Speaking at the conclusion of his weekly Sunday prayer in Saint Peter’s Square, the pontiff said the annual observance underscored both the value of independent journalism and the growing threats faced by reporters carrying out their work.

“Today we celebrate World Press Freedom Day , unfortunately, this right is often violated, sometimes in blatant ways, sometimes in more hidden forms,” he told worshippers gathered in the square under clear skies.

The pope urged the faithful to remember journalists and correspondents who had lost their lives while pursuing facts and reporting from areas affected by war and violence.“We remember the many journalists and reporters who have been victims of war and violence,” he said.

World Press Freedom Day, supported by UNESCO and observed annually on May 3, serves as a global platform to defend media independence, highlight censorship and intimidation, and honor journalists who have died in the line of duty.

The Catholic leader has repeatedly described journalism as a pillar of democracy and social accountability, emphasizing that access to truthful information is a public good that must be protected from manipulation and political pressure.

In previous addresses, he has thanked reporters for their role in uncovering facts and holding power to account, arguing that journalism should never be criminalized and calling for the release of journalists unfairly detained or prosecuted around the world.

His remarks come at a time when press freedom advocates continue to warn of growing restrictions on independent reporting, particularly in conflict zones where journalists face heightened risks of detention, violence and death.

The Vatican has increasingly used global observances such as Press Freedom Day to reinforce broader appeals for human dignity, transparency and protection of civil institutions amid rising international instability.

Nearly 1.5 million voters were registered across the Israeli-occupied West Bank, while around 70,000 were eligible to vote in Gaza’s Deir El-Balah area, according to the Ramallah-based Central Elections Commission.

Polling stations opened at 7 a.m., with voting taking place under the shadow of continued conflict, institutional paralysis, and long-standing frustration over the absence of national elections.

Footage from Al-Bireh in the West Bank and Deir El-Balah in Gaza showed election workers preparing polling centers as residents arrived to cast ballots in what many described as a symbolic rather than transformative process.

Most electoral lists were aligned with President Mahmoud Abbas’s secular-nationalist Fatah movement or were running as independents.There were no lists affiliated with Hamas, which governs much of Gaza and remains Fatah’s principal political rival.In many municipalities, including Ramallah and Nablus, only one list was submitted, resulting in automatic victory without a contested vote.

Where competition existed, Fatah-backed candidates faced independent lists, some led by figures associated with leftist factions such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.Mahmud Bader, a businessman from Tulkarem in the northern West Bank, said he would vote despite believing the outcome would have little practical effect.

“Whether candidates are independent or partisan, it has no effect and will have no effect or benefit for the city,” he said.“The occupation is the one that rules Tulkarem. It would only be an image shown to the international media — as if we have elections, a state or independence.

”Tulkarem has been under heightened Israeli military pressure, with two adjacent refugee camps remaining under military control for more than a year.In Gaza, the vote in Deir El-Balah marked the first local electoral exercise since Hamas won the 2006 legislative elections and later took control of the enclave in 2007.

Political analysts said the Palestinian Authority’s decision to hold voting only in Deir El-Balah reflected both logistical limits and a cautious test of public sentiment in post-war Gaza.Jamal Al-Fadi, a political scientist at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, said the limited vote served as an “experiment” because there had been no reliable post-war opinion polling.

Deir El-Balah was selected partly because it was one of the few areas in Gaza where much of the population had remained in place and not been displaced during more than two years of war.Farah Shaath, 25, said voting for the first time was emotionally significant despite the extraordinary conditions.

“Although it is unlike any election in the world, it is a confirmation of our continued existence in the Gaza Strip despite everything,” she said.The elections commission said polling staff in Gaza were recruited from civil society groups and that a private security company had been contracted to secure voting centers.

However, a commission source in Gaza said Hamas police insisted on overseeing security around polling stations through unarmed personnel in civilian clothing.

UN coordinator Ramiz Alakbarov praised the organization of the vote, calling it a “credible process” and saying the elections represented an important opportunity for Palestinians to exercise democratic rights during an exceptionally difficult period.

Abbas, now 90, has remained in office for more than two decades without re-election, despite repeated promises of legislative and presidential polls that have yet to materialize.

Saturday’s municipal vote, while limited in scope, reflects both the persistence of Palestinian civic institutions and the deep uncertainty surrounding the future of governance in both Gaza and the West Bank.

The proposed law, which sought to increase the size of the lower house by about 55% to 850 seats ahead of the 2029 general elections, fell short of the required two-thirds majority, with 298 lawmakers voting in favor and 230 against in the Lok Sabha.

The government had linked the expansion to the implementation of women’s reservation, arguing that redrawing constituency boundaries based on updated population data was necessary to ensure equitable representation. Seats in parliament have remained frozen since the 1971 census, despite significant demographic changes.

Opposition parties supported the principle of reserving seats for women but opposed tying it to a nationwide delimitation exercise, alleging the move could be used to alter electoral dynamics in favor of the ruling party.

Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi criticized the bill shortly after the vote, calling it an “unconstitutional trick” that undermined the Constitution under the guise of advancing women’s representation.The government rejected those claims, maintaining that the proposal was essential for modernizing India’s electoral framework.

Interior Minister Amit Shah defended the bill in parliament, warning that blocking it would disappoint women across the country and vowing continued efforts to secure legislative backing for gender quotas.

A law passed in 2023 had already approved reserving one-third of parliamentary seats for women, but its implementation was contingent on the completion of the next census and subsequent constituency redrawing, a process still underway and expected to delay enforcement beyond the next election cycle.

Women currently account for about 14% of members in the lower house and 17% in the upper house, with representation in state legislatures averaging around 10%, according to official data.

The failure of the bill highlights ongoing political divisions over electoral reforms and gender representation, as well as the challenges of securing broad consensus for constitutional amendments in India’s increasingly polarized parliament.

Luxon dismissed suggestions of dissent within his party, telling a press conference he remained confident of continued backing from lawmakers. “I talk to my caucus all the time. I’m very confident I have the full support of my caucus,” he said, adding that his government would be re-elected if a vote were held immediately.

The comments follow a report by the New Zealand Herald that some National Party members could move against Luxon when parliament reconvenes, although the report indicated that any initial effort was unlikely to take the form of a formal leadership challenge or confidence vote.

The developments come amid weakening polling numbers for the ruling coalition. Several recent surveys have shown the National Party struggling to secure more than 30% support, raising concerns about its ability to retain power in the next general election scheduled for November 7.Luxon’s personal approval ratings have also come under pressure.

A March RNZ-Reid Research poll showed opposition leader Chris Hipkins leading preferred prime minister rankings with 20.7% support, compared with 17.3% for Luxon.

The polling trends underscore growing political headwinds for the government as it approaches the election cycle, with voter sentiment indicating a tightening contest between the incumbent coalition and the opposition bloc.

Addressing the lower house, Modi said the measures, which include increasing the number of legislators, extending quotas for women to state assemblies and redrawing constituency boundaries, would move India in a “new direction.” He said greater representation of women would bring “new strength, fresh thinking, and a greater sense of sensitivity” to governance.

The government said the proposed boundary changes reflect population shifts since constituencies were last fixed following the 1971 census, arguing the reforms are necessary to align representation with demographic realities.

The proposals come from the ruling National Democratic Alliance, which does not hold the two-thirds majority required to pass constitutional amendments in both houses of parliament, and is seeking support from smaller parties and opposition groups ahead of a vote expected this week.

Opposition parties, including the Congress, said they support the principle of women’s reservation but accused the government of attempting to use constituency redrawing to its political advantage. They called for immediate implementation of the quota without linking it to broader structural changes.

The bills propose increasing the strength of the lower house by about 55% to around 850 members, alongside proportional expansion in state legislatures, by the next general election scheduled for 2029.They also aim to operationalise the one-third reservation for women in both parliament and state assemblies by that timeline.

The quota was approved in legislation passed in 2023 but tied to a future census, delaying its implementation beyond the next election cycle.The proposed changes require ratification by at least half of India’s state legislatures before becoming law.

India currently does not reserve seats for women in parliament, despite women comprising nearly half of the country’s 968 million voters.

Women account for about 14% of members in the lower house and 17% in the upper house, while representation in state legislatures stands at roughly 10%.

At least four petitions are scheduled to be heard on March 23, targeting amendments linked to the Digital Personal Data Protection Act that critics say weaken the country’s two-decade-old Right to Information framework.

The dispute centers on a provision excluding “personal information” from disclosure under the Right to Information Act. Previously, such information could be released if it served the public interest.

Petitioners argue the change could allow authorities to withhold key data, including details about public spending or officials involved in controversial projects, thereby undermining accountability.

Anjali Bhardwaj said the amendment could enable the government to block disclosure of information critical to public scrutiny, while activist Venkatesh Nayak described the move in court filings as a “death knell for participatory democracy.”

