The child remained in a critical but stable condition at a hospital in Cambridge following the incident at Johnsons of Old Hurst, a privately owned zoo in Cambridgeshire, police said.

Authorities had detained a man from Norfolk on suspicion of attempted murder after emergency services responded to reports of a seriously injured child at the zoo. Police later said the suspect had been assessed as not fit for interview and was released on bail until Sept. 18 while investigations continue.

Investigators have not disclosed how the boy sustained his injuries and said they did not believe the suspect and the child were known to each other.

According to police, zoo staff pulled the child from the crocodile enclosure and administered emergency medical treatment before he was transported to hospital.

“Our thoughts remain with the boy and his family and specialist officers continue to support them through this difficult time,” Detective Inspector Verity McCann said in a statement.

Johnsons of Old Hurst said it had temporarily closed its Tropical House section out of respect for the child’s family, while the remainder of the zoo continued operating.

British media reported that the wife of the zoo’s owner entered the enclosure and helped rescue the child, although police have not publicly commented on those reports.

The facility, which also includes a farm shop, butcher’s shop, tea room and steakhouse, houses more than 100 animals, including lions, tigers, sloth bears, capybaras, meerkats and crocodiles, according to information published on its website.

Police said inquiries into the circumstances surrounding the incident remain ongoing.

Police said the shooting occurred at the Jumpers informal settlement in Cleveland, east of Johannesburg. More than 10 suspects are being sought in connection with the attack.

According to a police statement issued on Wednesday, the assailants arrived in a white Toyota Quantum and entered the settlement through two separate access points before opening fire at multiple locations. The suspects fled the scene in the same vehicle after the shooting.

Authorities said the motive for the attack remains unknown and investigations are continuing.

The latest incident adds to concerns over violent crime in South Africa, which has one of the highest murder rates in the world. The country records an average of about 60 murders each day, according to official crime statistics.

Police have not disclosed the identities of the victims and said efforts were underway to track down those responsible. Investigators are examining the circumstances surrounding the attack and appealing for information that could assist the ongoing manhunt.

No arrests had been announced as of Wednesday morning.

A decades-long legal dispute over hidden wealth and financial disclosure in divorce proceedings has concluded in the United Kingdom, with Indian-origin woman Varsha Gohil securing a £6.6 million settlement after more than 20 years of litigation.

The case, which began as a relatively routine divorce proceeding in 2002, evolved into one of the most closely watched family law disputes in recent UK legal history after subsequent criminal investigations uncovered substantial assets that had not been disclosed during the original settlement process.

Varsha Gohil filed for divorce from her husband, Bhadresh Gohil, in 2002, citing adultery and unreasonable behaviour. The couple, who had three children, reached a financial settlement under which Varsha Gohil received approximately £270,000 and retained the family Peugeot vehicle.

At the time, the agreement appeared to resolve the financial aspects of the divorce. However, Varsha Gohil maintained concerns that her former husband had not fully disclosed his assets during the proceedings.

Those concerns gained renewed significance several years later when Bhadresh Gohil became the subject of a major criminal investigation involving allegations of money laundering linked to associates of former Nigerian state governor James Ibori.

Prosecutors alleged that Bhadresh Gohil had assisted in moving millions of pounds through offshore entities and financial structures spanning multiple jurisdictions. Following a lengthy investigation and prosecution, he was convicted of money laundering, forgery and conspiracy to defraud.

In 2011, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison.The criminal proceedings revealed assets valued at tens of millions of pounds that had not emerged during the original divorce case. Prosecutors subsequently sought to freeze approximately £28 million in assets that they alleged had been concealed through an international network of companies and financial arrangements.

The emergence of previously undisclosed wealth provided the foundation for Varsha Gohil’s efforts to revisit the original settlement.The dispute ultimately reached the UK’s highest court. In a landmark 2015 ruling, the UK Supreme Court allowed the financial settlement to be reopened, establishing that a party who fails to make full and frank disclosure of assets during divorce proceedings should not benefit from that conduct.

