Speaking at a Turning Point USA event, Vance said distrust between Washington and Tehran remains a fundamental obstacle to any durable agreement. “There is a lot of, of course, mistrust between Iran and the United States of America.

You are not going to solve that problem overnight,” he said, while adding that Iranian negotiators appeared willing to reach a deal.Vance, who participated in recent negotiations held in Pakistan, said he was cautiously optimistic about the trajectory of talks.

“I feel very good about where we are,” he said, signaling confidence in ongoing diplomatic efforts despite recent setbacks.Donald Trump said on Tuesday that discussions aimed at ending the Iran war could resume in Pakistan within days, following the collapse of negotiations over the weekend.

The breakdown prompted Washington to impose a blockade on Iranian ports, escalating economic and military pressure on Tehran.A two-week ceasefire between US and Iranian forces remains in effect, with one week remaining, offering a limited window for diplomatic engagement.

The pause in hostilities follows weeks of intensified conflict that began on February 28, when US and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran.Tehran retaliated with attacks targeting Israel and Gulf states hosting US military bases, expanding the geographic scope of the conflict.

Subsequent US-Israeli operations inside Iran, along with Israeli strikes in Lebanon, have resulted in significant casualties and widespread displacement, according to official accounts.

The evolving situation underscores the complexity of negotiations, with diplomatic momentum constrained by entrenched mistrust and ongoing military developments.

Macron made the remarks at the start of a defense meeting with advisers and cabinet members, according to official statements.While endorsing the ceasefire as a step toward de-escalation, Macron emphasized that broader regional stability would require addressing tensions affecting Lebanon.

The French president did not provide further details on how Lebanon could be incorporated into the agreement, but underscored the urgency of the situation there in the context of ongoing regional developments.

France has been actively engaged in diplomatic efforts in the Middle East, and Macron’s comments reflect Paris’s continued focus on preventing spillover effects from wider conflicts.

Wang Yi has led a flurry of outreach, holding discussions with counterparts across the Middle East and Europe while advocating a ceasefire and reopening of the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. Beijing has also opposed a United Nations proposal backed by Bahrain that could authorize force to ensure maritime transit through the strait.

Analysts say the diplomatic push reflects China’s broader ambition to project itself as a responsible global power. Sun Yun of the Stimson Center said the conflict presents an opportunity for Beijing to demonstrate leadership, while former U.S. diplomat Danny Russel described the initiative as largely symbolic, comparing it to China’s earlier proposals on Ukraine that lacked implementation.

“It’s messaging, not mediation,” Russel said, arguing that China is seeking to contrast its approach with Washington’s.The administration of Donald Trump has shown limited enthusiasm for third-party mediation, with U.S. officials indicating reluctance to elevate China’s diplomatic role in the Middle East.

One official described Washington’s stance on the China-Pakistan proposal as “agnostic,” though the position could shift ahead of a planned summit between Trump and Xi Jinping expected in mid-May.Beijing has an economic incentive to contain the conflict, particularly disruptions linked to the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global energy flows.

While China has reduced its reliance on Iranian oil to about 13 percent of imports and maintains strategic reserves, analysts warn that prolonged instability could raise input costs and weaken global demand for Chinese exports.

China has also worked to secure safe passage for its vessels through the strait, even as tensions have driven up energy prices worldwide. At the same time, Beijing’s position aligns with Moscow’s opposition to measures that could expand the conflict, with both countries wary of endorsing force through the United Nations Security Council.

Diplomatic activity has intensified in recent days, with Wang engaging officials from countries including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel, France and the United Arab Emirates. He has also sought backing from European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas and regional leaders for China’s ceasefire proposal.

China’s embassy in Washington said Beijing has been working “tirelessly for peace,” while analysts note that its approach emphasizes calls for de-escalation, respect for international law and a greater role for the United Nations.

However, U.S. officials say the proposal lacks operational detail, describing it as a broad appeal rather than a concrete roadmap for ending the conflict. The muted response from Washington underscores broader strategic competition between the two powers, limiting the prospects for coordinated diplomacy.

Meanwhile, efforts at the United Nations continue, with Bahrain revising its proposal to authorize defensive measures to protect shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, with a vote expected in the coming days.

The quake hit at 8:42 p.m. local time (1612 GMT) at a depth of 186 km, with its epicentre in Badakhshan Province, according to the United States Geological Survey.

Afghanistan’s health ministry said the fatalities occurred in the Gosfand Dara area of Kabul Province, where a single family was buried under the impact of the tremor. “Eight members of a family died as a result of the earthquake,” ministry spokesman Sharafat Zaman said in a statement.

He added that a child, estimated to be around two years old, survived but was injured. The country’s disaster management agency confirmed the child had sustained injuries during the incident.

Journalists reported that the tremors were felt in Kabul and other parts of the country, though no immediate wider casualty figures were released.

Afghanistan lies along the seismically active Hindu Kush region, where the Eurasian and Indian tectonic plates converge, making earthquakes a frequent occurrence.

The latest quake follows a series of deadly seismic events in recent years, including an August tremor that killed more than 2,200 people in eastern Afghanistan after devastating remote mountain communities.

