OPINION: The Dangers of a Muslim Brotherhood Terror Designation

5 mins read

by John Rossomando

The writings of the leading Muslim Brotherhood ideologue have been used to legitimize AQ-related terror

Amid reports that the Trump administration is considering designating Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, several longtime Brotherhood watchdogs and critics are urging caution.

The Brotherhood, created in 1928 by schoolteacher Hassan al-Banna, wants to restore the global Islamic Caliphate — the Islamic theocratic state abolished in 1924 — through the gradual Islamization of society.

But the organization has splintered, especially after the Egyptian military ousted the Muslim Brotherhood-led government in 2013, following that up with a violent crackdownon Brotherhood supporters and brutal arrests of its leaders and others.

The resulting breakdown of organizational cohesion makes a terrorist designation more challenging.

By law, in order to qualify for designation as a terrorist organization by the US State Department, a group must:

  • Be a foreign organization;
  • Engage in terrorism, or have both the ability and intent to do so; and
  • Its terrorist activity threatens US nationals or national security.

The Muslim Brotherhood, as one organization, doesn’t have a unified command and control structure ordering terrorist attacks, said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Samuel Tadros.

“A political designation [of the overall movement] really doesn’t fit at the State Department; it’s going to be challenged in court. [It’s] gonna lose,” Tadros said. “That’s going to give them the biggest victory they’ve ever had. [They would say,] ‘American courts have proven we aren’t terrorists.’”

That doesn’t mean the Brotherhood and its leaders are peaceful.

Muslim Brotherhood branches, including some in Egypt since the fall of President Mohamed Morsi, have established armed wings that have close relations with hardcore jihadists. This is particularly true in Syria, Libya, and Yemen, where Brotherhood militias fight side-by-side with al-Qaeda-allied forces.

The Muslim Brotherhood resorts to violence when its path to domination is obstructed, Sir John Jenkins found in the British government’s 2015 review of Brotherhood activities.

“They have deliberately, wittingly and openly incubated and sustained an organisation — Hamas — whose military wing has been proscribed in the UK as a terrorist organisation (and which has been proscribed in its entirety by other countries),” the report said. “The writings of the leading Muslim Brotherhood ideologue have been used to legitimize AQ-related terror.”

“Some leading Muslim Brotherhood members and supporters have endorsed attacks on western forces,” it said.

That was true after the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. Late Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide Mehdi Akef encouraged Muslims to wage jihad against the United States. He sided with al-Qaeda’s forces, led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, in the April 2004 Battle of Fallujah.

“Participating in jihad is a duty on the neighboring countries” if Iraq wasn’t capable of doing it alone, Akef said. “Jihad is the height of Islam, and it is an obligation to go to the Day of Judgment. … The barbaric aggression and the brutal US aggression on Iraq have united the Iraqi people under one umbrella … and indeed awakened all the [Islamic nation].”

The International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), then led by Brotherhood ideologue Yusuf Qaradawi, issued a fatwa encouraging Muslims to fight Americans in Iraq in November 2004, during the Second Battle of Fallujah.

The Brotherhood denounced the 2011 US “assassination” of Osama bin Laden, calling his activities “legitimate resistance” against the West.

“As long as the occupation remains, the legitimate resistance will remain, and America, NATO and the European Union must announce quickly the end of the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq and the recognition of the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people,” a Brotherhood Arabic language statement said.

And after Morsi was forced from Egypt’s presidency, a schism emerged within the Brotherhood’s leadership, documents obtained by Egypt’s Mada Masr news site show. Older leaders favored peaceful resistance to military rule, while others endorsed violence short of taking lives.

One violent faction sent a member to train in Gaza with Hamas’ Qassam Brigades, with the intent of passing on terrorist skills to other Brotherhood members in Egypt. The Brotherhood “visibly split” in 2014, Mada Masr found, with the violent faction led nationwide by Guidance Bureau member Mohamed Kamal. He died in a 2016 shootout with Egyptian authorities.

Terror cells linked to Kamal began carrying out attacks in 2015 under the names Popular Resistance Movement (PRM) and Revolutionary Punishment Movement (RPM). These attacks happened just after the Brotherhood’s official website, then managed by Kamal’s faction, promised “a long, unrelenting Jihad” to end military rule.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Shariah Committee published The Jurisprudence of the Popular Resistance to the Coup in Arabic that same month.

A website linked to the Kamal faction claimed responsibility for killing Egyptian Prosecutor General Hesham Barakat in June 2015. Egyptian authorities reportedly found evidence linking the Hamas Qassam Brigades to the assassination. Earlier that month, the RPM killed a man because he had helped police round up 40 leaders of pro-Brotherhood protests in Helwan. And the RPM and the ISIS Sinai Province claimed responsibility for killing eight Egyptian police officers in Helwan province near Cairo in May 2016.

State Department officials designated Hassm and Liwa al-Thawra as foreign terrorist organizations in 2018. Both groups emerged from Kamal’s wing of the Brotherhood, Mada Masr reported.

The best thing the US can do now is to have the Treasury Department sanction Brotherhood entities which finance Hassm and Liwa al-Thawra, Tadros said.

“It will bring the whole thing down, but without the overly political victory for them,” Tadros said. “It’s a very slow process, but it brings an end to any monies … for the organization.”

Opponents to US action against the Brotherhood argue that designating the movement could open the door to terrorist designations being made for political reasons.

“In this very vein, adding the Brotherhood to the watch list subjects the designation process to our value judgments and political whims, undermining the legitimacy of existing designations,” Vish Sakthivel, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, wrote last month in The National Interest.

Sakthivel and other opponents argue that designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization would compromise American bargaining power and diplomatic flexibility. They also contend that it would validate arguments made by ISIS and al-Qaeda that violence is the only valid means to bring about change, even though Brotherhood factions work with these terrorist groups.

But the Brotherhood created one designated terrorist group — Hamas — and Brotherhood leaders retained control of it, the British government’s 2015 report found. The Brotherhood’s Shura Council acts as the international movement’s legislature. Its bylaws state that its decisions are binding on all Brotherhood chapters.

Top Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in 2009 described Hamas as an inseparable branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and a year later pledged his religious fealty and obedience to Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie. Brotherhood members swear absolute obedience to the supreme guide as part of their membership.

This pledge of allegiance is not isolated; a 2012 video shows Hamas members in Gaza pledging allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood. The original 1988 Hamas charter described the movement as “one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine.”

Designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization is “aimed at American Muslims and controlling them while at the same time continuing to demonize Islam,” former Council on American-Islamic Relations legal director Arsalan Iftikhar argued in a Washington Post op-ed.

“If the Muslim Brotherhood is labeled as a ‘terrorist’ organization, anyone who is labeled a Muslim Brotherhood supporter will be seen as a terrorist sympathizer by their fellow Americans without any proof needed whatsoever,” Iftikhar said.

“Nearly seven million American Muslims would become the primary domestic target of such a designation.”

The most recent estimates say American Muslim population is 3.5 million people — half of what Iftikhar claimed.

Whether the United States designates the Brotherhood as a whole, or limits actions to target its violent branches, criminal law and the threshold for prosecution won’t change. American Muslims, even those who support the Brotherhood’s ideals, cannot be targeted with criminal violations. The line is material support — aid in the form of money, supplies, or services — provided to the designated entity.

Article first published on Algemeiner.

John Rossomando is a senior analyst at The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not reflect Milli Chronicle’s point-of-view.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: