The incident unfolded on Saturday evening when a man identified by police as 21-year-old Nasire Best allegedly fired toward a security checkpoint near the White House. Secret Service personnel returned fire, striking the suspect, who was later pronounced dead at a hospital.

The unidentified bystander sustained a gunshot wound during the exchange of fire. Officials said the injury was not considered life-threatening, though authorities have not determined whether the individual was struck by the suspect’s gunfire or during the officers’ response.

The United States Secret Service said no officers were injured. Secret Service Director Sean Curran expressed concern for the wounded civilian and said the agency hoped for a full recovery.
President Donald Trump was inside the White House at the time of the shooting, according to officials.
Authorities have released limited information regarding the motive behind the attack. In a post on his social media platform, Trump said the suspect appeared to have a “possible obsession” with the White House and linked the incident to his broader calls for expanded security measures around the presidential complex.

The president has requested congressional funding for a major security expansion of the White House campus, including the construction of a large ballroom and additional protective infrastructure. Following the shooting, Trump argued that enhanced facilities would contribute to future presidential security.

Court records show Best had a previous encounter with law enforcement near the White House in July 2025. During that incident, he was arrested after allegedly attempting to enter White House grounds near another checkpoint, ignoring police orders and making statements claiming he was Jesus Christ.

Investigators are reviewing the latest shooting as concerns grow over a series of security incidents near the president. The attack marked the third shooting-related episode in the vicinity of Trump within the past month.

In April, an armed individual breached security at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, while earlier this month Secret Service officers shot and wounded another man following a confrontation near the Washington Monument.

Best graduated from Dundalk High School in Maryland in 2023 and had previously participated in track and field athletics. In comments reported by U.S. media, a woman identifying herself as his mother said she learned of the shooting through social media and disputed portrayals of her son as a violent person.

The shooting remains under investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia and federal authorities.

Venezuela’s immigration authority said in a brief statement that Saab’s deportation was linked to ongoing criminal investigations in the United States, although officials did not explicitly confirm his destination. The statement referred to Saab solely as a Colombian citizen, an apparent acknowledgment of Venezuelan constitutional restrictions prohibiting the extradition of Venezuelan nationals.

Saab, 54, was previously released and returned to Venezuela in 2023 after former U.S. President Joe Biden granted him clemency as part of a prisoner exchange between Washington and Caracas.The businessman had long been regarded by U.S. authorities as a key financial operator for Maduro’s government, helping manage overseas commercial networks and sanctions-sensitive transactions.

Maduro’s administration had described Saab as a diplomat carrying out humanitarian missions when he was detained during a 2020 refueling stop in Cape Verde while traveling to Iran.The latest move follows major political upheaval in Venezuela after Maduro’s removal from power earlier this year and the emergence of acting President Delcy Rodriguez as the country’s interim leader.

According to reports, Rodríguez removed Saab from his government positions after assuming office on Jan. 3, stripping him of influence over foreign investment channels tied to the Venezuelan state. Unconfirmed reports in recent months suggested Saab had been under detention or restricted movement inside Venezuela.

The Associated Press reported in February that U.S. federal prosecutors had intensified scrutiny of Saab’s alleged role in a bribery scheme linked to Venezuelan food import contracts under the government’s CLAP distribution program.The investigation reportedly stems from a 2021 U.S. Justice Department case involving Saab associate Alvaro Pulido.

Prosecutors in Miami have examined allegations surrounding contracts tied to the CLAP system, which was created to distribute subsidized food staples to Venezuelans during years of economic collapse, hyperinflation and shortages.

U.S. authorities have alleged that Saab accumulated substantial wealth through government-linked contracts and opaque financial arrangements connected to Venezuela’s state apparatus.The U.S. Justice Department did not immediately comment on Saturday’s deportation announcement.

Marie-Thérèse Ross, the widow of a retired U.S. military veteran, told The Associated Press she was arrested on April 1 at her home in Anniston, Alabama, after immigration officers arrived early in the morning and took her into custody over an alleged violation of the terms of her 90-day visa.

Ross said she was transferred to a federal immigration detention facility in Basile, Louisiana, where she shared a dormitory-style room with dozens of women, many of them mothers separated from their children.
“Some of them didn’t know where their children were,” Ross said in remarks published Tuesday by the AP. “I think it’s terrible for a woman not to know where her children are.”

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ross had overstayed her visa at the time of her arrest. The department had not publicly commented further on the case as of Tuesday.

Ross returned to France after her release later in April and is recovering with relatives near Nantes. Family members told AP she continues to experience memory gaps and emotional distress following her detention and is seeking medical support for symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress.

The case drew diplomatic attention in France after Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot publicly criticized the detention, saying the methods used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were “not in line” with French standards.

Ross said she had moved to the United States after marrying William B. Ross, a retired U.S. soldier she first met while he was stationed in France during the 1950s. The couple reunited decades later after both became widowed and married last year before settling in Alabama.

William Ross died in January, after which a dispute reportedly emerged over his estate. An Alabama judge later alleged in a court order that one of Ross’s stepsons, a former Alabama State Trooper now employed by the federal government, may have used his position to facilitate her detention and called for a federal investigation.

