Sharif, writing on social media platform X, said Pakistan would be “ready and honoured” to facilitate “meaningful and conclusive talks” for a comprehensive settlement, subject to agreement by Washington and Tehran.

His statement comes as the war, involving U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran and retaliatory attacks, entered its fourth week.Trump said on Monday that U.S. officials had engaged in “very good and productive” discussions with Iran over a “complete and total resolution of hostilities in the Middle East.”

He added that talks began on Sunday and continued into Monday, involving Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner.

Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf rejected the U.S. account, saying no talks had taken place and describing reports of negotiations as “fake news,” according to Iranian state-linked statements and sources familiar with the matter.

The divergence underscores the opacity surrounding diplomatic efforts as fighting continues across the region.

The United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, citing a lack of progress in negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme. Mediator Oman had previously indicated that significant advances had been made in earlier discussions.

Since the strikes, Iran has responded with missile attacks and expanded its actions beyond Israeli territory, targeting countries hosting U.S. bases and striking Gulf energy infrastructure.

The conflict has disrupted global energy markets, with Iran effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supplies transit.

The escalation has heightened concerns over supply stability and increased geopolitical risk across the Middle East, prompting renewed international calls for de-escalation through diplomatic channels.

Officials in Moscow described the latest round of talks as constructive, highlighting the willingness on both sides to explore pathways that could eventually support regional stability and reduce tensions.

The positive tone follows a five-hour meeting between President Vladimir Putin and two senior U.S. envoys earlier this week. During the discussions, the Russian side acknowledged parts of a U.S.-drafted peace framework while signalling that more work must be done to bridge gaps.

Still, the Kremlin emphasised that the dialogue itself demonstrated renewed commitment to diplomatic channels at a moment when the international community is seeking signs of de-escalation.

Senior Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said the talks reflected gradual progress and that Moscow remained ready to continue engaging with Washington’s current negotiating team.

He noted that both sides had entered the discussions with clear positions but also with openness to identify areas of alignment.

This measured approach, he suggested, offered a foundation for future conversations aimed at reducing hostilities and pursuing a durable settlement.

Officials in Moscow said they were now awaiting Washington’s reaction to the latest exchanges, hoping the constructive dialogue would continue in the same spirit.

While differences remain, the diplomatic environment appeared more fluid than in previous months, and the Kremlin welcomed what it views as a shift toward more pragmatic communication between the two countries.

In Washington, U.S. officials also indicated that the talks had been productive, with President Donald Trump describing the atmosphere as “reasonably good.”

While acknowledging the complexity of the situation, American representatives conveyed that sustained engagement could open opportunities to narrow disagreements.

This measured confidence has been interpreted by observers as a sign that the channels between Moscow and Washington are functioning, even amid global uncertainty.

Ukraine, meanwhile, has reiterated its desire for an immediate ceasefire and expressed cautious concern about the nature of ongoing talks.

Kyiv has stated that it seeks a peace arrangement anchored in security guarantees and long-term stability rather than temporary accommodations.

Its leadership continues to advocate for a settlement that prevents future escalations and ensures the protection of its territorial integrity.

Despite differing viewpoints, the broader international community has welcomed any diplomatic movement as a positive sign. Countries in Europe and beyond have encouraged continued dialogue, emphasising that negotiated solutions are essential for avoiding further humanitarian and economic fallout.

Observers note that even incremental progress can create useful opportunities for further discussion, confidence-building, and eventual compromise.

Russia has maintained that it prefers a negotiated end to the conflict but remains prepared to pursue its objectives by military means if diplomacy fails.

Still, the Kremlin’s recent signalling of encouragement suggests that both major powers recognise the value of sustained communication.

The acknowledgment of progress, even at an early stage, represents a meaningful step toward a more stable diplomatic environment.

As Moscow and Washington prepare for further exchanges, analysts say the tone of the recent talks could help reshape the strategic landscape.

Constructive engagement from both sides may foster conditions that support de-escalation and responsible dialogue.

The coming weeks will indicate whether the momentum generated in these discussions can contribute to a path that balances national priorities with broader regional peace efforts.

The remarks come at a moment when global attention remains focused on pathways toward a sustainable settlement that prevents further escalation and strengthens regional stability.

President Vladimir Putin, speaking ahead of his upcoming visit to New Delhi, said that Moscow expects a resolution that ensures its strategic goals in Donetsk and Luhansk.

At the same time, officials emphasized that discussions with multiple nations, including the United States and partners in Asia, are aimed at pursuing diplomatic channels that keep negotiations open.

Russian authorities maintain that the long conflict in eastern Ukraine began years before the full-scale escalation, shaped by tensions between Ukrainian forces and local groups.

Moscow continues to argue that its interests in Donbas are tied to security concerns and cultural ties, although Kyiv rejects any proposal involving territorial concessions.

Despite stark differences between the two sides, recent engagements with U.S. representatives have drawn international attention.

Putin received envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Moscow, calling the meeting productive and describing the dialogue as grounded in proposals earlier discussed with U.S. leadership.

Russian state media highlighted that Moscow has accepted some ideas put forward in ongoing diplomatic exchanges, framing the talks as an important step toward identifying areas of mutual understanding.

While details remain undisclosed, the acknowledgement of progress has been seen by analysts as a positive gesture toward keeping diplomatic avenues active.

Russia currently holds significant portions of Ukrainian territory, including full administrative control of Luhansk and most of Donetsk.

Ukrainian officials nonetheless insist that all regions recognized internationally as Ukrainian must remain under Kyiv’s sovereignty, expressing opposition to any form of territorial compromise.

Even with positions firmly held, observers note that the recent diplomatic activity suggests both sides acknowledge the importance of international mediation.

In particular, the involvement of global actors has helped sustain pressure for dialogue rather than prolonged military escalation.

International organizations continue to advocate for a negotiated outcome rooted in international law, regional security guarantees and humanitarian considerations.

The global community has consistently emphasized the importance of protecting civilians and maintaining the integrity of diplomatic platforms that encourage peaceful resolutions.

For Russia, the Donbas region holds political, historical and strategic significance, making it central to its stated goals.

However, the recent diplomatic tone suggests Moscow remains aware that long-term peace and regional stability will require the involvement of multiple nations and structured discussions.

Ukraine, meanwhile, continues to receive broad international support for its sovereignty as it defends the remaining parts of Donetsk still under its control.

Kyiv also maintains active diplomatic communication with partners to build consensus on a settlement that reinforces its territorial integrity.

As both sides navigate a complex geopolitical environment, global attention remains focused on preventing further military escalation.

Diplomats hope that sustained discussions, even amid disagreements, may eventually help bridge gaps and lead toward a roadmap addressing both security concerns and humanitarian priorities.

With heightened interest from global powers, including major states in Europe, Asia and North America, the coming months will likely see intensified diplomatic exchanges.

The hope among mediators is that continued dialogue will help reduce tensions and create meaningful steps toward a durable, internationally accepted agreement.