The government of Narendra Modi has rejected allegations that it is curbing transparency, saying the law maintains a balance between privacy rights and access to information.

IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw told parliament the changes would “not restrict the disclosure of personal information” and adhere to the principle of “maximum disclosure and minimum exemptions.

”Officials have also denied broader accusations of suppressing dissent, stating that content removal orders are limited to unlawful material.

The controversy comes amid wider scrutiny of India’s transparency framework. The country’s position in a global ranking by the Centre for Law and Democracy has fallen from second place in 2013 to ninth, with researchers citing expanding exemptions under the RTI regime.

Journalists and civil society groups have expressed concern that the amended law, combined with stricter digital regulations, could affect investigative reporting and access to public-interest information.

The privacy legislation also introduces significant financial penalties for non-compliance by technology companies, adding another layer of regulatory oversight in India’s digital ecosystem.

Taiwan’s Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim has made a rare and symbolic visit to Belgium, where she delivered an inspiring address to members of the European Parliament.

The visit marked one of the highest-level exchanges between Taiwan and Europe in recent years and reflected Taipei’s growing efforts to expand its international presence despite ongoing opposition from Beijing.

Hsiao’s trip to Brussels was centered around her participation in the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China’s annual summit, where lawmakers from various nations gathered to discuss human rights, global democracy, and the challenges posed by authoritarian governance.

In her speech, Hsiao drew strong parallels between Taiwan’s determination to preserve democracy and Europe’s long-standing commitment to protecting freedom and human dignity.

“Europe has defended freedom under fire, and Taiwan has defended democracy under pressure,” Hsiao declared, earning praise from European lawmakers who commended Taiwan’s resilience in maintaining its democratic institutions despite constant pressure from China

“I stand here as a voice for a society deeply committed to the ideals that animate parliaments of democracy around the world,” she added.

The visit represents Taiwan’s growing confidence in asserting its democratic identity on the world stage.

While Taiwan’s only formal diplomatic partner in Europe remains the Vatican, many European countries such as France, Lithuania, Poland, and the Czech Republic have increasingly shown willingness to engage with Taiwan through informal but meaningful exchanges.

These interactions demonstrate Europe’s acknowledgment of Taiwan as a democratic partner that upholds shared values of freedom, human rights, and rule of law.

China’s reaction to the visit was predictably sharp. The Chinese Mission to the European Union issued a statement condemning Hsiao’s presence in Brussels, describing it as a “serious violation of the one-China principle” and accusing the island of undermining mutual trust between Beijing and the EU.

However, Taiwan’s government has firmly rejected Beijing’s claims, asserting its right to engage freely with the international community.

Taiwan’s presidential office emphasized that the vice president’s trip was part of ongoing diplomatic outreach to strengthen global partnerships.

Accompanied by Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung, Hsiao underscored that Taiwan’s participation in global conversations is both legitimate and necessary.

She noted that, despite being excluded from many international organizations, Taiwan continues to contribute to global development, humanitarian aid, and sustainability initiatives.

“Despite being excluded from international organizations, Taiwan has stepped up,” Hsiao stated. “We contribute to humanitarian aid and uphold global standards even when we are not allowed a seat at the table.”

Her message resonated with many in attendance, reinforcing Taiwan’s image as a responsible global actor committed to peace and cooperation.

Hsiao also highlighted the importance of stability across the Taiwan Strait, calling it a cornerstone of global prosperity. Her remarks reflected Taipei’s desire to maintain peace while promoting dialogue and mutual respect, even as China continues to increase its military and diplomatic pressure on the island.

The vice president’s visit follows a broader pattern of Taiwan’s increasing diplomatic activity in Europe. In September, Foreign Minister Lin visited Austria, the Czech Republic, Poland, and Italy to deepen bilateral cooperation.

Former President Tsai Ing-wen is expected to visit Berlin next week to deliver a keynote address on democratic resilience and transatlantic unity.

These growing exchanges between Taiwan and European nations suggest a subtle but significant shift in global geopolitics. European countries are showing greater openness to engaging with Taiwan as part of their broader commitment to supporting democracies under threat.

While most European governments continue to adhere to the one-China policy formally, their willingness to interact with Taiwanese leaders reflects a pragmatic approach to international relations and a recognition of Taiwan’s contributions to global progress.

Hsiao Bi-khim’s visit thus stands as a powerful symbol of Taiwan’s diplomatic determination. It illustrates how the island, despite diplomatic isolation, continues to find meaningful ways to participate in the global dialogue on democracy, innovation, and peace.

For many observers, her presence in Brussels marks a new chapter in Taiwan-Europe relations — one grounded in shared principles, mutual respect, and a collective belief in the value of freedom.

The report confirms that Ukraine is confidently advancing toward full European Union membership, marking a historic step in the nation’s integration into the European family.

In his remarks, President Zelenskiy emphasized that the findings demonstrate Ukraine’s strong and steady movement toward meeting EU standards.

He said the country is ready to open the first three negotiation clusters, a key step in the formal accession process, reflecting Ukraine’s dedication to governance, transparency, and democratic values.

The president underscored that this achievement is not just a milestone for Ukraine but a victory for the entire European community.

He called on the EU to take decisive action to remove artificial barriers that stand in the way of progress, urging for unity and mutual support in building a stronger, more resilient Europe.

European leaders, including European Council President Antonio Costa, European Commission Vice-President Kaja Kallas, and EU

Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, met with Zelenskiy in Kyiv to reaffirm the EU’s continued commitment to Ukraine.
Their meeting symbolized solidarity, partnership, and the shared belief that Ukraine’s future lies firmly within the European Union.

Zelenskiy praised the European Commission for recognizing Ukraine’s reforms, which include progress in anti-corruption measures, judicial independence, and economic modernization.

He noted that despite the ongoing challenges posed by Russia’s invasion, Ukraine has not deviated from its reform agenda or its vision of democratic governance.

The European Union has consistently acknowledged Ukraine’s courage and resilience under extraordinary circumstances.

By pushing forward with reforms in the middle of conflict, Ukraine has demonstrated the strength and unity of its people, inspiring admiration and respect across the continent.

According to political analysts, the latest EU report reinforces Ukraine’s credibility as a candidate country. It confirms that the country has met key benchmarks in the rule of law, economic stability, and institutional transparency — essential pillars for EU membership.

This steady progress reflects a nation determined to transform itself and contribute meaningfully to Europe’s collective future.

For many Ukrainians, the European dream represents more than political alignment — it is a symbol of freedom, opportunity, and long-term peace.

Citizens across the country have embraced the vision of a modern, democratic Ukraine deeply integrated with its European partners.
Public support for EU membership remains strong, reflecting national unity in the face of adversity.

European officials have also commended Ukraine’s progress in aligning its legislation with EU standards. From environmental protection to digital transformation, Ukraine continues to implement reforms that enhance its competitiveness and resilience.

These steps ensure that the country is well-prepared to contribute to Europe’s innovation-driven and sustainable future.

Zelenskiy’s message of confidence and determination has resonated across the continent. He reaffirmed that Ukraine’s European path is not just a political ambition but a moral commitment to uphold the principles of democracy, justice, and human rights.

His words echo the aspirations of millions who believe in a united and prosperous Europe.

The EU’s encouragement and recognition have provided a new wave of motivation for Ukrainian institutions and civil society.

Together, they are working to accelerate reform, strengthen institutions, and build partnerships that reflect shared values and mutual trust. The process may be long, but the direction is clear — Ukraine is on a path of transformation and progress.

As Zelenskiy stated, Ukraine’s future is European, and its progress represents hope for a stronger, more integrated continent. The European Commission’s report serves as a beacon of encouragement for nations striving toward reform, unity, and shared prosperity.

In every step forward, Ukraine continues to prove that determination, courage, and faith in democratic values can shape the future of Europe.

This declaration comes as the EU continues to praise the steady progress made by Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, and Moldova, countries that are showing strong commitment to democratic values, governance reforms, and European integration.

Marta Kos, the EU’s enlargement commissioner, expressed confidence in the future of a broader European community.

She emphasized that the Union must prepare itself for new members by strengthening institutions, improving administrative capacity, and fostering deeper unity among existing member states.

Her statement reflects growing enthusiasm in Brussels about building a stronger and more resilient Europe.

Montenegro, with its population of around 600,000, was highlighted as the leading candidate among current applicants.

The country’s dedication to judicial reform, transparency, and rule of law has earned widespread praise from EU officials and observers.
Its consistent efforts show that small nations can play a major role in shaping Europe’s collective future.

Albania also received special recognition for what the commissioner called “unprecedented progress.”
The country has advanced rapidly in governance reforms, anti-corruption measures, and alignment with EU economic standards.Albania’s journey demonstrates that consistent reform, citizen engagement, and visionary leadership can transform nations and bring them closer to European ideals.

Moldova was applauded for its determination and speed in implementing reforms despite facing external pressures and economic challenges.