Jorgensen said the bloc is assessing “all possibilities” as it braces for sustained disruption, warning that energy prices are likely to remain elevated for an extended period. “This will be a long crisis energy prices will be higher for a very long time,” he said in the interview.

He added that for certain critical energy products, market conditions could deteriorate further in the coming weeks, underscoring concerns about supply constraints and volatility linked to the conflict.

The European Union has previously relied on coordinated measures such as strategic stock releases and demand reduction during periods of supply stress. Officials are now evaluating whether similar or more stringent interventions may be required if the crisis deepens.

The developments come as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to disrupt global energy flows, raising risks for import-dependent economies and adding pressure to inflation across the region.

The cabinet has ordered a 30% reduction in fuel and electricity consumption across government offices, alongside suspending certain staff training programs and halting the procurement of new vehicles, ships and aircraft. Decorative lighting for public celebrations has also been banned as part of broader conservation efforts.

Authorities said shopping malls and retail outlets would close earlier than usual, while office timings have been curtailed to limit overall energy demand in the country of more than 170 million people.

The measures come as Bangladesh grapples with heavy reliance on imported energy, which accounts for approximately 95% of its fuel needs. Officials are seeking alternative energy sources and arranging $2.5 billion in external financing to sustain essential imports.

The crisis has been exacerbated by global energy market volatility linked to ongoing geopolitical tensions, putting pressure on the country’s foreign exchange reserves and raising concerns over energy security.

Marcos told reporters he had consulted counterparts across the 10-member bloc on whether to postpone the gathering, but leaders agreed that coordination was more critical given the external shocks affecting fuel supply chains, food prices and migrant workers.

“The consensus that we came to is that it is precisely now that we must coordinate our efforts,” Marcos said.

The streamlined agenda will concentrate on immediate economic pressures facing Southeast Asia, including volatility in energy markets and rising food costs, which governments in the region are monitoring closely as geopolitical tensions persist.

ASEAN economies are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in global fuel prices due to their reliance on imports, while supply chain disruptions have added strain to domestic inflation dynamics in several member states.

Marcos said discussions would also address the welfare of migrant workers, a key issue for ASEAN countries that rely heavily on overseas employment. Regional governments have been assessing the impact of instability in the Middle East, a major destination for Southeast Asian labour.

The Philippine government has already flagged concerns about overseas workers in affected areas, reflecting broader anxieties across ASEAN about potential displacement and income disruptions.

The decision to proceed with the summit underscores ASEAN’s preference for continuity in regional dialogue despite global uncertainty. Marcos indicated that postponement was considered but ultimately rejected in favour of maintaining diplomatic engagement.

The summit is expected to retain core leadership interactions while scaling back ceremonial and extended policy sessions, reflecting what Marcos described as a need for efficiency under current conditions.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said discussions over the past two days had raised the prospect of a “complete and total resolution of hostilities in the Middle East.” Speaking later to reporters before departing Florida for Memphis, he described the talks as “very, very strong,” adding that negotiators had reached agreement on “almost all points.”

Trump said U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who had previously engaged in negotiations with Iran, held discussions with a senior Iranian official on Sunday evening and were expected to continue talks on Monday. He declined to identify the Iranian interlocutor, stating only that it was not the country’s supreme leader, and said Washington was engaging with “the man who I believe is the most respected and the leader.”

Reporter for Axios said officials from Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan had separately met Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, suggesting a coordinated mediation effort. Iran’s foreign ministry acknowledged unspecified “initiatives” aimed at reducing tensions, according to the Mehr news agency, and reiterated that Tehran expected Washington to participate directly in any negotiations as a principal party to the conflict.

The diplomatic push comes hours before a previously signaled U.S. deadline that had raised the prospect of escalation targeting Iranian energy infrastructure, a move widely seen as carrying significant regional and economic risks.

Trump said he had communicated with Israel, describing the U.S. ally as supportive of ongoing diplomatic efforts. A source briefed on Israeli planning said Washington had kept Israel informed of its contacts with Tehran and indicated that Israel was likely to mirror the U.S. pause by suspending any targeting of Iranian power plants and related infrastructure.

Trump’s comments helped ease immediate concerns of escalation, with oil prices falling and stock markets recovering as investors reassessed geopolitical risk. The prospect of a temporary halt in strikes on energy assets signaled a reduced likelihood of near-term disruption to regional supply.

Diplomatic contacts are expected to continue in the coming days as intermediaries seek to bridge remaining gaps between Washington and Tehran.

The demonstrations, driven largely by rising prices and currency pressures, reflect deep economic anxieties among ordinary citizens who are calling for relief, accountability, and improved living standards.

U.S. President Donald Trump issued a warning cautioning against the use of force on demonstrators, framing his remarks as support for civilian safety and the principle of protecting lives during periods of unrest.

While his language was forceful, the message underscored global concern about avoiding bloodshed and encouraging restraint as tensions rise during a sensitive domestic moment for Iran.

Iranian officials rejected any suggestion of foreign interference, emphasizing sovereignty and warning that external pressure could widen regional instability if not carefully managed.

