Home Blog

For Kuwait’s new emir, Saudi ties are seen as key

Kuwait (Reuters) – Sheikh Meshal al-Ahmad al-Sabah was named as Kuwait’s new emir on Saturday after the death of his brother Sheikh Nawaf al-Ahmad al-Sabah aged 86.

Sheikh Meshal, 83, spent much of his career helping build the Gulf state’s security and defence apparatus before stepping into the public eye when he became crown prince three years ago.

He was thrust further into the spotlight when he was handed most of the frail Emir Sheikh Nawaf’s duties in November, 2021.

Sheikh Meshal becomes Kuwait’s third emir in just over three years. Until 2020, the post had been held for 14 years by Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad, a prominent figure in the Arab world known for helping lead Kuwait out of the ruins of Iraq’s 1990 invasion.

As he takes the helm of the OPEC oil producer, Sheikh Mehshal is expected to preserve key Kuwaiti foreign policies including support for Gulf Arab unity, Western alliances, and good ties to Riyadh – a relationship seen as a top priority to him.

He may also look to expand ties to China as it seeks a bigger role in the region, especially after Beijing sponsored a deal that normalised ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia in March.

Sheikh Meshal signed several economic agreements during a visit to China in September, when he attended the opening ceremony of the Asian Olympic Games.

“He desires stability, and stresses the importance of Kuwait’s relationship with Saudi Arabia in particular,” a Kuwaiti source said, adding that Sheikh Meshal was concerned about the regional situation and afraid of wars in the region.

A Western diplomat described Sheikh Meshal as an early riser with a methodical work style. “He pays attention to details, sometimes to the very small details,” the diplomat said. While Sheikh Sabah had been closer to diplomatic work, Sheikh Meshal was closer to the military, the diplomat said.

Sheikh Meshal was deputy chief of the National Guard from 2004-2020 and head of State Security for 13 years after joining the interior ministry in the 1960s. He had been offered several senior roles in the past but declined them, experts say.

Britain's Prime Minister Sunak meets Kuwait's Crown Prince

He attended Britain’s Hendon Police College and was credited with helping to reform the National Guard.

Sheikh Meshal is the seventh son of former ruler Ahmed Al-Jaber, and a brother of three former rulers, Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad, Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad, and Sheikh Nawaf Al-Ahmad. He is married and has five sons and seven daughters.

Some believe he may move to further align Kuwait with Riyadh. His first calls after taking on Sheikh Nawaf’s duties were with King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and his first trip outside the Kuwait was to Saudi Arabia, which he has visited more than any other country.

As emir, he will have to grapple with long-running strains between the ruling family and its critics in the perpetually deadlocked and fractious parliament that critics say have hindered fiscal and economic reform.

Kuwait’s legislature wields more influence than similar bodies in other Gulf monarchies. The resulting political deadlock has for decades led to cabinet reshuffles and dissolutions of parliament.

The first two years of Sheikh Nawaf’s rule were buffeted by political turbulence with eight governments formed and three parliamentary elections held.

In 2022, Sheikh Meshal intervened in a protracted dispute between the government and parliament. He dissolved parliament, decreed new elections and replaced the prime minister but declared no intention to interfere in the vote or the selection of parliament speaker.

His move was widely welcomed by the opposition.

He also pledged to adhere to the constitution and not to amend, revise, or suspend it, in a speech delivered on behalf of the emir in June 2022. Parliamentarians and analysts considered this historic.

Although the 2022 elections were annulled by the Constitutional Court in March 2023, the subsequent vote – won by a majority of lawmakers who declare themselves “reformists” – led to a rare consensus between parliament and the government.

Pope Francis deplores Israeli killings of civilians at Gaza church

Vatican City (Reuters) – Pope Francis on Sunday again suggested Israel was using “terrorism” tactics in Gaza, deploring the reported killing by the Israeli military of two Christian women who had taken refuge in a church complex.

At his weekly blessing, Francis referred to a statement about an incident on Saturday by the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem, the Catholic authority in the Holy Land.

