Middle East conflict have complicated efforts to produce unified positions on global security issues.

“The UAE is an active partner in this aggression, and there is no doubt about it,” Araghchi said while attending the BRICS gathering hosted by India.“It also became clear that they participated in these attacks and may have even acted directly against us,” he added, without publicly providing evidence to support the allegation.

The remarks underscored widening fractures within BRICS as the bloc attempts to project unity amid the war involving Iran and intensifying geopolitical instability across the Middle East.

Araghchi also referenced reports circulated by Israeli media concerning an alleged secret meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in the Emirates.

Abu Dhabi has denied that any such meeting took place.According to Iran’s Mehr news agency, Araghchi said he had initially avoided explicitly naming the UAE “for the sake of unity” during discussions among BRICS member states.

“When the attacks started, they didn’t even issue a condemnation,” Araghchi said in response to remarks from the Emirati delegation.The accusations come as BRICS foreign ministers meet to discuss the economic and geopolitical fallout from the Iran conflict, including disruptions to Gulf shipping lanes, energy markets and rising divisions among member countries.

The UAE and Iran both joined BRICS during the bloc’s expansion phase in 2024, despite longstanding regional rivalries and competing strategic interests across the Gulf.

India, which currently chairs BRICS, is seeking to maintain consensus among members ahead of a leaders’ summit later this year, though disagreements over the Middle East conflict have complicated efforts to produce unified positions on global security issues.

The two-day meeting comes as the expanded BRICS grouping, now comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, faces growing diplomatic strain over the Gulf conflict and its economic fallout.

Iran has urged India, which holds the BRICS chairmanship for 2026, to use the forum to forge a consensus condemning military actions by the United States and Israel, according to officials familiar with preparations for the meeting.

The sharpest divisions have emerged between Iran and the United Arab Emirates, which are aligned on opposing sides of the conflict that erupted following military operations launched by the United States and Israel on Feb. 28.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is expected to arrive in New Delhi late on Wednesday for the talks, which run through May 15. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is also expected to attend, while it remained unclear who would represent the UAE delegation.

Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said earlier this year that forging consensus within BRICS had become difficult because several member states were directly involved in the conflict.

An Indian government official told Reuters New Delhi remained hopeful that discussions among ministers could still result in a joint communique despite continuing disagreements.

“Glad that the foreign ministers from all the BRICS countries, except China who is otherwise tied up, are coming,” former Indian diplomat Manjeev Singh Puri said. “This is a good sign on efforts to build a BRICS coalition around a matter of interest to emerging economies and the global south.”

China will instead be represented by its ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, as Foreign Minister Wang Yi is not expected to attend due to President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing this week.

The war has intensified pressure on BRICS economies through rising energy costs and market volatility, prompting several member states, including India, to introduce emergency measures aimed at cushioning consumers and stabilizing domestic markets.

China has maintained a publicly neutral position throughout the conflict while balancing close ties with Iran alongside expanding economic and diplomatic relations with Sunni-majority Gulf states.

The discussions are expected to focus on cooperation, shared security interests, and the strengthening of dialogue within the framework of existing alliances.

The meeting reflects continued interaction between Denmark, Greenland, and the United States, particularly in relation to the Arctic region, which has gained growing international attention due to its strategic location and economic potential.

Officials from all sides have emphasized the value of dialogue, mutual respect, and collaboration when addressing regional and global challenges.

Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has maintained a consistent position on its governance arrangements, while also welcoming constructive engagement with international partners.

Denmark has similarly reiterated its commitment to unity, cooperation, and diplomatic solutions that align with international norms and partnerships.

The White House talks are seen by observers as an opportunity to reinforce communication channels and clarify shared objectives in areas such as security, economic development, environmental protection, and regional stability.

Analysts note that sustained dialogue helps reduce misunderstandings and ensures that cooperation remains aligned with the interests of all parties involved.

Arctic affairs have increasingly become a topic of international discussion, driven by climate change, emerging trade routes, and technological development.

Denmark and Greenland have actively participated in multilateral forums to promote peaceful cooperation and responsible development across the region.

United States officials have also highlighted the importance of collaboration with trusted partners in maintaining stability and supporting international cooperation.

Meetings at this level underline the role of diplomacy in managing complex global issues through discussion rather than confrontation.

The presence of senior diplomatic representatives demonstrates the importance attached to maintaining strong transatlantic relations and addressing evolving regional dynamics together.

Such engagements are considered routine but significant steps in reinforcing long-standing alliances and ensuring open lines of communication.

Observers expect the discussions to cover a broad range of topics, including economic cooperation, scientific research, and sustainable development initiatives.

The Arctic’s role in global supply chains and environmental research continues to encourage closer coordination among allied nations.

Both Denmark and Greenland have expressed confidence in diplomatic engagement as the most effective means of addressing strategic concerns.

They continue to advocate for collaboration that respects sovereignty, international law, and shared values among partner countries.

The meeting is expected to conclude with reaffirmed commitments to dialogue and cooperation, reflecting the enduring partnership between the involved nations.

Such interactions reinforce the principle that complex international issues are best addressed through calm discussion and mutual understanding.

The meeting reflects continued dialogue between allies on Arctic affairs and regional cooperation.

The foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland will meet US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.

The talks are expected to take place at the White House and focus on mutual interests and long-term cooperation.

Danish officials indicated that the meeting was requested to encourage direct communication and understanding.

They emphasized the value of face-to-face discussions when addressing complex regional topics.

Greenland holds a unique position in the Arctic due to its geography and strategic location.

As an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, it has gradually expanded its self-governing role over recent decades.

Officials from Denmark and Greenland have highlighted the importance of constructive dialogue with international partners.

Such engagement is viewed as essential for maintaining stability and cooperation in the Arctic region.

The Arctic has gained increasing global attention due to environmental changes and economic opportunities.

Countries with interests in the region have focused on collaboration, research, and sustainable development.

Denmark has consistently stated that Arctic matters should be handled through diplomacy and international frameworks.

This approach aligns with its broader commitment to cooperation among allies and partners.

In parallel, Danish defense authorities are continuing discussions with NATO representatives.

These talks aim to strengthen coordination and preparedness in Arctic and northern regions.

Greenland’s leadership has expressed interest in participating actively in international discussions affecting the Arctic.

They see dialogue as a way to ensure that local perspectives are included in broader policy considerations.

NATO cooperation in the Arctic has expanded in recent years through joint exercises and information sharing.

Member states have underlined the importance of transparency and collaboration in the region.

Environmental protection remains a central theme in Arctic discussions.

Melting ice and changing ecosystems have prompted increased focus on sustainable and responsible engagement.

The upcoming meeting in Washington is expected to reinforce existing partnerships.

It also provides an opportunity to align views on regional priorities and future cooperation.

Observers note that regular diplomatic contact helps manage differences and build trust.

Such meetings are seen as part of normal engagement between long-standing partners.

Overall, the talks underline the importance of dialogue in addressing Arctic issues.

They reflect a shared interest in cooperation, stability, and responsible regional engagement.