The decision was regarded as a significant development in family law, reinforcing the principle that transparency is fundamental to the fair division of matrimonial assets.Despite the Supreme Court ruling, the litigation continued for several more years as competing claims emerged over the ownership and legal status of the frozen assets.

The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service argued that the wealth represented proceeds of criminal activity and should therefore remain subject to confiscation proceedings. Varsha Gohil contended that at least part of the assets had been generated through legitimate business activities during the marriage and consequently formed part of the matrimonial estate.

At the same time, Bhadresh Gohil disputed ownership of the assets, arguing that they did not belong to him.The competing claims eventually came before the High Court, where Justice Williams was tasked with determining the extent to which the frozen wealth could properly be considered matrimonial property.

Following a detailed examination of the evidence, the court concluded that a portion of the assets had legitimate origins and should be treated as part of the marital estate. Justice Williams identified approximately £6.66 million in assets that were not tainted by criminal activity and awarded that amount to Varsha Gohil.

In his judgment, the judge was highly critical of Bhadresh Gohil’s conduct throughout the litigation and related proceedings.According to reports of the ruling, Justice Williams stated that the husband’s conduct was “at the highest end of the scale in terms of dishonesty and its consequences.”The judge also reportedly described Bhadresh Gohil as “thoroughly and pervasively dishonest” in his assessment of the evidence presented before the court.

Reflecting on the extensive history of the litigation, Justice Williams observed that the Gohil case would remain memorable to lawyers and judges because of the complex and prolonged route it had taken through multiple courts and jurisdictions.

The proceedings have drawn attention within legal circles because they combined elements of family law, criminal law, asset recovery and international financial investigations. The dispute also highlighted the challenges courts face when determining whether wealth uncovered through criminal investigations should be available for matrimonial claims.

Last month, the UK Court of Appeal ruled that no further appeals would be permitted, effectively bringing the litigation to an end after more than two decades of legal proceedings.

The final award of £6.6 million, equivalent to roughly Rs 85 crore, marks the conclusion of a case that began with a modest divorce settlement and evolved into a landmark legal battle over hidden assets, financial disclosure and the intersection of criminal and family law.

State-run Anadolu Agency⁠ reported that prosecutors issued arrest warrants for 30 suspects linked to alleged corruption involving municipal subsidiaries and public tenders. Twenty-nine suspects were detained, while one individual was reported to be abroad.

According to a statement cited by prosecutors, the investigation concerns the alleged “activities of a criminal organization established under the leadership of Ekrem Imamoglu.”Authorities accuse the suspects of manipulating public procurement processes through companies affiliated with the Istanbul municipality.

Imamoglu, who has been imprisoned for more than a year, is currently standing trial alongside 413 co-defendants. Prosecutors allege he directed a large criminal network operating within the municipality. If convicted on all charges, he could face cumulative prison sentences totaling 2,430 years under Turkish law.

The Istanbul mayor and his political allies deny the accusations and argue the investigation is politically motivated, accusing Erdogan’s government of attempting to sideline one of the country’s most prominent opposition figures ahead of the 2028 presidential election.

Imamoglu emerged as a major national challenger to Erdogan after securing repeated election victories in Istanbul, Türkiye’s largest city and economic hub. Opposition parties have increasingly described the legal proceedings against him as part of broader pressure on dissenting political voices and municipal administrations controlled by the opposition.

The Turkish government has repeatedly denied accusations of political interference in the judiciary, maintaining that courts operate independently and investigations are conducted according to the law.

Police confirmed that several hostage-takers and hostages were inside the bank, according to a statement issued during the ongoing operation.

Authorities said the driver of a cash transport vehicle was among those being held.Large numbers of police officers were deployed around the area, which was cordoned off as security forces responded to the incident.

German police did not disclose the number of hostages involved, identify the suspects or provide details about possible demands.

The incident remained ongoing as authorities worked to secure the release of those inside the bank.Hostage situations are relatively rare in Germany, where heavily armed police tactical units are routinely deployed in major security incidents involving banks or public institutions.