The Patriarchate said an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) “sniper” killed the two women, whom the pope named as Nahida Khalil Anton and her daughter Samar, as they walked to a convent of nuns in the compound of the Holy Family Parish.

The Patriarchate statement said seven other people were shot and wounded as they tried to protect others.

“I continue to receive very grave and painful news from Gaza,” Francis said. “Unarmed civilians are the objects of bombings and shootings. And this happened even inside the Holy Family parish complex, where there are no terrorists, but families, children, people who are sick or disabled, nuns.”

Francis said they were killed by “snipers” and also referred to the Patriarchate’s statement that a convent of nuns of the order founded by Mother Teresa was damaged by Israeli tank fire.

“Some would say ‘It is war. It is terrorism.’ Yes, it is war. It is terrorism,” he said.

An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the incident was still under review and had no immediate comment on the pope’s words.

It was the second time in less than a month that the pope used the word “terrorism” while speaking of events in Gaza.

On Nov. 22, after meeting separately with Israeli relatives of hostages held by Hamas and Palestinians with family in Gaza, he said: “This is what wars do. But here we have gone beyond wars. This is not war. This is terrorism.”

Later that day, a messy dispute broke out over whether he used the word “genocide” to describe events in Gaza, with Palestinians who met him insisting that he did and the Vatican saying he did not.

Jewish groups criticised the pope for last month’s “terrorism” comments.

Israel stepped up its bombardment of Gaza overnight and into Sunday, killing at least 40 people, Palestinians said, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued that the only way to secure the release of hostages was intense military pressure on Hamas.

Palestinians must find new path from Israeli rule after war, top official says

Ramallah (Reuters) – Immediately after Israel’s war in Gaza ends, all Palestinian factions including Hamas must take a serious look at the failure of their policies to achieve freedom for their people, a top Palestinian Authority official said.

Hussein al-Sheikh, 63, said war in Gaza after the Oct. 7 attacks on southern Israel meant Hamas should make a “serious and honest assessment and reconsider all its policies and all its methods” once fighting subsides.

Hamas’ attacks killed 1,200 Israelis, triggering a relentless bombardment and ground war that has killed at least 19,000 Palestinians, displaced hundreds of thousands and left much of the enclave in ruins.

Sheikh, the general secretary of President Mahmoud Abbas’s Palestinian Liberation Organization, is seen by some as a potential successor. His comments were the first time a senior PLO leader has talked publicly about Hamas tactics since the Oct. 7 attacks.

Sheikh also acknowledged the political path under Oslo peace accords was faltering and as it currently stands would not achieve the ambition of the Palestinian people for the establishment of a Palestinian state within pre-1967 borders.

Sheikh and Abbas met senior White House aide Jake Sullivan in Ramallah on Friday. The Palestinians told him a new international effort was needed to persuade Israel of a comprehensive solution that includes the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, Sheikh told Reuters.

“There must be a single Palestinian government governing the Palestinian homeland,” Sheikh told Reuters on Saturday in a rare interview in sleek offices adorned with portraits Abbas and his predecessor Yasser Arafat in the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah.

The West Bank is divided by an Israeli wall and fence that snakes hundreds of miles across the hills. Jewish settlers, many of whom cite Biblical ties to the land, have in recent years expanded construction in areas that would become a future Palestinian state. Most countries deem Jewish settlements built on land Israel seized in the 1967 Middle East war as illegal.

Despite offering welcome verbal backing for a Palestinian state in the meetings, Sheikh said, Washington had not proposed concrete mechanisms or political initiatives. He reiterated a call by Abbas for an international peace conference to forge a new route.

A senior U.S. official said this week the idea of a conference had been discussed with partners, but the proposal was still at a preliminary stage.

Legitimate Representative

U.S. President Joe Biden has sent a series of top officials to the West Bank to meet Abbas and Sheikh, seeking to revamp the moribund Palestinian Authority to take charge of Gaza once the war is over and unify the administration of the enclave and the West Bank.

