
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>counterterrorism law &#8211; The Milli Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://millichronicle.com/tag/counterterrorism-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://millichronicle.com</link>
	<description>Factual Version of a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>French Court to Rule on Lafarge Terror Financing Case</title>
		<link>https://millichronicle.com/2026/04/65155.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruno Lafont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holcim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamic state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jabhat al nusra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lafarge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal proceedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions violations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Economy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=65155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paris— A Paris court is set to deliver its verdict on Monday in the case against Lafarge and eight former]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Paris</strong>— A Paris court is set to deliver its verdict on Monday in the case against Lafarge and eight former executives accused of financing jihadist groups, including Islamic State, to maintain operations at a cement plant in war-torn Syria.</p>



<p>The case centres on allegations that Lafarge, via its subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria, paid millions of euros in 2013 and 2014 to armed groups and intermediaries to ensure continued production at its Jalabiya facility in northern Syria during the country’s civil war.</p>



<p>The ruling follows a 2022 case in the United States in which Lafarge pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to designated terrorist organizations and agreed to pay a $778 million fine, marking the first time a corporation faced such charges under U.S. law.</p>



<p>French prosecutors allege that the company made payments totaling at least 4.7 million euros ($5.5 million) to groups including Islamic State and Jabhat al-Nusra, in exchange for access to raw materials and safe passage for employees and goods. </p>



<p>The payments allegedly continued until September 2014, when Islamic State fighters seized control of the plant.Lafarge completed construction of the $680 million facility in 2010, shortly before the outbreak of the Syrian conflict in 2011, triggered by protests against then-president Bashar al-Assad. </p>



<p>While many multinational firms exited Syria in 2012, Lafarge maintained operations, evacuating expatriate staff but retaining local employees until the site fell under militant control.Defendants include the company, its former chief executive Bruno Lafont, several former operational and security staff, and two Syrian intermediaries. </p>



<p>They face charges including financing terrorism and violating international sanctions.The French national counter-terrorism prosecutor’s office has argued that Lafarge acted with “a single aim: profit,” seeking the maximum corporate fine of 1.12 million euros and confiscation of 30 million euros in assets. </p>



<p>Prosecutors have also requested a six-year prison sentence for Lafont, who has denied knowledge of any illicit payments.During the trial, former deputy managing director Christian Herrault said the decision to keep the plant operating was driven by concern for local employees rather than financial gain.</p>



<p>Lafarge was acquired by Swiss group Holcim in 2015, which has said it had no knowledge of the Syria-related dealings.A separate judicial investigation into potential complicity in crimes against humanity remains ongoing.</p>



<p> The case originated from a 2017 inquiry following media reports and complaints filed by the French finance ministry, non-governmental organizations, and former employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