Its accelerated progress, even under difficult regional circumstances, highlights the country’s commitment to democracy and European cooperation.

Observers say that Moldova’s experience serves as a beacon for other nations seeking to align with the EU.

Ukraine’s progress was described as exceptional, given its ongoing struggle against Russian aggression.

Despite conflict, the nation has continued to move forward on key reforms related to governance, transparency, and anti-corruption efforts

EU leaders commended Ukraine’s resilience and dedication, calling its progress a symbol of courage and hope for all of Europe.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy welcomed the encouraging assessment, noting that Ukraine remains steadfast in its European journey.

He called on the EU to take decisive action to overcome political barriers, emphasizing that unity and solidarity are the foundations of a peaceful and prosperous Europe. His message resonated across the continent as a reminder of Europe’s shared destiny.

The commissioner also acknowledged that Serbia and Georgia face challenges that have slowed their reform pace.

However, she reaffirmed that the door to EU membership remains open to all nations committed to democratic transformation and the rule of law.

This balanced approach underscores the EU’s commitment to fairness, inclusivity, and long-term partnership.

As Europe looks ahead, the spirit of expansion carries broader meaning beyond borders and treaties. It represents a renewed belief in cooperation, shared prosperity, and the values that unite rather than divide.

A larger EU would enhance stability, strengthen the single market, and amplify Europe’s voice on the global stage.

Experts say that enlargement will also boost innovation, energy cooperation, and cross-border trade.

New members bring cultural diversity, fresh perspectives, and economic vitality, contributing to Europe’s growth and global competitiveness.

For millions across the continent, EU expansion is not just a policy goal — it is a vision of hope and shared progress.

The European Union’s commitment to enlargement reflects its core values of democracy, inclusivity, and solidarity. By welcoming new members, the EU continues its mission to create a continent of peace, prosperity, and partnership.

With Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, and Moldova leading the way, the dream of a united Europe has never felt closer or more attainable.

Deoband’s embrace of the Taliban foreign minister is dangerous — but also offers an opening.

Amir Khan Muttaqi, Foreign Minister of the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan and a senior figure in its political and ideological leadership, has recently completed a six-day visit to India — an episode loaded with meaning.

From his informal ban on female journalists, to the cancellation of his Agra leg, and his carefully choreographed stop at the Vivekananda Foundation. Yet, it is his visit to Dar ul Uloom Deoband, the theological heart of South Asian Deobandi Islam, that has invited sharpest scrutiny.

For years, Indian Muslims — particularly those aligned with the Deobandi school — have tried to draw a distinction between “their Islam,” described as democratic and egalitarian, and the Taliban’s brutal, patriarchal regime. Muttaqi’s pilgrimage to his ideological fountainhead has challenged that narrative.

When the Taliban’s foreign minister visits Deoband, and the seminary receives him with honor, it becomes almost impossible to sustain the claim that the Taliban are merely “misguided” Muslims. Why, then, should men who have subjugated women and silenced dissent be treated as heroes?

What emerges instead is a chilling recognition: the Taliban are not a deviation from Deobandi Islam according to the seminary, but one of its most literal political manifestations.

The confusion within India’s religiously-inclined Muslim intelligentsia over how to respond to this visit is telling — and repetitive. Some rush to rationalize it as “cultural diplomacy” or a gesture of goodwill in the national interest, strangely bringing the Muslim right and the Hindu right onto the same page.

Others recoil in discomfort but stop short of open criticism. Deoband’s endorsement of Muttaqi symbolically affirms the very doctrines that have justified gender apartheid, banned girls from education, and institutionalized moral policing across Afghanistan.

This moment is not merely about Afghanistan; it reflects a moral crisis within Indian muslims as well — a refusal to confront its own regressive solidarities under the pretext of religious kinship. The spectacle of Deoband greeting Muttaqi with reverence reveals the unbroken theological thread linking the 19th seminary to the taliban led theocratic governance.

Deoband’s embrace of the Taliban foreign minister is dangerous — but also offers an opening. If the Taliban truly draw their ideological legitimacy from Deoband, then Deoband carries a moral responsibility: to humanize that ideology, to insist that justice and compassion, not repression, define Islam.

The seminary has a proud history of standing against colonial injustice and for India’s freedom. Can it now stand for Afghan women denied education, or men imprisoned for thought?

If Dar ul Uloom Deoband wishes to remain relevant in a plural democracy, it must decide where it stands — with democracy, gender justice, and education, or with those who burn books, bury dissent, and blind the future of half their population.