Visiting U.S. officials have discussed the need for reforms to combat corruption, hand over broader executive powers to the prime minister and introduce new blood into the Palestinian Authority.

Despite the U.S. efforts, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday that he would not allow the Palestinian Authority to run Gaza after the war and suggested Israel would occupy it instead.

Sheikh said the Palestinian Authority was the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and would be ready to take control of Gaza after the war.

However, he recognised that the unpopular Palestinian Authority, which many Palestinians see as corrupt, undemocratic and out of touch, needed to reassess its role. Hamas by contrast has grown in popularity since the attacks, both in Gaza and the West Bank, a Palestinian poll showed this week.

Referring to Hamas, which has fought five wars against Israel since 2008, Sheikh said “it is not acceptable for some to believe that their method and approach in managing the conflict with Israel was the ideal and the best.

“After all this (killing) and after everything that’s happening, isn’t it worth making a serious, honest and responsible assessment to protect our people and our Palestinian cause?

“Isn’t it worth discussing how to manage this conflict with the Israeli occupation?”

Sheikh said 60% of Gaza was destroyed and it would cost $40 billion to rebuild over decades.

The 1993 Oslo peace accords with Israel were partially successful, he said, in that they gave Palestinians an identity and led to the repatriation of two million refugees to the West Bank and Gaza from countries they fled to during the 1948 and 1967 wars with Israel.

He said the PA has been weakened by Israel’s military raids and expansion of settlements.

Abbas promoted Sheikh last year. His new role effectively makes him the second most powerful man in the PLO, an umbrella for non-Islamist Palestinian factions that does not include Hamas.

He is deeply unpopular among Palestinians partly thanks to his liaison role with the occupying Israeli military. Opinion polls give him about 3% support.

In response to a request for comment, Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri said Sheikh was “on the side of the Israeli civil administration, and him attacking the Palestinian resistance isn’t surprising”.

Sheikh said it was his job to work with Israel to reduce the suffering of Palestinians.

Israel says it struck Hezbollah sites after attacks from Lebanon

Jerusalem/Beirut (Reuters) – Israel said on Sunday it had hit weapons launch sites and facilities belonging to Hezbollah in Lebanon in response to cross-border fire, while the Iran-backed group said it had attacked Israeli army targets.

Israel and Hezbollah fighters have been trading fire along the frontier on an almost daily basis since the war in Gaza erupted more than two months ago, in the worst hostilities since a 2006 conflict.

The violence, which has largely been contained to the border area, has killed more than 130 people in Lebanon, including 94 Hezbollah fighters and 17 civilians. In Israel, the hostilities have killed eight soldiers and four civilians.

Israel’s military said it had responded to Hezbollah attacks with artillery, tank fire and airstrikes at launch sites, an observation post of the Lebanese group and what it called a “terrorist cell.”

Hezbollah said it had fired at a range of Israeli military targets along the border, including what it said was a barracks, a command centre and an army crane installing surveillance equipment.

Israel did not report any casualties resulting from the attacks that set off rocket sirens in areas of northern Israel.

Israel uncovers ‘biggest Hamas tunnel’ near Gaza border

Gaza (Reuters) – Israeli forces battling Hamas said they had uncovered an unusually large concrete and iron-girded tunnel, designed to carry carloads of militant fighters from Gaza right up to the border.

Razing or disabling hundreds of kilometres of underground passages and bunkers is among the aims of the offensive Israel launched after Hamas gunmen went on a killing and kidnapping spree in its southern towns and army bases on Oct. 7.

Among sites that Hamas overran in that attack was the Erez border crossing between Gaza and Israel. Just 100 metres (yards) south of the checkpoint, concealed in a sand dune, the military showed reporters the exit point of what it said was a flagship Hamas project.

The tunnel ran down diagonally to a depth of 50 metres, where it expanded to a relatively capacious 3 metres (10 feet) in height and width, with electrical fittings.

Chief military spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari put the full length of the tunnel at 4 km (2.5 miles) – enough to reach into northern Gaza City, once the heart of Hamas governance and now a devastated combat zone.

It was “the biggest tunnel we found in Gaza … meant to target the (Erez) crossing,” Hagari said, without specifying whether it was used by Hamas for the Oct. 7 attack.

“Millions of dollars were invested in this tunnel. It took years to build this tunnel … Vehicles could drive through.”

Hamas did not respond to a Reuters request for comment on the Israeli account.

Generally the tunnels shown to the media by the group, or by the Israeli military after their discovery, have been narrow and low – designed for single-file movement of gunmen on foot. The tunnel shown by Hagari had shafts plunging vertically downward that, he said, suggested it was part of a wider network.

The tunnels have been a challenge for Israel’s engineers, worried that the networks could conceal hostages held by Hamas. That has slowed an offensive whose steep Palestinian civilian toll has alarmed world powers.

Hagari showed reporters a video of Mohammed Sinwar, brother of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and himself a senior operative in the group, sitting in the passenger seat of a vehicle that he said was driving inside the tunnel.

On Oct. 29, Israel’s Ynet news site reported that troops killed several gunmen who attacked Erez after accessing the area from a tunnel. Hagari’s office did not respond to a query on whether that referred to the tunnel he showed.

India’s JSW chairman Sajjan Jindal denies allegation of rape

0

Mumbai (Reuters) – Sajjan Jindal, the chairman of Indian steel-to-power conglomerate JSW Group, on Sunday denied an allegation of rape, saying he would cooperate with an ongoing investigation.

“Mr. Sajjan Jindal denies these false and baseless allegations. He is committed to providing full cooperation throughout the investigation,” a representative for Jindal said in a statement emailed to Reuters.

“As the investigation is ongoing, we will refrain from commenting further at this stage. We kindly request you to respect the privacy of the family,” it added.

A JSW spokesperson referred Reuters requests for comment to the third party representative.

Indian media reports said Jindal was accused of rape in a report filed at Mumbai’s Bandra Kurla Complex Police Station.

The reports said the complainant was a 30-year-old woman and the alleged incident occurred last year.

The police station in Mumbai’s central business district did not respond to Reuters calls seeking comment.

Thousands of Indonesians Protest at US Embassy, Urging Biden to Halt Support for Israel’s Gaza Offensive

Jakarta – In a massive demonstration held on Sunday, thousands of Indonesians gathered outside the US Embassy in Jakarta, calling on President Joe Biden to cease his support for Israel’s ongoing military offensive in Gaza. The protest aimed to draw attention to the devastating consequences faced by Palestinians, with the death toll reaching nearly 19,000 and over 1.9 million people displaced in the besieged enclave.

Dressed predominantly in white and black attire, the Indonesian protesters prominently displayed traditional Palestine scarves while chanting slogans such as “Gaza, Gaza don’t you cry, Palestine will never die.” They also brandished Palestinian flags and banners reading “Stop Genocide,” “Ceasefire Now,” and “Israeli genocide funded by the US.”

The demonstration, organized by more than a dozen Islamic mass organizations, strongly denounced US support for Israel and its recent veto against a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza at the UN Security Council. Nazar Haris, from the executive committee of the Islamic mass organization council, delivered a speech outside the US embassy, stating, “Palestine is our spirit and soul. We oppose what is done by America and Israel. We call on President Joe Biden and the US government to stop the war crimes.”

During the protest, some participants carried mock-ups of deceased Palestinian children, serving as poignant reminders of the tragic loss of innocent lives. Others painted their hands red to symbolize the atrocities committed by Israeli forces.

In addition to urging President Biden to alter his stance, the demonstrators demanded that the Indonesian government file a case against the Israeli leadership at the International Criminal Court and recall the Indonesian ambassador to the US in protest against Washington’s support for Tel Aviv.

Nurjannah Hulwan, the head of the KPIPA women’s coalition, expressed her solidarity with Palestine, stating, “Today we ask countries around the world, where is your humanity? As long as Palestine is not free, Indonesia still carries a debt.”

Indonesia has long been a steadfast supporter of Palestine, viewing Palestinian statehood as a mandate outlined in the nation’s constitution, which calls for theabolition of colonialism. Ahmad Heryawan, a member of the executive committee of the Islamic mass organization council, emphasized the unwavering commitment of Indonesia, saying, “As long as Palestine’s independence has not been granted, we will always stand up to fight for it.”

Simultaneously, another protest occurred at the National Monument complex in Jakarta, a few kilometers away from the US Embassy. These demonstrations represent the latest in a series of massive protests that have taken place across Indonesia since Israel initiated its deadly offensive in October.

A study published by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the proportion of civilian deaths in Gaza during the first three weeks of Tel Aviv’s onslaught stood at approximately 61 percent. This figure is significantly higher compared to the average civilian casualties observed in conflicts worldwide during the 20th century.

Ahmad Zaky Qolbuddin, a protester, condemned Israel’s actions, stating, “Israel’s actions are not acts of war; it is genocide. Just like what it said in Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution, all colonialism in this world must be abolished.”

The massive gathering of Indonesians at the US Embassy in Jakarta sends a powerful message of solidarity with the Palestinian people and urges President Joe Biden to reconsider US support for Israel’s offensive in Gaza. The protests highlight the strong belief among Indonesians that the plight of Palestine must be addressed, in line with their constitutional commitment to fight against colonialism and support the rights of oppressed nations.

Hispanic Voters in Arizona Shift Allegiance to Trump and Republicans, Alarming Democrats

San Luis – Arizona: In a surprising turn of events, a growing number of Hispanic voters in Arizona and other battleground states are shifting their allegiance to former President Donald Trump and Republican candidates, posing concerns for Democratic President Joe Biden as he prepares for a potential rematch with Trump in the 2024 general election. This trend among Hispanic voters, who have traditionally leaned Democrat, could have significant implications in swing states that will play a pivotal role in deciding the election.

Michele Pena, a Republican candidate for the Arizona state legislature in a heavily Hispanic and Democratic-leaning district on the Mexican border, exemplifies this shift. Pena, the daughter of a Mexican immigrant and a single mother with no political experience, defied expectations and secured an upset victory last year. Despite facing a campaign budget of just $1,600, Pena resonated with voters by focusing on their concerns about high food and gas prices, job prospects, and the quality of schools, rather than solely on issues around minority rights.

According to interviews with political analysts from both Republican and Democratic backgrounds, this shift among Hispanic voters towards Republicans is a cause for concern for the Democratic Party. In the 2020 presidential election, Trump’s national share of Hispanic voters increased by 8 percentage points to 36 percent compared to the 2016 election, as reported by the non-partisan Pew Research Center. A recent Reuters/Ipsos survey of nearly 800 Hispanic adults conducted this month showed Trump narrowly leading Biden in support, 38 percent to 37 percent.

Ruy Teixeira, a veteran Democratic political analyst, acknowledged the weakening of Democratic support among Hispanics since the 2016 elections. He argued that Democrats have been overly focused on issues such as voting rights and portraying Trump as a threat to democracy, while neglecting to address working-class voters’ primary concern: high prices. Teixeira emphasized that the Democratic Party should prioritize economic issues that resonate with working-class Hispanics.

Democrats, however, reject the notion that they are focusing on the wrong issues. They point to significant investments made by the Biden campaign during the 2020 election and the Democratic Party during the 2022 congressional elections, which aimed to address job growth and improve the economy for working families.

To attract more Hispanic voters, Republicans have employed strategies such as increased visibility in working-class neighborhoods, running Spanish-language TV and radio ads, opening Spanish-speaking offices, and emphasizing their ability to improve the lives of Hispanic voters. In Arizona, Republicans have supported legislation aimed at appealing to working-class Hispanics, such as the “Tamale bill” that sought to relax rules around the selling of food made in home kitchens.