The stepson denied involvement.
Ross described conditions inside the Louisiana detention center as orderly but said guards frequently shouted at detainees and treated them condescendingly. She also recalled hearing children and babies crying at night inside the facility.

“The prison was clean, the food was okay, but it was the way they spoke to us,” Ross told AP.
Despite the conditions, Ross said detainees showed solidarity toward her because of her age, describing how women in the facility referred to her as “Grandma” and cared for her during her stay.

Her detention comes amid heightened enforcement efforts under Trump-era immigration policies that have drawn criticism from immigrant rights groups and some foreign governments over detention practices and family separations.

Ross said the experience reshaped views she once held about the United States. She said she had previously regarded the country as a place where detainees were treated fairly and respectfully but now questioned those assumptions after witnessing the treatment of women held alongside her, many of whom were from South America.

“When I left this jail in Louisiana, I told them that if I ever had the chance to speak about them, I would do it,” Ross said.

The Minnesota House approved the measure by a vote of 126-5, with bipartisan backing from Republicans and Democrats. The legislation now heads to the state Senate and is expected to be signed by Governor Tim Walz, who has publicly indicated support for the proposal.

Under the legislation, the Office of the Inspector General, or OIG, would begin operating immediately, with broader enforcement authority scheduled to phase in by 2028. Lawmakers backing the bill said the agency would investigate corruption and misuse of public funds across state programs.

Republican state Representative Kristin Robbins, who chairs the Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Oversight Committee, said the new office would strengthen ongoing investigations into alleged fraud schemes linked to state-administered welfare and pandemic relief programs.

The legislation comes amid heightened political and legal scrutiny of fraud cases involving organizations connected to Minnesota’s Somali-American community, the largest Somali diaspora population in the United States.

Federal prosecutors and U.S. President Donald Trump have alleged that more than $9 billion may have been improperly obtained through social service fraud schemes in Minnesota involving federal and state welfare funding distributed since 2018.

One of the most prominent cases centers on the now-defunct nonprofit Feeding Our Future, which administered federally funded meal reimbursement programs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prosecutors said defendants created shell companies and fictitious meal distribution sites, submitting falsified meal counts to the Minnesota Department of Education to secure inflated reimbursements.

Former Feeding Our Future executive director Aimee Bock was found guilty of wire fraud and bribery charges, according to court proceedings cited by lawmakers.Authorities have charged 79 individuals, most of them Somali Americans, in connection with schemes allegedly involving more than $250 million in fraudulent grant claims tied to child nutrition and welfare programs.

Robbins’ committee recently subpoenaed Democratic U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar to testify regarding allegations that she assisted entities accused of abusing federal and state funds. Omar has not complied with the subpoena, according to committee officials.

The investigations have intensified debate in Minnesota over oversight of pandemic-era aid programs and the effectiveness of state controls governing the distribution of federal welfare funding.

The settlement resolves claims brought by Page, a former adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, who argued in a 2020 lawsuit that he was subjected to improper monitoring by the Federal Bureau of Investigation under warrants approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Page denied any ties to Russia and was never charged with a crime. His lawsuit cited errors and omissions in surveillance applications submitted by FBI and Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017, which sought authorization to monitor him as a suspected foreign agent.

The agreement was disclosed in a filing to the Supreme Court of the United States, where Page had appealed after lower courts dismissed his claims as untimely. The filing did not specify the financial terms, but a person familiar with the matter confirmed the $1.25 million figure.

The settlement does not extend to claims Page filed against individual former FBI officials, which remain separate.The lawsuit followed a critical report by the Justice Department’s inspector general, which identified significant flaws in the surveillance applications.

Former officials involved in approving the warrants later said they would not have done so had they been aware of the full extent of the issues, while the FBI has since implemented more than 40 corrective measures to strengthen oversight and accuracy.

The surveillance of Page constituted only a limited part of the broader inquiry into links between Trump’s campaign and Russia. That investigation, led by special counsel Robert Mueller, found that Russia interfered in the election in Trump’s favor but did not establish sufficient evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and Moscow.

In a related development, the Justice Department reached a separate settlement last month with Michael Flynn, agreeing to pay approximately $1.2 million.

Flynn had pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about contacts with a Russian diplomat before later receiving a presidential pardon.

The U.S. Department of Education said its Office for Civil Rights opened the probes to examine claims that Harvard continues to discriminate against students based on race, color and national origin, in potential breach of federal statutes.

According to the department, one investigation will assess whether Harvard has continued to apply race-based preferences in admissions following the U.S. Supreme Court affirmative action ruling 2023 that effectively ended affirmative action in higher education.

A second probe will examine allegations of antisemitism on campus, reflecting broader concerns about discrimination and student safety at U.S. universities.

Harvard did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The university has previously said it opposes all forms of discrimination and is working to address bias on campus.

Internal task force reports released by Harvard last year found that both Jewish and Muslim students had experienced incidents of bigotry and abuse, underscoring tensions within campus communities.

The investigations mark the latest move by the Trump administration targeting leading universities, as federal authorities increase scrutiny of admissions practices and campus environments in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling.