Hassan Fadlallah, a Hezbollah lawmaker, said in a televised excerpt that the group has “complete confidence” that Iran will insist on Lebanon being part of any US-Iran understanding, reflecting expectations within the organization that negotiations will extend beyond bilateral issues to regional conflicts.

The comments come as Hezbollah’s involvement in the wider regional conflict has escalated since March 2, when the group entered the confrontation in support of Tehran, triggering an Israeli military response in southern Lebanon that has resulted in heavy casualties and ongoing strikes, according to Lebanese officials and media reports.

Iranian officials have repeatedly called for an end to hostilities in Lebanon to be incorporated into any broader settlement. Mohsen Rezaei, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, has previously said Lebanon would be an “inseparable part” of any ceasefire framework, according to semi-official Iranian media reports.

A Western source cited in regional reporting said a memorandum between Washington and Tehran aimed at halting fighting could be signed soon, though details remain under negotiation, including provisions linked to Lebanon. The source added that Iran has maintained its position that any agreement must address the conflict there.

The United States has been mediating discussions between Lebanese and Israeli counterparts, but Hezbollah is not formally part of those talks and has rejected US-backed proposals calling for the group to cease fire and withdraw forces from southern Lebanon.

Tensions in southern Lebanon have continued despite multiple ceasefire announcements, with Lebanese state media reporting further Israeli airstrikes in several towns and villages on Friday.

Hezbollah’s political leadership has said it rejects external conditions tied to its military posture, while emphasizing its expectation that regional negotiations will reflect what it describes as Lebanon’s central role in any final agreement.

Speaking to reporters during a visit to Jaipur, Rubio said discussions involving Iranian representatives were continuing in Qatar and suggested that negotiations had entered a detailed phase focused on the wording of a potential agreement.

“There were some talks going on in Qatar today, so we’ll see if we can make progress,” Rubio said, adding that discussions were centered on specific language in an initial draft document and could require several more days to conclude.

Rubio said President Donald Trump remained committed to securing an agreement but would only support terms acceptable to Washington.
“The president’s expressed his desire to make it. He’s either going to make a good deal or no deal,” Rubio said.

The comments came after new U.S. strikes on Iranian-linked targets raised questions about the durability of efforts to halt hostilities. The military action coincided with the arrival of senior Iranian negotiators in Doha for another round of talks intended to end the conflict that has destabilized the region and disrupted global energy markets.

A central issue in the negotiations remains the status of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important maritime energy corridors. The waterway handles a significant share of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments and has become a focal point of the crisis after Iran moved to block transit through the strait.

Rubio said reopening the route was essential for international commerce and global economic stability.
“The straits have to be open,” he said.
He described the disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz as unlawful and unsustainable, arguing that freedom of navigation must be restored regardless of the outcome of the negotiations.

“They’re going to be open one way or the other,” Rubio said. “What’s happening there is unlawful, it’s illegal, it’s unsustainable for the world, it’s unacceptable.”
The latest remarks underscore Washington’s attempt to balance military pressure with diplomatic engagement as negotiators seek a framework that could end the conflict while addressing concerns over maritime security and regional stability.

The talks in Qatar are being closely watched by energy markets and regional governments, given the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz and its role in global oil and gas supplies.

According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, 120 Palestinians, including eight women and 13 children, have been killed in Israeli attacks since the Iran conflict was paused on April 8, marking a 20% increase compared with the preceding five-week period.

Conflict monitor Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) reported that Israeli attacks in Gaza rose by 35% in April compared with March, reflecting a renewed military focus on the territory after Israel scaled back operations linked to Iran.

The escalation underscores mounting difficulties surrounding US President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure a lasting ceasefire and advance reconstruction plans in Gaza following more than two years of conflict between Israel and Hamas.

“The war is still ongoing,” said Lafi Al-Najjar, a 36-year-old blind Palestinian whose son was killed in an Israeli strike on April 28. Speaking from a tent camp in the ruins of Khan Younis, Najjar said conditions on the ground had not reflected public declarations of de-escalation.

Israel’s military did not immediately comment publicly on the increased pace of strikes. However, four Israeli defense officials told Reuters that military leaders had recently warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government that Hamas was tightening operational control, replenishing weapons supplies and rebuilding militant ranks.

An Israeli military official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the ceasefire arrangement permitted Israel to act against imminent threats. The official added that the military had prepared broader operational plans for a possible resumption of large-scale combat in Gaza, although no formal order had been issued.

The ceasefire agreement reached in October halted major fighting after two years of war but failed to produce a permanent political settlement.

Negotiations aimed at securing a full Israeli withdrawal, Hamas disarmament and reconstruction of Gaza have stalled.

Israeli forces continue to control more than half of Gaza’s territory, where extensive demolition has left large areas uninhabitable. More than 2 million Palestinians are concentrated in a narrow coastal zone, many sheltering in damaged buildings or temporary encampments.

Since the October ceasefire, around 850 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes, according to figures that do not distinguish between civilians and combatants. During the same period, four Israeli soldiers were killed by militants in Gaza. Hamas has not released casualty figures for its fighters.

Several Israeli strikes since mid-April have targeted positions associated with Gaza’s Hamas-run police force. Palestinian health and police officials said at least 14 police personnel had been killed since April 14.

Nasser Khdour, a researcher at ACLED, said Israeli attacks during April targeted Hamas operatives, allied militant factions, police facilities and security checkpoints across areas under Hamas administration.
Khdour said drone strikes, artillery shelling and gunfire had also continued near armistice lines, affecting both militants and civilians approaching Israeli positions.

Since March, Israel has simultaneously expanded military operations beyond Gaza, joining US strikes against Iran while continuing air and ground campaigns against the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement in Lebanon. Although hostilities in Lebanon have slowed under a separate US-mediated ceasefire, clashes have persisted intermittently.

The meeting brought together Badr Abdelatty, Ishaq Dar and Hakan Fidan, who reviewed the evolving security situation and emphasized support for efforts aimed at achieving a permanent ceasefire, according to an official statement.

Participants welcomed Pakistan’s mediation role in ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, expressing hope that diplomatic progress would help de-escalate tensions and limit broader economic and security fallout.Recent developments have raised expectations of a breakthrough.

A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, alongside Iran’s decision to reopen the Strait of Hormuz during a temporary truce, have eased pressure on global energy markets and reduced immediate risks of escalation.The conflict, which began on Feb. 28 with U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, had disrupted shipping routes and triggered volatility in global oil supplies.

The reopening of the strait long a key U.S. demand—combined with a ceasefire extension linked to Lebanon, has aligned core conditions in ongoing talks.Donald Trump said on Friday that negotiations with Tehran were nearing completion, describing a deal as “very close” and indicating that most major issues had already been resolved.

Previous talks led by J.D. Vance in Pakistan did not produce an agreement, but further negotiations are expected as diplomatic channels remain active.Trump also credited regional actors including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar for supporting stabilization efforts, while praising Shehbaz Sharif and Asim Munir for their role in facilitating dialogue.

The Antalya meeting reflects intensified regional coordination as governments seek to consolidate recent gains and move toward a broader settlement that could end hostilities and restore stability across the Middle East.

Speaking at a Turning Point USA event, Vance said distrust between Washington and Tehran remains a fundamental obstacle to any durable agreement. “There is a lot of, of course, mistrust between Iran and the United States of America.

You are not going to solve that problem overnight,” he said, while adding that Iranian negotiators appeared willing to reach a deal.Vance, who participated in recent negotiations held in Pakistan, said he was cautiously optimistic about the trajectory of talks.

“I feel very good about where we are,” he said, signaling confidence in ongoing diplomatic efforts despite recent setbacks.Donald Trump said on Tuesday that discussions aimed at ending the Iran war could resume in Pakistan within days, following the collapse of negotiations over the weekend.

The breakdown prompted Washington to impose a blockade on Iranian ports, escalating economic and military pressure on Tehran.A two-week ceasefire between US and Iranian forces remains in effect, with one week remaining, offering a limited window for diplomatic engagement.

The pause in hostilities follows weeks of intensified conflict that began on February 28, when US and Israeli forces launched strikes on Iran.Tehran retaliated with attacks targeting Israel and Gulf states hosting US military bases, expanding the geographic scope of the conflict.

Subsequent US-Israeli operations inside Iran, along with Israeli strikes in Lebanon, have resulted in significant casualties and widespread displacement, according to official accounts.

The evolving situation underscores the complexity of negotiations, with diplomatic momentum constrained by entrenched mistrust and ongoing military developments.

Speaking on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Trump said discussions involving Zelenskiy and Russian President Vladimir Putin had reached a stage where an agreement to halt the conflict was now within reach.

Trump told global leaders and business executives that he has been directly engaging with Putin, whom he described as willing to strike a deal, while also believing that Zelenskiy is prepared to move forward toward a settlement.

The remarks come as diplomatic efforts intensify ahead of the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which will be marked on February 24, keeping international attention firmly focused on the conflict.

Trump said that although earlier attempts at reaching an agreement had failed, the current situation felt different, suggesting that both sides may finally be ready to compromise after years of bloodshed and stalemate.

He described the potential deal as “reasonably close,” adding that Washington was now edging toward brokering a ceasefire agreement that could pave the way for broader peace talks.

Confusion briefly surrounded the timing of Trump’s proposed meeting with Zelenskiy, as the U.S. president initially said it would take place later on Wednesday, a claim disputed by a source familiar with the Ukrainian leader’s schedule.

Trump later clarified that the meeting was expected to happen on Thursday, underscoring the fast-moving and fluid nature of diplomatic engagements at Davos.

The U.S. president acknowledged that personal tensions between Zelenskiy and Putin had previously derailed negotiations, describing what he called “abnormal hatred” between the two leaders as a major obstacle.

Only a week earlier, Trump had publicly suggested that Zelenskiy was the main impediment to a peace agreement, comments that sparked concern and debate among Ukraine’s allies.

On Wednesday, however, Trump struck a more optimistic tone, saying he believed both leaders were now at a point where they could “come together and get a deal done.”

He stressed the urgency of stopping the war, warning bluntly that failure to reach an agreement despite the current opportunity would reflect poorly on all parties involved.

Trump’s comments have drawn mixed reactions from diplomats and analysts, some of whom see renewed U.S. engagement as a potential catalyst for peace, while others remain sceptical given past failed negotiations.

European leaders attending Davos are watching closely, as any U.S.-brokered deal could reshape security dynamics across the continent and redefine transatlantic relations.

Ukraine’s war effort has relied heavily on Western military and financial support, making Washington’s role central to any negotiated outcome with Moscow.

Russia, meanwhile, has signalled openness to dialogue in recent weeks, though Kyiv and its supporters remain wary of concessions that could undermine Ukrainian sovereignty.

The prospect of a Trump-Zelenskiy meeting has heightened expectations at Davos, where geopolitical tensions have already dominated discussions alongside economic concerns.

As Trump continues to push his personal brand of high-stakes diplomacy, the coming days may determine whether his confidence in a “reasonably close” deal translates into tangible progress on ending Europe’s most devastating conflict in decades.

As 2026 begins, attention has shifted toward diplomatic channels aimed at reducing tensions, protecting civilians, and advancing dialogue that could lead to a sustainable and just resolution to the conflict.

The New Year period, traditionally a time of reflection and hope, has once again emphasized the need for restraint, humanitarian consideration, and renewed commitment to international law and civilian protection.

Ukrainian authorities reiterated their focus on safeguarding critical infrastructure and civilian life, stressing the importance of defensive preparedness while calling for timely international cooperation and support.

At the same time, Russia emphasized its own concerns regarding civilian safety in contested regions, urging global institutions to take note of humanitarian risks faced by people living in conflict-affected areas.

Despite contrasting narratives, both sides’ statements point to a shared reality: civilians continue to bear the greatest burden, reinforcing the moral and political necessity of de-escalation.

International observers view the current moment as significant, as diplomatic efforts intensify under renewed global attention, creating an opportunity to shift from confrontation toward negotiation.

The involvement of major international stakeholders has raised expectations that constructive engagement may help bridge gaps, reduce violence, and open pathways toward confidence-building measures.

Humanitarian organizations have echoed calls for uninterrupted aid delivery, emphasizing the need for safe corridors, energy security, and medical assistance during the winter months.

Energy infrastructure protection has emerged as a critical priority, with experts highlighting that stability in essential services is central to civilian well-being and regional resilience.

Political analysts suggest that continued dialogue, even amid disagreements, reflects recognition on all sides that a purely military solution remains elusive and costly.

The New Year has also brought renewed public discourse across Europe and beyond, where citizens and policymakers alike are urging stronger diplomatic leadership and conflict resolution initiatives.

Voices from civil society stress that peace-building must include accountability, reconstruction planning, and long-term frameworks that address security, sovereignty, and humanitarian recovery.

The emphasis on civilian protection has reinforced the relevance of international humanitarian law, reminding the global community of shared responsibilities in times of conflict.

As talks continue behind the scenes, cautious optimism persists that sustained diplomatic pressure and negotiation can reduce hostilities and pave the way for ceasefire mechanisms.

For communities affected by years of instability, the New Year symbolizes hope that dialogue will translate into tangible improvements in safety, livelihoods, and daily life.

Regional stability remains closely tied to broader global security, making progress in this conflict essential not only for those directly involved but for international peace as a whole.

Observers note that meaningful progress will depend on transparency, trust-building, and a genuine commitment to prioritizing human life over strategic gains.

While challenges remain significant, the renewed focus on diplomacy at the start of 2026 offers a chance to reframe the narrative toward peace, recovery, and reconciliation.

The New Year thus opens with a shared global expectation: that dialogue, cooperation, and humanitarian principles will guide the next phase of engagement toward ending the conflict.

Speaking to reporters in Kyiv, President Zelenskiy emphasized that the plan represents an initial step toward diplomacy rather than a final resolution to the ongoing conflict.

“It is not a plan to end the war. First of all, a ceasefire is needed,” he said, adding that Ukrainian and European advisers would meet on Friday or Saturday to work through the details.

The upcoming talks highlight a growing sense of international alignment aimed at reducing tensions and creating a pathway toward peace. European governments have been increasingly engaged in supporting Ukraine’s diplomatic efforts, seeking solutions that prioritize both security and sovereignty.

This latest development follows months of intensified coordination between Kyiv and several European capitals. Leaders have expressed a shared understanding that halting the fighting — even temporarily — could open the door to sustained dialogue and humanitarian relief for millions affected by the conflict.

President Zelenskiy’s statement reflects a pragmatic and forward-looking approach to diplomacy. By focusing first on achieving a ceasefire, Ukraine and its allies aim to build a foundation for broader peace negotiations. Officials involved in the talks are expected to focus on key terms, including security guarantees, humanitarian corridors, and mechanisms for monitoring compliance.

The renewed push for diplomacy also underscores Europe’s determination to play a constructive role in conflict resolution. Several European leaders have recently reiterated that peace cannot be achieved through military means alone but through persistent, coordinated negotiation efforts.

Diplomatic observers see this meeting as one of the most significant opportunities in recent months to bring all sides closer to dialogue. While challenges remain, including differing political goals and security concerns, the discussions signal a meaningful shift from confrontation to cooperation.

For Ukraine, a ceasefire would also offer a chance to rebuild critical infrastructure and restore normalcy in affected regions. International aid organizations have long emphasized that sustained humanitarian assistance becomes far more effective once fighting pauses, allowing access to vulnerable populations.

European nations are expected to continue playing a mediating role in the process, offering technical, humanitarian, and reconstruction support to ensure stability. Countries such as France, Germany, and Poland have been particularly active in supporting diplomatic outreach, aligning with Kyiv’s call for collective responsibility in fostering peace.

The talks come amid cautious optimism within the Ukrainian government, as officials view the process not just as a ceasefire negotiation but as a step toward establishing lasting regional security. There is growing hope that this initiative could set the stage for a broader international peace conference in the near future.

President Zelenskiy’s leadership throughout this process has been marked by persistence and optimism. His focus on diplomacy over confrontation reflects a commitment to national unity and the well-being of Ukrainian citizens. “This is a plan to begin diplomacy,” he said, reaffirming his belief that constructive engagement is essential for long-term peace.

As Europe and Ukraine prepare for the upcoming meeting, global attention remains fixed on Kyiv’s efforts to pursue a peaceful resolution. Though the path ahead is uncertain, the willingness of all sides to discuss a ceasefire provides a welcome moment of hope in a long and difficult conflict.

If the talks succeed in establishing even a limited truce, it could lay the groundwork for a larger dialogue on post-war recovery, security cooperation, and rebuilding trust between nations.

In a time of global instability, Ukraine’s push for diplomacy offers a powerful reminder that peace begins with conversation — and that every step toward dialogue brings the world closer to healing.