Michele Pena’s campaign utilized similar tactics, knocking on hundreds of doors in working-class areas and engaging voters with a message centered around improving schools, lowering prices, and valuing family. Her victory in a district that was expected to be won by Democrats was a significant political upset, highlighting the effectiveness of these strategies in appealing to Hispanic voters.

However, Democrats argue that Pena’s victory was due to a political tactic known as the “single shot,” where only one Republican candidate runs in a district with two seats, increasing the chances of winning one seat instead of losing both. They maintain that their campaign efforts have been comparable, focusing on addressing issues such as reducing homelessness, domestic violence, substance abuse, increasing mental health resources, and criminal justice reform.

Looking ahead to the 2024 election, the dynamics are expected to be different. Matt Barreto, the lead Latino pollster for the 2020 Biden campaign, noted that the COVID-19 pandemic limited campaign activities in 2020, with Democrats refraining from door-to-door campaigning and opening offices in Hispanic neighborhoods, unlike Republicans. Jason Miller, a Trump campaign spokesperson, emphasized that Trump would prioritize issues important to Hispanic voters, including the economy, crime, and the southern border.

While many Hispanics find Trump’s rhetoric offensive and vote for the Democratic Party, the Reuters interviews with a dozen Hispanic voters in Yuma County revealed that none of them considered Trump’s rhetoric about illegal Mexican immigrants as racist or xenophobic. Instead, their concerns primarily revolved around high prices, which they attributed to Biden. Several expressed support for a border wall and a desire to keep out illegal immigrants.

The shift in Hispanic voter allegiance to Trump and Republicans highlights the need for Democrats to address economic concerns and actively engage with Hispanic communities beyond election cycles. Analysts warn that taking Hispanic support for granted could have significant consequences for the Democratic Party’s electoral prospects in key swing states.

Donald Trump Faces Criticism for Xenophobic Comments on Undocumented Immigrants

0

Durham – Former President Donald Trump, the current frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination, has once again drawn criticism for his controversial remarks regarding undocumented immigrants. During a campaign event in New Hampshire on Saturday, Trump used language that has been condemned as xenophobic and reminiscent of Nazi rhetoric.

Trump’s comments focused on the issue of migrant crossings at the US-Mexico border, which reached record levels in September. Promising to take a hardline stance on illegal immigration and impose restrictions on legal immigration if reelected, Trump stated, “They’re poisoning the blood of our country.” He further claimed that immigrants from Asia, Africa, and South America were “pouring into our country.”

This is not the first time Trump has used the phrase “poisoning the blood” in reference to immigrants. In a late September interview with The National Pulse, a right-leaning website, he employed the same language, drawing criticism from the Anti-Defamation League. Jonathan Greenblatt, the leader of the organization, condemned Trump’s words as “racist, xenophobic, and despicable.”

Jonathan Stanley, a Yale professor and expert on fascism, expressed concern over the repeated use of such language by Trump. He drew parallels between Trump’s rhetoric and that of Adolf Hitler, who warned against the supposed poisoning of German blood by Jews in his infamous political treatise, “Mein Kampf.” Stanley emphasized the danger of normalizing such dangerous speech and the potential impact it could have on the safety of immigrants in the United States.

In October, Trump’s campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, dismissed criticism of the former president’s language as “nonsensical.” Cheung argued that similar language could be found in books, news articles, and on television. At the time of reporting, Cheung had not responded to a request for comment regarding Trump’s recent remarks.

Trump’s divisive rhetoric on immigration has been a hallmark of his political career, and his latest comments have once again ignited a debate over the impact of such language on marginalized communities. Critics argue that it perpetuates harmful stereotypes, fosters division, and undermines the spirit of inclusivity and diversity that many strive to uphold in the United States.

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Trump’s controversial remarks continue to generate significant attention and scrutiny, both within his own party and among the broader public. The discourse surrounding immigration and the treatment of immigrants remains a deeply contentious issue that will undoubtedly shape the political landscape in the coming months.

Voter apathy and concerns about violence mark Iraq’s first provincial elections in a decade

Baghdad (AP) — Iraqis began voting for the first time in a decade Saturday to select new provincial council members, who in turn will appoint governors, with the outcome seen as a bellwether for the parliamentary election due to take place in 2025.

Saturday’s vote was restricted to military and security personnel and internally displaced people living in camps, with the main polling set to take place on Monday. Results are expected to be announced Tuesday.

Despite relatively high turnout in Saturday’s narrower polling, concerns were raised about a low voter turnout and potential violence spreading in the long-awaited polls on Monday in the country’s 18 provinces.

Muqtada al-Sadr, a powerful Shiite cleric and political leader who officially resigned from politics in 2022 amid a lengthy deadlock over Cabinet formation, has called on his supporters to boycott the provincial elections, saying that their participation would reinforce the dominance of a corrupt political class.

A widespread boycott would “reduce the legitimacy of the elections internationally and internally,” Sadr said in a statement.

In some areas, Sadr’s supporters ripped down electoral posters while several political campaign offices were vandalized. In the southern city of Najaf — a bastion of Sadr’s support — thousands marched on Thursday to urge a boycott of the elections.

Activists who staged mass anti-government protests in 2019 and are opposed to all the ruling parties also widely vowed to sit the polls out.

Apart from those actively boycotting the elections, many are simply apathetic.

Sajad Jiyad, an Iraqi political analyst and fellow at nonpartisan think tank The Century Foundation, pointed out that millions of eligible voters aren’t even registered, and low turnout has been a trend since 2005.

“All signs point to apathy among the general population,” he said. “Young people in particular are not engaged with politics, and no party has captured their imagination.”

Aqeel Al-Rubaie, a perfume shop owner in Baghdad, said that he and his family were sitting the polls out. He said that he saw “no real electoral program,” and widespread corruption, in the political campaigns, with some candidates offering bribes to prospective voters.

“What did the Iraqis gain from the previous elections that would make me think I can benefit from this election?” he said. “Corruption and weapons are still rampant in the country. Unemployment and services are not available.”

The Independent High Electoral Commission reported a relatively high turnout of 67% in Saturday’s vote, which some observers attributed to the pressure placed on military and security personnel to vote.

“There is a threat against those who don’t participate in the elections” that they will be transferred to an undesirable assignment, said a member of the security forces who spoke on condition of anonymity, because he wasn’t authorized to speak to journalists. “For this reason, everyone will participate, because of the fear of being punished.””

Turnout was also relatively high among the tens of thousands of Yazidis still living in displacement camps in Dohuk province in the semi-autonomous Kurdish area in northern Iraq. They were displaced from their homes in Sinjar nearly a decade ago by incursions of the Islamic State group.

Khalid Abbas, director of higher committee for elections in Dohuk, said that turnout in the camps was 67.6% of registered voters.

Displaced Yazidis largely said they were supporting the Kurdish Democratic Party, the dominant political force in the area.

“If our candidates are successful, we might get our rights,” said Khodeida Ilyas, a Yazidi from Sinjar living in the Sharia camp in Dohuk. “I mean for example, to rebuild Sinjar, get compensation for us, and improve services (in Sinjar). There are no services in our area until now.”

In some areas, the elections could inflame existing political and sectarian tensions. Among them is the Kirkuk province, with a mixed population of Sunnis, Shia, Kurds and Turkmen, which has been the scene of a territorial dispute for years between the central government in Baghdad and that of the semiautonomous northern Kurdish region with its capital in Irbil.

Demonstrations in Kirkuk over the handover of a key facility from federal to local Kurdish authorities turned violent in September, killing one protester and injuring others.

A contentious election law passed in March that increased the size of electoral districts was seen as undermining the chances for smaller parties and independent candidates to win seats.

The law was backed by the Coordination Framework, a coalition of Iran-backed, mainly Shiite parties that is the main rival of Sadr’s bloc. With Sadr’s followers boycotting, the Coordination Framework is likely to be the main beneficiary of the provincial elections.