The initiative reflects growing interest among emerging economies in modernising payment systems as geopolitical tensions reshape global finance.

The Reserve Bank of India has recommended that the proposal be placed on the agenda of the 2026 BRICS summit, which India is set to host later this year.

If accepted, it would mark the first time the bloc formally considers connecting central bank digital currencies under a shared framework.

Sources said the plan is designed to reduce transaction costs, improve settlement speed and make cross-border payments more efficient for businesses and travellers.

By linking digital currencies directly, BRICS members could bypass multiple intermediaries that currently slow down international transfers.

The proposal also carries broader strategic implications, as it could reduce dependence on the U.S. dollar in certain trade and tourism transactions.

This comes at a time when global payment systems are increasingly influenced by political considerations and sanctions risks.

BRICS includes Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa as core members, with several other countries participating in expanded formats.

While none of the five main members have fully rolled out their digital currencies, all are running pilot programmes and investing heavily in digital payment infrastructure.

India’s digital rupee, known as the e-rupee, has gained traction since its launch in late 2022. The RBI has steadily expanded its use cases, including offline payments, programmability for welfare transfers and partnerships with fintech firms to distribute digital wallets.

China, meanwhile, has pushed to internationalise its digital yuan, while Brazil and South Africa are testing digital currencies to improve domestic and cross-border payment efficiency.

Russia has also accelerated digital currency efforts amid financial restrictions imposed by Western nations.

The RBI has previously stated that promoting the global use of the rupee is not aimed at undermining the dollar. However, U.S. officials have warned against initiatives that could weaken the dollar’s role in global trade, and President Donald Trump has previously criticised BRICS as pursuing anti-American measures.

According to sources, the RBI’s proposal builds on a 2025 BRICS declaration that called for greater interoperability between members’ payment systems.

Linking CBDCs would represent a deeper level of coordination, requiring shared technical standards and common governance rules.

Key challenges remain. Experts note that agreeing on interoperable technology platforms will be complex, as countries may be reluctant to adopt systems developed by other members.

Regulatory alignment, data security and privacy standards would also need careful negotiation.

Another sensitive issue is how to manage trade imbalances between member countries. One idea under discussion involves using bilateral foreign exchange swap arrangements between central banks to settle imbalances arising from digital currency transactions.

Sources cautioned that progress could be slow, as consensus among diverse economies with differing financial systems and political priorities will be essential. Any framework would need to balance national sovereignty with the benefits of deeper integration.

Despite these hurdles, analysts say the proposal highlights India’s ambition to play a leading role in shaping the future of digital finance among emerging economies.

Hosting the 2026 BRICS summit gives New Delhi an opportunity to push initiatives that reflect its growing influence in global economic governance.

For BRICS as a bloc, a linked digital currency system could strengthen internal trade ties and enhance resilience against external shocks.

Even if initial implementation is limited to specific use cases such as tourism or trade finance, it could lay the groundwork for broader cooperation.

As discussions continue, the proposal underscores a wider shift toward experimenting with digital currencies at the sovereign level.

Whether BRICS can translate ambition into action will depend on political will, technical cooperation and the ability to navigate the global financial order without escalating tensions.

The concept, referred to as a “payment account,” was outlined by Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller during a payments-focused conference held in Washington.

The proposed “payment account” would allow companies that currently depend on traditional banks or third-party intermediaries to connect directly to the Fed’s payment systems.

However, these accounts would not grant the same privileges as full bank master accounts, such as access to the Federal Reserve’s lending facilities or interest-bearing reserves.

Instead, they would provide limited, secure, and direct access for firms that perform payment-related activities but are not regulated as banks.

Waller emphasized that the initiative remains in the prototype stage, with no formal decisions yet made. The central aim is to explore how the Federal Reserve can modernize its approach to payments while maintaining financial stability and regulatory safeguards.

“Payments innovation moves fast, and the Federal Reserve needs to keep up,” Waller said in his remarks, noting that the evolving financial landscape now includes a wide range of participants — from traditional institutions to fintech startups and nonbank payment platforms.

The proposal reflects the Fed’s recognition that the financial ecosystem has changed significantly in recent years. Digital wallets, fintech firms, and real-time payment networks have reshaped how consumers and businesses transfer funds.

Many of these entities currently depend on partner banks to access the Fed’s payment rails, such as the Automated Clearing House (ACH) or Fedwire. The creation of a streamlined “payment account” could simplify this process, offering firms a more direct yet controlled entry point.

Under Waller’s vision, these accounts could come with several key limitations to ensure stability and minimize risk. For example, the accounts might be capped in balance size, not pay interest, and prohibit overdrafts.

They would not qualify for emergency borrowing through the Fed’s discount window, a privilege traditionally reserved for insured depository institutions.

However, firms applying for these accounts might benefit from a more efficient approval process, tailored to their operational scope rather than the broader requirements placed on banks.

This proposal also addresses ongoing debates about how far the Federal Reserve should go in granting nonbank entities access to its payment infrastructure.

Fintech companies and other payment providers have long argued that direct access would enhance competition, efficiency, and innovation in the financial sector.