No injuries had been reported at the time of the police statement.

An 18-year-old, Angelina Han Hicks, was taken into custody in North Carolina and charged with conspiracy to commit murder and assault related to members of Congregation Beth Israel, a historic Jewish place of worship in Texas.

A juvenile suspect, identified as 16 years old, was separately arrested in Texas and charged with conspiracy to commit capital murder, authorities said.The Federal Bureau of Investigation said its Charlotte Joint Terrorism Task Force launched the investigation following a tip received earlier this week.

The Houston Police Department said there was no indication of any ongoing credible threat after the arrests.Court records allege the conspiracy involved plans to “kill as many Jews as possible” by driving through a congregation at a synagogue.

A judge ordered Hicks detained on a $10 million bond, citing concerns over public safety and potential communication with alleged co-conspirators.Authorities said the timeline outlined in warrants pointed to a possible attack in 2028, though prosecutors indicated concerns that the threat could have been more immediate.

Investigators have not publicly disclosed a motive.The synagogue temporarily closed earlier this week as a precaution following warnings from law enforcement but has since reopened, according to community officials. The Jewish Federation of Greater Houston said security remains a priority.

The case comes amid heightened concerns over attacks targeting Jewish institutions. Last month, an armed individual drove a vehicle into a synagogue in Michigan, underscoring growing security challenges faced by such communities.

Hicks’ legal counsel said the case remains at an early stage, with further investigation expected. Her next court appearance is scheduled for May 13.

Around 1,000 officers searched more than 50 residential and commercial properties in and around Leipzig, according to federal police based in Halle an der Saale. The operation focused on a network believed to have sent legitimate residency documents issued in Germany to individuals in Syria with similar physical appearances.

Authorities said most of those targeted were suspected of allowing their documents to be used in the scheme, while a smaller number were accused of facilitating unauthorized entry into Germany.Police seized evidence including mobile phones, residency permits, flight booking records and at least 93,000 euros ($109,000) in cash during the operation.

Investigators also reported uncovering potential violations of narcotics and explosives laws, along with indications of links to organized crime.A total of 44 suspects were subjected to formal identification procedures, police said.

The investigation was supported by “document and visa advisers” deployed by German authorities at airports in the Middle East, where suspected cases of fraud were initially detected.

Since 2024, 71 such advisers have been stationed outside the European Union to assist visa processing at German embassies and to work with airlines at major international hubs.

The victims, three boys and five girls aged between three and 11, were killed in what officials described as a domestic incident linked to a marital separation.Elkins’ wife, Shaneiqua Elkins, and her sister were wounded in the attack, while other family members escaped.

Authorities said Elkins died after fleeing the scene, though it remains unclear whether he was shot by police or died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Caddo Parish Sheriff Henry Whitehorn said the killings had shaken the community, prompting calls for stronger measures to address domestic violence. Schools in the area brought in counselors to support students affected by the incident.Family members said the couple had been in the process of separating and were due in court on Monday. Relatives described the children as well cared for and central to their mother’s life.

Authorities said Elkins had a prior felony conviction for illegal use of a weapon in 2019, which legally barred him from possessing firearms for a period after completing his sentence.

Investigators are examining how he obtained the weapon used in the attack.Police said there was no known recent history of domestic violence involving Elkins, though he had briefly checked into a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital earlier this year, according to relatives.

The violence unfolded across two locations, with Elkins first shooting a woman in one neighborhood before targeting the home where the children were killed. One child who died was identified by local officials as his nephew.

The shooting is the deadliest in the United States since January 2024, according to data compiled by The Associated Press in partnership with USA Today and Northeastern University.

Community members gathered for vigils late Sunday, leaving flowers, candles and toys near the scene as local leaders called for renewed efforts to prevent domestic violence and gun-related tragedies.

In 2002, a recreational diving trip off the Croatian coast turned into a fatal incident that triggered a criminal investigation and the temporary imprisonment of two survivors, according to the account of Dan Frolec.