At the same time, authorities within Iran signaled firmness toward unlawful violence, while also acknowledging the seriousness of economic grievances expressed by segments of the population.

Reports from various provinces indicate that protests have spread beyond isolated areas, highlighting the nationwide impact of inflation and currency depreciation on households and small businesses.

Despite clashes reported in some locations, officials stressed the importance of restoring calm and preventing escalation while investigations continue into incidents that resulted in loss of life.

Human rights groups and local media have cited multiple fatalities and arrests, drawing international attention and prompting renewed calls for transparency and accountability.

Medical services and emergency responders have remained active in affected areas, reflecting efforts to manage the situation and protect public safety amid heightened tensions.

Iran’s leadership has a long history of navigating internal unrest, and analysts note that experience, combined with reform efforts, could shape how the current situation evolves.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has adopted a notably conciliatory tone, publicly acknowledging that economic mismanagement and governance gaps have contributed to public dissatisfaction.

His remarks emphasizing responsibility and dialogue were widely seen as an effort to rebuild trust and open channels of communication with concerned citizens.

The government’s economic reform agenda, including attempts to liberalize certain markets, aims to address long-term structural challenges, even as short-term impacts have proven difficult.

A sharp decline in the rial has intensified inflationary pressures, affecting food prices, housing costs, and basic services, and amplifying frustration among working families.

International observers note that economic recovery will require a combination of domestic reforms and eased external pressures to stabilize markets and restore confidence.

U.S. sanctions remain a central factor shaping Iran’s economic environment, with their impact felt across trade, investment, and currency stability.

Regional dynamics also influence the situation, as Iran’s relationships with neighboring countries and allied groups continue to shape broader Middle Eastern geopolitics.

Despite sharp rhetoric, diplomatic channels remain active, and many global actors continue to stress the value of dialogue over confrontation in resolving disputes.

Analysts suggest that measured responses, economic relief efforts, and inclusive policymaking could help de-escalate tensions and support long-term stability.

As events continue to unfold, the focus for many inside and outside Iran remains on protecting lives, addressing economic hardship, and encouraging peaceful solutions.

The current moment is widely viewed as a test of leadership, resilience, and the ability of institutions to respond constructively to public concerns.

Amid uncertainty, there is cautious optimism that acknowledgment of internal challenges and international engagement can open space for reform and recovery.

The government’s declaration of a state of emergency reflects its commitment to safeguarding national security and ensuring stability across its borders.

Officials noted that the balloons, believed to be used by smugglers, have interfered with aviation operations near Vilnius.

The situation prompted authorities to act swiftly in order to prevent further risks to civil aviation and avoid potential safety incidents.

Interior Minister Vladislav Kondratovic explained that the emergency decision was made to defend both civilian operations and broader national interests.

He emphasized that Lithuania is fully prepared to manage the situation calmly and responsibly while cooperating with all relevant institutions.

Belarus has rejected responsibility for the balloons, but Lithuanian officials maintain that coordinated measures are necessary to maintain order.

They stressed that protecting border regions requires vigilance, communication and strong cooperation between national agencies.

The government is now seeking parliamentary approval to expand the military’s ability to support police and border forces during the emergency period.

Leaders highlighted that involving the military will help strengthen surveillance, improve response times and ensure smooth coordination.

If approved, the military will gain temporary authority to secure sensitive areas, manage access points and conduct inspections when necessary.

These powers are intended to enhance safety and allow authorities to act quickly should additional threats or disruptions occur.

Defence Minister Robertas Kaunas noted that such measures are precautionary and designed to reinforce stability rather than escalate tensions.

He affirmed that any use of force would follow strict legal guidelines and remain limited to maintaining public order and safety.

The state of emergency will stay in effect until officials determine that risks have diminished and aviation operations can continue without interruption.

By taking early action, Lithuania aims to ensure that daily life remains as unaffected as possible, despite recent disruptions.

European leaders have expressed concern about the situation, underscoring strong regional support for Lithuania’s protective measures.

The European Commission previously described the balloon incursions as unacceptable, calling for vigilance and unity among EU members.

This is not the first time Lithuania has strengthened border protections due to activities originating from Belarus.

The nation has previously implemented emergency measures to manage migration pressures and enhance preparedness during regional conflicts.

Despite the challenges, Lithuanian officials continue to underscore the importance of diplomacy, collaboration and open communication.

They emphasized that protecting national security does not diminish their commitment to peaceful cooperation with neighboring states.

Leaders also reassured citizens that essential services remain fully operational and that aviation safety remains the government’s top priority.

Air traffic authorities are working closely with national security teams to minimize disruptions and keep passengers well-informed.

The government praised the professionalism of border officers, police and emergency responders who have been working tirelessly.

Their coordinated efforts have helped maintain order and demonstrate Lithuania’s strong institutional resilience.

Authorities have also urged the public to remain calm, stay informed through official channels and avoid speculation during the emergency period.

They reiterated that all measures are temporary, controlled and focused on ensuring the wellbeing of residents and travelers.

As Lithuania continues to reinforce its security framework, officials expressed confidence that the situation will be managed efficiently.

The country remains committed to maintaining safety while promoting regional stability, cooperation and long-term peace.