Conversely, critics worry that expanding access could expose the central bank to greater operational and regulatory risks, especially if nonbank firms are not subject to the same stringent oversight as traditional financial institutions.

Waller acknowledged these competing perspectives and stressed that any potential rollout would depend on careful evaluation and consultation.

“The payments landscape, as well as the types of providers, has evolved dramatically in recent years, and accordingly, a new payments account could better reflect this new reality,” he said.

If implemented, the concept could represent a significant step toward broadening participation in the nation’s payment ecosystem while preserving the integrity of the Federal Reserve’s financial framework.

The initiative also aligns with the Fed’s broader efforts to foster innovation, including the development of FedNow — the new instant payment service launched to modernize real-time money transfers.

As the Federal Reserve continues its research, policymakers, regulators, and industry participants are expected to provide input on potential benefits and challenges.

The outcome could shape the future of how payment firms, both large and small, interact with the U.S. financial system — striking a balance between innovation, accessibility, and prudential oversight.

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller unveils a visionary plan to open up the U.S. payment system — blending innovation, access, and stability in the digital age.

In a move that could reshape the landscape of financial innovation, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller has revealed that the Fed is exploring the creation of a new type of account designed to expand access to its payment systems beyond traditional banks.

Speaking at a central bank payments conference in Washington, Waller outlined a prototype concept called the “payment account” — a simplified version of the Fed’s traditional master accounts that could enable fintech firms, payment companies, and non-bank entities to access the Fed’s payment rails in a limited, regulated way.

This development signals a bold step toward modernization of the U.S. financial infrastructure, reflecting the Fed’s recognition that the future of payments is evolving rapidly — and the central bank must evolve with it.

Balancing Innovation with Prudence

Waller emphasized that the proposal remains in its early, exploratory phase, but its potential impact could be transformative.

The goal is to strike a delicate balance — promoting competition and efficiency in the payments sector while safeguarding financial stability.

“Payments innovation moves fast, and the Federal Reserve needs to keep up,” Waller said during his keynote remarks.

For years, fintechs and non-bank payment firms have sought direct access to the Fed’s real-time payments infrastructure, which is currently restricted to banks and select institutions.

However, granting such access has been controversial, as it involves complex regulatory oversight and potential systemic risks.

The payment account model aims to solve this dilemma — creating a “skinny” master account that offers limited access to the Fed’s core payment network, without granting the full privileges and protections enjoyed by banks.

How the ‘Payment Account’ Could Work

According to Waller, these accounts would function as streamlined tools for payment processing rather than full-fledged banking accounts. They could:

• Be limited in size, preventing excessive risk exposure.
• Not pay interest or allow overdrafts, minimizing financial dependency on the Fed.
• Exclude access to the discount window and other emergency lending facilities.

However, they could offer faster payment capabilities, greater transparency, and simplified regulatory reviews, helping smaller and innovative firms connect directly to the Fed’s system without relying on intermediary banks.

This proposal could make the U.S. payments ecosystem more inclusive, efficient, and resilient, allowing technology-driven companies to innovate within a clear and controlled framework.

Why It Matters for the U.S. Economy

The introduction of payment accounts could have wide-reaching benefits. It could reduce costs for businesses that depend on third-party access, enhance competition in digital payments, and improve consumer choice in how money moves.

For fintechs and payment startups, it could mean the difference between indirect participation and direct innovation. With streamlined access to Fed systems, they could offer faster, cheaper, and safer payment services — advancing financial inclusion for underserved communities.

At the same time, the proposal could strengthen the resilience of the payments network, providing more redundancy and innovation-driven efficiency. In a financial system increasingly powered by digital platforms, these changes align with the Fed’s mission to maintain stability, accessibility, and public trust.

Keeping Pace with Global Change

Globally, central banks are rethinking their roles in digital finance. From Europe’s instant payment networks to Asia’s real-time digital settlements, competition and innovation are redefining how economies move money.

The Federal Reserve, traditionally seen as cautious in its approach to financial innovation, is now signaling agility and openness. Waller’s remarks show that the Fed wants to ensure the U.S. remains a leader in payments technology and financial infrastructure.

By exploring limited-access accounts, the Fed can test new mechanisms safely — fostering innovation without compromising the stability of the nation’s banking system.

Waller chairs the Fed’s internal payments committee, which oversees research and strategy on emerging financial technologies. His advocacy for the payment account reflects a forward-looking vision: one where regulation supports innovation instead of stifling it.

“The payments landscape, as well as the types of providers, has evolved dramatically in recent years,” Waller noted. “A new payments account could better reflect this new reality.”

His comments also echo broader efforts by the Fed to modernize payment systems, including the launch of FedNow, its instant payment service, in 2023. Together, these initiatives show a central bank adapting to a new digital era — thoughtfully, yet decisively.

The Fed Steps into the Future

The payment account concept may still be on the drawing board, but it already represents a paradigm shift in how the Federal Reserve views access and innovation.

By embracing modernization while maintaining its cautious oversight, the Fed is sending a powerful message: the future of money is open, digital, and inclusive — and America’s central bank intends to help shape it.

As Waller leads the charge, the U.S. may soon see a more dynamic and democratized payments ecosystem — one that combines the trust of the Fed with the creativity of the private sector.