Frolec, then 32 and based in Prague, was part of a group of diving enthusiasts exploring coastal waters near Poganica Bay. The group included experienced divers and acquaintances from a diving club formed in the late 1990s.

During the trip, attention focused on a previously identified underwater formation described as a shallow hole, later understood to be a cave system with narrow tunnels and larger internal chambers.

On the evening of the incident, several members of the group entered the cave while others, including Frolec, remained on the boat. One diver, identified as Michael, surfaced briefly to retrieve additional equipment before returning alone to the cave. According to Frolec, this deviation from standard buddy-diving practice was not initially considered unusual, as it was assumed he would rejoin the others inside.

After a prolonged period, the remaining divers resurfaced without Michael. They reported abandoning further exploration due to poor conditions and inadequate equipment for cave diving. When it became clear that Michael had re-entered the cave alone, concerns escalated.

A subsequent attempt to locate him was unsuccessful, with limited visibility and hazardous conditions complicating the search.Emergency services were contacted, and Croatian coastguard personnel arrived the following morning. Despite reservations expressed by experienced members of the group regarding equipment suitability, two official divers attempted to enter the cave.

One diver remained outside while the other descended into the tunnel.The rescue operation resulted in a second fatality when the diver who entered the cave failed to return. A subsequent attempt by members of the original group to assist also proved unsuccessful due to deteriorating underwater visibility, likely caused by disturbed sediment within the confined environment.

Authorities later confirmed that both bodies were eventually recovered from the cave system. Conditions inside the cave, including low visibility and confined passageways, were identified as contributing factors in the fatalities.

Following the incident, Croatian police detained members of the diving group for questioning. Frolec and another participant, identified as Ivo, were separated from the group and subjected to further investigative procedures.

These included fingerprinting, blood sampling, and a polygraph test.According to Frolec, the line of questioning suggested that investigators were exploring the possibility of homicide. He states that authorities raised the prospect that Michael had been stabbed and questioned whether members of the group were responsible.

This marked a shift in the investigation from an apparent accident to a potential criminal case.Frolec and Ivo were subsequently designated as suspects and placed in custody. A judge ordered their detention for at least one month while the investigation continued, with the possibility of extended detention under Croatian law.

During this period, both men were held in prison alongside individuals accused of unrelated serious offences.Media coverage intensified the situation. Local reports published their names and alleged involvement in a murder, contributing to reputational damage and increasing psychological pressure during detention.

Frolec described the experience as disorienting and marked by uncertainty, particularly given the absence of formal charges .The investigation began to shift after additional evidence was reviewed. Testimonies from other divers challenged the initial theory of homicide, indicating that Michael had entered the cave alone and remained there for a period consistent with an accidental death.

Data from his diving computer reportedly showed that he had been alive for approximately 30 minutes while attempting to navigate the cave system.Attention also focused on red stains found on the group’s boat, which investigators initially considered potential blood evidence.

Frolec maintained that these marks were caused by mooring ropes. Subsequent DNA analysis confirmed that the stains were not blood, undermining a key element of the prosecution’s suspicion.Authorities later concluded that Michael’s injuries, initially interpreted as stab wounds, were likely self-inflicted in the course of distress within the cave environment.

The exact circumstances of his final moments remain unclear, though limited visibility and depleted air supply were considered significant factors.After nearly a month in custody, Frolec and Ivo were released without charges.

The case highlighted challenges in interpreting evidence in complex accident scenarios, particularly in hazardous environments such as underwater caves.In the years following the incident, Frolec stated that the experience had a lasting impact on his perspective, particularly regarding personal freedom and risk.

He later documented the events in The Cave: The True Story of Two Mysterious Deaths in an Underwater Labyrinth, detailing both the diving accident and the subsequent legal ordeal.The case also underscored the risks associated with cave diving, which requires specialised equipment, training and strict adherence to safety protocols.

According to Frolec’s account, deviations from these practices, combined with environmental hazards, contributed to a sequence of events that escalated from a recreational outing into a fatal incident and international legal case.